NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

Gordon1234's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

Gordon1234's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Gordon1234's Posts

Gordon1234's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Gordon1234's rumours posts

02 Jan 2020 01:09:46
Canucks Erikson joulevi

Nyd pk subban retain 3.5

Canucks stecher

Rangers Chris krieder

Miller Peterson boeser
Pearson horvat krieder
Roussel gaudette virtanen
Schaller beagle motte
Edler subban
Hughes tanev
Fanterberg myers

1.) 02 Jan 2020 03:23:20
Canucks add in both deals.

2.) 02 Jan 2020 06:40:49
Canucks definitely donâ€™t add in either deal lmao. Iâ€™d rather keep Eriksson than get Subban, and same with Stecher over Kreider.

3.) 02 Jan 2020 13:58:32
Canucks definitely add to Stecher. But the deal would only make sense for the Canucks if Kreider was signed beyond this year.

4.) 02 Jan 2020 15:16:02
These are crazy dreams in huge favor of Vancouver. Too funny. Homer much?

5.) 02 Jan 2020 17:18:46
Rather keep Loui? Really? ðŸ˜‚ðŸ˜‚ðŸ˜‚ðŸ˜‚ðŸ˜‚ðŸ˜‚ðŸ˜‚ðŸ˜‚.

6.) 02 Jan 2020 22:02:05
Stretcher over Kreider lol.

7.) 03 Jan 2020 00:42:40
Wow. Itâ€™s official. After the Blues guy and the two Winnipeg guys Vertius is the most biased homer on this site.

8.) 03 Jan 2020 21:22:24
It's not just erikson over subban, it's a 3.5m retained subban.

27 Dec 2019 16:43:29
Canucks Pearson

Ranger krieder

Reason ranger has lots of picks and prospect I think that would want a player for krieder Pearson as an extra year on his contact

Canucks get a little better of a player and save 3.5 million next to sign some big contract

1.) 27 Dec 2019 18:15:57
Neither team makes this. Kreider is a free agent and likely wonâ€™t re-sign in Vancouver. Pearson is too old for a rebuilding Rangers team that is pushing for a youth movement.

2.) 27 Dec 2019 19:52:33
Canuks take this and run. This is terrible for NYR wtf.

3.) 28 Dec 2019 02:39:54
Lmao â€œNeither team takes thisâ€.

4.) 28 Dec 2019 21:49:01
Why would either team make this vb? Youâ€™re so smart tell me. Why would a non-playoff team like Vancouver trade away a good player with an extra year on his contract for a rental in Kreider? And why would a rebuilding Rangers team that wants picks and prospects trade for Pearson? If they try to flip Pearson they wonâ€™t get the same value they would get for Kreider. So why would either team make this trade vb?

5.) 30 Dec 2019 16:14:10
Canucks take this and run, it's not really worth the debate.

20 Dec 2019 22:42:38
Canucks Sutter Lind

Cbj Josh Anderson

Canucks Sven 3 Rd pick

Preds grunland

Miller Peterson boeser
Granlund horvat Anderson
Pearson gaudette virtanen
Roussel beagle levio

1.) 21 Dec 2019 01:10:25
Columbus wonâ€™t deal Anderson for a cap dump and low level prospect. They will want a young roster player back.

2.) 21 Dec 2019 04:30:41
As much as I would love these Sutter and Sven have negative value (due to contracts) . Baertschis been on waivers twice. Only way Van moves either is for a cap dump in return.

3.) 21 Dec 2019 05:22:21
Those offers are way too good to be true for the Canucks lmao, they take em and run.

4.) 22 Dec 2019 00:55:03
His not a low level prospect.

17 Dec 2019 18:18:26
Canucks Madden

Col Connor Timmins

1.) 18 Dec 2019 02:22:52
I would rather we keep Madden. Rathbone and Rafferty are looking like prime steals for us so we arenâ€™t really short on good D prospects.

Itâ€™s not a bad idea though, just donâ€™t think it really fits Canucks needs right now.

04 Dec 2019 20:29:11
Canucks Erikson Lind joulevi

Devil's hall

Miller Peterson boeser
Hall horvat gaudette
Pearson Sutter virtanen
Roussel begal levio

1.) 04 Dec 2019 21:17:14
Lmao thatâ€™s a good laugh.

2.) 04 Dec 2019 22:54:23
No way in hell that gets Hall lol.

3.) 05 Dec 2019 04:08:55
Devils want take Erikson and his boat anchor contract.

4.) 05 Dec 2019 19:36:35
HAHAHAHAHA. Give all your busts for the #1 rental player on the market. that's really funny. Needed the laugh. thanks.

Gordon1234's banter posts with other poster's replies to Gordon1234's banter posts