10 Jan 2018 23:11:16
CHI: Panik , + 2 other players
ARZ: Duclair

1.) 10 Jan 2018
10 Jan 2018 23:16:58
Adam Clendenning is part of the deal too.

2.) 10 Jan 2018
10 Jan 2018 23:18:29

ARZ: Duclair, Clendening

CHI: Panik, Dauphin.

3.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 00:06:12
Honestly this ****ing brutal like how the hell does Chicago pull off another one sided trade like I don’t understand how they win every single trade? There’s no way Arizona thinks this is a fair trade like come on league is rigged.

4.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 02:32:06
Ya idk McJesus. CHI didn't even retain too.

5.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 03:34:14
I heard that GM's don't want to trade for Duclair because he is hard to coach.

6.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 03:47:58
Why do you think Duclair is that valuable? Lol you’re making it sound like it’s jvr for Schenn part 2. It’s 4 pretty insignificant players trading spots. I know Duclair seems to have the most upside but it’s also widely reported that they have tried to trade him for over a year and this was the best they could get. He has attitude issues and doesn’t have the offense to back up his negative qualities. Clearly 31 gms believed this is the most he’s worth. A lot of players a lot more talented than him have been very irrelevant because they wouldn’t get out of their own way.

7.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 03:55:54
Arizona is just happy to get rid of him. Chayka said his problems goes back long long ago. Player didn't want to be there and team didn't want the player.
I honestly used to really like Duclair, but unless he completely changes his attitude and grows up, he won't be anything special.
And I think Chicago is the organization to straighten him out.

8.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 04:39:07
Really wishing my team would made a play for him. He's young. can still be a solid player and potential 30 goal man.

9.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 04:40:28
Not saying he has loads of value at all just how does Chicago always find a way to absolutely burn the other team.

10.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 05:00:04
Also panik is only 26, his best season is 22g 44pts last season, Duclairs is 20g 44pts but 2 years ago. They have very similar stats this year (6g 10a for 16 pts in 37 games vs 9g 6a 15pts in 33 games) Panik has also fit into a few different teams now and you never hear bad character/ attitude reports. Your oilers would have been able to get him for the same price, blame your GM not a “rigged league” haha.

11.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 05:00:24
Potential 30 goal man I can’t see, but he’s young with speed and skill. But if he does got an attitude that’s a big issue and this is the second time he’s been traded and he’s young, not a great sign but if he can fix that then he could be a good player.

12.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 05:07:56
Plus . Look for him to start with Toews and Saad. Hawks have been looking for and option on that RW to complete that line.

13.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 06:06:42
Hes not hard to coach people just assume rubbish cause his black just people said about ignla back in the day more recenly subban kane stewart bufflyn you just makeing yourself look raciest.

14.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 12:54:18
Idk why everyone makes it that Chicago makes out like bandits?

Panik has 16 pts in 37 games after 44 in 82 last year. he's on pace for roughly the same. he's played well. i don't think the dofference between him and duclair is big, bsides the cap hits.

and honestly, i'd rather have laurent than clendening. dauphin can be something in the nhl, clendening has just fallen off a cliff.

15.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 14:30:48
22 years old and now on his 3rd team says all you need to know about Duclair!

16.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 19:19:44
Alexei yashin and Alex kovalev both had bad attitudes at times in their careers and were viewed as difficult, 2 white guys, and before you say now we hate blacks and Russians lol. Eric Lindros. The difference between Duclair and lindros is that lindros has the numbers and on ice success to balance out being a pain in the ass. Deciding if a guy like that is worth keeping around is a ratio of how productive the player is vs how distracting and disfunctional he makes a team, not shade of his skin.

17.) 11 Jan 2018
11 Jan 2018 20:01:36
There’s nothing racist about it. It’s been said by coaches, gms and media close to the teams he’s played for that he is difficult and has a poor attitude. Don’t make it about race, you sound stupid. Wayne Simmonds is a guy that gets a ton of respect because you never hear bad stories about him. He seems to have his life together off the ice and plays a very honest game on the ice. Joel ward also comes to mind when saying that. And on the contrary, there’s plenty of white players who have been called difficult and told they have a bad attitude.

18.) 12 Jan 2018
12 Jan 2018 00:15:30
Woah wtf. Race has absolutely nothing to do with it.

19.) 12 Jan 2018
12 Jan 2018 00:51:53
thats a new level of stupidity HIGH247. Not being a fan of one black player does not make someone a racist. Your proposals were never great but entertaining and had conversations and debates going, but you have definitely lost any respect I had and hopefully others had with that BS.

20.) 12 Jan 2018
12 Jan 2018 02:51:10
Is 24/ 7 Golden showers?