30 Apr 2021 16:09:43
Rielly (extension in place) for Pulock

Or

Rielly for Jones

Which one and who says no?


1.) 30 Apr 2021
30 Apr 2021 16:56:13
Islanders most likely declines and Columbus definitely declines.


2.) 30 Apr 2021
30 Apr 2021 17:02:21
Tbh I think Isles would say no to first one and I think Tor would say no to second one.


3.) 30 Apr 2021
30 Apr 2021 18:13:39
No way both decline!

Rielly for ekholm and a second round pick.


4.) 01 May 2021
30 Apr 2021 23:12:24
How about sign hamilton in the office season, trade reilly for 1st and a high prospect.


5.) 01 May 2021
30 Apr 2021 23:47:00
Both decline. I actually like Barrie’s suggestion. I really think Sandin can replace Reilly before long. Who knows?


6.) 01 May 2021
01 May 2021 16:03:44
Why would the leafs trade Rielly for a worse dman who is only slightly cheaper and also a UFA makes no sense. If anything it’d be a lesser dman signed to term like Esa Lindell for an example.


7.) 01 May 2021
01 May 2021 18:00:52
Yes they would need someone with term if trading Reilly.


8.) 03 May 2021
03 May 2021 17:20:26
Doesn't make much sense.

Rielly, Pulock and Jones are all UFAs after next year. Rielly and Pulock both have a cap hit of 5 mil/ year now while Jones's cap hit is 5.4 mil/ year. Jones will be getting by far the biggest raise of the three and Pulock might even have to take a pay cut.