19 Sep 2016 01:04:50
Leafs: Gardiner, Kapanen and a second
Colorado: Landeskog

Leafs: JVR, Lupul- 50% retained
Flames- Backlund, jokipaka

Flames: Wideman
Panthers: conditional pick

Flames sign Nakladal and Jackman
If Jankowski earns a spot, Stajan or Lupul in minors.

Thoughts or counter offers?

1.) 19 Sep 2016
19 Sep 2016 03:11:35
No From Avalanche, I've also seen better offers for Landy recently on this site (Virtanen, Tanev, 2nd for Landeskog)
No from Leafs.
And for the last trade, sure why not eh.

2.) 19 Sep 2016
19 Sep 2016 03:37:11
JVR, Gardiner
for
Hamilton, Dennis Wideman (25% Retained)

Reason being they need more defence but Calgary can't afford to lose Hamilton so they get an underrated Gardiner and a good playmaker to play with Gaudreau and Monahan.

Looks like
Reilly - Hamilton
Hunwick - Zaitsev
Polak - Wideman

Giordano - Brodie
Gardiner - Engelland
Jokipakka - Wotherspoon

Would never happen just counter offering like you wanted

3.) 19 Sep 2016
19 Sep 2016 03:46:58
Not enough for Landedkog.

4.) 19 Sep 2016
19 Sep 2016 04:55:47
Would take you morgan rielly to get landeskog.

5.) 19 Sep 2016
19 Sep 2016 05:01:40
I can't see why Florida wants/ needs Wideman.

For the first leafs trade, people agreed that Tanev, Virtanen and a 2nd was a good offer for Landeskog, so considering that, Toronto adds a better piece than Kapanen.

And the third one idk why Leafs would do it, I'd rather have JVR. If you wanna clarify your reasoning to that, that would be helpful.

6.) 19 Sep 2016
19 Sep 2016 06:07:23
Don't know why Florida wants/ needs Wideman, they have zero use for him.
If I'm the leafs I'd rather have JVR.
And considering a lot of people agreed that Tanev, Virtanen and a 2nd was a good offer for Landeskog, leafs are going to need to add a better quality player rather than Kapanen.