Chicago Blackhawks Rumours

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

05 Sep 2017 23:15:25
-Flames and Bennet and Red Wings and Athanasiou are both far apart with their teams for contract nagotiations. Both reportedly shopping KHL contracts to pressure clubs.

-Cody Franson apperently deciding between Oilers and Blackhawks.

-Jagr could be preparing to stay in the Czech and play for Klando and the Olympics.

-Pasternak and his agent keep using Drias $8.5M as a comparable and demanding more than Boston is offering (believed to be $6M per for 6 years) . This nagotiation is maybe getting ugly.

-Horvat and Canuks could be announcing a signing in the next few days.

06 Sep 2017 02:40:42
Franson would be nice addition oil, upgrade over Gryba for sure.

06 Sep 2017 03:00:36
I think Pasternak at 7.5 would be fair. Draisatl being able to either ride shotgun with mcdavid or center his own line gives him a bit of a premium. But 6 million just wouldn't cut it if I were pasta either. And Franson was a guy i hated to see leave the leafs but we got a first, a prospect and a 5th or something for him so they had to. I would be glad to bring him back on the cheap because our RD is weak. But oilers would be a good fit too.

06 Sep 2017 15:46:51
-Duchane also didn't attend first captains practice yesterday. Landeskog was a little disappointed. But it's looking like Duchane will be traded within the month here.

-Horvats deals looking to be around 5/ 6 years between around $5.5M per.

07 Sep 2017 02:40:03
Duchene was at a wedding, lots of players weren't there.

04 Aug 2017 10:54:26
With Spooner looking for a long term contract with salary of 4m and up, the bruins might be looking to unload him before next season....

Bos Spooner 4 Pittsburg 2nd round pick 2018

or

Bos Spooner 4 Mtl 2nd rond pick(chicago's)

This would allow boston to make room for the cap next year, picks for trades or to draft... and room for younger players to gain experience...

Let me know if it makes sense value wise, not to sure of spooner's value, thanks

04 Aug 2017 13:39:04
I think they're going to want more than a late 2nd rounder for him but I don't know how desperate their cap situation is. Money problems make teams take less for better players obviously.

04 Aug 2017 16:49:52
Any trade with MTL and Bos doesn't make sense.

05 Aug 2017 04:42:12
they just love to hate each other I do not see it happening unless a third team is involve.

05 Aug 2017 18:57:22
they love to hate each other, I don not see this one happening unless another team is involved.

05 Aug 2017 21:03:51
"That's hysterical" -Don Sweeney.

06 Aug 2017 19:34:29
The winning habits are saying blues would Like to unload Paul Statney salary cap, and thinks Bergie could Build a trade using Carr and other prospect for Statney , a lot more likely and spooner.

30 Jun 2017 20:56:44
Couple of Leaf moves.

Pittsburgh needs a 3C. I think Tyler Bozak may be the ideal fit there.

Tyler Bozak (50% Salary Retention) + Martin Marincin + Ben Smith to the Pittsburgh Penguins in exchange for Carl Hagelin + Derrick Pouliot + Tristan Jarry + 2017 5th Round Pick.

Hagelin had 22 points in 61 games. He was even scratched in the post season. He is more of a cap dump than anything now, and I think Toronto would be fine with taking him on. Pouliot and Jarry are two fine prospects who could end up doing well for Toronto. Pouliot is more of a reclamation project, but Jarry could end up as a solid NHL backup to Freddy.
As for Pittsburgh, they get a player who is all too familiar with Phil. Phil was at his best when he was with Bozak (weird, I know), so maybe reuniting them could get Phil back to his 30 goal days. Bozak essentially replaces Bonino at half of Bonino's FA cost, plus Pittsburgh dumps Hagelin, so the Pens save a ton of money.

____

I can tell that Chicago wants to be a contender again. They only have Saad on the LW though.

James van Riemsdyk to the Chicago Blackhawks in exchange for Marcus Kruger + 2018 1st Round Pick + Laurent Dauphin.

JVR is bound to get at least a first. A first, a cap dump, and a prospect seems to be enough for me. Especially considering that Kruger (the cap dump), can fill a hole on Toronto (4C) .
Chicago now has their lineup in tact for next year; Saad/ Toews/ Panik ; JVR/ Anisimov/ Kane. that's two solid lines. If JVR wants too much money by the end of the year, let him go to FA. This deal was more like a rental deal anyway.

Sign:
Joe Thornton; 2 years/ 5.5 million per.
Cody Franson; 1 year/ 2.2 million.
Curtis McElheinney 1 year/ 800K

Toronto lineup:
Zach Hyman - Auston Matthews - William Nylander
Leo Komarov - Nazem Kadri - Connor Brown
Kasperi Kapanen - Joe Thornton - Mitch Marner
Carl Hagelin - Marcus Kruger - Matt Martin
*Josh Leivo/ Kerby Rychel

Nikita Zaitsev - Jake Gardiner
Connor Carrick - Morgan Rielly
Cody Franson - Derrick Pouliot
*Calle Rosen

Frederik Andersen
Curtis McElheinney.

01 Jul 2017 02:53:55
The Pittsburg one is just horrible for Toronto they keep 50% get a horrible contract (cap dump) and two bad prospects? While Pittsburg get a 60 point player for an amazing contract and a young defenceman that actually played in the NHL? Is it just me or this is ridiculous

Also Toronto won't take Markus krugers contract he's making more than 3mill and giving up JVR and receiving a low 1st?

Both trades were bad IMO but just my opinion.

01 Jul 2017 03:01:42
Honestly this is hilarious! Can't see this coming from anyone else than a huge Pittsburg fan.

01 Jul 2017 07:56:30
^clearly you have no idea what you're talking about. Pouliot was one regarded to be a great prospect, which he hasn't shown yet, but sure good to give him another shot and Tristan Jarry is quite a good goalie prospect, just overshadowed by Murray. Also, TOR basically isn't giving anything but Bozak.

01 Jul 2017 11:38:12
@Ali

Lmao, if youve read from me before, I'm a leaf fan. I've always thought that Bozak/ JVRs peice tags were higher than this, but with the trades that have been coming in for players with term, it is clearly evident that the prices of two soon-to-be UFAs has dropped. What we get from Bozak is positional upgrade, a defenseman and a goalie. What we get from JVR is a first rounder, and Kruger can help on the fourth line. Yes the salary dumps are bad, but Hags comes to end at the same time as Marner/ Matthews need new deals. So there is no problem there. If worse comes to worse with Kruger, just buy him out.

Idk, of course as a leaf fan I would have wanted more. But looking at the market, I feel like both players values have gone down.

01 Jul 2017 15:35:11
@Draisaitl_94 what do you mean only giving bozak? They keep 50% of his salary and take a cap dump player that makes 4 mill for 2 more years and all they get back are 2 unproven low end prospects that played what 5-20 NHL games and is like 23.

01 Jul 2017 17:49:11
So basically an Early 2nd ( I'm guessing 30th ovr ) for JVR and on top of that 3mil in dead cap space ( the buyout period closed. ) why wouldn't you just keep him? And Bozak for Tristan Jarry? No from leafs Pouliot is a failed prospect that could do well in Europe. May as well just buyout Bozak then take on Haglin.

24 Jun 2017 11:19:40
CBJ: Saad
CHI: Anisimov, Dano

WPG: Dano, 1st
CHI: Ladd

CBJ: Panarin
CHI: Saad

(1+3 trade other little pieces involved)

Crazy. 2 Saad trades within 2 years in the end basically Anisimov for Panarin, as Dano is now in Wpg and Ladd in Ny. Wins for Clb and Wpg.

23 Jun 2017 17:23:05
As per Friedman.

Saad ++++ back to Chicago for Panarin +++++


The hockey world is losing everything.

23 Jun 2017 16:43:48
At the draft:

Mtl sends Chucky and a 1st to Chi

Chicago sends Anisimov and Hjalmarrson.

23 Jun 2017 17:13:06
No from MTL we don't want old players with bad contracts.

23 Jun 2017 20:48:59
Hjalmarsson got traded.

22 Jun 2017 20:05:57
Ott trades Claeson to
Chic for Seabrook

Allows Chicago to save money and get a solid second pair dman. Ottawa replaces hole left by Methot

22 Jun 2017 20:25:51
No from both.
Claesson doesn't get Seabrook, despite his long contract. He is still a good dman, who has won three Stanley cups. Chicago, if they want to trade Seabrook, will surely get better offers.

As for Ottawa, do they really want the contracts of Seabrook, Phaneuf AND Ryan dragging on for the next four-five years. Those are three overpaid, 30 year old players, who combined make 20 million. Dorion should be looking to dump Phaneuf and Ryan, not add another hefty contract.

22 Jun 2017 21:17:24
Seabrook is old and aging. He still has the IQ and Shot but his lags have worn out. That mixed with his terrible contract is say he has nagitive value. No team in there right mind would want him at his full salary.

21 Jun 2017 01:57:44
MTL: Anisimov

CHI: 2nd 2017, 3rd 2017

Not sure of Anisimovs value but maybe they get him at a cheap cost since chicagos cap problems.

If Montreal can handle Hjalmarsson and Anisimovs contract and able to sign galchenyuk and radulov...

MTL: Hjalmarsson, Anisimov

CHI: 2nd 2017, 2nd 2018

Montreal does Chicago a favour and gets them out of the red.

21 Jun 2017 02:24:21
Dont think that will be in compliance with the cap. Unless we can somehow get rid of Plekanec contract . Even then would be a stretch
I also feel like Habs should hokd on to a few picks. cupboard is really bare, especially with Sergachev gone now . All the prospects are C to C+ prospects at best.

21 Jun 2017 02:44:49
first of all montreal would have to lose emilin and plekanec to absorb those deals which is going to cost them, secondly I wouldn't want anisimov beacuse the main problem for Montreal last year was their faceoff % and anisimov is averaging 45% and that's the main reason they wanna trade him, third of all they are both pretty old and would much rather see Radulov stay and if anisimov comes in they won't be able to sign Radulov.

21 Jun 2017 15:18:33
2nd one is brutal Montreal adds A lot.

17 Jun 2017 23:57:06
Talks of Galchenyuk to Chicago for Hjalmarsson and a pick.

18 Jun 2017 00:35:43
I said that yesterday. Minny also offered Brodin to Montreal for Galchenyuk and a 1st. Montreal had until today to decide.

18 Jun 2017 00:40:14
No from Montreal don't want his bad contract.

18 Jun 2017 00:41:44
Only 2 years remaining and he's 30 never going to happen.

15 Jun 2017 10:32:55
Reason: Chicago needs to free up cap space and will lose him to expansion anyway. I seen an article saying he'd be a good fit with Calgary. So here's my proposal.

Calgary Flames
• 1st round pick (16th)
• 2nd round pick (2018)
• Morgan Klimchuk

Chicago Blackhawks
• Niklas Hjarmlsson

* Stajan + pick/ prospect to Vegas for expansion claim to Stajan

(Idek his value but he's pretty solid and I think in my opinion that it's pretty fair but I might be off, can anyone give me their opinion please? )

TOP 4 D

Mark Giordano - Dougie Hamilton
Niklas Hjalmarsson - TJ Brodie

(Brodie's natural fit on the right side)

10 Jun 2017 04:18:19
Vancouver:
2nd Round Draft Pick 2017 (55)

Chicago:
C - Marcus Kruger $3.08
1st Round Draft Pick 2017 (26)

10 Jun 2017 15:45:58
Cap dump?

31 May 2017 23:20:57
Apparently Vegas and CHI are making a trade that involves Vegas to take TVR but they must take Kruger as part as a trade in order for Chicago to save on cap.

I think that's a great deal for Vegas if you ask me.

01 Jun 2017 00:32:01
Idk. In some ways, I don't see reasoning behind Vegas' decision.
Hawks have to protect HJalm/ Keith/ SEAbrook on the backend. TVR is there no matter what. Idk. ITs kinda how LV sees Kruger.

01 Jun 2017 02:43:48
Get a bottom 6 defenceman, never played top 4 so you have no idea how he's going to do and an over-payed center.

It's alright I guess.
More happy that Chicago can clear that cap space.

01 Jun 2017 01:57:56
Agree with top shelf Chicago needs to add a pick.

01 Jun 2017 02:07:49
I guess they figure Hawks could deal tvr somewhere else prior and Vegas wouldn't have anyone near as good to choose from. THis way they get a good young D who wasn't given, but earned top 4 minutes on a great team, and krugers contract is only 3.083 for 2 seasons. He's still a decent checker and can score a little more than he did last year. Not like taking on a Bolland 5.5 mill for a ton of years. The cap hits not great but it's not going to cripple a team, especially not Vegas.

07 May 2017 08:30:49
If Kruger isn't taken by Vegas (IMO it's TVR).

To CAR:
Marcus Kruger

To CHI:
Eddie Lack (50% retained)


Kruger is still an excellent on PK and Canes can easily afford his cap hit. Carolina retains on Lack because the Hawks do this mainly for cap reasons.

07 May 2017 08:53:06
Interesting.

07 May 2017 16:29:41
What does kruger bring to car. Not enough to part with lack. Ward maybe.

07 May 2017 18:46:02
Colt dunno if you know or not (probably not) Canes had a falling out with Lack this season, he won't be back with the team.

I like the idea honestly, wouldn't mind my Nucks going after Lack (if he's cheap) assuming we lose Miller and want Demko to have another full year in the AHL.

06 May 2017 17:52:06
Toronto: 17th ovr

Chicago: Kruger,2018 1st and Pokka

Chicago loses cap in Kruger and get more picks for this years draft sense they are hosting. Toronto gets a pick in a better draft + an okay dman. They could buyout Kruger.

06 May 2017 18:07:21
Vegas is likely to choose kruger in the expansion draft, and we don't have much for defensive prospects, pokka could make the blackhawks next season.

07 May 2017 08:54:47
This is retarded VB like I get it you like the leafs.

06 May 2017 14:25:32
J. Van Riemsdyk + M. Marincin + J. Greenway + G. Sparks in exchange for M. Kruger + V. Pokka + N. Schmaltz + 2017 2nd Round Pick


How I take it from both teams.

Chicago:
Gives them another chance at a cup after a disappointing end to 16/ 17. JVR/ Toews/ Panik and Kane/ Anisimov/ Panarin are two disgusting lines that opponents have to fear. Plus Motte, Hossa +++ in the bottom six.
JVR is a legitimate 60 point man, and playing with his brother and Toews/ Kane could make him a possible 70 point man.
Plus, a PP of Panarin/ JVR/ Toews/ Kane/ Keith is right up there with Kessel/ Hornqvist/ Malkin/ Crosby/ Letang.

Marincin fills in as a cheap bottom two dman, Greenway is a decent prospect, maybe an AHL guy? Sparks in the second buggest piece coming to Chicago though, as he had a stellar AHL year and could possibly be a cheap backup for the Hawks if they cannot affoard to get a legitimiate backup. Yes, he played poorly in the big league in 15/ 16, but so did the entire Leaf team. He projects to be a future backup in the league anyway.

Toronto:
Toronto gets something in value for JVR, who would probably want northwards of 6 million+ in free agency, which we simply do not have the cap for, with out big three coming up soon.
Nick Schmaltz is a good player, former first round guy, could be a nice third line centre, eventually replace Bozak as third line centre. For not though, he'd probabky take wing with Bozak/ Marner, as a more defensive guy.
Ville Pokka would be the Leafs fourth best defender, and would give them a better top 4 than if they were to keep Connor Carrick in there. Carrick is a better bottom 2 guy, still servicable, but better in sheltered minutes. Ville Pokka could be a nice defensive guy with Morgan Rielly, and he'd be a nice addition to the dcore. Gardiner/ Zaitsev and Pokka/ Rielly looks pretty decent.

Marcus Kruger allows us to let Brian Boyle go to free agency, and although he is servicable, he is more of a cap dump wuth a 3 million dollar salary. He can play fourth line, and really, if his salary becomes too unbearable, we can buy him out or send him to the minors.

So what do you guys think? I think this is a fair asking price for JVR. MIlan Lucic got two firsts + Colin Miller, and since JVR doesn't have the grit of Lucic, I'd see him getting this. It's basically a first (Schmaltz), Pokka (Miller) + 2nd (which is worth less than a first) . Kruger for Sparks/ Marincin/ Greenway,

Maybe a small add from the Leafs? Maybe a small add from the Hawks?

06 May 2017 15:44:38
Make the 2nd a 2018 first and if you really wanted to you could take out Pokka.

04 May 2017 18:08:05
Chicago: hossa
any team: 2nd OR 3rd round pick

chicago: Graham Knott + 5th
vegas: picks kruger in expansion draft.

04 May 2017 19:25:51
I understand wanting to lose cap, speaking about Kruger, but really you wanna give a prospect and a pick for them to pick an actual decent player? I don't know who else can be taken from Chicago, but if Kruger is available I'd take him.

05 May 2017 00:36:13
@McJesus yeah the only other real choice Vegas has after Kruger is TVR. And with the lack of good forwards available I would choose Kruger in a heartbeat. But if LV GM is smart he could be like we won't take Kruger unless u give us that. So Kaner could be onto something.

05 May 2017 05:56:28
No he's really not onto anything. Vegas also needs to hit the cap floor too.
If Kruger is available you take him. There will be many decent defenseman available for Vegas and forwards will be slim, as you did say.

23 Apr 2017 16:25:49
This will never happen but its interesting and tricky trade.

Ok this is a big deal. A little confusing.

4 team trade.

Chicago - Vancouver - Arizona - Toronto

TO

Blackhawks - D. Sedin
- H. Sedin
- Kalinin (from Tor)

Canucks - Seabrook
- Burmistrov
- Lupul

Coyotoes - Hossa

Leafs - Kruger

lots of pieces and money.

Have at it GMs

23 Apr 2017 17:29:58
So.

Vancouver trades D. Sedin + H. Sedin in exchange for Seabrook + Burmistrov + Lupul
Hell no from Vancouver. The twins are getting traded for younger pieces, not a usless Lupul, an old Seabrook and a bust of Burmistrov

Chicago trades Seabrook + Hossa + Kruger in exchange for Sedin + Sedin + Kalinin.
No from Chicago, and yes. The Sedins are worse but are on term for less. So idrk. Chicago does dump cap, so is a possibility.

Arizona trades Burmistrov in exchange for Hossa.
HELL YEAH FROM ARIZONA. Hossa isn't playing out his term. he's probabky playing 2-3 more years max. But still, 2-3 years more from Hossa is worth way more than whatever Burmistrov will do in a depth role.

Toronto trades Kalinin + Lupul in exchange for Kruger
As a leaf fan, i take that any day of the week. Kruger may be on the books for longer, but Kalinin is nothing and Lupul is negative value. Kruger can play the fourth line, something that Toronto needs after Boyle leaves. But this part definetly favours the Leafs.

All in all, it just seems like Vancouver and Chicago get screwed, and Arizona and Toronto make off with spoils.

24 Apr 2017 01:08:11
Seabrook has one of the worst contracts, his mobility is almost gone. Zero interest in Seabrook.

24 Apr 2017 07:22:44
there's so much wrong with this. i don't even know where to start.
1) chicago says no, even though we lose a rubbish load of cap with kruger, seabrook and hossa, it's not worth taking sedin twin salary.
2) vancouver's in a rebuild so why would they want seabrook, lupul and burmistrov? burmistrov is the only one that would be worth while, even then they aren't getting their money's worth out of the deal.
3) toronto would be getting a decent deal getting rid of lupul's contract and getting kruger who could help 4th line
4) arizona taking hossa's contract would be nice and would help them reach the cap floor but they could just use that money to pay their youunger guys more
5) it's extremely rare to see a 3 way trade, let lone a 4 way trade. correct me if i'm wrong but i don't remember there ever being a 4 way trade.

12 Apr 2017 17:53:54
Col: Landeskog, 5th
Chicago: Tuulola. pokka, 2nd, kruger (cap dump)

who adds? is this close?

12 Apr 2017 18:57:09
quantity doesn't = quality Colorado adds, jokes

come on what a biased chicago trade.

12 Apr 2017 19:07:40
What a bunch of crap for. Landeskog. Not even a 1st which is sad. A late 2nd, a cap dump, a weak prospect and an ok prospect in Pokka. Not close or happening. Kaner back at it again. Panarin for Colburne, Greer, 2nd and Beachimin?

12 Apr 2017 19:14:39
Sorry Kaner. I can't see it.
Maybe Debrinkat.
Vanriemsdyk
A 1st.

I dunno. that's probably off as well. Avalanche want a lot for him. amd i'm not sure of they want more NHL established talent with still some upside.

13 Apr 2017 00:52:12
sosa, i'd argue about pokka being nhl ready and tuulola being close to ready. but yeah you got a point, i'd do your proposal for landy.

13 Apr 2017 01:02:33
Sodas package is WAY closer that original proposal, which is laughable.

13 Apr 2017 03:56:35
Well Sosa since DeBrincat and a arguably a 1st have more value then the package he originally offered, yes it's a lot closer. Don't see Hawks going after Landeskog tho, don't really have the assets, Avs want (young ( (left handed) ) NHL defencemen)

02 Apr 2017 17:01:51
based on the feedback from my previous post, it would take more than a 4th to get vegas to take kruger, so maybe add a prospect in as i don't see chicago giving up their 1st or 2nd round pick with the draft being in chicago this year.

Chicago: 4th + Robin Press (defense prospect)
Vegas: Takes Kruger

Is this a closer bet?

02 Apr 2017 23:24:29
I'm not sure if the draft being in Chicago is going to detour anything gm bowman will do to drop a bad contract to be cap compliant. He has shown in the past the he is willing to make bold moves.

29 Mar 2017 08:03:48
Chicago: 4th round pick
LV: takes kruger in expansion draft

does this make sense? chicago can protect one of their better players and shed salary by getting rid of kruger's contract. vegas gets a 3rd/ 4th liner and some salary to get to the cap floor as well as essentially a free draft pick to get another prospect in their pool. would this work or would they want a prospect rather than a pick for this?

29 Mar 2017 15:54:13
Probably going to have to make it a 2nd in this crappy draft year.

29 Mar 2017 18:50:43
CHI would have to give a 2nd to get rid of Kruger, yet the godly Shattenkrik was only worth a very late 1st "in this crappy draft year. "

That's interesting, eh Tankie.

29 Mar 2017 19:22:39
Shankar, Kruger has a high cap hit for low production. As for the draft there isn't going to be much outside the first round and most of second round.

29 Mar 2017 21:10:16
Don't get me wrong, the draft this year is generally seen as a weak one, and I'm not debating that.

But here is another thing I have noticed: Kruger has 14 points and Lehtera has 19 in about the same amount of games played. Kruger's cap hit is 3.083 million and Lehtera's is 4.7. So, since you mentioned cap hits and low production, let's look at dollars per point for those two. Kruger's production as it relates to cap hit is 220K per point thus far into the season, while Lehtera's is 247K per point. So, it seems that Lehtera is less valuable than Kruger.

Yet you were saying a few months ago how Lehtera is one of the best playmaking centres in the league, but now he is producing less efficiently than a player who you are saying is worthless. That's kind of funny.

29 Mar 2017 21:39:20
I hate how points mean everything. Obviously the more points you get the "better" you are. But guys make a living off of being a 3rd liner who kills penaltys and does other things instead of just producing points.

29 Mar 2017 21:51:45
Get used to it, what the blues have is always gold and what anyone else has is garbage. He's the ft4a of St. Louis.

29 Mar 2017 23:12:31
Unbiased Jim, ya got it mixed up. Therell only ever be one tankie.

FT4A is Edmontons TAnkie.

30 Mar 2017 03:10:56
Lehtera is like tied for around 260th in assists in the league. Guys unreal! Right up there with McDavid, Backstrom and Thornton for set up guys in the game.

30 Mar 2017 04:18:04
Tankie u just got d_stroyed.

30 Mar 2017 13:40:55
I find it interesting that you keep fixating on one thing I was wrong about. Difference between me and u I can admit it. Lehtera had a really good season helped tarasenko get to 40 and helped with tarasenkos 9 goals in playoffs. He was a great playmaker this year he came out flat and straight up sucked. Can't help that happens pretty often in nhl. But I find it funny its the only thing you gravitate to. If I remember correctly partake was going to be a one year wonder and wouldn't match his numbers from last year. we got 7 games left and he has already performed better.

30 Mar 2017 14:17:11
Kingsolver, blues are going to destroy your hopes of making the playoffs.

30 Mar 2017 17:14:54
LOL! There's many many things we "gravitate" to that you say Colt. Don't flatter yourself thinking there's only one.
And this is the very first time EVER you have said you were wrong about something. That's also a huge reason you get so much hate. Lol. Man you're hilarious. Kinda sad tho.

30 Mar 2017 18:20:08
We don't gravitate to one thing. We gravitate, to use your term, to most things you say. You are the one cherrypicking claims here with Parayko, that was the only thing you were ever correct about.


Also, it feels so amazingly gratifying getting Tankie to actually say he was wrong.

31 Mar 2017 22:25:02
Did i hear that right? Colt said he's wrong?

31 Mar 2017 23:25:42
I still don't believe is Sosa.
He will say something any time now to totally destroy it tho. Lol.

01 Apr 2017 00:12:23
Or he'll just tell me to get out of my mom's basement again, and ignore everything else.

01 Apr 2017 14:30:40
Lol. Yep he's just going to ignore it.

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass