NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


yupp's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



yupp's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To yupp's Posts



To yupp's last 5 rumours posts


To yupp's last 5 talk posts


To yupp's last 5 rumour replies


To yupp's last 5 talk replies


yupp's rumours posts with other poster's replies to yupp's rumours posts


19 Oct 2019 17:12:33
“According to sources in contact with Stars management, the stars have indeed been contacted by two team regarding the structure of a Jamie Benn trade, Carolina hurricanes and Montreal Canadians.

Jamie Benn has a full no trade clause, and last season when the ownership called out the players, the rumors circulated then, but he believe was the Vancouver Canuks and the Vegas Golden Knights would be the only two teams Benn would waive for.

Both west coast teams, something the Stars weren’t interested in. ”

Crazy. I wouldn’t trade Benn right now if I was Dallas. Sends a bad message to Pavelski and Perry who you just brought in for a cup run.


1.) 19 Oct 2019 18:08:27
If this is true both montreal and carolina are great trade partners

C. Fleury, N. Suzuki, Caufield


H. Fleury, Necas, R. Suzuki

I mean if this was anywhere near the asking i'd go for it

Unfortnetly, all this is just speculation about Benn but something to pay close attention to. Benn would turn montreal and càrolina from playoff hopefuls to contenders with just one move.

2.) 19 Oct 2019 21:18:11
Neither team would offer that craigger especially not Montreal.

3.) 19 Oct 2019 23:25:34
Yeah, suzukis, necas and caufield may be much

Lets try
Tatar, Fleury 4th rd pick

Dzingel, Fleury 3rd rd pick


4.) 19 Oct 2019 23:30:49
I really like Benn, however, it seems like his best is behind him. don't get me wrong, he's still a great player, but to give up so much youth for him, I just don't think Habs should part with those young guys. Benn isn't enough of a peice to make the Canadiens a true contender.

5.) 20 Oct 2019 01:07:10
Dallas don’t trade Benn for prospects. So those Montreal and Carolina deals are no good. Dallas did good last year. It was a successful season by all accounts. Look for them to build on last season. Not rebuild.

6.) 20 Oct 2019 04:21:02
From what I've read, its a roster player, top prospect and a 1st. But doubt they get that with his contract.

7.) 20 Oct 2019 04:33:20
That's closer craigger but I think it would have to be a little more going to Dallas this time. maybe not much though as he really isn't living up to his cap hit lately.

8.) 20 Oct 2019 17:51:15
Habs: Jamie Benn

Stars: Habs 2020 first round pick, Poehling, and Leihkonen.



13 Oct 2019 20:08:07
WPG: Ehlers
BUF: Ristolainen.



1.) 13 Oct 2019 20:25:27
Tor Nylander
Buff Risto.

2.) 13 Oct 2019 22:04:59
Risto >>>>> Ehlers

Ehlers is a sack of potatoes. He had his fifteen minutes. He was a flash in the pan. If he breaks fifty again I would be surprised. He’s a third line player on a contending team.

3.) 13 Oct 2019 20:27:14
Buff: Risto.

4.) 13 Oct 2019 20:30:13
Det: Athanasiou and a #1 pick
Buff: Risto.

5.) 13 Oct 2019 20:31:57
Mont: Domi
Buff: Risto.

6.) 13 Oct 2019 20:34:15
Cal: Lindholm
Buff: Risto.

7.) 13 Oct 2019 23:29:02
Lmao Island. Nylander, Nuge, Lindholm, Domi, AA, 1st are all better than Ehlers. 🤷‍♂️😂.

8.) 13 Oct 2019 23:30:39
Thoughts. no. buffalo adds a few prospects and picks

Then. no . nylander at 700K owed this year. no again
Then. no. buffalo adds a few prospects RNH worth more but not ehlers more
Then. no. anthanasiou for risto and prospect maybe. i know was a joke
Then. no. montreal doesn't need rhd. risto plus 1st maybe just for fun
Then. yes. why not. just for fun to get calgary fans to be pissed off for once.

9.) 14 Oct 2019 02:00:14
Lol Ehlers is a top 6 player on any team.

10.) 13 Oct 2019 23:05:03



11.) 14 Oct 2019 15:41:34
Please stop the silly Risto trade posts.

12.) 14 Oct 2019 16:22:55
Sure. Soon as you guys stop with the silly Risto replies.

13.) 14 Oct 2019 17:30:56
This was fun guys, let’s do it again soon.

14.) 14 Oct 2019 17:33:27
I was really looking forward to some Marcus tears tho. I feel a little let down.



09 Oct 2019 15:58:19
EDM: Puljujärvi.

CAL: Gaudreau.


1.) 09 Oct 2019 16:47:59
I can't see Calgary turning this one down. Lol.

2.) 09 Oct 2019 18:04:17
I think Treliving might go for this.
Not sure Edm can add the contract so CAL retains %50 and Edm adds Gagner.
Actually maybe this instead:

EDM: Puljujarvi, Gagner, Manning, Russell
CAL: Gaudreau (%50 retain), Hanifin.

3.) 09 Oct 2019 18:22:44
Ha Ha ha. I'm waiting for Sean Monkeybrain to see this. I think you could add more cap dumps from Edmonton though yupp.

4.) 10 Oct 2019 08:16:26
Calgary adds big time. Gaudreau is a liability and probably a cap dump at this point. Puljujärvi a top 20 forward in the league

5.) 10 Oct 2019 08:17:24
Winnipeg trades Patrik Laine and Nikolaj Ehlers to Calgary for Milan Lucic and Tj Brodie. 2 cap dumps for 2 cap dumps. Similar in skill

6.) 10 Oct 2019 16:51:17
Treliving would say no to that Sean, he just got Lucic and they absolutely love him there. They aren’t letting him go for that so soon.

7.) 10 Oct 2019 20:43:22
@yupp i agree Lucic is worth more than Ehlers alone not worth eating Laine's contract



05 Oct 2019 18:49:02
Islanders have offered RHD Pulock, Ho-Sang and a 2nd for Ehlers.
Good deal for both teams to me.


1.) 05 Oct 2019 20:00:39
If they infact offered this already then i guess ehlers is playing for the islanders now

Ehlers surely would be amazing beside barzal. one can dance with the puck on his stick and the other can flat out skate fast. perfect tandem.

Pulock helps what it looks like a horrible defence. I mean thank goodness the jets have weapons offensively because they can't keep teams from scoring right now

Ho Sang gets a change so u never know
Turn that 2nd into a first since ehlers really is the prize here and i think its a win win kind of deal.

2.) 05 Oct 2019 21:10:48
The Jets should start the car and run with this deal =)

3.) 05 Oct 2019 21:12:20
Ehlers sucked last year. Unless he turns it around, and fast, then his value drops like a stone every day he doesn’t score point. Pulock alone is worth more.

4.) 05 Oct 2019 22:40:29
Pulock is a nice defenseman, but I highly doubt the Jets would consider moving Ehlers.

5.) 06 Oct 2019 01:05:46
Ehlers has 4 points in 2 games i believe. so i guess his trade value has risen like a tsunami after a meteor hits the ocean.

6.) 06 Oct 2019 01:06:33
Aight Marcus, stay with Kulikov on your top pair eh.



03 Oct 2019 20:04:30
WPG: Laine
STL: Parayko



1.) 03 Oct 2019 23:05:34
As much as I like Parayko, the Jets won't be trading Laine right after he signed a new contract.

2.) 04 Oct 2019 00:00:52
I don't think the blues need a 1 dimensional player for their best defensive dman.

3.) 04 Oct 2019 12:54:58
1 dimensional dman for 1 dimensional forward.

4.) 04 Oct 2019 15:18:30
I disagree Vb, petro is a very good all round defenceman, I’d compare him to a doughty, not as good as doughty but not far off.

5.) 04 Oct 2019 15:20:25
I’m sorry vb, just realized that it was Parayko not petro. my bad.

6.) 04 Oct 2019 15:49:12
Nah, jets add a bit, not big but theyd add something.

7.) 04 Oct 2019 16:10:17
VB parayko gets 30-35 points and is a puck moving dman and best defender on team. That's not exactly one dimensional. He also comes with zero baggage, doesn't play fornite.

8.) 04 Oct 2019 17:08:06
@Redwing1 has a good point

9.) 04 Oct 2019 17:48:55
Laine is done with Fortnite. it was just a fad for him. now back to 40-50 goals.

10.) 04 Oct 2019 23:03:18
Paryanko is a 1 dimensional defensive dman he doesn’t really produce offence even though he has a cannon of a shot. Also playing fortnite isn’t baggage lmao.




yupp's talk posts with other poster's replies to yupp's talk posts


19 Oct 2019 19:29:25
With Tavares out if I was Babcock I would go
Mikheyev Matthews Marner
Johnsson Nylander Kapanen.
Maybe switch the two LWs if you want to keep Johnsson with Matthews.
Those are the two strongest top two lines imo with Tavares out.
But I think Nylander stays with Matthews and Kerfoot with center Marner and Mikheyev, So Marner can drive his own line. I’d see what Matthews and Marner can do together this two weeks. Nylander 2C which he’s supposed to be able to do.


1.) 19 Oct 2019 22:29:00
May be the first time I’ve ever agreed with you yupp. I don’t recall Matthews and Marner ever getting much of a chance together at 5 on 5. Nylander looked pretty good in the short time we saw him at center. That’s the bonus of having a winger that can play center, they fill in when there’s an injury.

2.) 19 Oct 2019 23:38:21
Matthews, Marner and Johnsson line scores on their 2nd or 3rd shift together and Babcock says, “ I better switch them up. ” Wtf.



18 Oct 2019 00:16:38
Schwartz Schenn Senko
Blais O’Reilly Perron
Fabbri Bozak Steen
Barbashev Sundvist Thomas

Colt, why is Thomas being demoted and not promoted to #1 center status like you say? If he’s supposed to be a future #1C why is he demoted to 4RW from 3LW. In favor of Blais, Perron, Fabbri and Steen?


1.) 18 Oct 2019 10:13:44
Colt won't answer he hides and comes back when St Louis are successful, under the name Redwing. But I can say Thomas will never be a #1 center he's just not that kind of player. However if he's develop correctly he should be the #2 center and be a good two way back checker.

2.) 18 Oct 2019 20:35:38
But if he is supposed to be a good 2C then why did they just resign Schenn for so long while having O’Reilly for 4 more years as well. When’s he going to get his top C role?

3.) 19 Oct 2019 01:15:12
Good point, maybe in 2-3 years when Thomas is ready to take on a bigger role, they might trade one of Scheen or O'Reilly. Or maybe it takes another 4 years for Thomas to become a top 6 center so O'Reilly becomes a UFA then anyways.

4.) 19 Oct 2019 16:35:36
Ah yes, the classic development of a #1 C. 😂😂😂.



24 Sep 2019 16:33:52
Bob McKenzie says the Jets Connor is seeking a longer term deal around 5-6 years. But he would also consider a shorter term deal similar to Sharks Timo Meir 4 years $24M $6M AAV but paying him a salary of $10M in the final year meaning his qualifying offer for for a new contract while still being RFA would need to be at least $10M per.

Wait, what? Did anyone realize the Sharks did that for Timo? $6M per year for 4 years, sure half decent deal, but $10M salary for the last year having to qualify him at at least that? I sure missed that detail there.
Good move by the Sharks there?


1.) 24 Sep 2019 17:01:37
I think that is the new style contract we're going to see. If the players agree to take a bridge or a team friendly contract they'll want a high salary in the last year to push up the QO. Then they either get that QO minimum or are UFA.

2.) 24 Sep 2019 19:42:37
I didn't realize that before - makes a big difference. I guess front loading that contract for Aho actually made it even better now that he won't have a large sum at the end of the contract.

3.) 24 Sep 2019 20:47:11
I think Aho’s contract takes him to his first year of UFA status doesn’t it? So he won’t need to be qualified so his last year salary won’t matter.

4.) 24 Sep 2019 20:54:26
Ya i know that’s the way contracts are going now, but I’m still really shocked SJ did that for that certain player. That’s a huge gamble.



23 Sep 2019 17:07:30
TB signs Point to 3 year deal worth $6.75M per year. What a steal of a contract. If you happen to disagree, could ya explain how this is a bad deal? You’ll see many disagree buttons hit but no balls to say why.
Sorry if this hurts your feelings Leafs17, completely understandable with Nylander making $6.9M.
Marner- 224P in 241GP = $10.893M
Point- 198P in 229GP = $6.75M.
Why is there such a gap in $$ on the contracts? Is Marner THAT much better than Point? What am I missing here.


1.) 23 Sep 2019 18:04:42
I'm guessing that Point will be going for $12M after this contract is up.
Amazing deal for now though! He will still be an RFA at the end of it earning $9M in the final year of his deal.

2.) 23 Sep 2019 18:51:25
Well for starters you’re comparing a 3 year deal with a seven and six year deal. AAV increases dramatically with term and buying up UFA years. Others on this site will point to the tax differences between Ontario and Florida (Personally I think that impact is overstated but it’s not zero) .

That said, IMO Nylander and Marner signed for about $1 mln and $2 mln too much per year. Matthews probably about in that range too.

But I think I’d rather be paying those guys a mill or two too much than the same or worse on guys like Lucic, Ladd, Neal, etc. They are young and trending up not old and on the back 9 of their careers.

Now that I’ve typed all that out I’ve realized you probably know that anyways and are just looking to troll Leafs17. Enjoy 😂.

3.) 23 Sep 2019 19:05:31
It is a great signing but we all know 6 year terms are different than 3. Yuppie you change your tune every week. Are these GM’s not supposed to be locking these kids up long term? I appreciate that you’re always thinking of me when I’m not involved in the conversation.

4.) 23 Sep 2019 19:13:31
Thanks unsportsmanlike, That is ironically very sportsmanlike of you. I get what you’re saying, just got to hope those boys produce and it won’t be bad really. Win a playoff series would be a start this season. Best of luck, going to be a fun year to watch Tor, Bos and TB.

5.) 23 Sep 2019 21:04:41
Atlantic is going to be a fun race to watch. In addition to the 3 you mentioned, I suspect Montreal will be nipping at their heels (assuming Price stays healthy), if Buffalo can get decent goaltending they should be in the mix, and at the risk of being wrong for like the 4th year in a row, I expect the Panthers to be a lot better this year.

6.) 23 Sep 2019 21:00:09
You do know the whole argument there is that Dubas and Mathews changes things for the RFAs now, right? Which they have, big time. Now all these “star” young RFAs want shorter term deals.

Do you honestly thing Marner would have signed for anything even close to Point on a 3 year deal? Lmao. No chance in hell he would have signed for anything even close to under $8M for 3 years. Not a chance in hell.
I agree with unsportsmanlike that Dubas has overpaid all your stars at least $1-2M each. At least.

7.) 23 Sep 2019 23:32:17
Tampa got a great bargain for Point! Honesty I’m sure I’m not the only one that thinks this but there is a serious flaw in the cap system that teams in the south that don’t have to pay taxes can sign their players to decent team friendly contracts example Kucherov at 9.5. If that was Montreal or Toronto or rangers etc they’d be paying him 11-12M for him to take home 9.5. Its a crap system and there really should be some sort of compensation or way to even it out. Its BS! Good for Tampa, rubbish for almost everyone else!

8.) 24 Sep 2019 00:05:47
Lol Marner was willing to do a 3 year deal. for like 10 million a year. What a team first guy.

9.) 24 Sep 2019 00:28:04
10M USD is over 13M CDN. Maybe certain guys take cheaper bridge deals because there apart of a winning culture and want to continue it. Point signed a similar deal to MacAvoy and Werenski, there all going to get paid in 3 years.

10.) 24 Sep 2019 02:40:57
Point will clean up in 3yrs with a new contract but that’s a great signing for TB at the mo. They’ll need to move assets in 3yrs to retain him but could have a Cup or two under their belt by then so great grab for the time being.
I respectfully feel this is a lot better than doing Marner money right now. I’m not a fan of the Marner deal for Toronto. I’m sure that’ll come off as being flippant toward the leafs, which I won’t even pretend isn’t my MO, but I don’t like it no matter who it is for. For what it’s worth I think Rantanen deserves more than Marner and he isn’t going to get it and will likely sign a similar deal to Point and that’s really how it should work. IMO.

11.) 24 Sep 2019 02:50:39
I know people don’t believe me and I’ve said it before but the tax thing is more or less a myth. A tax lawyer did all the calculations and found that Stone is making 500k more over the life of his contract in Vegas than he would have in Ottawa. I’d almost argue players on Canadian teams getting paid in USD have a bigger advantage, as it’s like a 25% increase in purchase power.

12.) 24 Sep 2019 11:34:55
Any player that plays in Toronto should be paid 2-3 million more. Just such a terrible place to live.



22 Sep 2019 16:16:15
Hello Mr. Marcus and Mr. Islandjet.
Question for you, IF* Liane was to be traded, say to one of maybe Carolina, Nee Jersey, Buffalo, Montreal, Anaheim, LAK or Detroit. What would you want and expect back from each team?


1.) 22 Sep 2019 16:38:22
Nothing. I highly doubt the Jets have any intention of trading Laine.

It's pointless trying to start a civil discussion on this board about theoretical trade values IF Laine was traded. Almost everyone here suffers severely from recency bias and can't possibly evaluate trades objectively and also taking team needs into account.

So it will just end up with a bunch of whining and name calling.

2.) 22 Sep 2019 17:06:54
The Jet shouldn't trade Laine at this time, but if they do any possible return has to be quality rather than quantity.

3.) 22 Sep 2019 17:57:55
No no no, All you do is bash all the trade posts involving Jets players because they aren’t good enough. So here’s your chance to say what those players are worth. I want your trade ideas/ expectations on record here since you bash all them. So, if he is traded, what would you expect to be the return. Players names please. Simple discussion, I’m not bashing you in anyway, just want to know from the Jets fans what they would expect back if player was to be traded.

4.) 22 Sep 2019 17:59:17
Islandjet I would agree with you, if I was to trade Liane I would want quality over quantity as well, to still try and be a cup contender and not take a step back.
Can you give some examples/ names of the quality you would think would be offered by other teams?

5.) 22 Sep 2019 18:07:21
If we do play along for fun though, what kind of grounds rules do you want us to set for this exercise yupp.

Going from the offers that you guys all deem as fair here, for evaluating Laine it would be:

- Jets fans can ONLY base Laine's value on last season and accept that we will only get half of that value, at best, because we have to trade him.
- At 21, Laine is a finished product, will never, ever get any better and is starting to go downhill.
- Just because every fan base here wants Laine, it is only because he's a crappy player and you're just trying to help us out.

When Jets fans evaluate players from other teams:

- If they are a current player, we can ONLY evaluate them on their career year and have to accept they will continue to improve no matter how old they are.
- We can only ask for 4th line players unless they are over 30 years old, then we can request a 3rd liner.
- If we ask for a prospect, we must evaluate them at their maximum potential minimum, even if they are the same age or older than Laine and have shown nothing yet.   As prospects always reach their maximum potential and never bust (except for Laine) .

I would imagine that's what you would consider reasonable?   Or, would any asks based on this still be too unreasonable by Jet fans?

6.) 22 Sep 2019 18:13:06
It’s simple. Very very simple. What would you want back in a trade for Liane. Names of players from other teams you would expect/ want in a trade for him - Lianes value to you with names of other players coming back in the trade.
Very simple. You don’t need to complicate it.

7.) 22 Sep 2019 18:14:05
No need for another response besides your value of Liane with names of players you believe would be involved in any Liane trade.

8.) 22 Sep 2019 18:44:28
No matter what players Memarcusjoe and I would think would be fair compensation for Laine or Connor it would just become fodder for the list of trollers that claim we're homers and unrealistic so why should we bother.

9.) 22 Sep 2019 19:15:15
As Islandjet says, it's pointless. Just look at all the offers on the main page for Laine now. Objectively, you can see all are incredibly lowball offers, trying to get something for nothing.

Yet Jet fans are the ones being accused of being biased homers for turning them down.

10.) 22 Sep 2019 20:37:39
What do you two believe Lianes value is. Name some players from other teams you believe would be offered. Simple as that. Why are you so sacred to say? Just answer the question.

11.) 22 Sep 2019 20:38:40
Ok. If they are low ball offers. Then answer my question. What’s his value to you guys. Name some players you would expect in an offer. Very very simple. Don’t deflect or ignore. Answer the question.

12.) 22 Sep 2019 20:45:34
If it's pointless for you guys to actually make a proposal concerning laine then it's pointless for you to keep going against everyone on here that makes one. But yet you continue to do so.

13.) 22 Sep 2019 23:37:37
I’m not a jets fan. But I would like to play this game.
Carolina would for sure be a top 4 defenseman going back to the jets. Maybe not Pesce or Slavin but possibly Dougie Hamilton? That would be the base maybe with a small add from Carolina.

I imagine anything from New Jersey would have to involve hischier. They don’t exactly have a lot of disposable players but Laine playing with hall and Hughes could be magic. This fits for the jets because they get a young centre man that can play second line minutes. Only a year apart in age too.

I could see something being worked out with buffalo around Risto or Reinhart. I think if it’s either than buffalo adds but if it’s both then it’s much closer in value.
I’m a Habs fan but I genuinely don’t see the Habs having anything valuable to help the jets now. Unless they worked something out around Jeff Petry potentially. I think the jets would rather keep Laine than take Petry.

Anaheim has an abundance of forward prospects they could use as a base in any Laine trades but I don’t believe Winnipeg needs prospects and I don’t see any value on Anaheim’s roster that would fit the jets needs and timeline/ preferred Player age. LA could send maybe Martinez and some picks/ prospects. But I think they’d have to be good picks or prospects because Martinez is old. Not sure how that would work for either team. Last Detroit, assuming Detroit won’t deal Larkin for the world, Detroit needs to get further into the rebuild before we could consider them contenders in the Laine sweepstakes.

But I believe Larkin would be equal or more value for Laine from Detroit. But based of team needs and preference, I don’t think this would work out. Keeping in mind this is all hypothetical and that I don’t believe Laine is going to be traded. Also chevys ask is based on the jets perceived value of Laine. Not the way the rest of the league sees it especially recently. In the event he does get traded, it’ll be less than chevys ask but more than other teams garbage.

14.) 23 Sep 2019 01:59:08
Lol Bergevin, nice effort but you didn’t even really completely answer the post when it was meant for two Jets fans not you. Just a bunch of blah blah.
I want exact names in the packages or single person these two Jets fans think Lianes value is.
Not, oh well it would start with so and so and be a so and so add on or blah blah.

15.) 23 Sep 2019 04:05:26
My bad. Just thought I would give it a try.

16.) 23 Sep 2019 06:05:40
How many times can one person spell LAINE wrong? Bergevin you played the game wrong, lol. This is yuppies site and he rules it with an iron fist. Bergevin and habby are too good for this conversation, let the 3 stooges battle this one out. 😂.

17.) 23 Sep 2019 07:14:47
Since memarcus/ islandjets=same person, is too afraid to post what he truly believes, i'm going to assume based on what he was asking for Trouba and what he's be turning down for Laine, he's wants/ hope for a return like this:

Carolina: Slavin, Necas, Fleury


New Jersey:Hischier, Severson, Butcher

MTL: Kotkaniemi, Brooks, Phoeling, Gallagher


18.) 23 Sep 2019 09:53:23
Hamilton, Necas & 2nd for Laine

Ristolainen & Reinhart for Laine

Hischier & Severson for Laine

19.) 23 Sep 2019 15:17:48
HAHAHA. Leafs17 you’re feeling are hurt over THIS?
That’s so efin awesome. You just made my day. Made my week, sorry.

20.) 23 Sep 2019 15:20:35
Gabby and Bergevin bring more to any conversation than anything you’ve ever brought Leafs17. You’re such a little whiney little b$&ch is efin hilarious. I’ve never know anyone to whine as much as you. How does this of all things hurt your feelings?

21.) 23 Sep 2019 17:20:42
Not a jets fan but something like-

Islanders- Dobson, Wahlstrom And 1st

Jets- Laine

That’s what i'd ask for if I were the GM. Maybe also be willing to take Ladd back.

22.) 23 Sep 2019 18:50:00
Hahahahahaha. That’s the biggest overpayment joke ever VB. Lmao. Good one.

23.) 23 Sep 2019 20:45:35
Captain original with another zinger, bahaha! How can you continue to post the same thing? An internet stranger makes your week. You need to do a life check kid. It seems administration let’s you post whatever you want and try to bully people. I want NAMES, lol.

24.) 24 Sep 2019 19:47:03
Lol, you think GMs ask for fair offers, yup.




yupp's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

21 Oct 2019 00:48:09
And I’m loving the fourth line of JJ-Sheahan-Archibald/ P. Russell. Such a good grinder, never give up on battles and good penalty killers. Great fourth line. They need to upgrade the third line to me. The third line is made up of mostly fourth line players like Petan in a Granlund, Jurco, Haas, Gagner. I do like Nygard and Chaisson when they are on the third line, helped when they are in. But it anything they need better players than Petan for their third line. Petan is the last type a guy they make a trade for now. Dump him off to another team.




Click To View This Thread

21 Oct 2019 00:43:40
Lol. What? Edm has too many bot six guys right now better then Petan. He’s the last thing they need. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
Clueless post to me.




Click To View This Thread

20 Oct 2019 20:37:04
Ya that was the big rumor, he wanted to be the man on the team and that all changed when they won the Mcdavid draft lottery.
That was how many years ago now? Different organization and team now, few years of maturity, I believe it would be a welcome fit from both sides myself. I still don’t like Hall as a person, but the hockey player is a great fit on the team now. I think it’s very possible he comes back, but Probably unlikely.




Click To View This Thread

20 Oct 2019 00:26:08
As an Oiler fan I never personally liked Hall since the day he was drafted, But that was a long time ago and I would for sure welcome him back if we can sign him. I think it’s now a great hockey fit for both parties, that’s it that’s all.
To trade for him during the season, I’m not sure what I would give up.




Click To View This Thread

19 Oct 2019 23:11:50
Carolina laughs.





yupp's talk replies