NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


AO99's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



AO99's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To AO99's Posts



To AO99's last 5 rumours posts


To AO99's last 5 talk posts


To AO99's last 5 rumour replies


To AO99's last 5 talk replies


AO99's rumours posts with other poster's replies to AO99's rumours posts


23 Apr 2018 04:20:53
Col: two 2nd round picks

NYI: Varlamov


Col: Markstrom

Van: Timmins.


1.) 23 Apr 2018 05:48:37
If sven can't get you timmins i doubt markstrom will lmao.

2.) 23 Apr 2018 08:04:04
Hahahaha. Colorado laughs at the Vancouver one.

3.) 23 Apr 2018 11:10:41
Timmons won’t be traded for anything short of a gross overpayment.



23 Feb 2018 20:36:46
Van: Edler

Pit: Sprong, Hagelin, 2nd round pick.


1.) 23 Feb 2018 21:55:10
Bruh like what.

2.) 23 Feb 2018 23:31:13
Edler makes 4.5 and Pittsburgh can’t afford that and they have been known to want to dump Hagelin for cal reasons so that makes it work.

3.) 24 Feb 2018 06:20:37
Haglin make 4.2 mill a season lol.



22 Feb 2018 09:04:29
NSH: Dante Fabbro

Tor: JVR.


1.) 22 Feb 2018 13:11:11
Straight up I'd say it's lost for a top line rental. Idk Fabbri is look at highly so hard to say.



15 Feb 2018 04:51:24
Just a thought how far would a straight up swap as a base be for this?

ARZ: Domi

Van: Beartschi.


1.) 15 Feb 2018 13:07:58
Ahah add Juolevi.

2.) 15 Feb 2018 16:12:34
I think Van would need to add a pick to even this out.

3.) 15 Feb 2018 19:56:02
Add somthing but not juolevi.

4.) 15 Feb 2018 20:46:56
Canucks laugh and hang up. Baertschi is already more than what Domi currently is. Arz would have to add to put this through and I doubt they’d do that.



14 Feb 2018 17:13:53
LAK: Clague

Van: Vanek.


1.) 14 Feb 2018 23:03:26
Lol A099. Not getting Clague for Vanek. As you are not getting Heiskanan for Tanev.




AO99's talk posts with other poster's replies to AO99's talk posts


20 Apr 2018 01:58:36
Is it possible that Ben Hutton could fetch a second round pick in this or next years draft and what could teams be willing to pay to get a Brandon sutter?


1.) 20 Apr 2018 04:32:58
I can't see a 2nd for Hutton. yes he's young. however, I don't see a lot of upside from him. I think on a lot of teams he's a 5th or 6th Dman. or in the minors.
As for Sutter. he may fetch a 2nd.

2.) 20 Apr 2018 13:08:16
Suter may fetch a second? What? What did my eyes just see. After seing: "Sutter is worth at least 2 second rd pick" the pther day I just figured it was just Brocks / Ao99 being biased but after you a very knowledgeable hockey persona i'm wondering. Does Sutter has any skills that i'm not aware of? Or are you just influenced by Brock comments.

3.) 20 Apr 2018 15:50:38
Imo Sutter would have to be combine with a warm body to have any value.

4.) 20 Apr 2018 22:58:21
Suter is a cap dump without salary retention.

5.) 21 Apr 2018 01:51:50
Sutter is good at killing pks and has some leadership abilities that gms may like and he’s not too bad at faceoffs but I don’t see a spot for him as a center for 5e canucks next year or the year after as he’s being paid almost 4.5million and there seems to be some good center prospects coming up that would push him back to 4th line which would be a waste for him. I think on a really string team he’d be good as a 3c but he’s just overpaid.

6.) 21 Apr 2018 03:37:36
Sutter a good player heys over payed he's geting 4.35 mill canuck would have to retain 1.35 i think to make him attractive to othere teams i like the oiler use him his better player then boyle and they would be getting payed the same.

7.) 21 Apr 2018 06:09:09
Brock, man, The Oilers don't need Sutter, get that through your Head. Wow.

8.) 21 Apr 2018 07:52:12
Yea your right they got strome as a 3 line center real solid.

9.) 21 Apr 2018 09:02:31
Strome: 82GP. 34P. $2.5M. RFA.
Sutter. 61GP. 26P. $4.375M. 3 more years. NTC.

Lol. I'd rather Strome right now thanks.

10.) 21 Apr 2018 17:40:46
Ok so they get about the same amount of points the like i said canuck retain 1.375 sutter a much better at pk and faceoff and can play again other people top lines strome can't also he was play with mcdavid for part of the year what boosted up his stats.

11.) 22 Apr 2018 13:35:16
Sutter is a plus 8 and sutter plays the most pk on the canucks strome -4.

12.) 22 Apr 2018 23:25:36
Lol @yup
Brock is the new MontrealFinest except for the Canucks.

Sutter sucks. If you want us to take Sutter you can take Lucic without any retained salary.

Or give us Thatcher Demko.

13.) 23 Apr 2018 04:20:23
Oiler gm would jump all of him for a 2 rd pick if canucks retain 1.375 lmao.

14.) 23 Apr 2018 08:13:19
Brock. Your an idiot. Why would they bring a third or fourth line center in for $3M when they have hose positions already filler and don't have a need for Sutter. They would rather spend that money on something they need. Please get a clue.



03 Apr 2018 01:32:11
Sedins =14 million, jokinen = 1.1 million, cap going up 5 million minimum. So Canucks have roughly 20 million in cap space going into next season so question is, what are the odds we sign Tavares cause cap space they have plus what honestly looks like a better prospect pool and future than the islanders have.


1.) 03 Apr 2018 06:12:09
I don't see Tavares interested in the Canuks.
Of course the Canuks should be interested in him. But the real question is, would Tavares himself consider signing there. It is his choose after all.
Just cause the Canuks are clearly able to sign him doesn't mean he's interested at all.
I don't see him signing in Vancouver myself.

2.) 03 Apr 2018 13:09:40
Vancouver has half an NHL team and a slightly above average prospect pool that is a few years away. I know they have the money and should try but they're in the same situation Tavares has been in his whole life i think he wants to go somewhere that's guarenteed to compete.

3.) 03 Apr 2018 14:08:39
If Vancouver gets Dahlin I could see it.

4.) 03 Apr 2018 21:56:34
They have a cpl really good prospects, but not an extremely deep system. They should definitely try for him, but I don’t see Canucks being the type of situation he leaves NYI for. He could stay where he already lives and likes it and wait 3-4 years for The isles top prospects to be ready to compete rather than go to Vancouver and do the same thing. I think he wants an established team. The worst team I could see him going to is buffalo because he grew up halfway between there and Toronto, has family connections in buffalo already and they have a Eichel, Reinhart, Nylander, middlestadt, risto. A lot further along than other teams although they have been disappointing. Add Tavares and consosten goaltending and they would be a lot better team.

5.) 05 Apr 2018 23:48:36
Well elias petterson is the best prospect in the nhl and probably well win the calder next year and also sam gagner grow up toghther and there best friends and they work out toghther in the off season so he might come even with the sedins gone they have a lot of depth i think they got to trade a winger for a dman

Goldobin lipsic gagner virtanen erikson sven boeser petterson archabold gaunce one of zadina/
svechnikov/ Tkachuk.

6.) 06 Apr 2018 00:58:36

7.) 06 Apr 2018 01:22:04
Whats so funny?

8.) 06 Apr 2018 07:20:32
You. You're hilarious.



12 Mar 2018 22:04:54
Quick question. Why can’t offsides be as simple as if any part of your body is over the line before the puck then it’s offside. It’s a simple as that in soccer and I think it works brilliant. Of course some linesman make a bad call but the rule is clear and everyone can accept it.


1.) 12 Mar 2018 22:45:06
I personally find the offside rule in soccer to be one of the most unnecessarily complicated rules in sports lol it’s as subjective, if not more subjective than hockey.

2.) 12 Mar 2018 23:51:31
I feel like the rule where a players skate has to be in the ice for it to be onside is a bit ridiculous. Shouldn’t be challengable. It is so abused and just wastes time off the clock when they challenge for offside. I think it should be when both skates break the vertical plane it is offside.

3.) 13 Mar 2018 03:08:09
Sorry how is the soccer rule complicated? Either a part of your body is infront of the last man back or he’s not, it’s pretty simple. I’d like hockey to take an approach like that where if any part of your body is over the blue linen before the puck then it’s offside. No stupid skate exception or any bs like that.

4.) 13 Mar 2018 11:50:34
So then reversely if any part of the puck hits the blue line in the offensive zone is it cleared and offside if played? Hockey has been a sport where the whole of an object has to cross the line. Whole puck for goals/ offside etc. Makes sense it would remain consistent that way. The skate on/ off ice thing is stupid though doesn't make much difference so shouldn't impact offsides.

5.) 13 Mar 2018 17:59:39
Well soccers rule is when a pass is made, then they look at the plane of offside. That’s why I said it’s unnecessarily complicated. The rule isn’t bad the way it is. It’s the challenge being used far beyond what it was implemented to do. It was brought in because Duchene scores a goal while being 12 feet offside. It was not intended for coaches and fans to complain about a quarter inch when a linesman has to make that call at full speed, from ice level while avoiding being run over by 220 lb players. Obviously the coaches will use it to the letter of the law to gain advantage, but the rule isn’t that complicated.



23 Feb 2018 05:48:27
Grabner got a 2nd and a decent prospect and Vatrano got a 3rd. So realistically what would Vanek fetch because I would think he’s a lot better than Vatrano but he’s not better than Grabner so what can he fetch?


1.) 23 Feb 2018 11:29:03
A third and something. Probably.

2.) 23 Feb 2018 13:39:12
Well some Canuks fans on here think he will get a 1st +.
Probably gets a 2nd or 3rd+. Prospect.

3.) 23 Feb 2018 20:53:00
I thought Grabner would atleast get a first.



22 Feb 2018 00:07:42
Honesty I don’t get the whole issue with Tampa trading for Karlsson without an extension in place. First of all you get him for 2 full playoff runs and second. Steve ****ing YZERMAN will handle his contract. Remember Steve saying he won’t sign stamkos for more than 8.5 and he kept his word, Yzerman is a genius of a man and I think he’ll match hedmans contract and Karlsson will accept for 2 reasons. 1, tax rate is lower in Florida and 2, he’s good friends with Hedman and lastly he wants to win and he knows he’ll be on the best team in hockey for aslong as he wants.


1.) 22 Feb 2018 01:12:28
steve yzerman or at least his scouting staff has done a tremendous job. but with regards to player signings he is at a huge advantage with the very low tax in florida. 8.5mil in tampa is the equivalent of 9.8 in montreal or Toronto.

2.) 22 Feb 2018 03:34:19
Nobody will argue tax rate helps. But 9.8 was still lower than most would have thought Stamkos and Hedman would go far and if that's their salary equivalent in Toronto Yzerman still did a hell of a job.

3.) 22 Feb 2018 05:27:36
At the time it would have been high not so much now.

4.) 22 Feb 2018 05:53:38
8.5 was equivalent to almost 11 mill in Toronto. Canada being federal income tax and california have the highest state income rate at over 13% were in the worst negotiating position. And add in cost of living and provincial taxes on top of it and ontario is by far worst bang for your buck.

5.) 22 Feb 2018 06:12:48
Actually Jim Quebec has the highest tax.

6.) 22 Feb 2018 07:30:25
To bad there wasn't some way to figure this tax crap out, so there is true parity in the league.

7.) 22 Feb 2018 14:05:20
At the time people thought Stammer would get 12+ following Toews and Kane 10.5 deals. Different teams have different advantages. Some are closer to homes of more players. Some have legacy. Some have weather. Some don't have taxes. Only way to even the playing field would be a blind bid system where the player doesn't know what team submitted what offer. I don't think that's a good idea. But i don't think that the no tax in Florida has that much more impact than Montreal/ Toronto legacy and closeness to family players will take cuts for that stuff.

8.) 22 Feb 2018 16:43:23
It's a huge advantage jbs.

9.) 22 Feb 2018 20:19:14
Nice try JBS. I don’t think anyone cared about the legacy in my lifetime. All of a sudden it is ok to play in Toronto. The weather hasn’t changed and there’s always been a crap load of players from the gta. I think they go to win and make the most $.




AO99's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

18 Apr 2018 09:58:16
Not enough value from Toronto to get anywhere near Tanev, plus Sutter in a good team is a 3rd liner or a really good 4th liner and at only 3.5 million he has enough value to fetch atleast 2 2nd round picks considering cap hit, contract length and age. So I’d say No bug time from Vancouver, maybe add Liljegren or Dermott.




Click To View This Thread

04 Apr 2018 00:39:57
Honestly even if the Sedins stayed wed have don’t **** cap room that keeping loui doesn’t hurt them all. He’s the most expensive contract and it’s still only 6 million so they are fine.




Click To View This Thread

24 Mar 2018 07:34:12
Mittlestadt wouldn’t get you Horvat alone and last year at the 2017 NHL draft. Dallas was offering the 3rd overall pick for Tanev so Tanev and beartschi for a top 5 pick is definitely realistic. If you break it down really Vancouver declines or Buffalo adds something.




Click To View This Thread

09 Mar 2018 00:27:43
Also Lucic has 5 ears left while loui has 4 and Edmonton is already a cap team so goodluck with that contract.




Click To View This Thread

09 Mar 2018 00:26:45
TSN also said Lucic isn’t built for today’s game with speed and skill. Atleast loui can kill penalties and keep up with his speed in today’s game and he Atleast can get a few good stretches or games. Also Canucks don’t have any bug name players contract coming up anytime soon other than Boeser so his contract doesn’t even affect the Canucks all that much.





AO99's talk replies