NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


VanCity's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



VanCity's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To VanCity's Posts



To VanCity's last 5 rumours posts


To VanCity's last 5 talk posts


To VanCity's last 5 rumour replies


To VanCity's last 5 talk replies


VanCity's rumours posts with other poster's replies to VanCity's rumours posts


28 Dec 2017 21:19:37
Toronto: Hornqvist and 2018 first.

Pittsburgh: Bozak (50%) and Komarov.


1.) 29 Dec 2017 04:02:24
Hornqvist > bozak, and komarov is definitely not worth a first, even if its a late one.



04 Nov 2017 14:46:34
Since Montreal wants to trade Price. How about he comes back home to B. C. Vancouver trades Markstrom, Boeser and a 1st for Price.


1.) 04 Nov 2017 15:18:58
Vancouver has Demko almost ready to go, so they will have an elite goalie soon anyway. No from Van but not because of the value.

2.) 04 Nov 2017 15:19:21
Lol are you serious
You don't have any player that has Price value or not even more than the half of his value
Wanna trade your best player for 20 pucks?

3.) 04 Nov 2017 17:53:22
Demko is a lottery ticket, not a guaranteed elite goalie. Remember Justin pogge for the leafs? Rated #1 goalie prospect in the world. or jack Campbell, top 10 or 12 pick and supposed to be Dallas star goalie.? And many more stories like that. Until the kid is consistently playing in the nhl and putting up great numbers, he’s a lottery ticket. Being a good NCAA goalie or a good AHL goalie is not reason for a team to pass on a carry price lol.

4.) 04 Nov 2017 20:57:24
Can I have horvat?

5.) 04 Nov 2017 22:22:57
This is ridiculous my goodness wtf.

6.) 05 Nov 2017 00:57:38
What do you mean with Horvat? Make a counter offer. If you want Horvat for Price, 1 for 1. Sure I think the Canucks will do that. I would.

7.) 05 Nov 2017 09:25:15
You can have Andersen. We'll add Bozak and Marner for Price.



13 May 2017 13:26:37
What if Vancouver trades the forth round pick they got from San Jose to Dallas for Nieme or Lehtonen and Dallas third. Vancouver can then tank and try to rebuild through the draft.


1.) 13 May 2017 16:08:53
Dont think Canucks are going to have to try and "tank" to get good draft picks for the next while.



23 Apr 2017 01:33:39
Toronto: 2017 2nd round pick and Kerby Rychel

Vancouver: Erik Gudbranson

I really think this trade works for both teams. Toronto gets a top 4 penalty killing defenseman. Vancouver gets a young winger with size and physicality and another draft pick.


1.) 23 Apr 2017 05:06:17
This is interesting but I'm not sure Gudbranson is the solution to Toronto's D-problems. Toronto also got Rychel for the purpose of going towards rebuild. So I don't think they want to trade their young forwards like Rychel yet.

Value wise, I think it's close. Maybe a 3rd instead of 2nd.

2.) 23 Apr 2017 14:33:39
Leafs need a better defenceman than Erik Gudbranson.
Your value is fine for this trade, but if the Leafs wanna be serious contenders next year they'll need at least one more really good top 4 d-man. Gudbranson kinda just a number 4 d-man. Nothing more nothing less.

3.) 24 Apr 2017 15:47:59
Good trade, Toronto barely gave up any valuable assets and they bring in a guy that can fill out the top six, while helpping out Van. Toronto can't just fix all their problems with one move, there have to be tiny pieces as well.



02 Feb 2017 01:47:57
Hanifin for Duchene straight up!


1.) 02 Feb 2017 02:28:50
Avs add 1st rounder + Zadarovsky

2.) 02 Feb 2017 04:34:25
Boris you should actually just change your name to biggest troll so it's easier for people to know




VanCity's talk posts with other poster's replies to VanCity's talk posts


04 Mar 2018 03:28:47
The all white uniforms by Toronto are terrible!


1.) 04 Mar 2018 04:00:07
The uniforms aren’t as terrible as they have played lol cool spectacle but outdoor games are always crap hockey. I like the point of making them like the naval uniform, but blue pants may have been better. Just tried making them different than the last 2 outdoor games I guess.

2.) 04 Mar 2018 05:15:45
Yeah the outdoor thing is getting a little over played.

3.) 04 Mar 2018 06:17:39
They should have done a winter classic on New Years every year and that’s it. Then it would still be a big deal and feel special. Instead, I forgot they even had this game till 10 days ago looking ahead at the schedule. Only positive of them is that the revenue is massive and that’s what helps the salary cap rise. 20 outdoor games over the last 5 years probably gave each team an additional $7-8 mill in cap space.

4.) 04 Mar 2018 13:36:45
They are trying to grow the game with these games. Have whole weekend festivities. Sometimes alumni games. Sometimes AHL games day after. Concerts. While weekend of hockey festivities trying to gain more fans with this experience. That's the idea behind so many. Just like going to China and Europe for games. Just trying to expand their product to more people.

5.) 04 Mar 2018 21:59:57
@yup. I agree that’s the point, but I just mean for guys like us, already fans, it’s really lost it’s appeal and uniqueness, that’s all. When they only did the winter classic, and the heritage classic I guess, it was really cool. But when there's 4-5 a season it just doesn’t have the same feel.



03 Mar 2018 16:14:50
Is Drouin the biggest bust of the 2013 draft?


1.) 03 Mar 2018 16:45:44
No shinkurak is lol.

2.) 03 Mar 2018 16:45:59
Or morin or poirer.

3.) 03 Mar 2018 16:47:58
Or rychel or lazar or nichuskin or klimchuk.

4.) 03 Mar 2018 17:01:09
Lol no.

5.) 04 Mar 2018 10:23:30
No but it does look bad when an undersized middling 2nd line winger is sandwiched inbetween players like MacKinnon, Barkov, Jones, Monahan and even Lindholm to an extent.

6.) 04 Mar 2018 10:28:42
No obviously right now he would be ranked number 3. I still think in a couple of years he could be a 70 points even 80 points player. He's proven enough that we know he'll be an impact player in the league but not enough to be the 3 best player of that draft. i'd say in a redraft he still goes top 5.

7.) 04 Mar 2018 15:06:22
But steve yzerman is such a genius how did he ever waste a draft pick on a bust like drouin?

8.) 04 Mar 2018 22:25:54
I’d say in a draft re-rank it’s still mackinnon at 1, then drouin, Michael mccarron, zach fucale, Jacob de la rose, Sven andrighetto, with barkov, Jones and monahan close behind.

Probably close, right Habby?

9.) 04 Mar 2018 22:32:55
Why is mackinnon still at first?

10.) 04 Mar 2018 22:34:53
I was thinking gauthier would go first in a re draft right biased jim?

11.) 05 Mar 2018 03:49:00
Nope gauthier is an AHLer, maybe a fourth liner eventually but probably too slow to play for Babcock. because you know, the games get faster and harder come April. Let’s do a re rank of the 2005 draft tho. you would have price in the 5th round instead of 5th overall because he’s worse than your AHL goalies, right? Idiot.

12.) 05 Mar 2018 03:54:30
I look at who I would trade one for one when I do these things. You always skip around the fact that you think pacioretty is nearly untouchable, he’s like a god to you, and yet like a redraft, who would trade their best player one for one for him?!?! No one in the league. He’s not the best player on any team except Montreal and on a lot of teams he’s not even the 4th or 5th best player. Ppl are allowed to look and notice that and say it. It doesn’t make them biased. It makes them realists. I’m not going to lost every player on every team that’s better than him, but you look at rosters and find a team he’s the best player on. Can’t do it.

13.) 05 Mar 2018 05:07:29
Jim pacioretty isn't a god to me. Have I once argued with you over whether or not he's better then any teams top player? no that's just another nonsense remark by you to try and make me look wrong. I have argued with you on whether or not he's better the some other teams 4th or 5th best player. My last argument with you was how saad was more physical then pacioretty. Remember how you didn't anwser that one I guess you just realized how stupid it was to say that considering it's so easy to look up stats which prove different.

14.) 05 Mar 2018 05:23:10
But please go ahead and say how saad went to the front of the net 4 more times this year or how he spends 30 seconds more in the corner digging for pucks over the course of a season. jim unlike you when I'm comparing players I look at how they have played over there careers not just how they play for 3/ 4 of a season. i mean marner played a nice chunk of this year as a bottom 6.doesnt mean he's bad he was just struggling for awhile . In the case of patch vs saad both have sucked this year. I know saad is younger and signed for longer term but the argument wasn't who will be better in 4 years it was who is better now and based on previous seasons and even this year I think it's pretty obvious.

15.) 05 Mar 2018 13:24:30
Actually it was a trade proposal. So it would be who you would want on your team going forward. Not who is better today. When it’s a trade proposal I look at for the duration of their contracts obviously. And you argued that patches with a year left was better to have than saad who is like 4 years younger, signed longer and has championships to his name. You’re switching what it was now. It was a trade proposal, remember?

16.) 05 Mar 2018 13:27:55
You can go to the top of the page, press ‘NHL Trade Rumors’ and scroll down to see it was a trade proposal of saad for patches. And habs fans saying Chicago has to add to ‘dump’ saads salary haha.

17.) 05 Mar 2018 16:55:09
When it came down to what you and I were arguing about it was over who's better or that's how I took it. Either way where is all the data supporting your main argument of how saad is better cause he is more physical? I've asked 3 tines for this now.



16 Feb 2018 22:35:00
Just wondering why Edmonton didn't pick up Sosh from Toronto. I believe he was a penalty killer for them. Edmonton could use help there and he would add some speed to a slow line up. A 4th round pick is not that big price to pay for a guy that may play in your bottom 6.




18 Nov 2017 01:21:48
Do you think there is a deal with RNH and Nylander? I think Edmonton would have to add because I don't see them keeping salary. That 6 million a year is tough to trade.


1.) 18 Nov 2017 02:47:54
Nuge still has value and could be traded. he just wouldn't get back what say yup might think.

2.) 18 Nov 2017 03:40:10
Ugh oh. Nylander has more value right now than Nuge. And Toronto doesn't need another center like Nuge. Toronto laughs.

If you're talking about Buffalos Nylander, no thanks from Edm.

3.) 18 Nov 2017 04:58:40
No i was thinking Toronto's Nylander. He could play right wing, then Driasaitl could move to centre. Right now if you shut down that line you can beat the oilers. They need to spread out their scoring. I think Driasaitl can carry a line. At least they are paying to carry a line. RNH can replace Bozak in Toronto. It just that 6 million price tag that hurts. I don't know how Toronto would fit it in with still paying part of Kessel's contract.

4.) 18 Nov 2017 09:18:33
Why in the world would the leafs do that.

5.) 18 Nov 2017 16:43:47
Habby, I have never said what I think Nuge will bring back.
In fact, I've said all along that if Nuge gets traded, it's for cap reasons and I don't think Edm will win the deal.
Nice little idiotic jab at me tho, You're clueless
Now he's having a great start, hopefully keeps it up. And maybe a team would now want to give up more than a Strome type of value for him. Maybe.
I'm not delusional,

6.) 18 Nov 2017 21:29:13
Don't get offensive yup . There has been plenty worst idiotic jabs on here.

7.) 19 Nov 2017 02:29:59
I literally hadn't even comment on this thread and you took a jab at me. A complete wrong jab too, When I have never once said what Nuge value is just that if he gets traded that the Oilers probably won't win the trade because cap reasons. So that's kinda saying his value is low.
So your jab is completely idiotic man. So stupid.

8.) 19 Nov 2017 00:13:00
No deal to be made LMAO.

9.) 19 Nov 2017 13:40:51
Yup as your ex Friend lol I'll be honest with you man. Ya you never said that specifically but you say so many things that don't have they're place at the time or situation ( if you want example just ask I have about 20 of them ready to go) that I would understand why Gabby would say something like that even when you havnt even comented the thtead. Just a little more they're bud.

10.) 20 Nov 2017 06:00:00
You don't even know what you're talking about half the time Showers. You're sober one day then hammered the next five. You have zero input on anything. Lol.
You have more ups and downs than a woman with bipolar. mostly always down and drunk.



27 Jul 2017 02:53:48
Shoot I hit send. Anyway my question is should have Calgary have drafted Nylander over Bennett?


1.) 27 Jul 2017 14:44:55
Well clearly they should have lol Nylander is and will be a much better player Ehlers/ Nylander. At the time no Bennet was hyped to be Marner esc.

2.) 27 Jul 2017 20:59:16
Yeah, Bennett was hyped in his draft year to become a player that is younger than him. You read something new on here every day.

3.) 27 Jul 2017 22:30:34
I still to this day laugh at dumb fuk Doug McLean who said Bennett was WAY better than Driasitl and the Oilers made a mistake there.

4.) 28 Jul 2017 11:23:56
Bennett, Virtanen and DalColle = 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻.

5.) 28 Jul 2017 19:41:49
Nylander looks like he's going to be a Real game breaker and Bennett could be good middle six forward so today I would say yes for sure. But they're still so young. Anything can happen with these kids to change their career path. But I'd rather the risk/ reward of hitting a homerun with Nylander.

6.) 28 Jul 2017 20:08:01
Great insight VB like wow.

7.) 28 Jul 2017 20:12:51
Okay sorry Patrick Kane esc I did not mean that in the draft they compared him to Marner. I'm just saying they were hyped similarly and both went fourth overall. He was compared to Kane at the draft. They both were.

8.) 28 Jul 2017 21:18:02
Ok, this "esc" is annoying. It's "-esque". There, you learned something.

And no, Bennett was never thought of as being nearly that good.




VanCity's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

10 Mar 2018 02:15:42
This is not a year to trade the first overall. Maybe if Karlsson is involved they will listen.




Click To View This Thread

10 Mar 2018 02:13:20
I don't think it would be a good idea to give Kane that long of a contract.




Click To View This Thread

03 Mar 2018 16:02:46
Montreal should ask for McDavid! This is just plain cr@p. Remember Bergervin is your GM.




Click To View This Thread

19 Feb 2018 00:20:17
Faulk and Kruger for JVR, Carrick and a 2nd. How does that sound?




Click To View This Thread

24 Jan 2018 05:16:37
I know I'm in the minority but I don't think the leafs are a cup contender. They are a couple years away. They are still learning how to win. They are having a tougher time this year because they are not playing back up goalies and teams are not taking them lightly. I'm surprised they have been holding a playoff spot all year. Playing in a crappy division helps but I'll give them credit. You don't pick which division you play in.
I would trade UFA's and continue building through the draft. They are still a couple pieces away. If you trade Nylander you are just creating a hole upfront.
That being said Toronto loves trading young players for over the hill players.





VanCity's talk replies