11 Nov 2018 01:38:22
Mtl:Juulsen,Suzuki

Canucks:Juolevi,Gaudette

1.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 03:50:16
Boom Boom, I can't tell If your serious or trolling.
If you are serious, can you explain the logic behind this? Cause IMO . no friggin way.

2.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 04:25:42
@ Sosa he just wants the habs to aquire every Finnish player they can.

3.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 10:12:17
For some reason I thought you were a Habs fan, Then last week I thought you were a Canuks fan.
Who is your team Boom?
Isn't this bad for the Habs?

4.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 13:08:50
I'm the biggest hand fan they is for clarification. I guess I value Juolevi very high. My taught prowess was

Juolevi>Juulsen

Suzuki>Gaudette
And no I'm not trolling I was very serious about this proposal. I tought Gaudette had a lot less value to suzuki and same with Juolevi to Juulsen. What am I missing guys? Seriously am I that way off?

5.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 13:11:04
My team is Montreal and my second favorite is Buffalo.

6.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 14:32:55
It's not that your value is off as much as it's pretty pointless for either team to make this trade.

7.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 15:25:30
I don't think Juolevi is going to be all that great. Gaudette as well. I like Juulsen, I think he's going to have a really good all around game, not as offensive, but still capable of being a 2nd PP unit. he's going to be a top 4 forsure. and I think his ceiling could be a number 2 on a top pair.
Suzuki has a lot o promise as well. I don't know much about his defensive side to his game, however he has good offensive skill., and with KK looking like a future number 1 . he could be a good number 2. and finally the Habs have there center position set for awhile. ( in the future)
I just don't see why Habs would do this.

8.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 16:01:14
I think Vancouver adds here. Joulevi has been more Underwhelming then Puljujarvi.

9.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 16:21:00
Lol. Leafs fans always got to bring up Oilers comparisons in posts that have nothing to do with Edm. Try finding other comparisons for once boys, they're a out there. Just give it a try is all in saying, I believe in you. Don't be offended, I'm so sorry.

And Boom I hair ask because it seems lots of Habs fans on here really like Juulsen and Suzuki and are excited about them so you just kinda threw me off. As well as Joulevi not looking like anything special just yet, still very young and D take a little more time to break out, but just haven't seen much from him. But maybe you have noticed something in him that you like.

10.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 17:12:26
I honestly see why he was drafted before Sergachev in terms of how he plays the game he could be a star imo. Obviously Sergachev is much better an proven at nhl level but I think Joulevi will be a better defensemen then Juulsen ever will be and Gaudette is also more proven as center then Suzuki so it work for mtl. And we add another finish player will is good because were going to be the Montreal Finish.

11.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 17:58:07
Ones a 4th overall pick the others a 5th 1 year apart both are a underachieving. The comparison is warranted.

12.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 18:04:44
@yupp, the top 7 players from that draft are Matthews, laine, Dubois, puli, juolevi, tkachuk and Keller. Saying he’s less proven than all of them is obvious, puli is the next closest to juolevi in terms of not living up to the hype in that group. That’s all he meant by it I’m pretty sure. Talk about offended lol next time he can put a side note in that puli has also been better than alex Nylander if it will please you.

13.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 18:25:28
I'm not offended what so ever there, how did you get that out of my comment man? Just getting old always talking about the Leafs and Oilers in every post.

14.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 18:31:19
😩😭poor yupper.

15.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 18:16:14
Joulevi been progressing every year jesse p hasn't joulevi has 11 points in 14 games in ahl that pretty good and probably would be playing in nhl if canucks didn't have so many d contracts.

16.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 19:58:11
You really don't understand tone hey Leafs17?
I'm trying to be better with bashing and just stick to actual decent on topic hockey conversation but no matter what I say someone takes it as bashing and is offended by it.
You have to take things as I say it, seems like whatever I say you think the tone is bashing you or something. Just relax a little and keep to on topic hockey conversation for a little would ya buddy?

17.) 11 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 21:24:53
I totally understand not wanting to talk about the leafs and oilers in every post. When you say don’t be offended and I’m so sorry, it’s your same childish stuff. Does that make sense buddy?

18.) 12 Nov 2018
11 Nov 2018 23:37:40
It's not childish at all. It's actually been on repeat non stop by you, no matter what I say you take it some crazy way and go off. You need understand tone and relax a little. Not everything I say is bashing you. If I'm going to
Bash you, Trust me, you'll know.

19.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 03:29:47
Nope, just with the I’m sorry and don’t be offended. Go back and take a look how often you use that without being provoked. “Trust me, you’ll know. ” Ouch! Those are some tough words, you should try boxing like Jim suggested.

20.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 05:19:25
@yupp, maybe you really don’t mean to bash people every post but 90% of your replies over the last year have been sarcastic, condescending or putting people down. So that ‘tone’ you think we keep reading your posts with, has been instilled by you over and over again. If you're not meaning it now, sorry, but it’s been that way for so long, that’s what I read every time.

21.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 14:27:31
Your problem not mine. Get over it.
Give it a try moving forward.

22.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 14:30:04
When I'm being sarcastic, You'll know.
When I'm trashing someone for being delusional, you'll know.
When it's just hockey talk and you take something completely out of context, misinterpret the tone, whine and bring up ten things non relevant to the topic, that's your problem. Just chill.

23.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 14:35:42
And yes, just as often as any leafs fan brings oilers into a conversation, you take an unprovoked shot with the “fun to watch tho” or “whiner leaf fans” or “offended, so so sorry” on a post that no leaf fan has even commented on yet, so yeah it’s a 2 way street.

24.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 14:41:00
On the other Talk page, you asked a direct question to me about Nylander sitting out, said it was an honest question, I answered it sincerely with a proper answer, never gave you any attitude or anything, and then you just abandon the thread because I gave you nothing to fight against lol it’s like you were wanting me to be a dick about it and when I wasn’t your “honest question, no trashing” was all of the sudden a non factor. It’s so obvious that you’re still just fishing for arguments and then claiming we take it out of context.

25.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 17:20:15
No, because I disagree with you on that and think it's very bad for a player to sit out a season, you just don't see it very often. and no matter what I say you'll turn into an argument just like you and Habby going at it on another one.

If an Oiler was to sit out a season you would be relentless on it. Don't you get it, I'm sick of arguing about anything I say with you. I don't even want to reply to you on this thread anymore. It's non stop. You're the one poking the bear here wanting to keep. Going and going.

26.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 17:55:23
You completely misinterpreted again there. If I was looking for arguments I would have bashed you there as I disagree with you. But I'm sick of going back and fourth so I just left it alone. I was only curious about your view on that topic, that's it, not interested in arguing about it.

27.) 12 Nov 2018
12 Nov 2018 22:32:44
It’s fine you disagree with me. You think it’s dumb for a GM to play hard ball and let player to sit out a season. I think it’s dumb to overpay an RFA just to get a situation over with when you h e 8 RFAs coming up this offseason including 3 Of your top 6 forwards. That is asking to be walked over again and again.

28.) 13 Nov 2018
13 Nov 2018 00:29:49
It doesn't come down to the GM being smart or dumb. He needs to get the players signed as cheap as he can if not he's going to lose at least one of them because of the cap. I doubt it has much if any affect on the other 8 rfas their agents we'll ask for what they think the player deserves regardless.

29.) 13 Nov 2018
13 Nov 2018 04:54:53
@Habby, it’s been said a lot that Nylanders camp is asking so much because they fear they will sign for less than they want and then Matthews and Marner won’t leave any money on the table. So I do believe that they are going to use eachothers contracts and therefore what happens with Nylander can affect the other RFAs.

Also when we were talking about the draisatl contract, you and yupp both said that he got that much money because it was compared to Mcdavids, and that Pasternak should have got more but they wouldn’t pay him more than Bergeron or Marchand. So in those situations it’s all team comparables but not now? Why not? I’m pretty sure I know why not lol.

30.) 13 Nov 2018
13 Nov 2018 10:10:24
I didn't say that. Ya better check again.

31.) 13 Nov 2018
13 Nov 2018 12:41:33
Not understanding what people say yet again.

32.) 13 Nov 2018
13 Nov 2018 12:51:54
Yeah you did lol him and I were talking about it, you chimed in wirh that and then he took up that as his argument too. If you want to deny it now, you can. But we both know you did and so does anyone else that read that thread. But whatever, same rules don’t apply when you guys talk about leafs manager/ player as with Edmonton, Boston or anyone else and both of you are the first guys to call ‘hater! ’ Lol just more hypocrisy.

33.) 13 Nov 2018
13 Nov 2018 17:56:27
What happens with your first RFA of 9 won’t arrecr the other 8 lol that’s as short sighted as it gets.