NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

BrockWizKidDubas's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded


BrockWizKidDubas's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To BrockWizKidDubas's Posts

 

 

To BrockWizKidDubas's last 5 rumours posts

 

To BrockWizKidDubas's last 5 banter posts

 

To BrockWizKidDubas's last 5 rumour replies

 

BrockWizKidDubas's rumours posts with other poster's replies to BrockWizKidDubas's rumours posts

 

23 Oct 2016 17:23:24
Leafs- JVR, Bozak, Marincin, 2017 2nd

WPG- Trouba, Stafford

Leafs-Dermott, 2018 2nd, Gardiner, Polak

ANA- Lindholm, Stoner.

BrockWizKidDubas

1.) 23 Oct 2016 19:21:35
The Anaheim one is laughable. The Winnipeg one is more tolerable.


2.) 23 Oct 2016 21:51:50
There both stupid.


3.) 24 Oct 2016 05:34:17
Leafs add Nylander and Rielly.


4.) 24 Oct 2016 17:03:36
The whole idea is for the Ducks to make cap space. Not bring in a 30 year old D-man who is an FA this year and is making 2.250 million dollars. They would much rather have Lindholm, even if they can't get him signed yet.


 

 

02 Sep 2016 06:42:13
ANA- Lindholm

STL- Shattenkirk, Rattie, conditional 2nd (only if Shattenkirk doesn't resign)

BrockWizKidDubas

1.) 02 Sep 2016 07:24:54
Ducks pass. The closest peice in value to Lindholm is Tarasenko. Obviously that would never happen but just saying. Don't see why Blues would give up assets for another d man either. They need a top line C much more then a top pairing defencemen.


2.) 02 Sep 2016 16:03:22
Seems like a pretty good trade to me.

Ducks need to win NOW before Getz, Perry, Kessler, Bieksa's primes are done. so the Shatty upgrade could fit into their plans nicely. St Louis gets a longer term D-man if they can sign the RFA to a reasonable deal.


3.) 02 Sep 2016 16:38:48
bj96


in no world or dimension is hampus lindholm equal value to tarasenko. I advise you put the pipe down and come back to this place called planet earth.

LOL this was so ridcules it put a smile on face thanks.


4.) 02 Sep 2016 18:44:59
I feel that the ducks won't want to trade Lindholm because he is their future stud d man. I think that the ducks would want to trade Fowler instead.


5.) 02 Sep 2016 23:07:57
BJ that is a very unthought out statement Taresanko>Petrangelo. Petrangelo>>>Lindholm I'd say Allen is closer in pure trade value but Lindholm is worth more and they have Gibson.


6.) 03 Sep 2016 00:25:06
If it were anyone other then Colt and VB responding to me I'd answer their comments but since both of them aren't worth it all just leave it as is. Also no where did I saw Lindholm for Tarasenko is fair, I said its closer. Go read the comments again before you start making fools of yourself, both of you have done that enough here.


7.) 03 Sep 2016 01:18:01
I don't think Blues would ever deal Tarasenko for Lindholm, but that's what I'd imagine Ducks ask in return for him. However, not going to happen. No way blues would make that deal.


8.) 03 Sep 2016 16:44:47
Seriously nobody is going to call this out wow. There isn't a pkayer on your team that is worth tarasenko value.

That's all i'm going to say.


9.) 03 Sep 2016 23:59:50
Bj you wrote that tarasenko is the only player close in value. LindHolm is in a tier below petro and tarasenko is an elite top 5 goal scorer (4th) last year and scored 9 goals 15 points in first two playoff series. Your statement was pretty off. Hence the back lash.

Petro and tarasenko are worth way more than LindHolm.


10.) 04 Sep 2016 02:00:54
Omg colt you can't read can you. I said closest to fair. Never once did I say Lindholm could get Tarasenko. Even you could explain why Blues would say no to that.


11.) 06 Sep 2016 18:40:26
im sorry but Lindholm is no where close to tarasenko that's my point.

Lindholm isn't even close to petro. And afte this year he will not be close to Fabbri or Parayko.


 

 

02 Sep 2016 06:39:58
DET- Green, Franzen

TOR- Greening, Holland, Hunwick, Corrado, Kapanen.

BrockWizKidDubas

1.) 02 Sep 2016 06:58:52
Detroit rejects that big time.


2.) 02 Sep 2016 13:45:55
I'm not wasting my time looking into all the salaries but please explain McJ. Green is decent but not the player he used to be. Franzen is another Lupul so no real value going to Toronto. At least the leafs are sending some younger players to Detroit.


3.) 02 Sep 2016 15:33:33
Again quality>quantity.


4.) 02 Sep 2016 19:51:07
Garbage for lots of garbage.


5.) 02 Sep 2016 17:47:43
Because how on earth does Detroit become a better team if they do this trade. Not one player there will improve the wings and they need defense, so why would they trade away one of their top guys, and somebody they got last year through free agency. Like come on you know that's brutal.


6.) 03 Sep 2016 01:04:32
I agree Detroit shouldn't be trading defense but Green is not all that anymore IMO. I think it's a brutal trade all around. Taking on Franzen would be awful for any team, not sure Green makes up for that. Most of the players coming from the leafs are serviceable NHLers, but not what the wings need.


 

 

02 Sep 2016 06:38:28
TOR- Kapanen, Kadri, 2017 2nd

WPG- Trouba.

BrockWizKidDubas

1.) 02 Sep 2016 16:05:48
Good trade.
Get what you can for Trouba before Vegas plucks him for nothing.


2.) 02 Sep 2016 17:08:02
Winnipeg wouldn't accept that trade, the jets have no use for kadri, he'd be playing 3rd/ 4th line with the jets. The leafs would have to give up more than kappanan, he hasn't proven much since he's been drafted.


3.) 02 Sep 2016 17:28:57
Jets can protect 4 dmen so they have the choice of protecting trouba or three forwards like armia Lowry and Dano so anyone saying the jets will lose Myers or trouba for nothing just don't know the jets. If trouba is traded it will be for a young left hand d.


4.) 02 Sep 2016 18:18:09
Jets wouldn't want this deal as both players coming back wouldn't help the Jets. Kapanen is a small winger that wouldn't be able to crack the Jets lineup and Kadri would be a #3 center behind Schiefele and Little at best.


 

 

29 Aug 2016 06:49:43
TOR- Lupul, Gardiner, Greening

NYR- Nash, Klein.

BrockWizKidDubas

1.) 29 Aug 2016 06:55:13
How many shrooms did you have that made you think this is a good trade for Rangers.


2.) 29 Aug 2016 14:40:15
Take out Nash and it's closer than the way you have it.


 

 

 

BrockWizKidDubas's banter posts with other poster's replies to BrockWizKidDubas's banter posts

 

29 Aug 2016 16:58:53
Or Burrows, Dorsett for Lupul, Greening, Hunwick, Holland.

BrockWizKidDubas

 

 

29 Aug 2016 16:57:48
Crosby for Lupul calling it.

BrockWizKidDubas

 

 

 

BrockWizKidDubas's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Sep 2016 06:36:41
TOR- laughs.

BrockWizKidDubas

 

 

Click To View This Thread

28 Aug 2016 05:24:32
Not bad trade but Leafs D lines are dumb. ZAITSEV.

BrockWizKidDubas

 

 

 

BrockWizKidDubas has no Banter Replies