28 Jul 2016 20:58:25
This is apparently I legit rumour going around.

EDM: RNH + Pouliot

MIN: Dumba + Zucker


Personally I think Minny needs to add a pick but that's a decent starting point. Be interesting to see what happens.

1.) 28 Jul 2016
28 Jul 2016 21:14:40
It is not a bad start, but I'd rather take Coyle than Zucker. Then add a 2nd from minny.

2.) 28 Jul 2016
28 Jul 2016 21:22:22
I doubt Minny would add Coyle to be completely honest. But yeah obviously that would make it much more enticing for Edmonton. 2nd maybe.

3.) 28 Jul 2016
28 Jul 2016 21:48:43
Zucker is a younger, cheaper and more defensive replacement for Pouliot and Dumba is your second pairing RD power play specialist so it's a pretty good trade for Edmonton. Minnesota could use a bonifide number 1 Center for the future but after the Staal signing they have Staal, Koivu, Grandlund, Coyle at C. Not a bad trade. Don't see why Minne would want Pouliot tho.

4.) 28 Jul 2016
28 Jul 2016 21:55:05
Coyle would make the most sense but Oil would have to add.

5.) 28 Jul 2016
28 Jul 2016 22:00:09
I never saw this rumour.
Maybe i just missed it.

6.) 28 Jul 2016
28 Jul 2016 22:03:30
Note:
I know about RHN going to Minnesota to the Wild but nothing with Pouliot and Zucker.

7.) 28 Jul 2016
28 Jul 2016 21:41:50
Yeah old news, and I think a consensus of people agreed Coyle and a 2nd instead of Zucker would be better.
If that was the case I made take it if I'm Oilers.

8.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 00:00:37
You guys are Overvauling RNH. Dumba, Coyle, 2nd?

9.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 00:11:56
Zucker is very underrated, but Minnesota would add here.

10.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 00:15:46
Coyle AND a 2nd is way too much. Coyle is already moving into a top 6 center role. I think just adding a 2nd onto Zuckerberg would be sufficient, and possibly a sweetener on top of it.

11.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 00:16:06
Woops, meant to say Zucker.

12.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 01:39:29
Coyle and a 2nd instead of Zucker? You do know Coyle >> Zucker, in almost every aspect of the game.

13.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 01:47:13
After Oilers traded Hall.
, I doubt they trade RNH, not unless in a package for a bonafide number one dman.
I think RNH will be a better number 2 center than Draisitle. ( however u spell it) . not saying he's the betterplayer. jus a better #2 center. with RNH and that 97 kid. could be best 1 2 in NHL in future. not meaning to insult Crosby. Malkin. .

14.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 04:01:36
A consensus of Oiler fans I'm sure would rather Coyle and a 2nd over Zucker, who wouldn't? We've talked about it before, although some of you Oiler fans do make very good posts, the agree/ disagree should be ignored on Edmonton proposals. Just being honest, no need for 35 disagree's.

15.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 06:32:44
Lol what are you saying man. All I said was everyone agreed OBVIOUSLY Coyle would be nicer to get in return to what are you trying to do here? And seriously the fact everyone gets all chapped over agrees and disagrees is crazy like does it really matter? Sure there could be more Oiler fans but there also a lot of Leafs and then some from other teams. If it's a good trade then it's a good trade, idk the problem with people agreeing it's just their opinion, it doesn't mean anything right?

16.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 15:47:53
What am I trying to do here? I said that some of you make very good posts. You are the one that always seems to point out how people agree/ disagree which is why myself and BJ have reminded you that it's crap. I'm not sure what is troubling you about the fact that most fans are bias towards their own team and tend to agree with posts from a fellow fan. Not always of course because I have agreed with some of your posts and bashed leaf fans. Notice I haven't called you McMuffin in a long time? It's because you have become a respectable poster. I just wanted to point out that a 6'3, power forward and a 2nd would obviously be a better addition to any team rather than Zucker.

17.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 19:18:45
Well said @Leafs17.

18.) 29 Jul 2016
29 Jul 2016 23:28:19
What is a "legit rumour"