08 Dec 2015 02:14:25
canucks: vrbata and hamhuis and vey

capitals: bowey and vrana and first

1.) 08 Dec 2015
08 Dec 2015 05:06:06
What do they do for cap they have under 1mill in cap space.

2.) 08 Dec 2015
08 Dec 2015 06:41:07
Also don't see Canucks getting that kind of a return.

3.) 08 Dec 2015
08 Dec 2015 12:08:40
I wish. In other words not happening., way to much for 2 UFA rentals who won't be resigned.

4.) 08 Dec 2015
08 Dec 2015 17:08:22
Your going to have more then 1 mil of cap, your going to drop like 8 Mil just by getting rid of hamhuis and vrbata,

5.) 08 Dec 2015
08 Dec 2015 18:46:42
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Caps.

6.) 08 Dec 2015
08 Dec 2015 19:10:46
Vancouver would take Bowey+2nd and a cap dump plus retain salary to make this happen.

7.) 12 Dec 2015
12 Dec 2015 21:57:18
I can see this being feasible if Caps have to offer up a 2nd and not a 1st.

Anyone thinking teams can just add guys like Ham and Vrbata at the deadline for nothing are delusional. Teams are always wanting to improve their chances at a Cup. Ham and Vrb do that and will cost. Caps should be looking at now as a lot of key guys are aging. Their window is now and may have a few more years.

8.) 13 Dec 2015
13 Dec 2015 00:51:38
Wow Wsh massively overpays. What's the history of trading Top Prospects for deadline rentals? It's extremely rare. Two Top Prospects for two aging vet UFAs? No Thanks. Hamhuis or Vrbata individually are not worth Bowey OR Vrana yet somehow packaging the two makes them exponentially more valuable? Atrocious.