16 Sep 2016 14:24:20
tvr+2nd for yakupov.

1.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 18:04:43
Who's TVR?

2.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 18:09:14
I wish bruhhh.

3.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 18:12:56
That's to much I think tvr for yak is fair.

4.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 19:26:13
Pretty sure k99 doesn't watch hockey. just read Chicago may be shopping tvr and pick and or prospect for a top 6 winger, but not much out there.

5.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 20:01:19
That trade actually makes a little sense IF VanReinsdyk is exempt from the expansion draft.
VanReinsdyk could challenge for the vacant spot left on D when Vegas takes Davidson in the Draft. It would be a pretty tough battle between him, Reinhart or Osterle on the depth chart.

Salary just fits into Chicago's cap situation, so add the 2nd and it is a feasible trade.

6.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 20:50:18
Tvr is Trevor van rymsdiek (James' brother) Wo plays for Chicago k99.

7.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 21:32:35
Trevor! No from Hawks.

8.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 21:55:26
I think the player swap is interesting. Adding a pick might happen but I highly doubt it's a 2nd. Getting a young serviceable D man is a good move for oilers with yak.

9.) 17 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 22:39:47
Unbiased.
Oilers are better to keep Yak and let him play and see what happens.

Trades involving him don't offer enough in return. If he starts to fail, then we can cue the Yak for the peanuts offered here deals.

10.) 17 Sep 2016
17 Sep 2016 04:10:07
You think this offer is peanuts? A decent young D and a 2nd for yak isn't bad. I'm not one of the guys that says you have to give yak away. I agree if you're getting offered a 4th round pick like some guys are suggesting you keep him and let him try to have a breakout year. However I don't think this is a terrible lowball offer.