NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

PKane88's Profile

Current Avatar:
PKane88's Avatar

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




PKane88's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To PKane88's Posts

 

 

To PKane88's last 5 rumours posts

 

To PKane88's last 5 talk posts

 

To PKane88's last 5 rumour replies

 

PKane88's rumours posts with other poster's replies to PKane88's rumours posts

 

15 Jun 2019 09:23:48
Chicago: Seabrook (25% Retained) +3rd round pick
Ottawa: Lajoie.

PKane88

 

 

10 Jun 2019 04:53:44
Chicago: Crawford
Pittsburgh: Murray

is it close value wise? who would add.

PKane88

1.) 10 Jun 2019 06:16:29
No thanks on murray; I would rather stick with Crawford with a prospect for back-up if he has heath issues. I would like to see Crawford step down after next year or sign a team friendly contract to mentor the future.


2.) 10 Jun 2019 07:01:22
Considering age difference, I’d value Murray way higher than Crawford.


3.) 10 Jun 2019 07:56:53
Chicago would add ofc.


4.) 10 Jun 2019 10:24:45
Chicago adds.

Crawfords age is the difference.


 

 

07 Jun 2019 16:39:57
Chicago: Keith
ottawa: Pageau + 2nd round pick

Chicago sheds some salary. Ottawa gains some salary to get to cap floor and gets another veteran presence to help mentor "the kids"

Chicago: Anisimov
Florida: 3rd round pick

Chicago sheds a bit of salary, florida gets a serviceable 3rd line center that could improve with a change of scenery.

PKane88

1.) 07 Jun 2019 23:30:03
Keith to Ottawa makes zero sense he’s still a solid #3 dman.


2.) 08 Jun 2019 19:50:58
agree with vb, maybe there's a taker for keith but it wouldn't be ottawa. with chabot, brannstrom, jbd, wolanin I can't imagine plugging up a spot on defence for the future would be a good move.


 

 

24 May 2019 03:26:26
Montreal: alzner, 3rd
Edmonton: Lucic, 2nd

bad contract for bad contract. edmonton gives higher pick because of contract difference?

PKane88

1.) 24 May 2019 05:20:22
Anything can happen I guess but if I'm gm of Montreal I don't even consider this. I think alzner is costing the habs 3.5 mil per year right now with him in the minors and tbh I'd sooner have him in the lineup then lucic.


2.) 24 May 2019 10:52:03
Add the 8th overall and it’s closer.


3.) 24 May 2019 15:57:07
Bad history with Lucic in MTL. They wouldn't trade for him. Also, we don't have any cap issues so Alzner is not a problem right now.


4.) 25 May 2019 12:16:18
Lol not a chance in hell we take Lucic. Like vbbbvvbb said at the 8th and it's closer. Lucic is buyout proof. NMC. Awful.


 

 

20 Mar 2019 09:33:39
Chicago: Seabrook, 2nd, tuulola
Ottawa: Jaros + 4th.

PKane88

1.) 20 Mar 2019 21:25:44
Chicago wishes.


2.) 21 Mar 2019 16:03:10
Seabrook too old and makes too much money. Ottawa is rebuild and want young players. Not old man who takes up all salary cap space.


3.) 21 Mar 2019 17:29:32
zamboni he'd be there for a veteran presence to mentor the younger guys. he'd take up some salary cap space yes but during rebuild you'd need to reach cap floor until younger guys need the bigger contracts do you not?


4.) 22 Mar 2019 02:52:56
They can make cap floor easy. Just give Gardiner $6M contract. Better player and costs nothing to sign. Is that not a better idea, yes?


 

 

 

PKane88's talk posts with other poster's replies to PKane88's talk posts

 

09 Feb 2019 21:42:02
ottawa: Stone
Winnipeg: Petan, Stanley, 1st

Ottawa: Duchene
Nashville: Fabbro, 2nd

Ottawa: Dzingle
NJD: 2nd.

PKane88

1.) 09 Feb 2019 22:17:18
P Kane. wouldn't Ottawa want at least a 1st for Duchene? .


2.) 10 Feb 2019 02:55:58
The Jets wouldn’t part with Stanley for a rental.


3.) 10 Feb 2019 05:21:07
Don’t think the 1st trade is enough for stone, late 1st a big d man that may not be more than a 5/ 6 and small forward who can’t crack the line up for stone isn’t enough. even as a rental. I like the duchene trade tho for both teams. Nashville goes all in getting more secondary scoring for the playoffs and I think fabbro is going to be a awesome d man, good size good skater moves puck well, good shot? I’d take that if I was Ottawa.


4.) 10 Feb 2019 15:31:17
3rd pick> Stanley.


 

 

09 Feb 2019 21:37:12
chicago: keith (5.5mx5) +2020 2nd round
boston: Grzelcyk (1.4mx2) + Vaakanainen (ELC)

Boston gets a top defenseman for playoff run. chicago sheds some salary and gets a couple young pieces for retool/ rebuild. Keith goes to a playoff contender to help. 2nd makes up for the age and salary?

PKane88

 

 

06 Nov 2017 00:56:28
confirmed trade!

Ottawa gets: Matt Duchene
Nashville gets: Kyle Turris
Colorado gets: prospects Samuel Girard, Vladislav Kamenev and a second-round pick from the Predators, and forward Shane Bowers, goaltender Andrew Hammond and a first- and third-round pick from the Senators.

thoughts on this deal?

PKane88

1.) 06 Nov 2017 04:27:56
Joe sakic is now the front runner for executive of the year IMO.


 

 

23 Sep 2017 23:21:51
chicago: hossa + 3rd
vegas: 4th or 5th.

PKane88

1.) 24 Sep 2017 20:19:37
I'd take much more for Vegas to take on that contract.
TB needed to pay a 2nd, 4th and Gusev to make Vegas take 1 year of Garrison at 4.5m or so. And Garrison can at least play and is a decent D for them.


 

 

 

PKane88's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Jun 2019 12:40:49
no way toronto trades one of their top prospects AND a 2nd to a rival team just to get rid of Zaitsev's contract only to get a 7th round draft pick back.

PKane88

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Jun 2019 17:06:19
no from ottawa.

PKane88

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Jun 2019 17:01:22
if pens pulled off that trade they'd have insane center depth, and i'd be interested to see what pul would do with crosby or malkin.

PKane88

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Jun 2019 09:31:19
how biased are you, jesus. marleau alone could at least get a 3rd.

PKane88

 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Jun 2019 16:25:43
so why would you give up 2 players to acquire him when you could just sign him for free in free agency?

PKane88

 

 

 

PKane88 has no Talk Replies