Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts
Renidrag's Profile
Renidrag's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Renidrag's Posts
To Renidrag's last 5 rumours posts
To Renidrag's last 5 banter posts
To Renidrag's last 5 rumour replies
Renidrag's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Renidrag's rumours posts
20 Nov 2023 22:53:36
Calgary trades Hanifin and Vladar to Leafs for Nylander and Minten.
Leafs get a quality defenseman and a decent young goalie, both of which are badly needed.
Flames get Calgary born Nylander and and a prospect
1.) 20 Nov 2023 23:47:33
Fair exchange of value, and the leafs definitely need help on D and in the net. Treliving obviously knows what Hanifin and Vladar can bring too.
However, if CGY is going to tear it down (as they should) they’re probably not as keen on a pending UFA like Nylander.
Perhaps this trade proposal could form the basis to bring a 3rd team in who could give CGY more of what they need: picks and prospects. (i. e. Hanifin would look great in a lot of places, and NJ has the ability to make this work. ?)
2.) 21 Nov 2023 01:02:34
Lol the leafs aren’t moving there franchise player who surpassed Mathews for a fringe number 4 dman and a backup goalie who’d be lost on waivers immediately.
3.) 21 Nov 2023 11:32:20
They’ll sign Nylander. I hate the leafs but he’s insane.
4.) 21 Nov 2023 14:31:12
@vbbbbbbbbm
Then I guess the Leafs should either sign Nylander to a 12 million dollar deal, or move Matthews.
Maybe they could try move Marner, but that would be a lot of retention and Tavares isn't going anywhere.
Welcome to the team that refuses to address defense and goaltending, so they can have 4 forwards making about 55% of cap.
5.) 21 Nov 2023 18:00:00
VB. Hanifin #2 d on leafs defence core. I agree not worth Nylander.
6.) 21 Nov 2023 23:19:48
Is he number 2 on the leafs? Probably is. It’d be between him or Brodie who’s quietly been having a great season Hanfin would be the better 2 way guy but Brodie is better in his own end. But on the last few cup teams he’d be number 4
Tampa- Hedman, McDonagh, Serg
Colorado- Towes, Makar, Byram
Vegas- Theodore, Pietrangelo, McNabb ( unreal in his own end )
I actually think he’d be the number #7 dman on Carolina assuming DeAngelo stays for the PP.
08 Oct 2023 14:46:17
Canu ks claim Brayden Pachal or Daniil Miroshenko off waivers from Vegas
16 Aug 2023 15:13:33
Canucks trade Boeser, Brisebois and a 7th rounder(25), to Montreal for Armia, Barron and a 4th(24),
Habs get some much needed offensive, as well as a useful depth depth defenseman.
Canucks get a useful bottom 6 player with some size, plus a young right shot defenseman.
1.) 16 Aug 2023 17:04:45
- the exchange of value is fair, but I'm not sure the fit is right for MTL.
- I personally wouldn't give up Barron, since I really like the kid's game, progression, and size.
- Brisebois is a LD, and MTL is loaded the left side. (Matheson, Guhle, Xehkaj, Harris, and Norlinder. )
- Boeser is a worthy piece, but is only 2 years away from unrestricted free agency, and therefore isn't the right age for a rebuilding team.
2.) 17 Aug 2023 17:05:13
Have to agree with Chicken on this one, I lean more towards Barron's potential than his progression. But there has been some growth in his game.
19 Jul 2023 17:26:34
Canadiens trade Joel Armia and 1 of 2024 3rd round picks
Canucks trade Conor Garland.
1.) 19 Jul 2023 23:14:10
I can see reasons why each team would pass.
- Garland is more productive, but has 3 years left at 1.5M more per season.
- Armia, though less productive, is less expensive, and is off the books organically in 2 years.
- I think a more likely scenario is that Armia, who is a big body guy who played a steady role in the MTL run to the Finals, gets traded at the deadline for an unspectacular return provided MTL retains 1M+.
2.) 22 Jul 2023 04:03:25
Personally rather keep Armia than have Garland.
3.) 24 Jul 2023 21:27:46
Armia I've heard buyout talk. I think vancouver would like to clear garlands whole contract without taking back another one they can't afford.
17 Jul 2023 00:44:47
Rangers trade Bar lay Goodrow and a 4th round pick to Canucks for Brock Boeser. Canucks retain 1 million on Boeser.
Rangers get a shooter for their PP, Canucks get a player that can help kill penalties and provides some grit.
1.) 17 Jul 2023 13:29:29
I REALLY like Goodrow, but this trade just isn't even close.
On a decent team, and given that Boeser is a year away from his statistical prime, Boeser is close to being a 30-goal scorer.
Goals aren't everything, but Goodrow's high was 13 goals, and that was 2 seasons ago.
Goodrow is a big body who looks great in playoff battles, and he's much more defensively reliable than Boeser. But he and a 4th just don't move the needle in getting a player like Boeser.
2.) 19 Jul 2023 13:25:54
@Chickenfoot
If Boeser could get anything moe/ better than what was proposed, that would be a bonus for Canucks. He is a slow, non-physical, one-dimensional and soft player, that is in Abundance with the Canucks.
A player like Goodrow would be a welcome addition in Vancouver.
3.) 21 Jul 2023 14:36:24
RENIDRAG: I can't really add to what I said previously. I just don't see the value fit for this trade, and neither can anyone else by the look of it.
Renidrag's banter posts with other poster's replies to Renidrag's banter posts
27 Feb 2023 05:17:33
Will there be anyone left to be traded, come deadline day? Could be a long day for all the panelists.
1.) 27 Feb 2023 18:50:41
Patty Kane to New York for a 2nd.
30 Dec 2022 21:22:39
JT Miller 50% retained, to any team willing to take on the POS
24 Mar 2022 12:20:58
I am hoping to see a team like Detroit and Ottawa offersheet some cap-strapped teams.
Just using Vegas as an example, both Nicholas Hague and Nicholas Roy are RFA and Vegas has no cash available.
Sure they might get someone to take on one of their contracts, but is that enough.
Signing Roy at under 1.35 has no compensation and sign Hague for the 1 year for 2million costs a 3rd tound pick.
It would look real good on Vegas.
02 Mar 2021 06:08:08
Calgary trades somebody for something.
1.) 02 Mar 2021 13:31:48
How about anybody for anything? With various picks from either side to even out value.
2.) 05 Mar 2021 04:56:08
I like it, seems like a good trade for both teams.
16 Jul 2020 11:58:42
I know Leafs fans won't agree withis, but I expect that if Toronto makes a trade of anyone of the top 4 paid forwards, they will be disappointed with the return.
In order for that team to get better, they need to free up apace, which is essentially a ap dump, so I don't expect to see the Leafs getting a major haul when/ if the do trade one of those players, I expect they will get a fair trade, which h would get them a quality defender and some other pie as.
1.) 16 Jul 2020 14:05:34
I think they could get good value for Nylander. Tavares just won’t be moved because that’s would just be the absolute lowest thing the organization could do. Marner and Mathews are to expensive to be traded for imo.
2.) 16 Jul 2020 14:55:09
If anyone would go, I agree it'd be Nylander. I also agree with the return being underwhelming, tho.
3.) 17 Jul 2020 02:40:16
The return could be underwhelming as mentioned but it depends on what Leafs want in return.
Nylander for a Dman of similar caliber 1 for 1 hockey trade isn’t out of the question right?
Although wingers for Defenseman is a different story than a Center.
4.) 17 Jul 2020 03:21:39
Nylander is on a great contract. I think it’s much more likely that you see a Kapanen+Dermott or Liljegren type trade. By themselves those players hold decent value, but together they hold very good value and could get you a very solid defenceman.
5.) 17 Jul 2020 14:10:06
In fairness to the Leafs other then McD no big contract player who makes over $10 mil per their team won't receive what they are worth in this C-19 cap uncertain NHL.
21 Nov 2023 14:31:12
@vbbbbbbbbm
Then I guess the Leafs should either sign Nylander to a 12 million dollar deal, or move Matthews.
Maybe they could try move Marner, but that would be a lot of retention and Tavares isn't going anywhere.
Welcome to the team that refuses to address defense and goaltending, so they can have 4 forwards making about 55% of cap.
12 Sep 2023 15:15:20
Now I understand.
I have stopped wasting my time reading what pinball posts, as they are always bad for the other team.
12 Sep 2023 00:25:54
Actually, I don't get your point. You have an asterisk beside Tanev's name, then mention Brodie, then Reilly having to accept a trade.
You then for some reason bring in Hanifin's name Into the proposal, so I am not sure who is intended to be traded in this proposal, as it contains 5 different defensemen.
26 Jul 2023 01:14:02
Miller has a NMC, so doubt that happens.
19 Jul 2023 13:25:54
@Chickenfoot
If Boeser could get anything moe/ better than what was proposed, that would be a bonus for Canucks. He is a slow, non-physical, one-dimensional and soft player, that is in Abundance with the Canucks.
A player like Goodrow would be a welcome addition in Vancouver.
Renidrag has no Banter Replies