NHL rumours 2


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

21 Jan 2019 16:51:47
Minor deal between the Jets and Oilers.
Edm - Z.Kasian
Wpg - N.Petan

Jets give Petan an opportunity to start fresh with a new organization and Kasian comes to the Jets to add some physical presence. After seeing Scheif and Wheeler take a number of bumps over the past few games, Kasian will be just what the doctor ordered. Another option may be Sens forward Z. Smith?


Agree10 Disagree12

21 Jan 2019 17:26:35
The Jets would be better off to package Petan with other players and draft picks to obtain a player that could make a difference for the playoffs, or players/ draft choices for the future.

21 Jan 2019 19:48:50
Kassian was a beast i playoffs against San jose.

21 Jan 2019 20:07:19
I agree with Islandjet, the Jets would be better off using Petan in a package to get something they need. Instead of just a different guy to sit in the press box.

21 Jan 2019 20:12:00
Kassian went nuts last night. Lucic looked a little disgusted. He should be disgusted with his own play and worry less about what Kassian is doing. At minimal it’s entertaining. At least I got a kick out of seeing the replay this morning. Lol.

21 Jan 2019 16:16:14
Leafs oilers needs major shake up. Time for a blockbuster

Leafs - Mathews, nylander, gardiner

Oilers - Mcdavid, Lucic,

Agree6 Disagree17

21 Jan 2019 16:55:52
Cant see the Oilers ever trading McDavid! What I can see is a possible Matthews deal with Arizona at some point? Maybe Matthews and Gardiner for Keller, Chychrun and Fisher?

21 Jan 2019 17:00:02
The Leafs would have to add a couple of prospects like Sandin or Liljgren and at least a 1st. McD is so far ahead in skill, talent and potential that an over paid Nylander and a UFA Gardner will not cut it, even with Edmonton dumping that over paid anchor Lucic.

21 Jan 2019 12:16:45
Canucks Hutton goldobin 4 Rd pick

Oiler Klefbom

Agree3 Disagree16

21 Jan 2019 16:16:50
Totally will make Edmonton better 🙄 ugh.

21 Jan 2019 00:06:13
Leafs- nylander
Nash- fabbro and '19 1st

Saying that fabbro will join the preds after ncaa season is over, if he's good enough to join the preds he's definatley good enough to join the leafs. So leafs get a young controllable two way right handed dman they want. They save cap space for next year and nylander goes to western conference. Preds gain more scoring and I believe they can afford his contract as well. Win win for both teams

Agree8 Disagree18

21 Jan 2019 00:59:22
Honestly man I doubt Nashville wants Nylander contract they all have such good contracts on that team then and he’s obvs not living up to what he should be playing. I think Nashville declines imo.

21 Jan 2019 03:07:40
Fabbro is a very highly rated prospect player. Very impressive, his numbers have gotten better every year since being drafted, even as the compete level has increased. Between Fabbro and Liljegren, at least one of those guys should work out as Rielly’s partner, and hopefully the other replaces Zaitsev.

21 Jan 2019 11:55:07
If I'm Preds I keep Fabbro.

21 Jan 2019 14:10:59
Why Nashville give up fabbro and a 1st for 7 million guy on pace for like 12 points and -30? Seems like horrible deal for Nashville. Or is there a superstar on Nashville that can make him better than he is?

21 Jan 2019 14:12:11
Maybe fabbro alone but that's a stretch.

21 Jan 2019 16:59:10
Why would any team want over paid Nylander. In the game against the Coyotes he was on the bench laughing and joking. All this while his team is losing and he is playing horribly. That's not the type of player any good team would want.

21 Jan 2019 20:35:11
I saw that video highlight of Nylander this morning again too. I didn’t have a good impression of him either. I actually boo’d the tv. It’s impossible to blame Nylander for all the Leafs misfortunes. But it seems entirely too coincidental that they start losing shortly after he rejoined them. He’s unbalanced the entire team as they try to fit him back in the roster. It’s not working out the way they had hoped. Nylander was a distraction all year, and now he is even worse than a distraction. He’s physically contributing to this skid in Leafs performance. I’m starting to wonder if maybe Dubas is regretting not trading Nylander now? At minimal, I hope Dubas has learned a valuable lesson about making public statements and promises that are dependent on other people in order to fulfill. Now Dubas still has to contend with Matthews and Marner, and is under a very public spoken obligation not to trade Nylander. It’s commitments like that, made to the public, that Dubas absolutely has to keep. He can’t break those promises. The backlash would be brutal.

20 Jan 2019 23:38:09
Boston Bruins Trade:
David Backes [6.0 Million x 3 Years]
Danton Heinen [0.872 Million x 1 Year]
Urho Vaakanainen [0.925 Million x 3 Years]
Jakob Fosbacka-Karlsson [0.916 Million x 1 Year]
2019 2nd Round Draft Selection
2020 3rd Round Draft Selection

St. Louis Blues Trade:
Brayden Schenn [5.15 Million x 2 Years]
Nikita Soshnikov [0.800 Million x 2 Years]
Patrick Maroon [1.500 Million x 1 Year]

Essentially, Boston acquires Brayden Schenn for a slightly higher cost than Rick Nash last year, since Schenn has an extra year on his contract. JFK and the 2nd offset for Backes' contract, while the 3rd goes straight for Maroon. Schenn hauls Vaak, the Bruins top defensive prospect who is an a-lister in most books, and Heinen, who was solid last year and took a step back this year. [I think St. Louis would rather Heinen than Bjork/ Donato although idk]

Bruins Lineup:
Marchand - Bergeron - Pastranak
Schenn - Krejci - Debrusk
Cehlarik - Donato - Maroon
Kuraly - Acciari - Wagner

Blues Lineup:
Schwratz - O'Rielly - Tarasenko
Heinen - Bozak - Perron
Sanford - Sundqvist - Kyrou
Backes - JFK - Steen.

Agree6 Disagree13

20 Jan 2019 23:00:03
Rangers Trade

Leafs Trade
Timashov (AHL)
1st Round Pick 2019

Shattenkirk hasn't really panned out on Broadway and I believe the Rangers would bite on this Trade proposal, for the Leafs they get a better Defenceman having an off year that will help more than Zaitsev on the backend.


Agree3 Disagree12

20 Jan 2019 23:14:51
I can't see the Rangers wanting Zaitsev or Timashov as part of this package. The Leafs will have to give up some quality to improve their weak defense. Maybe a 1st and either Sandin or Liljegren would do it as Shattenkirk would be an upgrade in the Leafs defense.

21 Jan 2019 00:03:24
Given Shattenkirks struggles throughout most of the season and how much he’s paid, leafs definatley shouldn’t give Sandin/ Liljegren and a 1st. That’s definatley an overpayment for what shattenkirks brings. He’s a offensive minded d man and that’s really not what he leads need in a d man anyways. There are better options out the for the leafs. Sounds like Dante Fabbro will join the preds after his ncaa season is over and if he can make the preds team straight outta school he’d definatley be a upgrade for the leafs. I’d propose nylander for fabbro and ‘19 1st. That’s give the leafs a young and good right handed d man and another pick and Nashville gets more scoring. Leafs also gain that cap space for next year as well as get nylander outta the eastern conference.

21 Jan 2019 03:17:37
If Rangers could get a 1st for Shattenkirk, I think it already would have happened by now.

21 Jan 2019 13:44:14
Why every leafs trade on here revolves around a low 1st and spare parts?

20 Jan 2019 22:36:51
Blues give: Tarasenko

Bruins give 2019 1st, Heinen, Bjork, Donato, 3rd 2020

Bruins get a young (27) solid 2nd line player to play with DeBrusk and Krejci

Blues get two solid young option players for 2nd / 3rd line and one player who's good but could be better ( Bjork ) and a 2020 3rd to hopefully round it all out and obviously blues want a first bruins have given their first below so it's not new ground for them

Agree2 Disagree9

20 Jan 2019 23:23:21
If Tarasenko goes to Boston, which is unlikely, Debrusk is the main piece heading back, not Heinen imo.

It'll probably be centered around Debrusk + Carlo + Bjork + 1st + something else, imo.

If he does get traded, it'll be a better return than what Kessel got due to the age imo. I don't know if Boston's the right fit for another star though, I think Brayden Schenn works as a better option for them.

20 Jan 2019 23:47:49
This package does not give the Blues enough to trade a player like Tarasenko. Heinen, Bjork and Donato are young but not that great and may be 3rd line players at best, while the 1st would be in the high 20's.

20 Jan 2019 21:51:49
Mtl offer brooks-reilly-hudon-2nd pick

For gostisbere or muzzin

Agree1 Disagree10

20 Jan 2019 22:41:30
I don't think it would be enough to get either player.

20 Jan 2019 23:06:49
I wouldn't trade brook in a deal for either of these players. I know you have to give up something to get something but I still wouldn't, don't need either of these guys that bad.

20 Jan 2019 13:23:49
Florida: Huberdeau
Columbus: Panarin

Florida`s first line Panarin-Barkov-Dadonov

Agree8 Disagree13

20 Jan 2019 14:31:17
That’s bad for Florida. Huberdeau is solidly offensively and a great overall player. Putting up a point a game this year. He also has 4 more very reasonably priced years left while Panarin is in his last year and rumour is he wants to go to New York. Even if they resign Panarin they will be giving him a lot more money than Huberdeau and while he may be better offensively I’m not sure his overall impact on the game is the much bigger than Huberdeaus.

20 Jan 2019 14:51:22
True, but if someday Florida wants to win games they need player like Panarin.

20 Jan 2019 15:06:32
Or they can just sign him in the off season and then have both guys.

20 Jan 2019 16:00:20
Florida gives up Too much for a rental.

20 Jan 2019 22:11:34
I don’t think Panarin helps you win more games than Huberdeau though. I think Huberdeau has a bigger impact on the game.

20 Jan 2019 23:02:13
Huberdeau is finally coming into his own and the best is yet to come imo. At 25 he has a couple 50 point season and a 69 point season plus almost a point per game rate. I like him just as much as Panarin and he's big.

19 Jan 2019 22:30:46
Josh Manson
Max Jones

Andreas Johnsson
Nikita Zaitsev
Jesper Lindgren
Jeremy Bracco
2019 1st Round Pick

TOR gets a big, right-handed defenseman in Manson who excels on the defensive side of the game and can allow Rielly to be a lot more involved with the offense and a young, big power forward in Jones who can get under the opponent's skin and play a role similar to Hyman's in that he can get into the tough battles and grind for the puck in the corners and get it to Matthews. This would also mean that both Matthews and Tavares have this sort of grindy player on their wings instead of entirely skill (which as recently evident has not seemed to be entirely effective for the Leafs.)

ANA gets a young, offensively-talented player in Johnsson when they are in desperate need of goals from somewhere, a fill-in replacement for Manson in Zaitsev, a good defensive prospect in Lindgren (an area in which they do not have a great selection to choose from at the moment), an extremely talented playmaking winger in Bracco and a 1st round pick for this year if they miss out on the playoffs and want to stockpile more prospects.


Agree6 Disagree16

19 Jan 2019 23:16:47
Anaheim gives up two young roster players for Zaitsev an overpaid player who was a signing mistake and 3 players that will have problems cracking the Ducks lineup. Two get those two players off the Ducks the Leafs would have to add a good roster player and much better players from the minors.

20 Jan 2019 00:00:25
Johnsson > Jones, not by much though.

Rest of the package doesn't get Manson.

If it's Manson we're going after, imo, its going to take Kapanen + Bracco + 1st or something based around Nylander without the inclusion of Jones.

And islandjet, quit the hyperbole. The Ducks just lost 12 straight, Johnsson doesn't have 'problems cracking the Ducks lineup'.

20 Jan 2019 01:46:29
I’d love Manson but I actually agree with islandjet this time. Kapanen or Nylander would have to be in there and I’m not sure what Anaheim’s cap looks like.

20 Jan 2019 08:29:03
How is it Johnsson > Jones?
Jones is a 20 year old first round pick enough said.

20 Jan 2019 14:03:28
Johnssons what, three years older and has 21 points in like 40 games in his rookie season. I even said ‘not by much’. Johnsson’s done something at the NHL level atm, and Jones still has to prove himself there. I get where your coming from with the potential side, but Jones’ junior numbers aren’t all that eye catching that show that he’ll develop into better than what Johnsson’s producing right now.

And I even said, if we want Manson, you take Johnsson and Jones out and add like Kapanen/ Nylander to the package.

20 Jan 2019 14:38:24
TSS you have to realize how ridiculous that sounds, Jones is considered one of the ducks top prospects, Johnsson is at most a 3rd line guy. Just because he’s in the NHL because he had 3 extra development years to get there doesn’t make him better or more valuable. We don’t live in a world where every player in the NHL is better/ more valuable than every player outside it. Having success helps Johnssons value because he wasn’t a very valuable piece before but I still don’t think he’s as valuable as a 20 year old first round pick who at this point seems to have met his expectations in development.

20 Jan 2019 16:38:31
Jones is pretty close to 21 and really hasn't shown much to this point I agree the trade isn't great but it's mostly ruined by the inclusion of zaitsev.

20 Jan 2019 17:29:23
Puljujarvi is a 20 year old 1st round pick and he’s still complete trash at the nhl level. Lucic litterly out produces him. Draft position means nothing.

20 Jan 2019 18:03:27
I mean, if we're going by draft position, we can look at a guy like Lawson Crouse who was drafted only a year before Max Jones, plays a similar style, and has busted out pretty hard in Arizona, even if they give him playing time.

Jones is a good prospect, don't get me wrong. But really, if we're talking a matter of appx. two years of age, one guys in the NHL playing 2nd Line minutes [Johnsson >>>> guys like Connor Brown who are 3rd liners] and one guy still has to prove his worth, I'd be taking the proven guy. Only time that isn't the case is if the prospect really is top-notch, but really, Jones is basically #50 in the NHL, and his style of player just isn't as popular in todays NHL.

Plus, Jones' AHL production and OHL production really doesn't tout him as much better than Johnsson. His +1 year was 36 in 33 and his +2 year was 24 in 29 - hampered by injuries a lot too. His inaugral AHL season wasn't terrible, 24 in 32 is pretty good, but Johnsson's rookie year was 47 in 75, the next year, PPG [54 in 54]. You can't call one to be a 'top prospect' and the other to be 'a 3rd line guy', when their statistics in the same league at the same age were basically identically. And draft position isn't anything to be crowned over, just because Johnsson's a seventh round pick doesn't mean I'd take Frederik Gauthier over him [both were 2013 picks]. I put Johnsson in the same talent range as Kasperi Kapanen, and tbh, I'd value both higher than Max Jones atm - unless Jones proves at the NHL level he's better, i'm sticking with that.

20 Jan 2019 18:31:06
Vbb, you're completely wrong and why you hate every player on Edmonton? Draft position means alot, that's why players drafted higher are more likely to make nhl then guys drafted 150th, can find late bloomers late but the chance of a guy being drafted 6th, very slim chance they'll ever play a game in nhl.

20 Jan 2019 20:41:14
TSS, you’re right in saying we don’t know who’s better until Jones is a NHL regular. But unless the ducks have given up on Jones and I doubt they have because he’s 20, they wouldn’t trade him straight across for Johnsson. His potential is higher.

VB would you be saying that is Puljujarvi was a point per game in the AHL? The Oil management is garbage not Puljujuarvi. I get more and more confindence in him being a good player as the season goes on.

20 Jan 2019 20:55:55
Atta boy vb.

20 Jan 2019 20:57:08
He was itching to bring in Puljujarvi oh yes he was.

20 Jan 2019 23:01:41
Jones = 2× Johnson lol.


NHL Trade Rumors

NHL Trade Rumors 3

NHL Trade Rumors 4

NHL Trade Rumors 5

NHL Trade Rumors 6

NHL Trade Rumors 7

NHL Trade Rumors 8

NHL Trade Rumors 9

NHL Trade Rumors 10

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass