NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

redwing1's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from: detroit


Favourite player: federov


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




redwing1's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To redwing1's Posts

 

 

To redwing1's last 5 rumours posts

 

To redwing1's last 5 talk posts

 

To redwing1's last 5 rumour replies

 

To redwing1's last 5 talk replies

 

redwing1's rumours posts with other poster's replies to redwing1's rumours posts

 

10 Dec 2018 19:31:10
Blues waive goaltender Chad Johnson.

call up young guy Jordan Binnington.

redwing1

1.) 10 Dec 2018 20:50:05
Johnson Arizona bound maybe?


2.) 10 Dec 2018 23:24:57
Robert bortuzzo also just beatbthe crap out of zach Sanford at practise, so maybe that, along with waiving a backup, will be the answer instead of trading from the core lol.


 

 

10 Dec 2018 03:01:45
Nylander liljgren 1st



Perron. Sundqvuist maroon

This shake up could help both teams. Not really sure how but figured I would save everyone here the bullsheet of a long made up reason. Lol.

redwing1

1.) 10 Dec 2018 03:33:21
I don’t know a lot about Sundqvist but the the leafs are stacked at center. Unless he’s a 4th line center in which the leafs would be giving up way too much for with a couple older players. Maroon would be a great addition to the leafs but not at that cost. Any trade including Nylander would be built around Parayko or Pietrangalo. What do you think would be fair for Parayko and Maroon? Nylander, Liljegren and a 1st is probably pretty close. I don’t think you’d agree though.


2.) 10 Dec 2018 03:47:23
Nylander liljgren 1st

Honestly for parayko and maroon. Is defiantly better than most offers. Maybee a conditional pick added depending on going to conference and Stanley cup finals.


3.) 10 Dec 2018 04:09:11
I guess it depends on what Maroon could fetch at the deadline. He would get a 1st for sure. I think Nylander and Liljegren gets Parayko. You’re probably right about a small add from the leafs depending on their playoff performance. I’m still not 100% sold on a playoff spot yet with how tough that division is this year. There’s not a lot of room for error.


4.) 10 Dec 2018 15:01:36
@Leafs17, redwing1
Are you kidding?
Liljgren and Nylander is way too much for Parayko, Dubas laughs and hangs up the Phone.
If St. Louis is getting Liljgren then the leafs get Kyrou and a pick. Nylander straight up for Parayko is equal value.


5.) 10 Dec 2018 15:53:13
No, A 20 goal scoring winger does not get you RHD Parayko straight up.


6.) 10 Dec 2018 15:56:55
You are high my friend. Move aling then no parayko or petro for you. Lol.


7.) 10 Dec 2018 17:28:01
Well then it’s an easy no from Toronto.


8.) 10 Dec 2018 18:23:46
Thanks now just do us all a favor and make sure you get the other leaf fans to stop asking for them. LOL good luck with that.


9.) 10 Dec 2018 18:38:59
Maroon at 2 Deadline Deals was Traded both times for a B Prospect and first time a 4th Round Pick and then a 3rd Round Pick when Edmonton traded him to NJ, no Team is giving the Blues a 1st Round Pick for Maroon #Leafs17.


10.) 10 Dec 2018 19:38:50
hey pnball was maroons cap hit 1.75 mil wich would be about .75mil or less at deadline. that's a lot of wiggle room to get another player.


 

 

06 Dec 2018 14:58:09
Parayko Kostin

for

Nylander Liljgren! st 2029

Or parayko, Blais 3rd
for
Kappy, Sandin, Liljgren 1st.

redwing1

1.) 06 Dec 2018 15:13:07
By 2029 we should be rebuilding again and my nephew will be draft eligible. Kid can really play! So I’ll say no from leafs.


2.) 06 Dec 2018 19:49:25
Parayko for kapanen, borgman, sandin and a 1st. No way does t. o. trade there 2 best d prospects.


3.) 06 Dec 2018 21:06:58
No way does blues trade their current best defenseman for Kappennan unless you over pay with d propsects. Its an esay answeer.


4.) 07 Dec 2018 00:22:53
Love how you speak so matter of factly Colt. Almost like you feel your part of any actual negotiations. No team gives up there 2 best dmen prospects in a single trade.


5.) 07 Dec 2018 04:48:07
And teams don't give up their best dmen for crap. If a trade doesn't meet teams needs then it's worth making the trade.


6.) 07 Dec 2018 10:54:35
Problem is, None of Kapanen, Sandin and a 1st are crap. They all carry a lot of value. Borgman, while nor being great can turn into a useful player. And your best dman is not Parayko, its Pietrangelo. Watched them both play for years, pietro is better than him. You overate Parayko. He is good, carries a lot of minutes but he is a 35 point dman 4 years running who is known for periodic defensive lapses. He is a real good top 4 dman.


7.) 07 Dec 2018 15:27:46
Do you know how to read. Current best Dman. Petro is injured be out for a month. Yes kap 40 50 pt guy, sandin,50/ 50 males it to mil, and liljgren top 4 potential. They are ok parts but you want a top pairing rhd Dman capable of pricing 35 40 pts and playing big minutes. For a bunch of smaller pieces. Hi about you do this

Mathews
For
Parayko, Thomas, 2ndrnd pick


I am not making that prop but showing you that a bunch of little pieces (in comparison of the player wanted) does not equal the player.

Quantity doesn't equal quality.

At this point blues are not trading parayko. Since nylander + isn't on the table then neither would parayko. Find a different Dman to go after with lesser pieces.


8.) 07 Dec 2018 17:16:07
I don't care what your comparasion is, you don't compare Parayko to Matthews. you're so biased its funny man. Get your head out of your a** come on, the BLues are playing like absolute horsesh**, don't start getting weezy and asking for Marner + Likjegren + god + gretzky + lemieux + babcock + seventeen firsts for Parayko. You had this crazed obsession with Parayko way before, don't being this up again.


9.) 07 Dec 2018 17:37:04
It was a funny trade proposal. but the funniest thing is a leaf fan calling someone else bias!


10.) 07 Dec 2018 17:52:23
What do you mean i didn't comare mathews to parayko. I compared the idea of smaller lesser pieces for a superior player. SO its ok to go after a teams (current) best top pairing dman you want and offer several lesser peices to add up to a whole. But If someone asks for Mathews and offers several Lesser Pieces to make a whole then its bullsheet and completely bias of that person.

Get The F*** outta here with that sheet. You sir are a hypocrite.


11.) 07 Dec 2018 17:57:28
I didn't ask for anything. I don't want to trade parayko. The blues defense with petro hurt can't handle it. Even with petro we can not replace him.

Its Hilarious how much you over react because you can't get parayko for crap. I laid it out there for you.

Marner>Parayko>>Nylander>> Kapp

you don't want to part Marner, Nylander then you will be paying a premium in top prospects to get him. In fair value and team needs here are the trades that are possible.

Parayko, Blais 3rd
for
Kapp, Lijgren, Sandin

Parayko Kostin Schmaltz/ Peronuvich
for
Kapp Liljgren Sandin! st

Parayko, Blais 3rd

Nylander Liljgren

If you don't like it then move on to another player. The blues do not and will not trade you parayko unless it benifits them now or in the near future.


12.) 07 Dec 2018 18:48:20
Again speaking as if you were the GM. And funnt how you stress current dman. As far as i know piwtrangelo, though injured is still property of the blues. If a Parayko trade does happen I think you will be a little down due the return you would get.


 

 

28 Nov 2018 04:08:58
Stl
Parayko, kostin, gunnerson, 2nd 2019

Tor
Nylander, sandin, lijgren.

redwing1

1.) 28 Nov 2018 04:53:14
Blues need to add to that Colt.


2.) 28 Nov 2018 06:35:03
Like schmaltz or walman?


3.) 28 Nov 2018 11:28:26
Doubt leafs move both just make it Nylander and Liligren for Paryanko and Kostin.


4.) 28 Nov 2018 15:14:09
Also looks like TOR is running out of time with Nylander. Once December 1st comes no team is going to be willing to part with a core piece if nylander can not play till next year. Also if his cap is above 6.5 mil he will lose trade value not much, but in the cap era overpayment is not a good thing.


5.) 28 Nov 2018 15:41:07
He won’t get past dec 1st and if he did, they just wouldn’t trade him till the draft.


6.) 28 Nov 2018 16:53:36
No something of actual value needs to be addedfrom blues. Like Kyrou or Thomas.


7.) 28 Nov 2018 16:55:47
YOu do realize That Parayko is not getting trade for Nylander 1 for 1. Let along our second best forward prospect that is the 3rd youngest player in the AHL currently Adjusting from Russsian style to American

If Blues trade Parayko for nylander it would inlucde Tor best defensive prospect which neither project to be a top pairing dman. So you throw both prospects in throw in blues second best forward prospect and a few adds. Gunnerson covers the cap and is gone next year.

Parayko Gunnerson Kostin 2nrnd pick 2019 (with Parayko gone will def be a 32-36 pick which is basically a late first in this draft)

for

Nylander (8mil which is overpayment) Sandin lhD, Lijgren Rhd

If tor doesn't like it then they need to go for trouba.


8.) 28 Nov 2018 18:11:59
Liljegren isn’t projected as top pairing? That’s news to me. Last I checked he is one of the highest rated RJD prospects in the world and is doing admirably well as one of the youngest players in AHL. He looks ready to make the big league sometime this year, possibly sharing duties with Hainsey between 1st and 3rd lines, and full time next year.


9.) 28 Nov 2018 18:16:07
Thats the price that is expected. If he is what you say hold onto him . We will keep parayko.


10.) 28 Nov 2018 18:22:48
Colt, are you willing to pay Nylander 8M a year?


11.) 28 Nov 2018 18:53:13
You can keep Parayko then.

Leafs are saturated at forward. So much so that they are dominating while missing 2/ 3 of their top line. We don’t need Kostin. We need defensive prospects/ players. Trading away a combined 24 + years of Nylander, Sandin, Liljegren for 4 years of Parayko, a possible top 9 forward prospect player, and a 2nd doesn’t seem like a fair trade to me.


12.) 28 Nov 2018 23:15:47
That's fine. Getting nylander at 8mil and 1 possible top4 d prospect no thanks. Need them both if your gutting my teasms defense. I could at maximum

Parayko kyrou jaybo 3rd

Nylander liljgren sandin.

You got other d prospects.


 

 

09 May 2018 17:57:03
Not sure of Mins needs but here we go.

STL- Barbashev, 2nd 2018

Min- Eric Staal.

redwing1

1.) 09 May 2018 23:44:34
Staal is old i'm not sure if i'd give up Barbasehev for him. Ya he's been great in the last 2 years but still for a 34 year old center to get a 20 year old venter and a center is a reach unless you're talking deadline wich is an steep but I guess ok pricr to pay. If Nash got a rubbish ton maybe its not out of the question.


2.) 10 May 2018 01:27:26
I think Minnesota can get more he’s scored 40 Goals last season and was a near PPG player on a great contrac.


3.) 15 May 2018 04:44:30
Ufa with a great season. 2nd round pick in super deep draft and a rfa center capable of playing 2/ 3c.


 

 

 

redwing1's talk posts with other poster's replies to redwing1's talk posts

 

19 Nov 2018 17:38:59
Honest Opinion.

Has oriely so far performed as a 1c this year for blues

on pace for 105pts 40 goals
62% faceoffs 21mins toi Runs the top line with blues has been a beast.

I get it everyone loves to mess with colt. Do me a favor honest assesments.

redwing1

1.) 19 Nov 2018 18:29:09
He's doing well yes!
Tough start for the Blues tho, I didn't see that coming.

I think both teams win the trade? What do you think.
Buffalo is off to a great start. Their trade for Skinner was a big win, bringing in Sheary was good, drafting Dahlin, middlestadt playing well, Reinhart also, And the guys they brought in for Oreilly are rounding out and they are playing well. Good moves by buffalo.


2.) 19 Nov 2018 18:33:11
As of right now the answer is 100% yes. But we are only 20 games in and I assume he will not keep up 105 point pace. but if he stays on top line with the amount of offensive looks he's getting 70 to 80 points is not out of the question and then that will still be 1st line production.


3.) 19 Nov 2018 21:35:22
I liked the move for both teams at the time.

ROR wouldn't fit in on BUF w Eichel, Mittelstadt, etc.

Sobotka and Berglund were contracts that stl needed to get out of, yet, Buffalo couldve used them as they lack depth.

Tage Thompson and the 1st is a heavy price, but ROR is a consistent 60 point guy and could be 70 this year. Worth for both imo.


4.) 19 Nov 2018 21:38:17
Hes deffenitley been one so far. I do feel he is overachieving offensively this season, however, I have always liked his game, and have thought of him in the same light as the Toews, Kopitar, Bergeron mould, 2 way star centermen. those guys are all number one guys.
Offense is up all over the league. its nice to see.


5.) 19 Nov 2018 21:39:58
With those numbers it’s really obvious he’s performing like A 1C. But as Habby says, it’s early. I think he will still have a career year, barring injury. I think part of his success is rejuvenation and getting some passion back. Constantly losing in Buffalo really sucked the fun out of the game for him and he expressed that. St Louis looks like a good fit.


 

 

08 Nov 2018 19:54:38
What do you think it would cost to get Brian Elliott From Phi

Conditions, No 2019 2nd no 2019 1st or 2nd. Must be willing to take salary back to offset his cost? Allen is available.

redwing1

1.) 08 Nov 2018 21:58:38
Elliott for Parayko.


2.) 08 Nov 2018 23:53:11
Maybe this

St Louis:Kyrou

Phi:Elliot.


3.) 09 Nov 2018 00:02:07
Taresanko for Elliot and 2nd.


4.) 09 Nov 2018 00:51:01
Elliot for Kyrou, Parayko and Thomas.


5.) 09 Nov 2018 12:33:22
Could maybe get Elliot for Nylander.


6.) 09 Nov 2018 15:26:08
wow as expected no real seriousness to my ask. Nothing changes here. Guess I need to up my game lol.


7.) 09 Nov 2018 17:14:39
Why would you want him Colt? I know Allen has struggled, but Elliot hasn't been all that great past few season either.


8.) 09 Nov 2018 18:37:35
Better than Allen, more of a positional goalie and I would like to have a tandem with him and johnson.


9.) 09 Nov 2018 18:59:51
Quite the age difference isn't there?
Can Blues afford to go after Bobrovsky in the offseason? Or any other potential free agents.
I don't see Elliot as the answer to the problems in STL.


10.) 10 Nov 2018 16:37:17
Blues will not pay him what he wants.


 

 

14 Mar 2018 11:34:51
Have a legit comparison question. I was perousing another site and saw some comen's I thought were completely wrong.

It was stated that darnell nurse was over all a better defenseman than colton parayko. I know I'm a bit bias but I just don't see it and advanced stats agree with me

With out being to vicious can I get whom you think and why.

redwing1

1.) 14 Mar 2018 15:15:04
Whoever suggested nurse is better is either a homer or just don't know hockey. It isn't even close ATM. I like nurse and he is improving but he's nowhere near parayko yet. maybe someday but not yet.


2.) 14 Mar 2018 21:12:02
Nurse better then Parayko? What? Nurse is maybe half the defensemen that Parayko is. Parayko is a Elite top 2 defensmen. Nurse is a solif top 4 D but if he's your best defensmen in your locker room your screwed. If Parayko is your best defesemen in your team (wich he is not rn because of Petro in St louis who I value just a notch over) they're can still be guys like Dumba, Klefbom, Ellis, Ekholm behind him. See what I mean? Petro and Parayko is a categorie over all those last guys that I put Nirse with in a year or two. Right now is games needs to improve drasticaly before even being serously considered better all arohnd then Parayko.


3.) 14 Mar 2018 22:37:50
Definitely parayko right now and I assume for a long time.


 

 

06 Feb 2018 23:34:45
Button just posted his top 50 nhl affiliated prospects.

i will post top 20
1) Elias Petterson C 19 Van
2) Eeli Tolvanen rw 18 NSH
3) Martin Necas C 19 Car
4) Cody Glass c/ rw 19 VGK
5) Casey Mittelstadt C 19 Buf
6) Robert Thomas C 18 STL
7)Ilya Sorokin G 22 NYI
8) Miro Heiskanen D 18 DAL
9) Igor Shesterkin G 22 NYR
10) Ilya Samsonov G 20 WAS
11) Cale Makar D 19 Col
12) Dylan Strome C 20 ARI
13) Lias Andersson W/ C 19 NYR
14)Kiril Kaprizov lw 20 MIN
15) Jordan Kyrou c/ rw 19 STL
16) Henrik Borgstrom C 18 FLA
17) Aleksei Heponiemi C 19 FLA
18) Juuso Valimaki D 19 CGY
19) Carter Hart G 19 PHI
20) Erik Brannstrom D 18 VGK


goo.gl/EXQgK

redwing1

1.) 07 Feb 2018 00:41:46
Yes but button is a moron. eventhough this isn't a hortible list there are at least 2 players there that shouldn't even be in the top 50. Make that at least 3.


2.) 07 Feb 2018 03:01:25
Alex Nylander? Timothy Lindergen?


3.) 07 Feb 2018 17:52:56
Juolevi play at better then Valimaki or Heiskanen at world juinors lol.


4.) 07 Feb 2018 23:19:15
There’s always room for debate on these lists. I would like to see liljegren on there too, but to be honest his stock really dropped during his draft year, he was picked 17th or whatever. Meaning 16 teams didn’t feel he was even the best prospect at each of their spots of his draft year, and this ranges from 18-22 year olds. I don’t feel button is wrong not having him in the top 20. I would assume he cracks the 50 though.


5.) 07 Feb 2018 23:22:14
@Habby, who are the obvious ones that shouldn’t be there? There’s a cpl that I’m not really familiar with but couldn’t say for sure they shouldn’t be there.


6.) 08 Feb 2018 01:20:13
Jim I might have been a bit harsh with my initial statement about them but some who are ranked way too high IMO are heiskenien heponiemi, borgstrom Lias andersdon, kaprizov and eric branstrom.


7.) 08 Feb 2018 04:40:55
Yeah, I don’t know much aboit heponiemi, Kaprizov or Borgstrom. But I’ve heard a lot of smart hockey people raving about brannstrom so I thought 20th is Atleast justifiable and Heiskanen was just a 3rd overall pick, playing in the top Swedish division, near point a game as a 18/ 19 years old Dman. Without knowing everyone, can’t say for sure he should be 8th, but I would think near the top of the list is fair.


8.) 08 Feb 2018 12:58:03
I can see heiskenien being around 12th to 15th and branstrom around 25th to 30th. Good prospects but there are a few guys who should be ahead of them.


9.) 09 Feb 2018 11:25:37
Kaprizov definitely deserves to be there he’s a beast.


10.) 10 Feb 2018 04:20:31
I liked kaprizov more this time last year.


 

 

29 Jan 2018 00:27:05
Just wanted to ask since I don't follow every team. Who are the top 10 - 15 prospects that have not played more than 10 nhl games.

redwing1

1.) 29 Jan 2018 05:01:21
I know you’re just fishing so that if anyone has the gall not to include kyrou, you can attack them and tell them he’s the next 50 goal man in the league. Expert panels make these lists every few months. Just look it up.


2.) 29 Jan 2018 06:13:00
Can you point me to a link. I can only seem to find prospect rankings for the upcoming draft. I was curious to prospects already drafted.


3.) 29 Jan 2018 10:11:35
All I can think of is Rasmus Dahlin, Elias petterson, Kyrou and andrei Svechnikov.


4.) 29 Jan 2018 13:33:49
That’s from a September 2017. So 4 months ago kyrou was ranked 50th. No doubt he’s got more hype since then and will have climbed the list, but he doesn’t jump 50 spots because he’s putting up huge numbers in junior. A quarter of the list is also younger than him.


5.) 29 Jan 2018 14:35:53
There was a link I posted ahead of that but I guess we aren’t allowed to put links. Anyway you can look up ‘the hockey writers top 100 prospects’ and then just look at the day to make sure it’s a recent one. Newest one I saw was September. I saw 4 blues including kyrou (50), Kostin (59) Thompson (75) and Thomas (81)

{Ed001's Note - The link is here top-100-prospects}


6.) 29 Jan 2018 19:47:50
😱😱😱. What do you mean Jim? Those 4 blues prospects weren't all in the top 10? Unbelievable.


7.) 29 Jan 2018 20:03:07
OK I will go look those up thanks.


8.) 29 Jan 2018 22:55:38
I remember reading that list. it is sad that MTL only has one prospect on a list of the top 100 and he is ranked 99th, lol.


9.) 30 Jan 2018 01:41:00
Yeah, shocking eh yup? Lol I figured they would be 1, 2, 5 and 7 or something. Okay, well that’s a lie, but anyone that doesn’t know anything except what they have read from redwing (colt) probably think that.


10.) 30 Jan 2018 10:46:15
Can we call these trolls out Ed? How many Colt’s can one site have? Let’s Be Real Now has the exact mannerism and beliefs as FairTrade4all. It’s one thing to be anonymous but that’s not good enough for some folks. I don’t get it. Post from one account, if people don’t like or agree with you, oh well.


11.) 30 Jan 2018 13:33:56
Let me be 100 percent clear to all. I am not nor have I ever been this colt fella, nor do I post from another account. I have not been disrespectful nor have I harassed anyone on this site. So please stop trying to say I'm one of these crazy people like colt65 or Rambo etc.


12.) 30 Jan 2018 15:43:45
We know you’re not colt65. you’re colt 55 lol the old colt that overvalued and defends his blues to the death, even using the exact wording, analogies and metaphors. I see similarities in some of the accounts and wonder, but come on lol.


13.) 30 Jan 2018 17:00:07
so what your saying is people have never used a metaphor or an analogy before. that's what you base this off of. Well you my friend have earned the sherlock award.


14.) 30 Jan 2018 17:25:54
Nobody said anything about being disrespectful, it’s just annoying that being anonymous is not good enough for some people. If you’re not one of the Colt’s, I apologize.


15.) 30 Jan 2018 17:59:10
Hey redwing, what did you think about that Shattenkirk trade? Did your Blues get what you were hoping.

And, how sad are you to see they traded the best set up man in the league to Philly?


16.) 30 Jan 2018 21:04:44
I never said no one else uses analogies. I use them on here all the time, so do others. I’m saying when you pick the same arguments as colt55 always did, and use the EXACT SAME wording of your analogies (duck a duck lol) and explanations, then I don’t have to be Sherlock to see it. And if you truly aren’t colt55, then you should look him up because somewhere out there is your soulmate that would finish your sentences lol.


 

 

 

redwing1's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Dec 2018 16:04:44
No who is parayko.

Blues once again ate not trading our best players for a bunch of lesser pieces.

redwing1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Dec 2018 16:03:10
I am glad one of the older posters sees this and is calling it out. Lol.

redwing1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Dec 2018 15:20:08
Are we talking about the blues no. so VBBBVVBB do your self a favor stick on topic.


Also Marner is not more valuable than tank and parayko.

redwing1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Dec 2018 15:18:56
yeah sorry but radulov is 32 that's 6 years older thank tarasenko. No thanks. This deal is crap. /.

redwing1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Dec 2018 14:29:50
Blues say no. Quantity doesn't equal quality. If nj, wants parayko think hall.

redwing1

 

 

 

redwing1's talk replies