Chicago Blackhawks Rumours


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

10 Feb 2018 16:10:02
Mtl: Plekanec
(Ufa so gone this summer)


Mtl are TAKING a 7 million dollar contract but are getting a good rmyoung player to justify and to start rebuild)

10 Feb 2018 16:45:54
Hell no.

10 Feb 2018 17:57:54
So are another aging slow Dman for a long term expensive contract.
Honestly., dunno what Seabrook has left for contract. all I know, he was (is) a really good Dman, however he is starting to slow., and this shouldn't be the direction the Habs go in. but with Bergevin. anything is possible.

10 Feb 2018 19:10:56
Literally does not make any sense whatsoever for Montreal lol.

10 Feb 2018 19:40:37
Chicago would probably have to add a 1st and one or two good prospects to take seabrooks contract.6 years at 6.875 or something like that.

10 Feb 2018 23:42:30
Hartman isn't good enough to make taking on seabrooks contract worthwhile.

11 Feb 2018 03:16:47
Damn I thought Seebroke had a positive value.

10 Feb 2018 15:49:16
St Louis: Stasny,Dunn,2 rd pick 2019

Chicago: Toews

Is this fair for both teams. Chicago downgrade center but could resign him if he adept around 4 million. I'd say it's fair Right? Chicago gets a good defense prospect to replace Keith maybe

10 Feb 2018 18:21:35
Edmondson is out 6 weeks so making dunn available is a no go. Besides he is looking to be jaybos replacement. Why wouldn't blues resign stats at 4 mil.

10 Feb 2018 19:12:57
Wtf is this lol.

10 Feb 2018 21:53:46
Toews will more than likely be a Hawk for life.

10 Feb 2018 14:54:36
The leafs are missing 1 good defenceman in order to become cup contenders. The Blackhawks on the other hand will miss the playoffs and need a retool. What perfect dance partners
Leafs - Nylander 2nd pick 2018
Hawks - Keith
As much as I love watching Nylander play with Matthews one must trade from strength to help weakness
Why Chicago would do it - gets younger more skilled
Why toronto would do it - number one defenceman they need who is a leader Nylander gets a raise next season

10 Feb 2018 15:02:26
North is a great defenceman but too old if we trade nylander it will be for a younger dman.

10 Feb 2018 15:52:35
I agree with tyhockey.
If your going to trade a guy like Nylander., think long term. package him for OEL.?
Something on those lines.

10 Feb 2018 17:24:43
You really want to trade a 21 year old Nylander + for 34 year old Kieth? Crazy.

10 Feb 2018 17:29:43
Yeah nylander/ marner don't get traded for a 35 year old who is signed till he’s 40 lol they should only go in a package for a star d in his mid to late 20s like Sosa said.

10 Feb 2018 19:45:11
Agree with everyone but going to need and huge deal for oel, Keith still a top de in the league and hasn't slowed down much and has been one of the best de in the league for year on a very good cap hit, would just worry he starts to slow down.

10 Feb 2018 21:19:51
Or don't trade at all, i mean the leafs are looking good this year with what they already have. The young guys on the blueline look better and stronger the more experience they get. I think if the leafs just stand pat with what they have, they'll be just fine.

10 Feb 2018 21:30:26
Ya try and trade Nylander + for a OEL or Faulk, Doughty type a guy. Not a 34 year old. Lol.

10 Feb 2018 22:54:27
Ya. Why trade for a 34 yr old who is signed till he is 40.they can offer him 3 yrs at 6.75 then

And lmao at the "leads 1 good defenceman away"

11 Feb 2018 05:01:07
Balsam, what’s your definition of a cup contender? because Nashville snuck in the playoffs last year and was a cpl wins away. Leafs are a shoe in to the playoffs because wings and habs are about 17 pts back lol they have a lethal offense, 4 pretty good Dmen and a cpl kids playing well and a goalie who has been unbelievable since the first 7-8 games of the season. So adding a top pair D doesn’t give them a good chance? I guess they should follow Marc Bergevins plan to success, make a series of moves that take a playoff team and make them lottery pick contenders.

11 Feb 2018 05:09:55
And the “3 year at 6.75” comment I figure is about Marleau because that’s your go to shot at the leafs, but Marleau at 37 has 2 more goals in 2 more games than paccioretty. Remember that Max plays top line and top PP and has been on the ice for 125 more minutes than Marleau this season while being almost a decade younger and scoring less. Not saying pacioretty isn’t a good player, he is, but if you’re going to make Marleau your target for criticism, make sure he’s not out performing your best player! Also it’s 6.25 mill, not 6.75. Get your chirp right at least lol.

08 Feb 2018 19:18:12
So reading today there is rumors mtl is talking to Chicago about sadd? Guessing Chicago would want picks/prospects at this point

08 Feb 2018 19:50:39
How bout Saad for Patches? Maybe a little add from Mtl?

08 Feb 2018 20:08:09
If montreal has to add for taking back the lesser player with a higher cap hit. Then I would then jump on the fire bergevin bandwagon.

08 Feb 2018 20:48:44
With all the money they have tied up in Chicago with their core, i don't know if they would want to take Patches knowing he needs a raise in a year. I don't think they will be contenders this year so it really only leaves them next year to build on.
Also, if Bergavin trades patches for another winger. he might as well just resign.

11 Feb 2018 14:00:59
Colt. Saad for patches and mtl adds? Think you made a typo.

27 Jan 2018 23:42:38
Mtl: Patches



Mjn:Joel Erikson Ek



28 Jan 2018 08:39:59
so bad i don't even know where to start. stick to your blues feedback colt.

23 Jan 2018 23:29:19
Chi: Connor murphy
Tor: Garret Sparks

Not sure on the value here, but with crawford out they will be looking for someone to fill in and Sparks has been great in the Ahl this season. Toronto on the other hand gets that defensive minded rhd that fhey have been looking for and what's better he is locked in for a decent price. What yall think?

24 Jan 2018 00:00:45
Pretty easy no from Chicago imo.

24 Jan 2018 00:01:39
I’m all for it from a leafs perspective lol but I doubt that flies with the hawks. Sparks I believe is from Chicago too which is a nice bonus, and he has been great for the marlies. So has Pickard which makes It easier to move one of them. And with Andersen signed for 4 more years and playing great and still young, the best these guys can hope for here is a back up role. However, Murphy’s contract is exactly why the hawks got him. They need cost controlled players and he’s one of them.

24 Jan 2018 16:55:44
WHat do you think would get Murphy?

22 Jan 2018 19:02:00
Since Tampa is one of the worst faceoff percentage teams, heading into playoffs they definitely need to improve it.
Might as well acquire Vermette just like every other team making a run lol, not to mention it’s very possible Anaheim deals him before the deadline.

TB: 2nd (or even 3rd tbh)
Ducks: Vermette

He’s 34 and not the same player as he was when he was traded for a player and a 1st back when he got traded to Chicago so I think Tampa is willing to pay this price to improve their faceoff percentage, as well as add more playoff experience to the roster. Thoughts?

22 Jan 2018 19:35:25
Makes sense. Win draws in all situations and can still fly. Good penalty killer too with that speed and smarts.

22 Jan 2018 19:45:58
Faceoffs are over rated. Tampa needs to be better but if you can win face offs and not do anything else your a liability.

22 Jan 2018 19:55:45
Jbs are you calling him a liability? Lol are you for real.

22 Jan 2018 21:02:13
Face offs are over rated? I guess so is puck possession.

23 Jan 2018 00:39:50
Hey guys scoring goals and winni g games is overrated.

23 Jan 2018 01:14:38
No. But i said if all you can do is win face offs there isn't a spot for you on a team. Still need to be able to play offense and defense (and Vermette hasn't scored much in a few years now) . Its kinda funny if you think faceoffs are extremely important but look at standings last few years. Canes Sens Panthers Sabres currently all top 10 in faceoff %. Avalanche Canes Flyers Red Wings Canucks all top 10 last year, first 3 were top 5. Edmonton Chicago and Pitt were bottom 3. Faceoff % does not correlate to success and when you dig into it it doesn't even drive possession the way you would think. Look at the numbers.

23 Jan 2018 06:08:05
It sounds like you’ve already looked at the #’s. I wonder why they try and win the face off then? They should just give it to the other team. You have to see how ridiculous that sounds.

23 Jan 2018 11:48:04
Are you for real Leafs? Did i say just give em away? No. Did i say they're meaningless? Also no. I said they are over rated and i have the evidence to prove it. Its not an end all be all stat and you don't need to be great in the face off dot to win games. The difference between first and last in face off% can be as little as 5% and if your players are good at other things you make it up quite easily. 3 of last years top 5 faceoff% and 5 of top 19 finished in bottom 12 while a bottom 3 team won the cup i don't see how its so ridiculous and absurd to say that they are overrated. It doesn't drive possession the way you would think as some top possession teams (like Tampa) don't win them while low possession teams (last years Avs) lead the league. It doesn't have a huge impact on goals or wins. Rather win them than not but they're impact is often overstated i don't know how its so "ridiculous" and "absurd" to see the direct impact of being a team that's great in the dot and one that's terrible (5/ 100 faceoff difference) doesn't impact the result a lot.

23 Jan 2018 11:56:53
Like give me something to go with other then "thats ridiculous". I realize its counter intuitive. that's why I've backed up my stance with fact and stats. And i never said they're negative or give them away like you seem to be quoting to me i just said they're overrated and the impact is not as big as people think. You triggered me haha.

23 Jan 2018 21:23:06
I guess I mean as a player. Maybe your stats back up teams can win being weak in the the face off circle. However, having 1-2 guys that can win the face off is huge in many aspect of the game. You win the face off on the PK, you kill 30 seconds. You win the draw on the PP, you get a chance to set up. You win a draw late in the game and you close out a game. I guess that is why it is sometimes such a small % that separate the good teams from the bad in face offs, because it may be 1 player that is the difference. I wasn’t saying you need 4 centerman that are good but every GM in the league would like to have 1-2 guys you can rely on. Didn’t mean to trigger you.

20 Jan 2018 17:06:46
Saw this rumour on another site:

To Jets: Sharp

To Chicago: 3rd round pick

20 Jan 2018 17:50:58
I think he’s worth a bit less than a 3rd but maybe Winnipeg is willing to give it up. But if Chicago makes this that means they feel they are not going to make the playoffs and I don’t know if management is ready to give up yet.

14 Jan 2018 19:13:24
Ok so I am a Montreal fan. And I noticed I'm not the only one on here. So I'm going to ask my fellow jabs fan this question but even if you're not one i'd love to hear your perspective just thin I have fan will be able to give me more precise hypothetical options of what MB should be thinking of doing right now in terms of trades or any type of transaction that could benefit the team.And after that explain what would be your priority if you where in MB.The future or present? I'm going with future for many reasons that I won't explain since I'm hoping this post won't be as long as TSS ones usally are lol( tbh even if they're long I always read them all because of how easy it is to ready). Ok so here are the trades that will help us for the future imo and that also adresses the other club needs as well:

Mtl: Patches, conditional 2rd pick(if Patches gets 25 or + goals this year the pick is going to be reversed)

Cal:Valimaki conditional 2 rd pick( condition mention aboved)

Now that where stuck with Weber we might as well at least get a top D prospect that he can take under his wing and bring to next level hopefully. I was hoping he would of been a mentor to Sergachev but... Drouin

Mtl: Gallagher

Car: Bean, Gauthier


Chi: Hartman,3 rd pick 2018

Mtl: Plekanec( I guess a little bit of value even with his contract since he's ufa this summer and still good defensive center for team that wabts to go in deep run)

Any team: 6 rd pick

13 Jan 2018 20:58:26
MTL: Plekanec
PIT: 2nd or 3rd (will most likely be later round picks so the 2nd is in fact closer to a third. This might be a bit much for him but he is one of the best shutdown centers in the league although he doesn't give anything offensively) .

MTL: Byron
To any team willing to give up a 2nd (because he scored 20 goals last year, is crazy fast and great on the PK) . Would go great with any team needing secondary scoring.

MTL: Benn
CHI: 3rd

Benn has been playing way above his pay grade recently and can fetch a 3rd-4th.

I might be overvaluing my Habs players though, let me know.

13 Jan 2018 21:15:42
Gotta retain on Plek to get anything decent. If you retain like %50 then could probably get a 3rd. Not sure a 2nd.
Byron should get you a 3rd for sure and ya maybe a 2nd.

13 Jan 2018 22:05:42
As a sens fan, I am willing to give up nick paul and a 3rd for Byron. Would that suffice?

13 Jan 2018 22:06:26
As for your trades, value seems there except for the first one. Plek is a cap dump. The most he's worth is a 4th-5th

13 Jan 2018 22:41:01
So Paul byron a guy who scored 20 goals last season will probably score 20 goals again this season and is great on the pk like you said who gets paid hen scratch compared to a lot of 20 goal scorers who can't kill penalties. And you want to trade him for a2nd round pick. We got two 2nds for lars eller and gave up 2 2nds for andrew shaw. I would value byron above both of these guys especially when you consider his contract.

13 Jan 2018 23:47:42
I'm ok with Plek and Benn deals., however. I don't want to see Byron go. And if he were to go, only as a good add on peice to say a Pacioretty or Galchenyuk to bring back a significant peice.
I do see Plek as an attractive option for a contender as a good 3rd line Center. If he isn't traded, I would offer him 3 mill for 2 years to be Habs 4th line Center and on the PK, cause he has been a good Canadien .

13 Jan 2018 23:47:57
Are you kidding me with all of these. Especially the first one. Absolute garbage.

14 Jan 2018 02:14:19
McJesus. what do u think then?

14 Jan 2018 14:13:38
No Crazy Attack, that won't suffice. That's good if you want Michael Mcaron but since Byron is cheap, very fast, good on pk and get around 20 goal/ 40 points a second round pick it will take more to get him. Beside Dorion gave up Dahlen who was drafted second round but looks far more promising then his rank, for an old, slow and overpaid Burrows who's maybe half has good as Byron. So I wouldn't be surprise if Dorion offers White for Byron. lol.

14 Jan 2018 18:17:20
The fact he thinks a team will be willing to give up a 2nd for Plek blows my mind.

14 Jan 2018 19:15:04
It's deffinetley a stretch McJesus
. however, that pick is probably around 50th to 62nd overall. it's not totally outta the question. who knows. i'd prefer to get a deal similar to the Weiss, Flieshman deal to Chicago when we received Danault. but. I also know that's a big stretch as well. Lol. maybe Benn and Plek? I dunno.

14 Jan 2018 19:17:51
The only thing Mvjesus think nowadays is to critize people instead of explain why trades are bad. Kinna lazy. It's sad tho because you used to have very good post but now all you posts are either a critic or an insult.

13 Jan 2018 05:45:59
Chicago: seabrook, pokka, 2nd. Columbus: jack Johnson Don't really know but Johnson wants a trade and Chicago needs outta seabrook contract...... anywhere close?

13 Jan 2018 06:43:05
Wow. Massive yes from Chicago. Massive no from Columbus.

13 Jan 2018 12:12:09
Without seabrook its way closer. what's seabrook going to do, be number 6 on Columbus' depth chart for the forseeable future? he'd be behind Murray, Jones, Werenski, Carlsson and Nuttivara on defence. And his contract is super bloated. No thanks from CBJ.

12 Jan 2018 22:32:43
Ottawa: Karlsson
Nyi: Tavares
Chic: Hartman,Seabrook,Ist round,2nd round

Ottawa trades Karlsson to New York
New York trades Tavares to Chicago
Chicago trades Seabrook,Hartman and draft picks to Ottawa

12 Jan 2018 23:22:56
Ottawa loses. Chicago wins.

12 Jan 2018 23:30:12
Oof terrible for New York and Ottawa. Chicago makes out like bandits.

Seabrook is a damn cap dump.

12 Jan 2018 23:35:40
This may he the worst 3 way trade I've seen.

12 Jan 2018 23:51:35
Hahahaha wow this is awful my goodness.

13 Jan 2018 00:18:10
This is the worst 3 way trade ever proposed. Lol.

13 Jan 2018 01:50:55
Terrible for every team not named New York.

13 Jan 2018 05:42:21
Seabrook isn't really a cap dump right now, but in 2-4 years that contract looks horrible.

13 Jan 2018 15:17:54
You are aware there is this thing called the salary cap. How exactly does Chi fit Kane, Toews and Tavares under the cap?

13 Jan 2018 16:29:21
@Shootsmcgee seabrook is a cup dump right now. There is a reason why they benched him a few games ago, yet he still makes almost 7 million. that's what I call a cap dump

13 Jan 2018 21:24:32
If ottawa is adding karlsson and the islanders tavares, shouldn't the hawks be adding patty kane? I mean, come on you homer.

17 Jan 2018 22:30:03
For once I actually agree with facelift 39.

Ottawa has enough bad contracts on their hands why would they trade their best player only to add another one?

Their called the ottawa senators not the ottawa dump sheesh.

10 Jan 2018 23:11:16
CHI: Panik , + 2 other players
ARZ: Duclair

10 Jan 2018 23:16:58
Adam Clendenning is part of the deal too.

10 Jan 2018 23:18:29

ARZ: Duclair, Clendening

CHI: Panik, Dauphin.

11 Jan 2018 00:06:12
Honestly this ****ing brutal like how the hell does Chicago pull off another one sided trade like I don’t understand how they win every single trade? There’s no way Arizona thinks this is a fair trade like come on league is rigged.

11 Jan 2018 02:32:06
Ya idk McJesus. CHI didn't even retain too.

11 Jan 2018 03:34:14
I heard that GM's don't want to trade for Duclair because he is hard to coach.

11 Jan 2018 03:47:58
Why do you think Duclair is that valuable? Lol you’re making it sound like it’s jvr for Schenn part 2. It’s 4 pretty insignificant players trading spots. I know Duclair seems to have the most upside but it’s also widely reported that they have tried to trade him for over a year and this was the best they could get. He has attitude issues and doesn’t have the offense to back up his negative qualities. Clearly 31 gms believed this is the most he’s worth. A lot of players a lot more talented than him have been very irrelevant because they wouldn’t get out of their own way.

11 Jan 2018 03:55:54
Arizona is just happy to get rid of him. Chayka said his problems goes back long long ago. Player didn't want to be there and team didn't want the player.
I honestly used to really like Duclair, but unless he completely changes his attitude and grows up, he won't be anything special.
And I think Chicago is the organization to straighten him out.

11 Jan 2018 04:39:07
Really wishing my team would made a play for him. He's young. can still be a solid player and potential 30 goal man.

11 Jan 2018 04:40:28
Not saying he has loads of value at all just how does Chicago always find a way to absolutely burn the other team.

11 Jan 2018 05:00:04
Also panik is only 26, his best season is 22g 44pts last season, Duclairs is 20g 44pts but 2 years ago. They have very similar stats this year (6g 10a for 16 pts in 37 games vs 9g 6a 15pts in 33 games) Panik has also fit into a few different teams now and you never hear bad character/ attitude reports. Your oilers would have been able to get him for the same price, blame your GM not a “rigged league” haha.

11 Jan 2018 05:00:24
Potential 30 goal man I can’t see, but he’s young with speed and skill. But if he does got an attitude that’s a big issue and this is the second time he’s been traded and he’s young, not a great sign but if he can fix that then he could be a good player.

11 Jan 2018 05:07:56
Plus . Look for him to start with Toews and Saad. Hawks have been looking for and option on that RW to complete that line.

11 Jan 2018 06:06:42
Hes not hard to coach people just assume rubbish cause his black just people said about ignla back in the day more recenly subban kane stewart bufflyn you just makeing yourself look raciest.

11 Jan 2018 12:54:18
Idk why everyone makes it that Chicago makes out like bandits?

Panik has 16 pts in 37 games after 44 in 82 last year. he's on pace for roughly the same. he's played well. i don't think the dofference between him and duclair is big, bsides the cap hits.

and honestly, i'd rather have laurent than clendening. dauphin can be something in the nhl, clendening has just fallen off a cliff.

11 Jan 2018 14:30:48
22 years old and now on his 3rd team says all you need to know about Duclair!

11 Jan 2018 19:19:44
Alexei yashin and Alex kovalev both had bad attitudes at times in their careers and were viewed as difficult, 2 white guys, and before you say now we hate blacks and Russians lol. Eric Lindros. The difference between Duclair and lindros is that lindros has the numbers and on ice success to balance out being a pain in the ass. Deciding if a guy like that is worth keeping around is a ratio of how productive the player is vs how distracting and disfunctional he makes a team, not shade of his skin.

11 Jan 2018 20:01:36
There’s nothing racist about it. It’s been said by coaches, gms and media close to the teams he’s played for that he is difficult and has a poor attitude. Don’t make it about race, you sound stupid. Wayne Simmonds is a guy that gets a ton of respect because you never hear bad stories about him. He seems to have his life together off the ice and plays a very honest game on the ice. Joel ward also comes to mind when saying that. And on the contrary, there’s plenty of white players who have been called difficult and told they have a bad attitude.

12 Jan 2018 00:15:30
Woah wtf. Race has absolutely nothing to do with it.

12 Jan 2018 00:51:53
thats a new level of stupidity HIGH247. Not being a fan of one black player does not make someone a racist. Your proposals were never great but entertaining and had conversations and debates going, but you have definitely lost any respect I had and hopefully others had with that BS.

12 Jan 2018 02:51:10
Is 24/ 7 Golden showers?

10 Jan 2018 23:00:04
Apparently Duclair is heading to CHI according to Elliot Friedman

11 Jan 2018 23:31:04
I would love to know who clicked unbelievable for this.

09 Jan 2018 20:48:18
Mtl: Brent seabrook + panik+ Hartman
Chi: Max Pacioretty+ Fucale

09 Jan 2018 21:25:16
You want this?

09 Jan 2018 22:47:20
Chicago says yes please. Thanks. Seabrook a healthy scratch tonight. $6.88M for 6 more seasons after this one. He would be great with Weber, Alzner and Petry.

09 Jan 2018 22:48:27
hell no.

10 Jan 2018 02:42:05
Chicago would need to add a first round pick at least to get rid of that Seabrook contract.

10 Jan 2018 03:39:20
Are you a Habs fan?

09 Jan 2018 03:34:34
There's reports Ian Cole to the Blackhawks. Can anyone else confirm this?

09 Jan 2018 06:59:24
they waived franson so I could believe it.

04 Jan 2018 05:45:24

- 2018 1st Round Pick

- Ville Pokka

- 2018 conditional 2nd&5th (If the Chicago's 2018 First round pick is after the 24th selection)

- 2019 2nd round pick

- 2020 3rd round pick

Chicago :

- Max Pacioretty

I didn't post in like a year, don't judge me.

Chicago's LW depth kinda sucks. Saad isn't performing the way Chicago hoped he would.

Montreal can start a much needed rebuild.

Ville Pokka is NHL Ready.

04 Jan 2018 06:14:47
Well um that’s a lot from Chicago lol nah.

04 Jan 2018 07:39:10
Ville pokka was on waviers and no one pick him up.

04 Jan 2018 16:03:44
I don’t think hawks do that. Pokka was on waivers, but it wasn’t to get rid of him, it was that he didn’t crack the top 6 and they were trying to sneak him through to the minors like lots of teams do in the last day or 2 of September. But also hawks only jumped over Avs to get out of the central basement last night. Giving up a first, second and third might not be smart for a guy like patches at this point. Could be different come deadline tho.

28 Dec 2017 12:32:06
Ottawa needs to make trades leading to the draft. No point in attempting to get players because they won't make the playoffs. They should get prospects and picks.

Ottawa: Hoffman
Oilers: 1st 2018

*a lot of rumours regarding hoffman to oilers to be Mcdavids shooting partner

Ottawa: Brassard, Ceci
Chicago: Keith, 2nd

*Other than toews (struggling), Chicago doesn't have a quality center and a young, strong mobile defenceman

28 Dec 2017 13:39:03
Keith only makes 5.5 mill

Brassard makes 5 mill and ceci makes 2.8 till July then needs a raise.

They couldn’t take the cap hit today anyway, but the Hawks are always losing quality players due to salary cap problems, why would they trade an underpaid #1 defenseman to purposely create more problems for themselves in 6 months?

28 Dec 2017 14:36:09
Now the rumor is the Oilers and Sens talks about Hoffman died down. As per Elliote Friedman.

28 Dec 2017 14:36:38
A suggested fit for Hoffman now from Friedman is maybe Carolina or STL.

28 Dec 2017 18:08:34
Lmfao I heard the Edmonton one but the Chicago one is a joke for the sens Keith is old and starting to struggle so why would the sens want that contract? Lol Keith for Phaneuf and a 5th would be more realistic than that.

28 Dec 2017 20:50:48
Aloll i think you guys forget that their 1st will be one of the highest so Hoffmam is not enough.

29 Dec 2017 14:57:09
I dnt mind the first one. But if anything they will be getting younger.

sens laugh at the second pick.

Keith has been getting worse. Also ottawa could probably get a decent prospect or a solid top 6 forward for ceci.

29 Dec 2017 23:17:53
Actually Edm will finish in a higher position so their 2018 ist will not be that early as you suggest their keyhabs. I'm ok with the trade but the Sens could get more for Hoffman.

16 Dec 2017 19:40:37
Hawks should rebuild why there players still have good value, hawks are good but no longer good enough to win the cup

Buf: Kane, Crawford

Chi: Kane, Moulson, Bogosian, Beaulieu, Lehner, Ullmark, Nylander, 1st unprotected, 2nd 2019 becomes first if buf makes the playoffs

Mtl: Toews, Murphy

Chi: Galchenyuk, Lekonen, Petry, hemsky, Fucale, 1st unprotected, 2nd 2019 if mtl makes playoffs

Nyr: Anisimov, franson, wingels

Chi: Staal, Chytil, 1st 2019

Ott: Keith, Panik, Sharp

Chi: White, Ceci, Burrows, Condon, Macarthur, 1st 2019, 2nd if sens make it to the stanley cup finals in the next two years

Bos: Saad

Chi: Beleasky, Miller, Zboril, 1st 2019

Sjs: E. Kane, Condon

Chi: Boeker, Martin, Dell, 1st 2019, 2nd if kane re signs

Phi: Galchenyuk, Seabrook

Chi: Lethora, MacDonald, Sanhien, 2nd, 1st 2019

Hawks don't take a bad contract longer than 4 years, try and get jack hughes next years, got young players like: white, Chytil, Lekonen, Nylander, Still have dibrincat, dmen you got Sanhien, Zboril Ceci, Goalies dell and ullmark a lot of picks, bad contract: Lethora, Macdonal, Boeaker, Martin, Staal, Bealsky, Bogosian, hopefully be able to trade miller, petry, lehner

16 Dec 2017 20:25:41
Because Chicago would totally do this 🙄.

16 Dec 2017 20:40:59
The hawks are not trading Toews.

16 Dec 2017 21:00:54
Dumbest post iv ever seen, sorry. Like what are you talking about man :/.

16 Dec 2017 22:01:42
This is a whole new level.

17 Dec 2017 04:00:35
This is one of the worst. Until Toews and Kane are like 32 33 years old. they will try and figure out how to put the best team around these guys. not destroy the team altogether.

17 Dec 2017 04:23:47
Agree but still Hawks used to be carried by Toews Crawford Keith Kane
Toews down 3 to go.

23 Dec 2017 12:18:47
Multiple NOs starting with Chicago . duh?

26 Nov 2017 16:22:56
Hey guys I just added a one to my name because I'm better then all of you's. Okay so the first trade with my new name.



Edm gets a winter who has a lot of upside and Chi gets a really good proven top 4 D man. Oh and here's a fact about a random player for. The West.Why is nobody comenting on this and just talking about habs/ oilers?

26 Nov 2017 16:50:27
Someone is a sad sad sad little man.

Chicago says no to this.

26 Nov 2017 20:17:01
Pretty sad somebody needs to make an account to mock Yup when he’s literally honest about posts lol.

26 Nov 2017 20:26:14
I mean, I did have it narrowed down to one person. So I guess I'm not surprised.

This actually made my day. Way too funny.

26 Nov 2017 20:28:08
Ed, Has all his accounts been deleted? Or is GoldenKnights still coming on strong?

27 Nov 2017 00:15:53
This is just way too awesome.

27 Nov 2017 00:21:33
Thank you soo much, ed. that guy was waisting everyones time by having to scroll through his everyday non sense, thanks again!

27 Nov 2017 02:28:22
Aahah love the editors comments about golden showers

27 Nov 2017 09:10:17
This is so funny. I feel flattered.
I was actually hoping the site would say who the troll is.
Made my day.

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass