22 Feb 2016 13:45:02
Leafs - Spaling Polak
Sharks 2017 2nd 2018 2nd Torres
Good deal by the leafs.
1.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 13:55:56
before people start saying unbelievable its a real confirmed trade, good trade for the leafs.
2.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 14:14:32
great trade IMO. good value.
3.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 14:42:04
Figured Polak would get a 2nd. Extra second for Spaling and taking on torres is just gravy. Solid deal for leafs.
4.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 15:29:30
People said Polak would get a 3rd at best and don't say you didn't say that because a handful of you did. Love our management.
5.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 16:50:26
I think they got higher picks because they're further in the future but still solid since toronto probably doesn't care about that they have enough picks this year. Future picks have less trade value than current ones but they are appreciating assets that could only get better as that draft approaches allowing toronto to sit on them till they use them or flip them for better.
6.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 16:53:29
I was really hoping the Sharks would pick up a puck moving dman, but I'm happy with both our forward and defensive depth after this trade. With a good backup this team has a chance to make some noise.
As for the trade, I think essentially there was one 2nd for Spaling, another for Polak. Torres basically has negative value since he won't play again and even if he does, his form will take a long time to regain. With Torres having negative value, it means that the other two were with a little less than 2 2nds.
7.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 17:20:53
spaling worth a 2nd? i don't think so, he's barely better than torres.
8.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 17:39:15
Surprised the Sharks gave up 2 2nds. Thought the leafs coulda got to 2nd and a late pick not 2. Leafs win the trade hands down.
9.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 18:17:52
*a 2nd.
10.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 18:43:14
Haha agreed would've been happy with a 6th for Spaling same as Matthais but management is rolling.
11.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 18:51:42
Well shankar proves that you really don't have a clue eh bud. I like how you say I don't think so. but it has already happened that way. Hhehehe and u said once that your an actually GM? Should have said your a garbage man, your used to shoveling it.
12.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 19:36:29
Paolozza
He's not worth a 2nd, San Jose overpaid and no other GM would have given that for him. So Shankar makes more sense to be a GM lol.
13.) 22 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 20:04:51
WOW are you his assistant on the garbage truck? It does not matter sometimes what u think he is worth there is so many factors that will determine what the trade will become. I just want him to feel like when he talks down to people. That's what he deserves.
14.) 23 Feb 2016
22 Feb 2016 23:37:48
Paolozza you shouldn't be trying to insult other people on here. You are def in the top 5 for most delusional proposals on here. Get a clue.
15.) 23 Feb 2016
23 Feb 2016 00:47:57
Leafs were smart to get the picks down the road, I could see sharks moving down the standings next couple years, right now maybe sharks paid a little too much but if they decline, will be even better for the leafs. we'll see if Polak can keep up with playoff speed.