Site last updated: 13:32:01 Site updated with larger posting forms, text size adjuster (just before the start of the posts) and dark mode / light mode (toggle top right).
If you are looking for rumors that concern just your team, please visit our NHL Teams Rumors page.
The sent in rumors have been split into 2 pages. The NHL Talk page is the other page.
28 Jun 2026 05:48:41
Montreal makes a trade to solve their 2c and they keep their top prospects and trade to solidify their right side d
Habs send: Kapanen, Gallagher (6.5), 2027, 2028 first round top 10 protected
To Vancouver for Elias Petterson 3 million retained (8.6 per 6 yrs).
Habs trade with Rangers
MTL sends: Dach and 2027 2nd round
To NYR for: Schneider
25 Jun 2026 11:16:07
If I were Montreal, I would pass. Too much going one way, plus I would want to see how Zharovsky does.
Agree1Disagree0
25 Jun 2026 11:46:30
I'd counter with Kappanen, 2025 1st and Engstrom.
Agree0Disagree0
25 Jun 2026 14:21:00
nlues laugh in your face, would you trade suzuki for that trash?
Hage, Zhorosky, Kapanen, pickford 1st 2026
Agree3Disagree0
25 Jun 2026 21:21:39
Thanks for all of your replies!
I tried to make a better offer than what Habs propose for Knies thinking Thomas is a better player.
Splits feedback sound to me like "good trade offer".
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jun 2026 03:00:11
Thomas isn't Suzuki Colt.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jun 2026 17:29:26
While IMO Suzuki is better than Thomas, the gap is pretty narrow. Thomas had an awful start to the year battling through injuries but ended the year on a heater scoring 2 hattys in 10 games.
I’m a Leafs fan and I acknowledge that Thomas does have more value then Knies and should return a better package.
I highly doubt Blues move Thomas; there was obviously smoke last year but there isn’t anymore.
If he hits the block Montreal has the assets to make this this trade and they absolutely should.
IMO Hage, 1 of Rienbacher or Pickford and 2 of (1sts 2026, 2027, 2028 or Zharkovsky) is what it would take.
This point is moot tho because Saint Louis has no reason to trade a 26 year old 1C signed to a beautiful contract.
Agree1Disagree0
26 Jun 2026 17:41:57
Sosa
Thomas was better till last year while he was injured. He was the better center down the stretch after Worlds.... They are very freaking close. Would you take that trash for Suzuki... no you would not.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jun 2026 17:42:59
VB
You are correct sir.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jun 2026 20:15:07
Thomas is a great player, but ideally MTL needs a 2C that shoots left, and who has the wheels to play with Demidov.
23 Jun 2026 12:38:22
Edmonton gets significantly better, Boston gets significantly worse.
Agree2Disagree0
23 Jun 2026 18:41:00
Lindholm hasn’t gotten 50 points with Boston yet. And yes, they’d be selling high on Swayman, while Edmonton is selling low on Jarry, but I feel like Boston can make an average goalie look good. The goal isn’t for Boston to get better after this trade. Also, it's common to see players moved after bad negotiations/hold outs.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jun 2026 11:39:00
I think Edmonton will be able to pick up a suitable goalie without giving up the 1st.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jun 2026 17:42:30
Lohrei instead of Swayman is probably more realistic.
13 Jun 2026 15:56:38
I don't believe that Ottawa would do this trade for Tkachuk alone to get Robertson.
Agree1Disagree0
13 Jun 2026 17:30:34
Well, if the rumors are true that Brady isn't opposed to being traded. This is the best way to fill the void.
Agree2Disagree0
14 Jun 2026 11:50:33
Tkachuk has higher value than Robertson
Agree2Disagree0
14 Jun 2026 17:09:34
While it's common knowledge that RFA Robertson is seeking 12 million and Dallas would off load him in a heartbeat. Brady Tkachuk is not available for trade at this time.
Agree0Disagree0
15 Jun 2026 19:58:58
Sorry 96 point winger is more value then 60 point power forward.
Agree0Disagree0
15 Jun 2026 23:09:17
@Colt Contracts play a role. Brady + 4M of cap space is fair face value imo. I still don’t think either side does it.
Agree0Disagree0
16 Jun 2026 13:47:41
No, rather have a 100pt player making 10 mill then a 60 point player making 8 mil.
Agree0Disagree0
16 Jun 2026 22:49:05
Y’all said the same thing when Matthew got traded. Guys on good teams put up points (ie Huberdeau).
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jun 2026 11:43:04
That 100 point winger just turned down 8 yrs 112 million, I'll pass.
08 Jun 2026 04:17:00
I don't want to trade McKenna but the Vancouver wants him really bad. McKenna could turn into the next big thing so you convinced me but it's going to cost you dearly if you want him that bad.
TML McKenna
VAN 2026 1st (3) 2026 1st (24) 2027 1st F. Hronek
You have to remember if you want him that bad be prepared to pay.
Believable2Unbelievable0
08 Jun 2026 08:59:45
Hronek and the 3rd plus another pick should be good.
Agree1Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 10:57:46
Do the Leafs even have him? Are they guaranteed to pick him?
Agree2Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 14:35:15
I believe there is too much drama surrounding McKenna and could be a problem in the room when it matters. I would rather go with a guy like Stenberg if I were the Sedins. He is a better 5 vs 5 player and the stats tend to say that.
Agree1Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 19:41:18
I would be happy to trade down to 3 and draft Reid. If you can get Hronek in the trade down scenario, a defense looks like this...
McCabe Hronek
Carlo Tanev
OEL Reid.
I would be good with that. Trade Reilly and Benoit for what you can get. Keep Stecher as a 7 dman. Hopefully get the 24th pick as well and use it in a trade on a good forward.
Agree0Disagree0
15 Jun 2026 09:18:59
Lol, not sure where yo heard te Canucks want him really.
Also, typical Leafer thinking they can get 4 nice assets for 1 of their assets.