NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


VanCity's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



VanCity's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To VanCity's Posts



To VanCity's last 5 rumours posts


To VanCity's last 5 talk posts


To VanCity's last 5 rumour replies


To VanCity's last 5 talk replies


VanCity's rumours posts with other poster's replies to VanCity's rumours posts


28 Dec 2017 21:19:37
Toronto: Hornqvist and 2018 first.

Pittsburgh: Bozak (50%) and Komarov.


1.) 29 Dec 2017 04:02:24
Hornqvist > bozak, and komarov is definitely not worth a first, even if its a late one.



04 Nov 2017 14:46:34
Since Montreal wants to trade Price. How about he comes back home to B. C. Vancouver trades Markstrom, Boeser and a 1st for Price.


1.) 04 Nov 2017 15:18:58
Vancouver has Demko almost ready to go, so they will have an elite goalie soon anyway. No from Van but not because of the value.

2.) 04 Nov 2017 15:19:21
Lol are you serious
You don't have any player that has Price value or not even more than the half of his value
Wanna trade your best player for 20 pucks?

3.) 04 Nov 2017 17:53:22
Demko is a lottery ticket, not a guaranteed elite goalie. Remember Justin pogge for the leafs? Rated #1 goalie prospect in the world. or jack Campbell, top 10 or 12 pick and supposed to be Dallas star goalie.? And many more stories like that. Until the kid is consistently playing in the nhl and putting up great numbers, he’s a lottery ticket. Being a good NCAA goalie or a good AHL goalie is not reason for a team to pass on a carry price lol.

4.) 04 Nov 2017 20:57:24
Can I have horvat?

5.) 04 Nov 2017 22:22:57
This is ridiculous my goodness wtf.

6.) 05 Nov 2017 00:57:38
What do you mean with Horvat? Make a counter offer. If you want Horvat for Price, 1 for 1. Sure I think the Canucks will do that. I would.

7.) 05 Nov 2017 09:25:15
You can have Andersen. We'll add Bozak and Marner for Price.



13 May 2017 13:26:37
What if Vancouver trades the forth round pick they got from San Jose to Dallas for Nieme or Lehtonen and Dallas third. Vancouver can then tank and try to rebuild through the draft.


1.) 13 May 2017 16:08:53
Dont think Canucks are going to have to try and "tank" to get good draft picks for the next while.



23 Apr 2017 01:33:39
Toronto: 2017 2nd round pick and Kerby Rychel

Vancouver: Erik Gudbranson

I really think this trade works for both teams. Toronto gets a top 4 penalty killing defenseman. Vancouver gets a young winger with size and physicality and another draft pick.


1.) 23 Apr 2017 05:06:17
This is interesting but I'm not sure Gudbranson is the solution to Toronto's D-problems. Toronto also got Rychel for the purpose of going towards rebuild. So I don't think they want to trade their young forwards like Rychel yet.

Value wise, I think it's close. Maybe a 3rd instead of 2nd.

2.) 23 Apr 2017 14:33:39
Leafs need a better defenceman than Erik Gudbranson.
Your value is fine for this trade, but if the Leafs wanna be serious contenders next year they'll need at least one more really good top 4 d-man. Gudbranson kinda just a number 4 d-man. Nothing more nothing less.

3.) 24 Apr 2017 15:47:59
Good trade, Toronto barely gave up any valuable assets and they bring in a guy that can fill out the top six, while helpping out Van. Toronto can't just fix all their problems with one move, there have to be tiny pieces as well.



02 Feb 2017 01:47:57
Hanifin for Duchene straight up!


1.) 02 Feb 2017 02:28:50
Avs add 1st rounder + Zadarovsky

2.) 02 Feb 2017 04:34:25
Boris you should actually just change your name to biggest troll so it's easier for people to know




VanCity's talk posts with other poster's replies to VanCity's talk posts


18 Nov 2017 01:21:48
Do you think there is a deal with RNH and Nylander? I think Edmonton would have to add because I don't see them keeping salary. That 6 million a year is tough to trade.


1.) 18 Nov 2017 02:47:54
Nuge still has value and could be traded. he just wouldn't get back what say yup might think.

2.) 18 Nov 2017 03:40:10
Ugh oh. Nylander has more value right now than Nuge. And Toronto doesn't need another center like Nuge. Toronto laughs.

If you're talking about Buffalos Nylander, no thanks from Edm.

3.) 18 Nov 2017 04:58:40
No i was thinking Toronto's Nylander. He could play right wing, then Driasaitl could move to centre. Right now if you shut down that line you can beat the oilers. They need to spread out their scoring. I think Driasaitl can carry a line. At least they are paying to carry a line. RNH can replace Bozak in Toronto. It just that 6 million price tag that hurts. I don't know how Toronto would fit it in with still paying part of Kessel's contract.

4.) 18 Nov 2017 09:18:33
Why in the world would the leafs do that.

5.) 18 Nov 2017 16:43:47
Habby, I have never said what I think Nuge will bring back.
In fact, I've said all along that if Nuge gets traded, it's for cap reasons and I don't think Edm will win the deal.
Nice little idiotic jab at me tho, You're clueless
Now he's having a great start, hopefully keeps it up. And maybe a team would now want to give up more than a Strome type of value for him. Maybe.
I'm not delusional,

6.) 18 Nov 2017 21:29:13
Don't get offensive yup . There has been plenty worst idiotic jabs on here.

7.) 19 Nov 2017 02:29:59
I literally hadn't even comment on this thread and you took a jab at me. A complete wrong jab too, When I have never once said what Nuge value is just that if he gets traded that the Oilers probably won't win the trade because cap reasons. So that's kinda saying his value is low.
So your jab is completely idiotic man. So stupid.

8.) 19 Nov 2017 00:13:00
No deal to be made LMAO.

9.) 19 Nov 2017 13:40:51
Yup as your ex Friend lol I'll be honest with you man. Ya you never said that specifically but you say so many things that don't have they're place at the time or situation ( if you want example just ask I have about 20 of them ready to go) that I would understand why Gabby would say something like that even when you havnt even comented the thtead. Just a little more they're bud.

10.) 20 Nov 2017 06:00:00
You don't even know what you're talking about half the time Showers. You're sober one day then hammered the next five. You have zero input on anything. Lol.
You have more ups and downs than a woman with bipolar. mostly always down and drunk.



27 Jul 2017 02:53:48
Shoot I hit send. Anyway my question is should have Calgary have drafted Nylander over Bennett?


1.) 27 Jul 2017 14:44:55
Well clearly they should have lol Nylander is and will be a much better player Ehlers/ Nylander. At the time no Bennet was hyped to be Marner esc.

2.) 27 Jul 2017 20:59:16
Yeah, Bennett was hyped in his draft year to become a player that is younger than him. You read something new on here every day.

3.) 27 Jul 2017 22:30:34
I still to this day laugh at dumb fuk Doug McLean who said Bennett was WAY better than Driasitl and the Oilers made a mistake there.

4.) 28 Jul 2017 11:23:56
Bennett, Virtanen and DalColle = πŸ‘ŽπŸ»πŸ‘ŽπŸ»πŸ‘ŽπŸ».

5.) 28 Jul 2017 19:41:49
Nylander looks like he's going to be a Real game breaker and Bennett could be good middle six forward so today I would say yes for sure. But they're still so young. Anything can happen with these kids to change their career path. But I'd rather the risk/ reward of hitting a homerun with Nylander.

6.) 28 Jul 2017 20:08:01
Great insight VB like wow.

7.) 28 Jul 2017 20:12:51
Okay sorry Patrick Kane esc I did not mean that in the draft they compared him to Marner. I'm just saying they were hyped similarly and both went fourth overall. He was compared to Kane at the draft. They both were.

8.) 28 Jul 2017 21:18:02
Ok, this "esc" is annoying. It's "-esque". There, you learned something.

And no, Bennett was never thought of as being nearly that good.



27 Jul 2017 02:51:07
As a lot of Canucks fans are telling me that we should have drafted Nylander over Virtanen. ( I was happy with the Virtanen pick and still hold out hope that he will become the power forward I hoped for when they drafted him) That brought me to all the teams that passed on Nylander. He was picked at #8, so at least a couple teams missed on him. (I still think it's still a bit too early to call players misses yet) This question is mainly for flames fans but I expect a lot of people to chim.


1.) 27 Jul 2017 13:35:14
During a draft its really hard to know who is going to be the better player. Virtanen had a really good Jr career with the Hitmen, and at the time, he may have fit the needs the Canucks were looking for. I still beleive the kid can turn it around. I probably woulda made the same choice back then, however now that I've seen Nylander, I can't beleive he didn't get picked sooner. he's a super talented kid. wouldn't suprise me at all if he is the Leafs point leader, while Mathews is the goals leader.

2.) 28 Jul 2017 06:32:20
I think it might be time to show Bergevin the door.

3.) 28 Jul 2017 20:09:49
At the time, the Nucks almost had to go with the local boy if you believed in his upside (which they did and I still personally do) of course right now looks like we shoulda went Nylander but it's so easy to speculate after the fact.



20 Feb 2017 01:21:10
This year sucked for trades. Hopefully deadline day has some action.


1.) 20 Feb 2017 12:38:52
The countdown is on.

2.) 20 Feb 2017 14:21:56
Other than deadline, think the inseason big deals are a thing of the past. Although the cap has made parity in the league, its kinda killed the exciting trades.
Even deadline day is getting a little stale.

3.) 20 Feb 2017 19:41:30
Mainly because of the expansion draft and the salary cap and big contracts now a days. There's Timor the salary cap might be staying pat for next year so that will affect how some teams we're going to look at moves at deadline and off season. Also a weak draft plays into trading away and trading for draft picks.

4.) 21 Feb 2017 15:07:35
Chyka and Burke heard your request!



25 Jan 2017 00:16:38
I love the Ottawa trade! To have Wingels and Dzingel on the same team is awesome!


1.) 25 Jan 2017 03:49:39
Someone's a little over excited.

2.) 25 Jan 2017 12:42:58
I mean they pretty much got him for nothing (Stortini lol) but Wingels isn't going to make Much of an impact. Nice bottem 6, PKer. Need those depth guys to win championships.




VanCity's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2018 03:34:14
I heard that GM's don't want to trade for Duclair because he is hard to coach.




Click To View This Thread

04 Jan 2018 05:32:09
The problem is Gudbranson is a UFA. So he's a rental and he hasn't played particularly well. He has been dealing with injuries too. If Vancouver can get Rychel and a 2nd. I would take that deal. Maybe you could add a clause where they get anothe 2nd if he signs.




Click To View This Thread

04 Jan 2018 03:50:42
If Montreal gets a 1st and a prospect for Patches they should take it. I doubt any team will give up a roster player. If they do it will not be a young defender.




Click To View This Thread

22 Dec 2017 01:59:17
Centres have more value.




Click To View This Thread

20 Dec 2017 13:47:47
That's called collusion and is against the CBA. It is also illegal.





VanCity's talk replies