NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

vbbbvvbb's Profile

Current Avatar:
vbbbvvbb's Avatar

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team: Rangers


Where from: Saint John


Favourite player: Connor McDavid


Best team moment: Playing Midget AAA underage


Interests:


Timezone:




vbbbvvbb's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To vbbbvvbb's Posts

 

 

To vbbbvvbb's last 5 rumours posts

 

To vbbbvvbb's last 5 talk posts

 

To vbbbvvbb's last 5 rumour replies

 

To vbbbvvbb's last 5 talk replies

 

vbbbvvbb's rumours posts with other poster's replies to vbbbvvbb's rumours posts

 

22 May 2017 18:37:47
Tor: Morgan Rielly

Buff: Alex Nylander and 1st 2017 ( Timothy Liljegren )

Who adds? Buff overpays for a young top 2 dman signed long term cheap who'd be perfect with Risto. Leafs get a replacement and An Elite prospect that fills up our Core for forwards.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 23 May 2017 01:39:05
How is this an over-payment for a top 2 defenceman?

2 players who have never played an NHL Game are obviously not worth a top 2 defenceman. And please explain to me why Buffalo will pick Liljegren with the 8th overall pick when there are better defencemen than him.


2.) 23 May 2017 01:47:46
Why could you trade Reilly who is on a cheap contract and growing into a great defenceman.
Nylander and the 8th would be great to have but it would set us back.


3.) 23 May 2017 02:00:17
Not saying Leafs would do it but that definitely is an overpayment. The D at 8 are projected to be top 2 D plus another projected top 6 forward. Reilly would be a good fit but don't think Buffalo would make that trade.


4.) 23 May 2017 04:14:37
You're nuts. Clinically nuts.


5.) 23 May 2017 08:58:37
Yeah because TOR needs another skilled F over Rielly. Value wise, BUF declines tho.


 

 

20 May 2017 22:49:47
Toronto: William Nylander

Carolina: Noah Hanfin

Who adds? Elite forward for a top 4 dman who can log top minutes but has no offensive upside.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 20 May 2017 23:35:39
Lol. hanifan does have offensive upside. I think toronto needs to add a little just because of the demand for dmen right now. But i do not want to see the leafs trade him. Rather they trade JVR and the 1st rounder for a dman.


2.) 20 May 2017 23:49:17
Leafs will not be trading nylander. Even with the defensive needs he's untouchable.


3.) 20 May 2017 23:52:00
You always talk about this and post it like every other week.


4.) 20 May 2017 23:58:53
I wouldn't call 29 points "no offensive upside"


5.) 21 May 2017 00:23:01
Also if I'm Carolina I ask for Marner. Maybe Toronto says no but better to keep him than to undervalue him.


6.) 21 May 2017 00:28:36
We know you're a Leafs homer.
But why call the Leaf player "elite" and then talk down the player you want to trade for.
Why would you want to make the trade then?


7.) 21 May 2017 00:30:17
Hahaha lol VB. Even with this new account yup delusional. Hanifin is worth Marner plus Bracco++ so forget Nylander straight up for him.


8.) 21 May 2017 00:32:04
But, but. How? How did you find this account again?


And my God, to all you old-timers on the site (Yup/ BJ/ Ovies/ Drais/ Chirp, etc. ), check out this VB's page. My god. His trades haven't stopped being bad.


9.) 21 May 2017 01:10:13
Very Bad Bad Bad VERY VERY BAD BAD
Is that what vbbbvvbb stands for?


10.) 21 May 2017 01:11:04
Ha ha. I came up with that ALL by myself yup!
Feeling proud ☺️🍻.


11.) 21 May 2017 01:12:08
Nylander is a lightweight looser! Sad!


12.) 21 May 2017 02:13:46
VB had a "page" all to himself? What.

Haha I think most us have had to make a new name along the way. My first was yep not yup
BJ was BJ69 then hotguybabes. I know others have had a few. Kinda funny.


13.) 21 May 2017 02:38:42
Golden Knights, you have already proven your lack of knowledge. Don't make it worse.


14.) 21 May 2017 09:40:20
I meant elite offensive upside he won't be like an Eklblad, Karlsson or even Hedman offensively but imo he could be like a Petro. Also saying leafs add in Marner for Hanfin is ridiculous. Marner has overachieved so far and was drafted ahead of Hanfin for a reason he'd go 3rd overall in a redraft. Meanwhile Hanfin hasn't done anything special besides live up to his expectations. I see Hanfin potting 15g 30A in a career season and I could see Nylander putting up 40G 40A in his prime.


15.) 21 May 2017 16:03:44
No vbbbvvbb is my initials.


16.) 21 May 2017 18:08:14
No. Vbbbvvbb is for very bad here. Very bad bad bad very very bad bad.


 

 

04 Jul 2016 16:00:07
Edm:Pouliot and Yakapov

Buffalo: Kane

Peter was interested in Kane in Boston think and he gave 2nd chances before with Kassian. If all things go south they can Expose him. Not many teams would be willing to take a waiver on Kane.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 04 Jul 2016 17:17:59
Not enough bro


2.) 04 Jul 2016 17:25:16
Hmmm.

Interesting deal. Both yak and Kane have struggled and you get to dump Pouliotts salary.

Kane is a problem child. I think he is working on his fifth chance already. For that reason 'I'm out'. Oilers say no.


3.) 04 Jul 2016 17:37:18
I think Oilers say no, but then again they 'could' say yes. he's got the skill to be a good player, he just needs to do it.


4.) 04 Jul 2016 17:49:01
Honestly American Tank I think it is who would pay more for him? And Buffalo wants to dump him.


5.) 04 Jul 2016 17:53:01
Agree with Ron and mcjesus. It's a gamble but it can work well. Kane is better than yak and I heard Kane wanted to come to Edmonton before.


6.) 04 Jul 2016 21:42:02
Like I've said before I don't think any team wants to give up anything for Kane right now. With all of his off-ice antics no NHL team will trade for him because it's all about publicity.

Buffalo is stuck with him until he sorts himself out if you ask me.


7.) 04 Jul 2016 21:57:39
Kane isn't useless. He could be a good 2nd liner. With size and attitude. Like lucic lol


8.) 05 Jul 2016 00:44:48
Get rid of hall as a cancer to the team, replace him for Lucic who can play with and protect Mcdavid, then trade assets to get another cancer., seems counter intuitive. I think Kane has worn out his welcome with most teams, a 3rd and a decent prospect should be what a team should be willing to give, or another bad contract. Kane has the skill but needs the right team to lead or control him. I don't think Edmonton has that right now.


9.) 05 Jul 2016 04:28:36
Hall was NEVER a cancer for the team. But Kane definitely is. So don't go off saying Oilers got rid of one, because he never was.

Anyhow, Kane is and he's worth the risk in my mind if Oilers can trade Pouliot and Yak. Pouliot won't be around for too long and Yak probably won't improve much with the Oilers. Kane could maybe do really well in Edmonton.


 

 

03 Jul 2016 01:50:58
Toronto: William Nylander and Tyler Bozak

Minnesota: Mikeal Granlund and Matt Dumba

I think the Leafs should Make Nylander Expendable to get an upgrade on defence.

IMO all things considered

Nylander>=RNH

Id like to see Minny add a pick but i think it's really close to fair.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 03 Jul 2016 05:15:03
I think at this point, there's just nothing left to say to you. You clearly don't listen to any suggestions anyone gives, especially those who are important people to listen to (AKA Lou, Shanahan, Babs) . We are grooming our own talent, get that through your head.


2.) 03 Jul 2016 05:37:03
Uhh not sure about your evaluation of Nylander>Nuge, also Wild just signed Eric Staal to mend their centre need.


3.) 03 Jul 2016 06:30:48
If you actually think Nylander is better or equal to RNH you really need to start watching hockey instead of saying things you have no clue of. Also stammer made a good point, leafs aren't trading any of their young players. Howver, to get a good young dman in Dumba would be a good move to make.


 

 

02 Jul 2016 21:48:11
Tor: Josh Leivo and a 7th RD pick

Phi: Robert Hagg

A swap of prospects. I think this trade is very fair 2 prospects that don't have room to excel in there organization.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 02 Jul 2016 23:23:16
Don't know a lot about Hagg but from what I have heard of him I still think the leafs add. Leivo isn't more than a bottom six forward.


2.) 02 Jul 2016 23:57:44
Not bad. Surprised it's you posting it.


3.) 03 Jul 2016 01:18:15
JF12 he had a pretty bad year there value is pretty close He is looking like a 7th dman right now but he still has upside.


 

 

 

vbbbvvbb's talk posts with other poster's replies to vbbbvvbb's talk posts

 

19 Jul 2016 06:24:55
Is it just me or is Kyle Connor overrated by the latest top 50 prospects he was ranked 4th behind Mathews, Laine and Dylan Strome.

I mean he is a good prospect he probably deserved to win the Hoby Baker award but do you guys seriously think he should be ranked ahead of guys like Mitch Marner, Jesse Puljujjarvi, Ivan Provonov, William Nylander and Matt Murray.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 19 Jul 2016 12:43:24
I think it is slightly overrated. I would have him somewhere in the 7-10 range.


2.) 19 Jul 2016 15:48:57
With rookies you never know. usually it depends on his line mates, staying healthy and the confidence his coach has in him to use him on the power play, penalty killing, over time and minutes of play game. Age and experience also plays a factor. A 20 year old is usually better prepared than an 18 year old. Look at Chicago last year. But great skill usually rises to the top.


3.) 19 Jul 2016 16:14:11
Yah 7-10 seems good to me.


4.) 19 Jul 2016 20:32:36
I can't believe all you guys think Kyle Connor is a better prospect then Jesse Pulj. That's pretty sad.


 

 

03 Jul 2016 01:29:39
Polak resigns with Leafs. Pretty good signing he will be a mentor for the young guys and bring a physical presence on the blue line it's a 1 year deal so it can't be a bad signing. They may be able to acquire a pick at the deadline. All in all I'm just glad they didn't go out and sign Kris Russel to a ridiculous contract.

vbbbvvbb

 

 

29 Jun 2016 21:27:42
Pk for Weber that's a weird interesting trade

Safe to say that's the biggest trade in the last 10 years 2stars.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 29 Jun 2016 22:43:10
Wouldn't say it's the top trade in the last 10 years but defs top 5.


 

 

29 Jun 2016 21:04:50
Larsson for Taylor Hall

Looks like Benning isn't the worst GM in NHL this is just down right terrible.

I think all Edmonton fans deserve an apology.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 29 Jun 2016 21:47:50
Lol. Just like Stamkos owes Leafs fans an apology?


2.) 30 Jun 2016 00:01:15
You're such a tool yup. Make sure you defend every single post about the mighty oilers. Be sure to put lol so we all see you laughing it off.


 

 

25 Jun 2016 21:31:17
Did anyone else here dissapointed in how the leafs handled this draft?

I feel like they went of the board many times to select a player they didn't need and the goalie they drafted seems a lot worse then the 4 drafted prior I think they should've took Fizerpatrick instead of The Swedish Winger they basically just got a better version of him in Rychal.

Also I think the Leafs should have moved JVR, Komarov and/ or Bozak for draft picks sense they are useless to the leafs because there not contending and they have the worst or one of the worst teams in the NHL.

But I guess that's why I'm not the GM.

vbbbvvbb

1.) 25 Jun 2016 21:50:50
they had the most picks in the draft, yet you wanted more? you realize you need quality vets to compliment all the young talent right? cups aren't won with a whole team of guys under 25.

jvr can show guys how to use their size,
bozak can teach guys how to take a draw and be responsible defensively.
komarov can teach guys to play with an edge

i doubt any of them are moved before the start of the season.

bozak is a perfect 3C behind kadri and matthews. and can move up in case of injury.


2.) 25 Jun 2016 23:20:36
If Leafs Hypothetical sign Stammer Bozak is far to good to be a 4th line center he's worth a 2nd Rd pick 2017 + a small add.

JVR can get a lot of value and he only has two years left if they need veteran expierince they could pick up some one Like Thomas Vanek at this point I'd trade him for a good pick just to get some value.

And yah Komarov would be good to keep but I'd rather have a good prospect.


3.) 26 Jun 2016 00:57:27
1 that's a solid goalie u just don't know him so u say he sucks

2 Babcock already said Mathews 3rd line center behind kadri and bozak

You must not be a leaf fan they ate drafting for the future look at it they have a lot of players in the ahl so took goos guys from over seas that they can store over there pplaying with men

Leafs had a great draft.


4.) 26 Jun 2016 02:34:55
Except Babcock said that Mathews will start as 3C behind Kadri and Bozak.


5.) 26 Jun 2016 13:48:41
you can't base being disappointed at the nhl draft on hypothetcally signing stammer. that would be backwards. its why the draft happens before free agency.


6.) 26 Jun 2016 16:07:57
If they don't try to clean out there roster I'll be truly dissapointed in the leafs management. No way should Mathews be a 3rd line center that is pathetic. That's exactly how you destroy a kids confidence is rather just trade Bozak and Kadri for a conditional 7th Rd pick then see him play there.


7.) 26 Jun 2016 16:31:41
Boston played Seguin as a 4th line center his 1st year. The leafs do this to protect him from idiot leafs fans that don't know hockey like yourself. This is how you develop a kid you don't rush him into number 1 center you play him down the line up so he can learn the nhl game and gain confidence. You kill his confidence by saying your number 1 center and he gets out played by real number 1 center next year and he thinks he ain't that good.


8.) 26 Jun 2016 19:19:26
austin matthews hasn't played a game in the nhl yet and you think he's a top line ready to go 20 minutes a night against the best players a team can throw at them? you're a laugh. how did that go for luke schenn again? talk about ruining a player.

roster clean up? yea its almost close to being done, look at whos come and gone over the last 2-3 years, pretty much a new team dude, and with the system in place things are looking up.


9.) 26 Jun 2016 20:49:03
I don't know hockey? I'm pretty sure if you play Midget AAA you know hockey. And I think they should put him on the 2nd line kind of like what Buffalo did with Eichel.


10.) 26 Jun 2016 22:21:12
I'm pretty sure that means you can play hockey not that you know hockey smartypants.


11.) 26 Jun 2016 23:41:53
Lol no that definitely doesn't. I'm sure there's a few of us that have, doesn't mean you no hockey at all.


12.) 27 Jun 2016 00:28:52
no one said in any of these replies that you don't know hockey. but i am now.

you know how many meat heads play hockey? playing hockey at 17 years old doesn't mean anything regarding knowing the game.

the leafs roll 4 lines. his ice time will be there. 3rd line C, top PP unit, 2nd PK unit. mix it up, limit his opposition.

why wouldn't you want to put him up against 3rd pairing dmen to start his career off? seems logical to me, but what do i know, i didn't play AAA midget hockey

mcdavid lost more than half a season, could that have been anything to do with his workload?

is any of this getting through to you?


13.) 27 Jun 2016 01:33:00
All I'm saying I'd like to see Mathews play the same role Eichel did there very similar.


14.) 28 Jun 2016 02:16:41
thats all you have to say? seriously? you already said that. i'm sure you'll get to see your fill of auston matthews on the ice, the best thing for him is to bring him along as slowly as you can. the less pressure on him the better, especially in our toxic media market known as toronto, he's going to get eaten alive if he goes the route you want, instant superstar saviour STANLEY CUP CHAMPS 2017.


15.) 28 Jun 2016 02:16:41
thats all you have to say? seriously? you already said that. i'm sure you'll get to see your fill of auston matthews on the ice, the best thing for him is to bring him along as slowly as you can. the less pressure on him the better, especially in our toxic media market known as toronto, he's going to get eaten alive if he goes the route you want, instant superstar saviour STANLEY CUP CHAMPS 2017.


16.) 28 Jun 2016 02:16:41
thats all you have to say? seriously? you already said that. i'm sure you'll get to see your fill of auston matthews on the ice, the best thing for him is to bring him along as slowly as you can. the less pressure on him the better, especially in our toxic media market known as toronto, he's going to get eaten alive if he goes the route you want, instant superstar saviour STANLEY CUP CHAMPS 2017.


17.) 28 Jun 2016 02:16:41
thats all you have to say? seriously? you already said that. i'm sure you'll get to see your fill of auston matthews on the ice, the best thing for him is to bring him along as slowly as you can. the less pressure on him the better, especially in our toxic media market known as toronto, he's going to get eaten alive if he goes the route you want, instant superstar saviour STANLEY CUP CHAMPS 2017.


18.) 28 Jun 2016 02:16:41
thats all you have to say? seriously? you already said that. i'm sure you'll get to see your fill of auston matthews on the ice, the best thing for him is to bring him along as slowly as you can. the less pressure on him the better, especially in our toxic media market known as toronto, he's going to get eaten alive if he goes the route you want, instant superstar saviour STANLEY CUP CHAMPS 2017.


19.) 28 Jun 2016 02:16:41
thats all you have to say? seriously? you already said that. i'm sure you'll get to see your fill of auston matthews on the ice, the best thing for him is to bring him along as slowly as you can. the less pressure on him the better, especially in our toxic media market known as toronto, he's going to get eaten alive if he goes the route you want, instant superstar saviour STANLEY CUP CHAMPS 2017.


 

 

 

vbbbvvbb's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

22 May 2017 18:18:48
I think I'd rather just keep Gardiner.

vbbbvvbb

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 May 2017 18:16:32
Bruins need to add a significant piece or two.

vbbbvvbb

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 May 2017 17:57:00
No from Montreal.

vbbbvvbb

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 May 2017 15:08:00
I'd say the gap between Larson and Faulk is a mid 1st

Nuge=Mid 1st (15ovr) 2018 draft because this one is weak.

Is that not fair? Nuge is a good 2nd line center but at 6mil he is over payed and IMO right now his value is at an all time low playing 3rd C on Edmonton with Underwhelming offensive production.

vbbbvvbb

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 May 2017 15:00:39
I'd think Edmonton accepts.

vbbbvvbb

 

 

 

vbbbvvbb's talk replies