NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


AO99's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



AO99's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To AO99's Posts



To AO99's last 5 rumours posts


To AO99's last 5 talk posts


To AO99's last 5 rumour replies


To AO99's last 5 talk replies


AO99's rumours posts with other poster's replies to AO99's rumours posts


25 Jul 2018 07:25:30
How far of the possibility is this?

Tor: Nylander (rfa right now)

CLB: Panarin (UFA next year)

All signs point towards Nylander being worth 6-7 million a year and Panarin has said he wants to play for a bigger market so maybe he’d be willing to sign with the leafs next summer at a 7x7 deal. Columbus gets a younger player that has potential to play center and get 70+ points and Toronto gets a proven ppg winger that helps with the win now mentality as if think he’s the better player but not for as long as Nylander.


1.) 25 Jul 2018 15:32:38
If panarin was signing for Nylanders money then sure lol but I don’t see that happeneing at all and it would be dumb to trade 5 controllable years of Nylander to upgrade from a 65, Maybe 70 pt winger to an 75-85 pt winger for 1 season.

2.) 25 Jul 2018 16:35:57
If it was a sign and trade Columbus would need to add a piece like Ryan Murray because Nylander is 5 years younger and will probably be better then Panairan in the future but the reality is the leafs can’t afford him he’ll sign for Benn money on the open Market.

3.) 25 Jul 2018 17:51:07
Panarin getting minimum 8.5mil for his contract imo.

4.) 25 Jul 2018 18:30:23
Mcjesus is dead on. If ehlers is 6 mill + and kucherov is 9.5, panarin has to be able to get 8-8.5. Only thing that hurts him a bit is pasta signing long term at 6.6 is a comparable a team will try to use for sure.

5.) 25 Jul 2018 23:19:54
Toronto would have to add for that trade to work.



05 Jul 2018 00:38:05
Tor: Nylander

Van: Tanev, Goldobin

How much is missing to making this go through?


1.) 05 Jul 2018 02:29:30
a lot.

2.) 05 Jul 2018 02:32:51
Add canucks first

3.) 05 Jul 2018 03:22:43
You're missing a lot, As usual.
Sooo one sided to Canuks wow.

4.) 05 Jul 2018 11:40:45
This is equiv to

Petterson for Gardiner+Bracco.

Stop. Please. Nylander gets traded for a young dman with potential (similar age), or doesn't get traded at all. Not for Defensive Lupul and a prospect whos having a hard time making the Canucks.

5.) 06 Jul 2018 11:03:41
No way nylander gets you 2 players. Toronto adds.

6.) 07 Jul 2018 10:20:45
There are fans from multiple teams saying Vancouver adds Balsam. Your comments on every leaf post are redundant.

7.) 10 Jul 2018 16:39:16
If lead fans can read... WHAT NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO MAKE THIS GO THROUGH... the post doesn't say nylander for tanev and goldy...

Man... all the people that jumped to conclusions no have no credability... aka can't read.



23 Jun 2018 19:02:07
EDM: 10th overall, Yamamoto

VAN: Tanev

Remember it’s divisional rival so value has to be ot more from Edmonton’s side and if they think Larsson is worth hall then surely Tanev is worth this. Also no roster players get moved so Edmonton can keep all their good roster players and take on a very reasonable 4.5 million in cap for tjere top pairing defenseman.


1.) 23 Jun 2018 19:52:12
Why not throw in mcdavid too.? When did tanev become a franchise dman I must have slept through that.

2.) 23 Jun 2018 21:21:26
Wtf hahaa seriously where does Tanev get all this value it blows my mind.

3.) 24 Jun 2018 07:57:43
Tanevs a good top 4 Dman with a good cap hit. If the leafs traded our 25th overall and maybe a small add off the marlies for him, I’d be happy. You want oilers to pay a promising prospect and a 10th overall?! Hahaha.

4.) 24 Jun 2018 17:31:50
Jim tbh I wouldn't really consider him a good top 4 at this point he's one of the softest dmen in the league but is still always Injured. The only thing good about his contract is there are only 2 years left lol. leafs were better off with there pick then trading him for tanev. People still think his value is high but it's only cause he is a righty if he played left side nobody would bring his name up good bottom pair IMO when he actually plays.

5.) 24 Jun 2018 19:31:07
Yeah, well a decent RHD is still worth a late first when you see asking prices. I would be okay if they paid that price is all I mean. Like when Hamonic got a mid first rounder, and 2 seconds, I would assume a late first and a mid prospect is still what Tanev could get to a desperate team.



21 Jun 2018 00:08:27
TBL: Raddysh, Foote, girardi and a 2018 2nd round pick

Van: Tanev.


1.) 21 Jun 2018 04:40:34
Rumour is Tampa offered Koekkoek/ Dotchin and a pick so. Foote wasnt on the table for Karlsson so won't be for Tanev. Girardi has 1 year left so not worth trading top prospects to dump and has a NTC. 2 of their top prospects and top pick left this year for an all D no O Dman with injury issues? Just don't see it.

2.) 21 Jun 2018 06:07:37
I agree with jbs

3.) 21 Jun 2018 07:20:47
Whoa way way to much from Tampa and for Tanev? No way.

4.) 21 Jun 2018 09:21:17
Lol Foote alone would be too much, jesus christ.

5.) 22 Jun 2018 18:02:19
I think it's too much. MAYBE Foote for tanev. That being said can ramp afford a 4.45 million dollar contract? I think kuvherov contract will be up soon...he will demand HUGE money.



19 Jun 2018 22:23:37
MTL: 3rd overall

VAN: 7th overall, Ben Hutton

MTL is strongly rumoured to be taking kotkaniemi or even veleno at 3rd cause they desperately need a center so why not trade down so they don’t go off the board and pick up maybe a bottom 6 or even possibly a top 4 dman that needs a change of scenery and canucks potentially draft Zadina who would help their lw Depth.


1.) 20 Jun 2018 01:26:10
I've never heard one rumor suggesting they will take veleno at 3rd and I've read a lot of rumors. and ben hutton doesn't move you up 4 spots, probably not even 1 spot tbh.

2.) 20 Jun 2018 02:04:40
They can get a better if they are moving down that far

3.) 20 Jun 2018 02:43:07
EVEN tho Habs want to draft Kotkaniemi, there will prob be a bidding war for 3, and its going to cost more than a #5 dman.

4.) 21 Jun 2018 04:35:28
Have have a lot of great defence...I don't see it.




AO99's talk posts with other poster's replies to AO99's talk posts


05 Jul 2018 11:06:02
Alright leafs fans, what do you realistically expect to get back if they were going to trade Nylander

I’d say guys like doughty, Subban, Josi, OEL, Hamilton, mcavoy, Sergachev, burns, Fowler, Karlsson, Hedman, letang, klingerb, suter, byfuglein, Werenski, Provorov, Pietrangelo McDonagh, Giordano Ellis, Carlson and Barrie are all way out of his value, now maybe a guy like Demers, Tanev, Larsson, Klefbom, Dumba, Leddy, Myers, Ekholm, shattenkirk and Weber are all at his alum or just a very small kinda like a 3rd round pick away from it working out.

But I’m interest in seeing what the leafs fans have to say and try to keep in unbiased cause no he’s not worth Erik Karlsson.


1.) 05 Jul 2018 11:45:21
Ooie let's see, Letang, McD and Barrie don't belong in that first group at all. Nylander could get any of them tbh.


And stop with your Tanev nonsense, apart from Demers, he's by far the worst of that group and we aren't trading an elite potential winger for an oft injured #3 dman.

Imo, what i’d see for Nylander is a player like:
- josh manson
- dougie hamilton (prior to the trade; with an add from TO)
- shea theodore (unlikely, but w a small add from TO)
- slavvin/ pesce from Carolina

Not Tanev. Not Tanev. Not Demers🤣🤣🤣.

2.) 05 Jul 2018 12:14:45
I’m not sure who he could get straight up, probably a name top shelf mentioned. I’d like to see a 1st and maybe a prospect added to get the best return possible, if they were trading him.

3.) 05 Jul 2018 15:47:14
When you put Tyson Barrie in the same group as drew doughty I know it’s a joke already. I’d say both teams should be happy with a swap of Nylander or barrie though. Nylander may be a better player at his peak than barrie, but there’s still a bigger question mark around him than barrie. barrie is what he is. A good puck mover.

4.) 05 Jul 2018 16:23:48
@Topshelf don’t think the canes trade Slavin. I wouldn’t trade him for Nylander if I were canes. Maybe Marner but the leafs wouldn’t.

@UnbiasedJim don’t think the leafs are looking for a puck mover more of a Physical Defensive presence who can take a shot off the 1st PP ( not nessiarly quarterback) and can be a presance on the PK.

@A099 you’re obviously super petty the leafs put together a good team and Nylanders a big piece this post destroyed your credibility to just about anyone. Nylander=Demers?
Barrie>Nylander I’m done talking to you.

@everyone else Nylander is 20 and already a first line winger. When he’s in his prime imo he’ll have similar value to Kessel. But because he’s so young and already debatably Elite he has tremendous value.

One for one value I’d say Paryanko but Saint Louis isn’t in position to trade him for Nylander.

Maybe something around Orlov.

I think McAvoi, Sergachev, Fowler, Letang, Byfugliegn, McDonagh, Gio, Ellis, Carlson and Barrie. Don’t really have anymore value then Nylander.

5.) 06 Jul 2018 11:08:47
@jim I put Barrie on the first group cause he just came off a 57 point season and to what it’s worth he is a rhd that is going to turn 27 in a couple weeks and is about to enter his prime, that will not come cheap plus he had a a very reasonable cap hit so that adds a bit of value

Also I added demers because he is a guy that can do very well in a top 4 playing good defense and can score over 20 points, he’s got a over 51% CF% and he starts about 55% of his shifts in the defensive zone and that’s what the leafs need, a better defensive player, their offends is as good as anyone but their defense isn’t and for the people that don’t want Tanev cause he can barely stay healthy, this guy has played over 60 games in the all of the past 4 seasons while having an 81 games played aswell,

Lastly I said straight up for Nylander, not close and small adds just his value straight up for someone else and for whatever reason being a right shot dman adds value.

6.) 06 Jul 2018 16:08:29
Very hard to find an exact straight up value.

Also, I’m not putting down Barrie. I’m a fan. But having him in a group with those others is hilarious, especially when your reasoning is “57 pts, only 27 and 5.5 mill” Jake Gardiner just had 52 pts, almost exactly 1 year older and only makes 4 mill. I like Jake too. But if someone tried putting him in a ‘group’ of Dmen with doughty, Josi, Karlsson, hedman, burns etc they would be absolutely roasted and rightfully so lol give that head a shake.



23 Jun 2018 08:16:28
Who had a better steal? Detroit getting Zadina with the 6th or veleno with the 30th or canucks with Hughes at 7th or the islanders with Wahlstrom or Dobson at 11th and 12th?


1.) 23 Jun 2018 11:52:44
Wahlstrom at 11th or Zandina at 6th. Veleno is incredibly overrated I’ve played with him ( not at the Q level ) and I believe he’s extremely overrated and did not deserve exceptional status.

2.) 23 Jun 2018 12:03:39
Zadina at 6th.
Though NYI cleaned up nice too.
I don’t understand how Hughes is considered a “steal” considering that’s right in the area he was predicted to go.

3.) 23 Jun 2018 15:01:56
Of the players you mentioned only veleno dropped enough from where they were expected to be considered a steal. I think you will see a couple steals in the 2nd round. Noel marchenko Wilde and mcissac come to mind.

4.) 23 Jun 2018 17:28:48
I agree with McIssac.

5.) 23 Jun 2018 19:09:28
My surprising picks were Arizona and NYR in the top ten. Even Van woth Boquist. Pushing the guy I wanted Bouchard to 10 and Walstrom and Dobson to NYI at 11/ 12. Those two being pushed outside the top ten surprised me the most and what a good two picks ups for the Islanders. Wow.

6.) 23 Jun 2018 19:50:27
There were a few suprise picks but I wouldn't call them steals.



20 Jun 2018 10:08:00
Is it just me or does Dobson seem like a bad pick within the top 8 as they’re are more players which higher ceilings than him that may potentially be picked after him? For example Wahlstrom, Boqvist and Hughes even.


1.) 20 Jun 2018 16:51:14
1st overall is the only given in this draft. the rest could go in any order dobson could go anywhere from 4th to 10th imo.

2.) 20 Jun 2018 22:21:00
Yeah I wouldn't put much thought into any draft rankings. I say Dahlin 100% at 1st obviously and Svechnikov about 95% at 2nd. After that all I know is that Colt65 will have half of the top 10 on his biggest busts of all time list by christmas if they don’t have 20 goals.

3.) 20 Jun 2018 23:48:35
I think Montreal would be crazy not to take Zadina even tho their need is at Center. i'd say draft the best player available and try to work a trade for a Center need or look to free agency.

My order would be



4.) 23 Jun 2018 19:02:38
I hope Bouchard drops to 10 spot for Edm. I think anything can happen now between 2-10 spots. Any players can be picked by any team there.



20 Jun 2018 10:05:19
Hinge ottowa has the 4th pick this year and that could potential Zadina, would it be better to just give it up and start the rebuild this year rather than wait a year and potentially lose Karlsson and Duchene for less than market value or even nothing at all.


1.) 20 Jun 2018 16:53:59
So lose for hughes in other words? That's a tough one but I think you have to draft the sure thing this year. if you still wanna trade karlson and duchene go for it and maybe even what you get back can contribute and help the team finish better then 4th last.

2.) 20 Jun 2018 21:51:26
I would draft the best possible at that point and then try to finish as best you can this year so your first round going to COL isn't too high.

3.) 23 Jun 2018 19:03:53
Next year is the Jack Hugh's draft. There's talk Ottawa should give Colorado this years pick especially if they are trading away more players like Karlsson. They will be terrible next year and lots of people say they should keep their pick next year not give Colorado this years instead. Which now makes that Duchene trade look even worse.



16 Jun 2018 22:25:57
If Domi can get Galchenyuk, what can sven baertschi get in return?


1.) 16 Jun 2018 22:56:00
Domi shouldn't of got galchenyuk lol so don't try and think baertshi gets much because of that trade

2.) 17 Jun 2018 23:35:48
Like a mid second round pick.
Oilers should offer their second rounder for him, as they need help on the wings.




AO99's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

30 Jul 2018 23:38:30
Value is there but blues have no reason to trade Parayko when their forward core included ROR, Tarasenko, Schwartz, steen, Bozak, Schenn and have guys like kyrou and Thompson ready to make the jump to the NHL. Like i said value is there but the motivation or need isn’t there.




Click To View This Thread

25 Jul 2018 04:53:28
SAN Jose doesn’t have a 2019 first it’ll have to be a 2020 first and Columbus i don’t think would want to wait for a 2020 pick as they have a squad that could compete now so it’ll require a roster player or prospects that’s ready to make the jump.




Click To View This Thread

19 Jul 2018 20:02:07
Canucks say no by a lot.




Click To View This Thread

03 Jul 2018 12:56:46
Add a first rounder from Toronto and take out Goldobin and it’s fair.




Click To View This Thread

26 Jun 2018 11:17:26
Why would Carolina give one of the most coveted rhd available on the market and take back one of the worst contracts in the league?





AO99's talk replies