31 Dec 2016 20:12:28
Edm. Klefbom, 2nd and 3rd

Col. Barie and Iginla

Don't beat me up to bad.

1.) 31 Dec 2016
31 Dec 2016 21:11:51
I have no credibility apparently but the way I see it is Klef + 3rd for Barrie. And I personally think Edmonton should not trade away Klefbom.

2.) 31 Dec 2016
31 Dec 2016 21:54:00
That's how I came up with it.
Klefbom+3rd=Barie
Iginla=2nd.

3.) 31 Dec 2016
31 Dec 2016 22:52:39
Klefboom = never broke 20pt

Barrie= 38 53 49 and on pace for 40 more.

So a 3rd is not what separates these two try a 2nd and 3rd.

4.) 31 Dec 2016
31 Dec 2016 22:58:48
What I'm saying is I think Klefbom has more value. Younger, bigger, great contract. So I don't think Edmonton should trade him, even for Barrie.

5.) 31 Dec 2016
31 Dec 2016 23:41:30
What you think means nothing after those terrible Eberle trade.

6.) 01 Jan 2017
01 Jan 2017 00:00:52
If Aves would take the Kelfbom trade proposed, Chia would def take it because Nurse is going to be better then Klefbom and he's also a lefty. Larson is no good trading Hall for him is going to cost Chia is job later this year.

7.) 01 Jan 2017
01 Jan 2017 00:05:41
Yup, points mean absolutely everything for defencemen. Way to go, Tankie.

8.) 01 Jan 2017
01 Jan 2017 00:07:56
McJesusHabs simmer down.

9.) 01 Jan 2017
01 Jan 2017 21:13:08
Mcjesushabs stop embarrassing yourself seriously.