NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


Shootsmcgee's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Shootsmcgee's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Shootsmcgee's Posts



To Shootsmcgee's last 5 rumours posts


To Shootsmcgee's last 5 talk posts


To Shootsmcgee's last 5 rumour replies


Shootsmcgee's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Shootsmcgee's rumours posts


13 Jan 2018 05:45:59
Chicago: seabrook, pokka, 2nd. Columbus: jack Johnson Don't really know but Johnson wants a trade and Chicago needs outta seabrook contract...... anywhere close?


1.) 13 Jan 2018 06:43:05
Wow. Massive yes from Chicago. Massive no from Columbus.

2.) 13 Jan 2018 12:12:09
Without seabrook its way closer. what's seabrook going to do, be number 6 on Columbus' depth chart for the forseeable future? he'd be behind Murray, Jones, Werenski, Carlsson and Nuttivara on defence. And his contract is super bloated. No thanks from CBJ.



21 Apr 2017 06:47:20
Got a friend who's a flames fan, wants to trade gaudreau to nj for Taylor hall straight across, I think doesn't make sense for either team, I think Calgary should add a 2nd or 3rd, or decent prospect. Thoughts? Help settle our argument


1.) 21 Apr 2017 10:10:28
Wouldnt know why CAL adds, especially a 2nd.

2.) 21 Apr 2017 12:26:24
Each player has their benefits. I think Gaudreau fits better in Calgary's system, because without him they severely lack a skilled playmaker.

I'd say no from Calgary, and definitely no adding.

3.) 21 Apr 2017 14:13:24
I wouldn't trade johnny straight up for hall let alone add. Anyways makes no sense for Calgary.

4.) 21 Apr 2017 15:23:12
Id say no from Calgary. Him and Monahan have a good thing going, so not only would you lose Gaudreau, but you could see a little dip in Monahans production. I wouldn't make any changes to the front end of this team, maybe minor ones.
Now if you can figure a deal to get Schneider, ?

5.) 21 Apr 2017 18:52:39
Meh both players are compete Douchebags anyways. Douche for douche, sure give it a go. Lol

Probably a no from Calgary more so than NJ just because Johny has been part of Cakgary for a lot longer than Hall on NJ and they love him there and his chemistry with Monahan. But thinking about it, I actually think Hall could be better with Monahan myself. Isn't Johny from NJ area?
Interesting idea I suppose.

6.) 22 Apr 2017 02:08:45
Part of the reasoning was hall was born in Calgary and Jonny from nj, they'd both be happier. They're similar players but Jonnys complete lack of going into comers and leaving the zone early was part of my argument, plus just a sideways move for both teams.

7.) 22 Apr 2017 02:15:13
2nd is probably a little high, but do think hall is better all around, Jonny is pretty one dimensional and haven't seen him fight for pucks to hard, but also hall seems to be more of a dressing room cancer.



16 Sep 2016 14:24:20
tvr+2nd for yakupov.


1.) 16 Sep 2016 18:04:43
Who's TVR?

2.) 16 Sep 2016 18:09:14
I wish bruhhh.

3.) 16 Sep 2016 18:12:56
That's to much I think tvr for yak is fair.

4.) 16 Sep 2016 19:26:13
Pretty sure k99 doesn't watch hockey. just read Chicago may be shopping tvr and pick and or prospect for a top 6 winger, but not much out there.

5.) 16 Sep 2016 20:01:19
That trade actually makes a little sense IF VanReinsdyk is exempt from the expansion draft.
VanReinsdyk could challenge for the vacant spot left on D when Vegas takes Davidson in the Draft. It would be a pretty tough battle between him, Reinhart or Osterle on the depth chart.

Salary just fits into Chicago's cap situation, so add the 2nd and it is a feasible trade.

6.) 16 Sep 2016 20:50:18
Tvr is Trevor van rymsdiek (James' brother) Wo plays for Chicago k99.

7.) 16 Sep 2016 21:32:35
Trevor! No from Hawks.

8.) 16 Sep 2016 21:55:26
I think the player swap is interesting. Adding a pick might happen but I highly doubt it's a 2nd. Getting a young serviceable D man is a good move for oilers with yak.

9.) 16 Sep 2016 22:39:47
Oilers are better to keep Yak and let him play and see what happens.

Trades involving him don't offer enough in return. If he starts to fail, then we can cue the Yak for the peanuts offered here deals.

10.) 17 Sep 2016 04:10:07
You think this offer is peanuts? A decent young D and a 2nd for yak isn't bad. I'm not one of the guys that says you have to give yak away. I agree if you're getting offered a 4th round pick like some guys are suggesting you keep him and let him try to have a breakout year. However I don't think this is a terrible lowball offer.



19 Aug 2016 22:19:36
Chi: Hossa for buf: Kane

Just was thinking Hossa can be a leader for a young team and Kane play with a team full of leaders that might help straighten out Kane. Hossa only had a couple years left. signed for 4 but doubt he plays it out but then again, kane might be outta the league if he doesn't straighten out. Plus nmc. but might be good for both teams. Let me have it!


1.) 19 Aug 2016 23:29:08
0% Chicago does that. Just not for Kane.

2.) 19 Aug 2016 23:42:41
Both Kanes on the same team? They'd get arrested within a week.

3.) 20 Aug 2016 03:39:52
Haha chirp, probably right, would hope he hung out with toews but that wouldn't be much fun. Did read rumors Chicago was just looking into what they could get for Hossa but nmc makes it his decision and can't see him agreeing to go to buffalo at the end of his career. Just a thought.



28 Jun 2016 03:41:24
Chicago trade Crawford for to Winnipeg for pavelec and a 2nd or 3rd. Might be hard cause it's in division but Chicago gets a goalie with 2.1 mil less contract that only has one year remaining and splits time with darling, Winnipeg gets a proven top goalie. Thoughts? Chicago would have the cap room to resign Panarin after next season and maybe even try for a Bryan Campbell this off season.


1.) 28 Jun 2016 04:46:56
Darling isn't a #1 goalie. And Pavelec will not give Chicago the goaltending to go far in the playoffs. So no. Crawford is staying in Chicago.

2.) 28 Jun 2016 05:48:26
if we trade him to winnipeg i'd want comrie or hallybuk (however you spell his last name, i fail) back.

3.) 28 Jun 2016 11:48:53
I've read Chicago would be comfortable giving darling the outright starting job this year, he's not proven he can handle that much work so why not give him a chance by splitting time to see what he's got? If it works out, can sign him for much cheaper than Crawford, if it doesn't, it's a buyers market for goalies with the expansion draft next year.

4.) 28 Jun 2016 11:55:04
Chicago has won a cup with niemi so if they get ok goaltending and can get an upgrade at defense, they've got a better chance.

5.) 28 Jun 2016 12:27:50
@kaner88 instead of a draft pick, add a young goalie? Or scrap pavelec all together? Guessing Chicago has to take back some salary. What's fair? If not pavelec, Chicago would have a goalie tandem not far north than a million combined, which is damn good if they play decent.

6.) 28 Jun 2016 12:33:19

7.) 28 Jun 2016 14:10:13
Hawks signed Lars Johnasson out of Sweden. He was the top goalie and should see NHL time next season.

8.) 28 Jun 2016 15:32:54
Hellebuyck. haha, why not just have a easy name? . Heard the swed is a replacement for Leighton, maybe he's the real deal and can be nhl calibre.




Shootsmcgee's talk posts with other poster's replies to Shootsmcgee's talk posts


02 Mar 2017 04:09:40
Not a rumour but a hope, Chicago convinces Crawford to wave his nmc to be picked up by lv, sign darling for 4 years for 16-18 mil


1.) 02 Mar 2017 08:22:48
That's quite the contract for Darling, don't you think?

2.) 02 Mar 2017 20:13:09
Darling hasn't proven he can be the long term #1 guy, that would be a huge mistake.

3.) 03 Mar 2017 00:19:18
i don't think darling is the answer or worth 4 4.5 a year.

4.) 03 Mar 2017 02:19:48
I think Darling will be this years sought after back up to be given a chance at number one? I thought about that over a month ago.
What other backups might get that shot.
Like Talbot, Jones, Lehner, and many other backups who were acquired to play more.



08 Oct 2016 01:31:13
Wonder how colt feels about blues getting yakapov after bashing him so much.




23 Jan 2016 04:23:50
Think T. Teravainen and either R. Hartman or V. pokka should be enough for drouin? teravainen and drouin have about the same ppg and Hartman and Pokka are going to be nhlers, Hartman probably a really good 3rd liner and Pokka could be a top 4 deman.


1.) 24 Jan 2016 01:21:41
I think Tampa would probably do Teravainen straight up for Drouin. People need to get past the fact that he was a third overall pick and realize his face value. And his face value is a good prospect with a high ceiling, but always has a low floor.

2.) 24 Jan 2016 19:26:27
I think that's an overpayment.




Shootsmcgee's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

13 Jan 2018 06:27:08
Why you spell through wrong so many times. not even threw . you high?




Click To View This Thread

13 Jan 2018 05:42:21
Seabrook isn't really a cap dump right now, but in 2-4 years that contract looks horrible.




Click To View This Thread

23 Dec 2017 17:00:22
Another dude basing value solely on points^ jim, compare hits per season, there is many things other than points that make a player good.




Click To View This Thread

23 Dec 2017 02:23:26
Not a chance Tavares would resign with Ottawa if they're starting a rebuild, really bad actually for both teams.




Click To View This Thread

23 Dec 2017 02:19:51
Definitely doesn't make sense to break up 3m line.





Shootsmcgee has no Talk Replies