NHL rumours 10

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

10 Feb 2018 14:54:36
The leafs are missing 1 good defenceman in order to become cup contenders. The Blackhawks on the other hand will miss the playoffs and need a retool. What perfect dance partners
Leafs - Nylander 2nd pick 2018
Hawks - Keith
As much as I love watching Nylander play with Matthews one must trade from strength to help weakness
Why Chicago would do it - gets younger more skilled
Why toronto would do it - number one defenceman they need who is a leader Nylander gets a raise next season

Agree4 Disagree11

10 Feb 2018 15:02:26
North is a great defenceman but too old if we trade nylander it will be for a younger dman.

10 Feb 2018 15:52:35
I agree with tyhockey.
If your going to trade a guy like Nylander., think long term. package him for OEL.?
Something on those lines.

10 Feb 2018 17:24:43
You really want to trade a 21 year old Nylander + for 34 year old Kieth? Crazy.

10 Feb 2018 17:29:43
Yeah nylander/ marner don't get traded for a 35 year old who is signed till he’s 40 lol they should only go in a package for a star d in his mid to late 20s like Sosa said.

10 Feb 2018 19:45:11
Agree with everyone but going to need and huge deal for oel, Keith still a top de in the league and hasn't slowed down much and has been one of the best de in the league for year on a very good cap hit, would just worry he starts to slow down.

10 Feb 2018 21:19:51
Or don't trade at all, i mean the leafs are looking good this year with what they already have. The young guys on the blueline look better and stronger the more experience they get. I think if the leafs just stand pat with what they have, they'll be just fine.

10 Feb 2018 21:30:26
Ya try and trade Nylander + for a OEL or Faulk, Doughty type a guy. Not a 34 year old. Lol.

10 Feb 2018 22:54:27
Ya. Why trade for a 34 yr old who is signed till he is 40.they can offer him 3 yrs at 6.75 then

And lmao at the "leads 1 good defenceman away"

11 Feb 2018 05:01:07
Balsam, what’s your definition of a cup contender? because Nashville snuck in the playoffs last year and was a cpl wins away. Leafs are a shoe in to the playoffs because wings and habs are about 17 pts back lol they have a lethal offense, 4 pretty good Dmen and a cpl kids playing well and a goalie who has been unbelievable since the first 7-8 games of the season. So adding a top pair D doesn’t give them a good chance? I guess they should follow Marc Bergevins plan to success, make a series of moves that take a playoff team and make them lottery pick contenders.

11 Feb 2018 05:09:55
And the “3 year at 6.75” comment I figure is about Marleau because that’s your go to shot at the leafs, but Marleau at 37 has 2 more goals in 2 more games than paccioretty. Remember that Max plays top line and top PP and has been on the ice for 125 more minutes than Marleau this season while being almost a decade younger and scoring less. Not saying pacioretty isn’t a good player, he is, but if you’re going to make Marleau your target for criticism, make sure he’s not out performing your best player! Also it’s 6.25 mill, not 6.75. Get your chirp right at least lol.

10 Feb 2018 01:21:30
Blues: Dunn

Coyotes: Perlini

Agree2 Disagree7

10 Feb 2018 07:59:00
WHY? 🙄.

10 Feb 2018 18:22:11
Because colt is a troll.

09 Feb 2018 19:29:36
Ottawa- dion phaneuf, nick paul
Calgary- troy brouwer.

Agree4 Disagree10

09 Feb 2018 22:08:43
Don’t think nick Paul is the type of prospect teams will be Looking for to dump phaneuf a contract and don’t think flames want anymore money on that blue line.

09 Feb 2018 19:28:41
Ottawa- bobby ryan, nick paul
Calgary- troy brouwer, matt stajan, hunter shinkaruk, 2nd.

Agree1 Disagree11

11 Feb 2018 14:06:41
Take out stajan and Brower and add a 3rd for 3 years and it's a deal but that 2nd is not possible either as they don't have it unless you mean next year's 2nd in which case I say 2 3rds instead of 3.

09 Feb 2018 18:32:34
To cgy: donskoi
To sj: troy brouwer, hunter shinkaruk

Agree0 Disagree8

09 Feb 2018 18:43:04
who wants troy brouwer and that bad contract.

09 Feb 2018 18:44:38
You probably have better luck trying to give some one a STD than him and that contract. 3 goals 12 assist.

09 Feb 2018 19:06:54
Not to mention Donskoi is actually a good player.

09 Feb 2018 20:05:31
Donskoi is actually good haha why would San Jose want to do that.

09 Feb 2018 15:08:33
Pens- 3rd or 4th

Leafs-Nikita Soshnikov

Thoughts?

Agree11 Disagree9

09 Feb 2018 18:25:25
I’d be happy with a 3rd because we have no spot for him and kapanen has clearly solidified himself as the first option of those guys. And anyone that hasn’t watched him play, I believe fans of most teams would be happy with him if they paid a third. High energy and hard working and has some offensive upside. Pretty good shot and hots everything that moves. Plays fearless for his size.

10 Feb 2018 18:43:03
I'd rather have Sosh be part of a package for a dman.

09 Feb 2018 11:13:31
Idea:

2018 1st Round Draft Pick + Josh Leivo + Nikita Soshnikov + Roman Polak to the Arizona Coyotes in exchange for Niklas Hjalmarsson + Brad Richardson.

- Leivo will get a chance to play in Zona 100%. He could possibly be a top line/ second liner on a bad team, however, if he looks good, he could be a pretty good add-in. I've always rooted for him as a Leaf fan, and in the right oppurtunity, I thi k he's a 30+ point man. Sosh is a wild card, but is most likely going to end up as a gritty 10 point guy. Lol.

- Hjalmarsson fits into everything Toronto needs. Tough, stay at home blueliner with cup experience. he's the perfect blueliner. Richardson hasn't done much, and with his contract, he's maybe worth a 4th at the deadline. However, he's an upgrade on Dominic Moore imo.

And honestly, if Patches' value is a 1st + a prospect + a roster body, I would think Hjalmarsson's would be less. And imo, this is what it would take.

Lineup:
Zach Hyman - Auston Matthews - William Nylander
Patrick Marleau - Nazem Kadri - Mitch Marner
James van Riemsdyk - Tyler Bozak - Connor Brown
Leo Komarov - Brad Richardson - Kasperi Kapanen

Ron Hainsey - Jake Gardiner
Niklas Hjalmarsson - Morgan Rielly
Nikita Zaitsev - Travis Dermott

This actually looks like a really, really well balanced team. And Hjalmarsson is signed on for 2018/ 19 as well.

Agree3 Disagree12

09 Feb 2018 14:13:38
Not too bad. I’m just reluctant to give up a first round pick in a deal for a defenseman unless it’s a 27 minute+, do everything horse. Not that a first will get that guy, but that we could do a package to get him including prospects and picks. This definitely makes us more prepared for the Bruins and lightning without losing anything but Polak off the current roster which is good. I’m neutral on it which means I must think it’s pretty fair. Just not my ideal fit.

09 Feb 2018 16:16:37
Be surprised if hjalmarson gets that much, he was pretty much straight across for Connor Murphy, then has not had a good year, plus missed more games this year then the rest of his career combined. Don't think he'd get a first anyway.

09 Feb 2018 08:29:56
What is Mike Greens value at the deadline?
Would this come close?

DET: 1st, 4th, Sustr, 3rd 2019 (if he resigns)
TBL: Green

Idk probaly even more at this years asking prices...

Agree2 Disagree10

09 Feb 2018 14:15:01
No one knows the value of anyone till the first rental or two get moved to set the bar. Teams can ask whatever they want, but till someone pays that price, it’s not his value.

09 Feb 2018 20:17:16
I would imagine this proposal would atleast get the redwings attention.

10 Feb 2018 09:06:23
Sustr, 2nd and 3rd should do it, I would be hesitant offering a 1st.

08 Feb 2018 23:41:59
Ott: Jeff skinner
4th
Car:Zach smith
Mike condon

Ottawa needs left wingers and someone who can put the puck in the net

Carolina needs goaltending help bad

It’s prerty good cap wise also.

Agree2 Disagree22

09 Feb 2018 00:55:06
Just no. how. Just how does this make any sense.

09 Feb 2018 01:22:59
jeff skinner > zach smith
condon > 4th (could prob get at least a 3rd)

if ottawa got this offer they should take this and run.

09 Feb 2018 01:30:21
jeeeeeeezzz. Yes please lol.

09 Feb 2018 01:51:23
So a 25 YO top line winger for a backup goalie and bottoms 6 player?

09 Feb 2018 03:06:22
Lol absolutely terrible for Carolina. Skinner scored 37 goals last year and is still only like 25 or 26. For a bottom 6 forward making too much money and a back up goalie.

09 Feb 2018 03:33:47
On what planet would Carolina accept that.

09 Feb 2018 11:26:12
Ottawa says heck yeah no trade backs lol.

09 Feb 2018 11:28:03
Smith doesn't make too much money. he's a very versatile player who can play any situation he's needed to however it would definitely take a lot more than him and Condon to land a player like Skinner.

09 Feb 2018 17:26:16
Smith has 3 years and 9.75 million left on his deal, condon is not worth a 3rd or even a 4th. I understand carolina needs goaltending desperately, but this trade does not rectify that situation one bit.

09 Feb 2018 19:55:53
Condon is a capable backup who has shown he can play extended time when needed. But he is no more ready to be a starter than darling was last year and we have seen how that’s worked so far. And I’m not hating on smith saying he makes too much, but for what he does, you can get guys as good and younger to do his job far cheaper than 3.25 for 3 more years.

09 Feb 2018 23:43:09
I like it.

08 Feb 2018 22:17:50
Skinner is now on the TSN top 40 trade bait list so here it goes

Col: Barrie

Car: Skinner

To me, the value is pretty fair even though Carolina doesn't need defenseman

Agree9 Disagree10

09 Feb 2018 00:57:53
Value is fair but makes no sense for Carolina but it would make sense to a team like Toronto

Colorado
Barrie
2nd round pick

Toronto
Jvr
Leivo
4th round pick.

09 Feb 2018 01:23:50
you explained why it's not believable in your post. value wise okay, but carolina doesn't need defensemen so why would they do this?

09 Feb 2018 01:30:52
yeah. i don't see a situation where they're trading for another Defence.

09 Feb 2018 01:58:55
I don't think they would want a D man back. They are looking pretty good on the back end and I would say they want pick prospect for forward depth.

09 Feb 2018 03:07:52
Not too bad value wise but Carolina doesn’t need D and they do need scoring. Doesn’t make a lot of sense.

09 Feb 2018 03:34:33
Value is there too bad Carolina has 0 reason to make this trade, as you said lol.

09 Feb 2018 05:55:39
Haha I like how somebody just only disagrees with my comments lol salty.

 


NHL Trade Rumors


NHL Trade Rumors 2


NHL Trade Rumors 3


NHL Trade Rumors 4


NHL Trade Rumors 5


NHL Trade Rumors 6


NHL Trade Rumors 7


NHL Trade Rumors 8


NHL Trade Rumors 9


 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass