NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

High247's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




High247's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To High247's Posts

 

 

To High247's last 5 rumours posts

 

To High247's last 5 talk posts

 

To High247's last 5 rumour replies

 

High247's rumours posts with other poster's replies to High247's rumours posts

 

14 Jan 2018 20:31:19
Canucks baertschi sutter dowd

Shark meier martin and a 1 rd pick

High247

1.) 14 Jan 2018 21:51:13
You’re kidding me with this one tho right. Bruh.


2.) 14 Jan 2018 22:20:57
Lol. I'm not surprised.

They aren't giving up Mier and a 1st just to dump Martin. Especially for that return. Wtf.


3.) 14 Jan 2018 22:45:35
You have to stop those strains man. This is so biased.


4.) 14 Jan 2018 23:28:18
Mier = bust.


5.) 15 Jan 2018 00:01:08
Sutter for Martin could happen. By itself. Cap dump for cap dump?


6.) 15 Jan 2018 00:23:46
Biased and delusional.


7.) 15 Jan 2018 16:35:32
Yea Meier is totally a bust eh? What an idiot.


8.) 20 Jan 2018 17:04:11
Really really bad.


 

 

12 Jan 2018 07:39:29
Canucks sutter hutton gadjovich and a 2 and 3 if buffalo retain 1.5 million of his cap for each year

Buffalo ryan o reilly

High247

1.) 12 Jan 2018 13:58:11
Hutton Gagner Sutter 2d always the same you offer.


2.) 20 Jan 2018 07:08:44
Nope.

You got to include a 1st or a one of your best prospects. You are just giving up trash for one the top 5 two way centres in the league.


 

 

11 Jan 2018 22:23:37
This team would be insane

Nashville fabbro tuvanen fiala 1 rd pick and 2 bonino

Ottawa brassard mark stone ceci

Forsberg jonahens avidsson
Smith turris stone
Watson brassard jarnork
Hartnell sissons aberg
Josi ellis
Elholm subban
Emelin ceci

High247

1.) 12 Jan 2018 00:08:39
Way too much from Nashville. Wow!
Stones good, but not those three players and a 1st, 2nd good. AND Bonino. Just seen him
Wow this is terrible for Nashville!


2.) 12 Jan 2018 00:25:09
Only guy worth getting there is stone imo no way Nash should give away so many assets for the other two.


3.) 12 Jan 2018 02:50:06
No from OTT imo, (probs biased) but Stone should be untouchable, without brassard we have a huge hole in our top 6 and you can have Ceci for free. lol.


4.) 12 Jan 2018 04:07:08
Bonino suck he way over payed he play good with kesel that about it to me with his contract makes him have negative vaule brassard would probably the best 3 line center in the leage ceci is underated he's a top for dman with some size.


5.) 12 Jan 2018 06:55:17
High is English your first language or second bcuz I can’t tell lol work on some grammar and spelling yikes after reading that.


6.) 12 Jan 2018 13:53:20
Bonino has negative value? LOL.
Fabbro, Tolvanen, Fiala alone have more value than the whole Sens package here. And you want a 1st, 2nd and Bonino. Just god awful for the Preds. Stone should be untouchable and Sens GM has said so. But this is an overpayment and should be a clear yes from Sens.


7.) 12 Jan 2018 21:43:26
Ottawa says thanks but no thanks.

And Ceci is far from free get real hoff68 he was almost traded straight up for hall when he was in edmonton and is worth more now as he's gotten better since then. is hall worth nothing now too? DIDN'T THINK SO! STOP CALLING YOURSELF A FAN MR. BAND WAGONER.


 

 

10 Jan 2018 08:02:42
Maple leafs marner Liljegren

Buffalo saber
ristolainen alex nylander

High247

1.) 10 Jan 2018 12:18:36
W. Nylander for R. Ristolainen, S. Reinhart, C. Pu and a 1st Rd pick in 2018. Marner is untouchable along with Matthews.


2.) 10 Jan 2018 13:33:43
The trade won’t happen between those two teams but I don’t think it’s terrible. I like marner over risto however ristos position clearly holds more value than a winger. And nylander is more valuable than liljegren. Far better than your Canucks trade proposals. But just don’t see it happening.


3.) 10 Jan 2018 13:34:32
And I hope NylanderMagic is a troll imitating Nylander! Because that’s just insane.


4.) 10 Jan 2018 16:53:05
I wouldn't be surprised if Nylandermagic is Nylander. Seems like something he would say/ think.


5.) 10 Jan 2018 17:41:19
I wonder if its william nylander himself and he's supper jealus of mathew. So he want him traded for kole lind and has a booner for marner so he untouchable. It all make sense now. Lop.


6.) 10 Jan 2018 17:45:41
Oh yay 2 Nylanders who don’t know anything about value yay.


7.) 11 Jan 2018 20:53:06
NOpe i'd make that trade in a heartbeat. Risto for Marner is fair Marner might have abit more potential and I’d take Nylander over Liligeren.


8.) 20 Jan 2018 07:13:01
@high247

Jesus you really must be high 24/ 7 if you think you can get Ristolainen, Reinhart, Pu and a 1st for William Nylander.


 

 

09 Jan 2018 22:33:31
If i was jim benning i would try to unload all my assest

Canucks: dahlen ben hutton 2 rd pick eriksson

Carolina: haydne fluery

Canucks: tanev vanek grunland or gadjovich 2 rd pick
Nashville fabbro Tolvanen

Canucks: edler sutter canuck retain 3m m of edler contact next year and .8 million a year of sutter contract freeing up 3 m in cap for

Tampa: Callahan coburn foote 2rd pck

High247

1.) 09 Jan 2018 23:34:03
Not trading Dahlen Gadjovich or our 2nds were good with drafting 2nd round picka.


2.) 10 Jan 2018 00:15:15
Don’t think there’s enough quality going to Nashville. I wouldn’t say that Tanev is a upgrade on any of the top 4 defence that they already have and yes Vanek is having a decent year but he’s getting old and isn’t exactly known for his playoff contribution. Don’t know much about gadjovich but I do know that fabbro is a really good defence prospect who is controllable for a bunch more years and will fit nicely into their top 4 when guys like ekholm or Ellis become ufa and Nashville can’t keep both. Tolvanen looks like the steal of last years draft, could even play this year once the lol season is over. In my opinion Nashville gives up 2 really good future pieces to get players that in my opinion aren’t going to put them over the top.


3.) 10 Jan 2018 00:31:44
lol ok now this is getting stupid these are both so unbelievable it hurts that you actually thought this was a good idea and please don’t comment trying to justify. This is brutal and I hope you figure it out soon lol.


4.) 10 Jan 2018 00:59:21
Your stick with Eriksson and that contract.


5.) 10 Jan 2018 01:00:40
Nashville doesn't need Tanev, stop trying to trade him there for heir top prospects.
They aren't giving you Fabbro and Tolvanen for that.


6.) 10 Jan 2018 01:54:49
Carolina has like 20 million in cap space lol they could take it and be fine lol well picking up a good prospect if nashville gets any of there top four dman injury then there not going to be so deep then guys would be playing 25 30 mins a night what well burn them out this well keep the top four around 22 min a night.


7.) 10 Jan 2018 04:40:48
Man. Tampa isn't giving up foote and a high pick to save 3 mill. Just stop.


8.) 10 Jan 2018 07:40:01
If they wanna keep Namestnikov, Vladislav and point or they can keep 2 player that's not play like they should be in the nhl and on top of that there getting a big dman upgrade and a even bigger upgrade on the wing or center.


9.) 10 Jan 2018 12:27:31
Coburn isn't as bad as your making him out to be. Tampa has about 2 mill cap space for next year right now. Sustr and Kunitz free up 4 more while being easily replaced from within (Erne/ Cirelli/ Thomas/ Cernal/ Masin) . Also 225k from Condras buried deal. So that's roughly 6 mill. Then the cap is projected to go up as much as 5 mill. So there's 11 mill for raises to Namestnikov next year. Season after that Stralman Coburn and Girardi deals done freeing up about 11 mill. that's when Kuch and Point need deals. Callahan will be in the last year of his deal and could be bought out to save another 3.5 mill if needed. Vasi needs a deal year after that. They aren't in as big of a hole as you think especially right now.


10.) 10 Jan 2018 20:20:11
Yeah this at least the third attempt of tanev to Nashville. There’s like 27-28 out of 31 teams that need some kind of upgrade in their top 4D. Why keep forcing him to one ofthe 5 or 6 who definitely do not? Lol

Pick someone, pick anyone other than like Nashville, anaheim, stlouis, Carolina.


 

 

 

High247's talk posts with other poster's replies to High247's talk posts

 

11 Jan 2018 21:32:24
Some sorces are saying tampa has offered challahan foote and a first rd pick a 2 rd pick IF RESIGN for coyotes OEL

High247

1.) 12 Jan 2018 00:21:17
Yzerman would prove again he's a magical wizard of this wee to happen.


2.) 12 Jan 2018 00:25:14
We heard it here first!


3.) 12 Jan 2018 00:32:06
What sources? As a Tampa fan i'd do that I've always been a big fan of OEL. I haven't heard that from any mainstream Canadian or Tampa sources though.


4.) 12 Jan 2018 00:55:44
Ya. can u imagine. Hedman, OEL, Sergachev? New Big 3. add Kuch Stamkos. and Vasilevsky, could be the next big Dynasty.
If Yzerman can so this, he will prove he is best GM in the game, probably already has planned it.
However your little handle in here makes me wonder if the strain your smoking gives you these great visions to try on PS4 instead of this page?


5.) 12 Jan 2018 16:55:59
If he could just unload Callahan he would move up a notch in my book.


6.) 12 Jan 2018 17:34:07
Lol its funny how that's the same package you've proposed TB would send to VAN for Edler and Sutter or so. You're just what your name says.


 

 

04 Jan 2018 23:57:24
Canucks vanek hutton and to people how think vanek has no value he has 12g 16a 40gp that set him on past for 60 point he can easily go for a first rd pick

Flames valimaki

High247

1.) 05 Jan 2018 00:59:58
hellllloooooo montreals finest

at least its similar jibberish.


2.) 05 Jan 2018 01:46:52
Aaaaaaahahahahaha
Canuks Colt. So funny.


 

 

01 Jan 2018 21:06:26
Canucks vanek 12 goals 16 assist 28pt -9

Hoffman 9 goals 15 assists 24 points -12
For rentals player vanek on top of the list and as less cap

I'm not say vanek for Hoffman

High247

1.) 02 Jan 2018 10:39:48
Yeah because having 2 1/ 2 years left on your contract apparently makes you a rental.


 

 

01 Jan 2018 19:15:06
I just realized that canucks thomas vanek has more points then anyone in mtl lol

High247

1.) 01 Jan 2018 19:27:45
Umm. So do like 100 or more other players In sure. think Sergachev does ad well. ya it's been a bad year. so what.


2.) 01 Jan 2018 19:58:09
Awfully high and mighty about a team beating mtl by a whole point.


 

 

30 Dec 2017 21:23:27
Kole Lind 6.1 192 pounds 27 games 47 points

Dillon dube 5.11 180 pounds 27 game 38 points

Way is kole Lind not on team Canada

High247

1.) 30 Dec 2017 23:28:44
Are you ever going to let this go? Why was Sam Steel not on it last year when leading the CHL in points? Points isn't everything and Dube is far from the most questionable forward on the team.


2.) 31 Dec 2017 00:07:15
Josh Bailey: 38 GP 11G 38A 49P

Patrick Kane: 37GP 16G 22A 38P

Why isn’t Bailey a top 10 player in the NHL?


 

 

 

High247's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jan 2018 20:41:40
On guy said that he had 2 25 point season he had an injury this year hasn't got as many pts but he grow his game his the canuck second best pently kill and has been dishing out some big hits lately.

High247

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jan 2018 19:28:33
Lmao his not one of the best goal scoring in the leage a couple years ago top 25 maybe one of the best is top 10 lol.

High247

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jan 2018 19:14:23
Guddy a ufa his a rfa they would have to trade hutton or stecher i think hutton and a 3 rd pick would do it.

High247

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jan 2018 15:49:14
Not going to happen tanev alone could get Liljegren by add guddy they would have to many d man vanek well get way better offers this year he has 31 points in 44 games and if you look at his playoff stats there pretty good.

High247

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jan 2018 06:41:12
Shark would have to give a a pic or prospect to get ride of him.

High247

 

 

 

High247 has no Talk Replies