NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

MJJJJ's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




MJJJJ's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To MJJJJ's Posts

 

 

To MJJJJ's last 5 rumours posts

 

To MJJJJ's last 5 talk posts

 

To MJJJJ's last 5 rumour replies

 

MJJJJ's rumours posts with other poster's replies to MJJJJ's rumours posts

 

02 Apr 2020 15:37:49
Tor:
Copp

Winn:
Kerfoot plus small add ie; draft picks

MJJJJ

1.) 02 Apr 2020 16:03:35
I would like to see the Jets make this trade. As much as I like Copp the Jets have him and Lowry playing the same type of game so they can take a chance on a soft defensively weak and mistake pron player like Kerfoot. Hopefully Kerfoot could learn how to play a more physical and intense game when playing for a coach like Maurice and with true leaders who play a complete game like Wheeler, Scheifele and Connor. I know posters on both sides may not agree with me but that's the fun of this site.


2.) 02 Apr 2020 16:10:59
No from Winnipeg. Kerfoot costs too much and doesn't fill any need for the Jets.


3.) 02 Apr 2020 16:43:02
I wouldn't agree with you there Islandjet. Copp and Lowry are two thirds of one of the top shut down lines in the league. Kerfoot is a not good at anything player, that is overpaid for another 3 years and has an NTC in his last year. He could be had for a lot less than a good player if you want to take a shot at him. I would think a 4th or C/ D prospect is enough for Kerfoot. If not, oh well, I guess we miss out.


4.) 02 Apr 2020 17:59:36
a 4th for Kerfoot? Good jesus, lmfao.


5.) 02 Apr 2020 18:05:07
Before Leaf fans freak out, I'm not saying Kerfoot is a bad player. He's "okay" at lots of things, just not "good" at any.


6.) 02 Apr 2020 18:35:54
Kerfoot is a decent 3rd line center, he's good for about 40 points a year, and I think comparably to other 3C's out there he's not overpaid.

But even if Kerfoot is on the trade block he's not a fit on the Winnipeg Jets. Their bottom 6 already has good line chemistry. I don't follow their team enough to know but I thought they are more so in in the market for a top 6 Center or top 4 RHD?


7.) 02 Apr 2020 19:11:17
That would be correct LilTuzziBert.


 

 

01 Apr 2020 17:45:44
Tor:
Lowry

Winn:
Kerfoot
2021 4th

MJJJJ

1.) 01 Apr 2020 20:06:45
No from Winnipeg. Kerfoot costs too much and doesn't fill any need for the Jets.


2.) 01 Apr 2020 21:44:18
Lowry who earns $2.9 mil and plays a physical checking game that all NHL teams want and need while Kerfoot at $3.5 mil plays a soft game. The Leafs are looking to dump their expensive Kadri trade mistake in order to fix their soft weak team at the expense of the Jets who don't need a player like Kerfoot.


3.) 02 Apr 2020 11:52:11
I don't see this working out unless for some reason Winnipeg is unhappy with Lowry. But as the Jets fans pointed out its not really a want or need for their team at this time.


 

 

23 Mar 2020 14:03:11
Tor:
Hague
Marchessault
2020 1st

LV:
Marner

Then,

Tor:
Manson

Ana:
Johnsson
2020 1st (Vegas)
Bracco
Liljegren

MJJJJ

1.) 23 Mar 2020 14:54:22
I don't think Vegas would want to get mixed up with Marner's contract. They'd be moving from a slightly unbalanced team to an extremely unbalanced team, similar to the Leafs.

There's nothing in the other offer that would entice the Ducks to even take a look at that offer.


2.) 23 Mar 2020 17:16:28
Leafs won’t trade Marner they’d just buyout Tavares or Mathews before moving the best player in the history of their Franchise and Manson might’ve been a bottom 5 worst Dman in the NHL last season why is he so overrated yes he’s physical but he was awful last year his value is probably a 2nd.


3.) 23 Mar 2020 17:51:56
Nothing in that offer the Ducks would want for Manson? Your way off in Mansons value if I had to guess.


4.) 23 Mar 2020 18:39:19
From what I've heard the Ducks are looking for top 6 forward help. So, the first would be nice, but I don't think they would be interested in a 4th line forward and an okay defensive prospect. I think they'd rather go after someone who at least has top 6 potential. So, not much there really interesting for them.

Trades usually aren't just piling up stuff until you have enough value like NHL 20. You usually have to address team needs.


5.) 23 Mar 2020 20:54:25
I’m not sure what there needs are so it might not be the perfect pieces for them but the value is enough they probably couldn’t say no to the offer.


6.) 24 Mar 2020 01:47:04
2 first round pick, a young middle 6 forward on a great contract ( basically another 1st ) and a decent prospect for a 4th defenceman coming off two awful season.

How about Vesalianen, Lowry, Stanley and 1st for Manson?


7.) 24 Mar 2020 15:31:10
You can tell memarcusjoe doesn't watch much hockey or he would know Manson is crap and not worth anywhere near those players. His assessment on the Leafs players is way off. Obviously a comment made from total ignorance and lack of respect for another teams players.


8.) 25 Mar 2020 16:26:13
memarcusjoe this has gone on long enough. You are undervaluing leafs players to the point where you think they are all worth nothing. You obviously have not looked at any stats this years and are going off of stats from 2 years ago.

Manson is an okay defenceman but he has no offensive output and his contract says top 4 guy. He is a bottom pairing guy at best. Not even worth half of that package.


9.) 25 Mar 2020 17:13:34
themostleaf, where did I de-value a Leaf player? All I said was that the Ducks are looking to add top 6 help, no top 6 help was offered by the Leafs in this proposal. Hence my saying there is nothing interesting for the Ducks.

It has nothing to do with what Manson is worth. Teams don't move players just because they are getting equal value. They trade players for guys that address team needs or wants.

It doesn't make the Leaf players bad just because they don't address the Ducks needs. It just makes them unneeded by the Ducks and there's nothing wrong with that. Sometimes there just isn't a fit.


10.) 25 Mar 2020 19:09:20
I’ll teach you a life lesson Memarcus let’s say Manson is a shinny dime the ducks really like and they’re trying to save up for a dollar. Andreas Johnsson is a dime obviously Anaheim likes their own dime so they keep there's ( Manson ) but then the leafs say how about we add 2 quarters ( 1st and Liligren ) and well add a nickel on top of that ( Bracco ) now if someone asks would you rather have 65 cents or 10 cents. No matter how shinny the Dime is you take the 65 cents. Also if you knew anything about the ducks their biggest need is RHD prospects for their rebuild which Lilijgren is.


11.) 25 Mar 2020 19:55:51
I would agree except that you value the Leaf players way too high. If Manson is a dime. Then a 25 year old, run of the mill 4th liner (Johnsson) is maybe a nickle, probably less. The first would be a dime, a nothing special defense prospect (Liljegren) is a dime. A 23 year old, career AHL'er, that every team has 3 or 4 of is pretty much worthless.

If their biggest need is RHD, why on earth would they trade one? So, again nothing there really makes it worth their while.

There's a life lesson for you.


12.) 28 Mar 2020 02:05:58
Johnsson is not a 4th liner he’s on the leafs 1st line and would make any teams 3rd.


13.) 28 Mar 2020 18:16:11
Manson doesn't get you top 6 help bud.


14.) 30 Mar 2020 04:53:08
lmfao, can i just point something out

mansons a dime: 10 cents

johnssons less than a nicel: 4 cents
the first is a dime: 10 cents
liljegrens a dime: 10 cents
braccos worthless: 0 cents

so trade 24 cents for 10 cents @memarcus?

your analogy just seems, off, lmao.


15.) 30 Mar 2020 18:05:43
This trade WILL NEVER HAPPEN because Marner WILL NOT be traded. Dubas didn't go through the whole summer of 2019 trying to resign him just to flip him for a pick to be used to acquire a 28 year old RHD, even if they're recovering some assets with Marchessault and Hague. If the first scenario was to provide cap space, I'd suggest Nylander is the more likely RW to be moved, and Kapanen much more likely to be moved before either WN or MM.

IMO Johnson is the detractor here, he puts up points on Auston's line but due to injuries we've yet to see enough of him on the ice to suggest he would develop into a top 6. Kapanen MIGHT be of interest to Anaheim now that they've traded Kase, but then again Anaheim could look to other teams for a better offer in a 1 for 1 trade for Manson instead of waiting for Liljegren and Bracco to further develop.


When you factor in that the salary cap is increasing next season and Toronto will have some flexibility once Horton and Clarkson's contracts are off the books, I'm 200% sure these trades would never happen.

Thanks for the laugh about "if I have 50 cents you're telling me you wouldn't trade me a dime for it? "


 

 

18 Mar 2020 15:34:07
Col:
Killorn

Tampa:
2020 3rd
Bowers

MJJJJ

1.) 20 Mar 2020 17:53:09
Not a lot of tanpa or col fans I guess.

Why does Tampa do this? They are contenders now and killorb is great.


2.) 21 Mar 2020 03:40:34
Cap reasons.


3.) 21 Mar 2020 15:32:54
Tampa lost foote and two first because of this virus shutdown. They got screwed the worst of all the teams. Did any other team lose anywhere near that much?


4.) 23 Mar 2020 01:55:55
Well Coleman and Goodrow aren’t UFA so they didn’t really lose. Arizona lost the most as Hall brought them nothing.


5.) 28 Mar 2020 02:54:13
They brought them in for the playoffs. If there is no playoffs they get screwed now don't they. They could have kept those picks for this year and traded next years picks for next year's playoffs. Oh yeah. And they lost foote. So yeah. They got screwed.


 

 

11 Mar 2020 22:14:30
Tor:
EJ (2M retained)

Col:
Holl
2020 4th

MJJJJ

1.) 12 Mar 2020 04:29:08
Why does Colorado do this?


2.) 12 Mar 2020 15:18:42
Colorado does not do this IMO.


3.) 12 Mar 2020 21:00:00
Retain and get absolutely nothing in return? Is Colorado Intentionally trying to get worse or what's the thinking behind this?


4.) 13 Mar 2020 05:14:45
Basically Toronto has 2 million dollars added onto their cap after this trade for next year. So the cap evens out a 4 mill on each team.

The stats of the two players are actually very similar this year.
However, because Johnson is older and likely declining, while Holl can be a stead top 6 defenceman for the next 4-5 years, I think the leafs pass. Dubas wants to keep this team young and cheap. Adding Eric Johnson to the mix just doesn't seem like something he would do.

Overall who is the better player? Probably Johnson. But who has more years left in them, Holl. I understand the trade from this point of view. I just don't see either team making it.


 

 

 

MJJJJ's talk posts with other poster's replies to MJJJJ's talk posts

 

06 Dec 2019 20:06:38
Lucic-Nielsen-Okposo
Boedker-Bjugstad-Eriksson
Helm-Rask-Backes
Smith-Anisimov-Dubinsky
Dekeyser-Seabrook
Johnson-Bogosian
Ceci-Zaitsev
Schneider
Howard

MJJJJ

1.) 08 Dec 2019 00:08:21
Cool.


 

 

01 Dec 2019 20:45:29
Philly:
Puljujarvi
Larsson

Edm:
Ghost

MJJJJ

1.) 01 Dec 2019 22:01:06
Way too much for an under performing healthy scratch. Wow. Last thing Edm needs are left handed offensive minded D men with Nurse and Klefbom on the lineup and Broberg coming up. With offensively solid Bear and Bouchard also in the mix. Ghost would be the last type Edm would be interested in. Especially for that price. Jeez.


2.) 03 Dec 2019 11:09:06
Larsson is better the Ghost.


3.) 03 Dec 2019 17:11:56
yupp remember when you said that Ghost was a far better player than parayko. I do.


4.) 03 Dec 2019 18:03:09
I’ve never said anything good about Ghost, Never really liked him. I’ve always liked Parayko myself. But you crazy overvalued him back a while ago when you were screaming how good Shatty was and what he would get. You were telling us Parayko would win Norris trophy’s. Remember how you made yourself look like a delusional homer, had to leave then come back as a different name months later. I do.


5.) 03 Dec 2019 19:37:46
Once again you turn this into something we are not discussing. You wanted Parayko in the worst way. Yes touted how good I thought he was and I was right. You and others thought ghost was better cause he broke out in points. lol.

Not only that you on several occasions tried to say RNH was worth more than petro. LOL you are just as much a homer as any one on this board.


6.) 03 Dec 2019 19:39:03
Also yupp never said Parayko was a Norris. I did say he would be a #1 rhd D and he has proven that. Also I was banned from the site very different.


7.) 03 Dec 2019 21:38:26
And there goes Colt pretending to be a Blues fan again. SMH.


8.) 03 Dec 2019 22:44:39
Oh thunder turkey you kidder.


9.) 03 Dec 2019 23:35:14
I’m sorry, you’re the one who brought up Parayko. Which was off topic, so am I not allowed to bring up other off topics? Just you, hey?
Lol. I’ve bashed my team and management decisions constantly on here for the last year or so. But I’m a homer?

Do we need to go over the insane homer delusional things you have done in the last, Colt? You were proven an insane delusional homer numerous times to the point you had to disappear and come back a different name. You really want to go there?


10.) 04 Dec 2019 00:51:07
Yupp did I strike a nerve lol. I called you out on past b's when you said ghost was a scratch. Just admit you were wrong and call it a day.


11.) 04 Dec 2019 10:04:34
This is a pretty dumb argument.


12.) 04 Dec 2019 16:29:12
Well no, I or any others weren’t wrong what so ever when they thought Ghost was better than Parayko a few years ago. Ghost had 65 points in 78 games on a playoff team and Parayko had 35 points in 82 games on a non playoff team. Ghost was 4th in league scoring among D man and Parayko has never gotten more than 38 points. He brings other things to the game that I love but to think he was better than the 4th leading scoring D man is kinda funny. i'm not sure why you’re bringing this up, so I’ll admit that I wasn’t wrong back then to think that at all.

So you got banned hey? Did you think you were being clever when you came back as the name “Redwing” when everyone was calling you out for being a delusional homer Blues fan? You did well at the beginning but then started commenting on all things Blues and we figured it out pretty easily. Why did you come back as “Redwing” man?
Also, do you still think Parayko is worth Drai ++?
Just curious. Two easy questions.


13.) 05 Dec 2019 04:24:36
#triggered

Lol yupp.


14.) 05 Dec 2019 15:37:48
Lol. Not at all. Your attempt to have me admit I was wrong completely backfired.
And that’s how you respond? You’re a joke bud.
#joke.


15.) 06 Dec 2019 00:26:47
Ah yupp I love it when you say nice things to me so triggered u.


16.) 06 Dec 2019 16:17:20
You’re actually a huge joke, and you know it.
You try calling me out and I give you good reasonings why you’re wrong, And that’s how you respond when called out as well? How is laughing at you triggered? You’re a #joke. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️.


17.) 07 Dec 2019 13:51:38
This is awesome.


 

 

30 Nov 2019 19:21:28
**January 2020**

Edm:
Ghost
Laughton

Philly:
Larsson
Puljujarvi
2020 2nd

MJJJJ

 

 

25 Oct 2019 09:18:00
Ottawa wants namestnikov trade 2.0

Possible targets:
Petan
Perlini
Goldobin
Ho Sang
Dal Colle
Raddysh
Baertschi
Puljujarvi
Julien Gauthier
Sprong
Nick Merkley
Bjugstad
Virtanen

**if I were Dorion I'd want baertschi or goldobin

MJJJJ

1.) 25 Oct 2019 15:25:35
I just read that Perlini wants out of Chicago too.


2.) 26 Oct 2019 06:36:57
How are most of those players comparable to Perlini?
Many of them have barely played in the NHL yet.


 

 

 

MJJJJ's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Jan 2020 22:12:22
He doesn't have trade clause. can't control it.

MJJJJ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Nov 2019 22:48:20
Why so unbelievable?

MJJJJ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Nov 2019 22:47:50
Forgot to mention, this would happen only if/ when buff is cleared.

MJJJJ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Oct 2019 22:06:07
Instead Oilers should target Tierney.

MJJJJ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

25 Oct 2019 00:07:32
This ain't bout edm my guy.

MJJJJ

 

 

 

MJJJJ has no Talk Replies