NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

Flyers2893's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Flyers2893's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Flyers2893's Posts

 

 

To Flyers2893's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Flyers2893's last 5 rumour replies

 

Flyers2893's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Flyers2893's rumours posts

 

07 Jan 2018 04:47:06
PHI: Rubtsov

ARI: Duclair

Flyers2893

1.) 07 Jan 2018 22:57:00
No from Philly Duclair isn’t worth a 1st.


2.) 09 Jan 2018 18:45:04
Rubtsov didn't look very good at the world juniors, haven't seen him during the season but I'd do this if I was Philly. Hard to judge talent coming out of Arizona. Duclair could be a 30 goal scorer around the right people in a year or two for all we know.


 

 

28 Dec 2017 08:36:27
EDM: Hopkins, Puljujarvi

PHI: Simmonds, Raffl, Sanheim, Flyers 1st round pick, 2019 2nd round pick

OR

MTL: Galchenyuk, De La Rose

PHI: Simmonds, Morin

No logic to the deals or anything like that. Just curious about the value and value only. Just trying to learn how biased I really am. Am I completely off?

Flyers2893

1.) 28 Dec 2017 10:10:38
So Galchenyuk and De La Rose have more value than Hopkins and Pujuljarvi?


2.) 28 Dec 2017 13:55:01
@kingslover. The oilers are getting raffl, a 1st and 2nd to make up the difference, not saying I agree with his trades, but don’t see how this says the habs players have more value.

Oilers get Simmonds, a young D prospect, a depth forward and 2 high picks

Habs get Simmonds, and a young D prospect.


3.) 28 Dec 2017 16:54:44
@Kingslover don't know why'd you say that. Simmonds = Simmonds. Sanheim > Morin. Raffl, 1st and 2nd round pick > nothing.


4.) 28 Dec 2017 20:51:50
Mtl are not giving young Galchenyuk for oldSimmonds, dream on.


5.) 30 Dec 2017 02:49:33
I would take Simmonds anytime.


 

 

20 Dec 2017 06:06:12
I've been a fan of Kapanen for a while. Seems like he's getting a little blocked out by depth on the Leafs. Similar situation with Morin on the Flyers so how bout this deal

TOR: Kapanen

PHI: Morin and a 3rd round pick

Or if Philly doesn't wanna give up youth and Toronto would prefer right handed d-men

TOR: Kapanen

PHI: Gudas, 2nd round pick, 4th round pick, Laberge

I ain't going to deny it. I often lowball without noticing because I'm a biased fan so please tell me any changes I should make

Flyers2893

1.) 20 Dec 2017 14:43:23
If Morun would be traded it wouldn't be for Kapanen, it would be for a guy like Marner. I think you're valuing Kapanen a little high in both trades.


2.) 20 Dec 2017 14:44:51
First one isn’t bad, but I’d rather keep kapanen. Leafs have D prospects and also have 3 UFA forwards in bozak, JVR and komarov. More important to have kappy here to take one of those spots full time in October than add another Unproven D.

No desire for Gudas at all. He’s a weapon out there. We have Polak who plays hard and has the odd questionable hit, but stays on the right side of the line most of the time. Gudas just crosses the line by miles too often. Can’t respect a guy that doesn’t respect anyone else.


3.) 20 Dec 2017 16:39:49
Morin for marner?! I don’t think anyone makes that trade. John Ferguson Jr doesn’t even touch that one. Morin May just be taking some time to come into his own, but he’s not blowing anyone away in 4 years since being drafted. Marner has a 60 pt season under his belt before he’s 20, and on his way to another. Not even close. Leafs would trade marner in a package for A number one proven D, or maybe for a similar age guy with the potential to be a star like hanifin or something. But not for a project like Morin.


4.) 20 Dec 2017 18:23:49
I’d anything the first trade isn’t too bad.


5.) 21 Dec 2017 02:34:56
Marner for Morin and Provonov maybe lol but seriously Marner has Elite 80+ point potential and like Jim said he is already a proven 60+ point player who teams set game plans against. Meanwhile Morin is A. Older B. Lower potential and C. not even a current NHL player. There is a chance he won’t even make the nhl full time. Just a stupid comment.


6.) 21 Dec 2017 06:09:48
Nylander really? Looool


7.) 21 Dec 2017 16:36:05
Flamers, I’m pretty sure nylander was kidding with the Morin and provorov comment. But what he says after that makes sense. The original offer of kapanen and Morin isn’t bad, but saying marner for Morin is the equivalent of leafs saying kapanen for provorov.


8.) 22 Dec 2017 01:15:38
Ya but Marner doesn't seem like a player that can be a 80+ player. Especially if you're playing him on the fourth line


9.) 02 Jan 2018 19:05:15
Someone stated.

"First one isn’t bad, but I’d rather keep kapanen. Leafs have D prospects and also have 3 UFA forwards in bozak, JVR and komarov. More important to have kappy here to take one of those spots full time in October than add another Unproven D.

No desire for Gudas at all. He’s a weapon out there. We have Polak who plays hard and has the odd questionable hit, but stays on the right side of the line most of the time. Gudas just crosses the line by miles too often. Can’t respect a guy that doesn’t respect anyone else. "

Toronto has employed some of the dirtiest players to ever play the game, and were talking respect for others? that's some funny stuff there.


 

 

06 Nov 2017 18:23:59
After my failure of a trade proposal somebody mentioned a little switch that I thought didn't look bad. Would this work or still way off

PHI: Simmonds, STL 1st round pick

WPG: Trouba, 3rd round pick

Same reasons as before

Is Trouba's value pretty much normal a year after his little dilemma

Flyers2893

1.) 06 Nov 2017 19:14:59
Winnipeg doesn't need simmonds. They want a left hand defencemen


2.) 06 Nov 2017 21:02:10
Nope. As I said the Jets won't be able to afford Simmonds after this contract is up and don't really need any wingers.


3.) 06 Nov 2017 21:08:48
Super young Simmonds that Winnypeg absolutely needs!


4.) 06 Nov 2017 23:18:39
Nope. Jets still won't be able to fit Simmonds' contract in when it is up and they don't really need more wingers.


 

 

06 Nov 2017 14:40:29
I look at what just went down with the Duchene trade and I look back at last years Hanzal trade. Two similar cases the Flyers have contract wise are Simmonds and Filppula. While age is a factor Simmonds is on a better contract than Duchene and isn't asking for a trade. Filppula is actually playing really good on pace to be better than Hanzal was. So basing off of history I've proposed these two deals

PHI Receives: Trouba, 1st round pick

WPG Receives: Simmonds, 3rd round pick

Philadelphia does this because Simmonds is a free agent in two years and will have to earn big money. With all the younger guys they'll have to pay, his contract might hurt them. They also only have one right handed d-man prospect and one right handed d-man on the team right now

Winnipeg does this because who knows how Trouba will be when it comes to an extensions after last time. Also, they are pretty stacked at defense and I see Simmonds fitting in their middle 6 easily

Trade 2

PHI Receives: 2nd round pick

LAK or CBJ Receives: Filppula 50% retained

Philly does for the sole purpose of getting something for a player I doubt they'll bring back. If he keeps producing the way he is either they might not want to trade him or he can possibly get more but I thought a second round pick was reasonable. Or is it too high? TBH I don't even know

LA or CBJ do it for pretty much the same reason. They both have a good goalie with a decent defense and should be looking to do good in the playoffs. LA might need him more with Carter injured but both teams add some center depth

Thoughts? Am I way off here?

Flyers2893

1.) 06 Nov 2017 16:20:36
Switch the picks in the first trade. Defenseman have way more value than wingers.


2.) 06 Nov 2017 16:27:03
Yeah, you are waaaaay off. No, way two years of Simmonds gets you Trouba. Simmonds is a good player, but the Jets would be in the same position in two years having to pay him when they can't afford him. Not to mention a middle 6 player isn't going to get you a young 1-2D.


3.) 06 Nov 2017 18:11:09
I agree the first trade doesn’t work for jets, but I wouldn’t call Simmons a middle six player. 28, 29, 31, 32 goals over last 4 seasons. That’s a top line forward on almost any team, but I would accept top 6. But not middle six. Not a 2nd-3rd liner.


4.) 06 Nov 2017 18:15:20
Btw, what was Trouba's value when there were trade rumors about him.


5.) 07 Nov 2017 01:54:49
Probably should have thought of that Hall for Larsson trade before posting. Guess this was a swing and a miss. How bout the second trade though?


 

 

 

Flyers2893 has no Talk Posts

 

 

Flyers2893's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Jan 2018 23:47:05
I like these trades way too much so I'm going to assume they are all in favour of the Flyers.

Flyers2893

 

 

Click To View This Thread

28 Dec 2017 16:54:44
@Kingslover don't know why'd you say that. Simmonds = Simmonds. Sanheim > Morin. Raffl, 1st and 2nd round pick > nothing.

Flyers2893

 

 

Click To View This Thread

28 Dec 2017 08:13:44
No from Arizona. Don't know why'd they'd give up the best chance at the first overall pick for 1 year of Brassard, 2 years of Hoffman and White. It isn't like they are trying to win now. Not to mention they give up a young player in Domi and the earliest second round pick. got to think about the long run. Domi, and whoever the first round pick is should be there 7-10+ years each. Not guaranteed to resign the two Sens players. White is good but not worth giving up a potential franchise player. Also it's weird from Ottawa giving up part of the future to get the future. Makes more sense trading veterans individually.

Flyers2893

 

 

Click To View This Thread

07 Nov 2017 01:54:49
Probably should have thought of that Hall for Larsson trade before posting. Guess this was a swing and a miss. How bout the second trade though?

Flyers2893

 

 

Click To View This Thread

06 Nov 2017 18:15:20
Btw, what was Trouba's value when there were trade rumors about him.

Flyers2893

 

 

 

Flyers2893 has no Talk Replies