Vancouver Canucks Rumours

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

26 Apr 2018 18:23:03
Tor: Gardiner, Nylander

Cgy: Brodie, Bennett

Then

Tor: Dermott, 3rd

Van: tanev

Reilly tanev
Brodie Zaitsev
Polak Hainsey

Toronto needs D

26 Apr 2018 19:01:42
Easy no from leafs.

26 Apr 2018 20:23:22
Gardiner for Brodie is fair. Honestly Bodie might hold next to no value after the season he just had. Nylander for Bennet is not close.

26 Apr 2018 21:21:24
Brodie is better than Gardiner but nylander is 100 times better than bennett.

26 Apr 2018 05:21:17
Minni: dumba, Parise, 1st round

Van: tanev, Baertschi


Think this could work? Canucks really need a good young Defender and could take on the contract of Parise.

26 Apr 2018 11:14:09
No from van i think a little week maybe


Min parise dumba

Canucks erikson tanev.

26 Apr 2018 12:56:09
I would take Parise over Eriksson and Dumba over Tanev. Lol.
But you're a homer so I get it.

26 Apr 2018 14:23:23
I agree with yup for player vs player. Dumba over tanev every day of the week. Parise over Eriksson for on ice play, but Parise makes 7.5+ till 2025 and Eriksson makes 6mill till 2022. At this point neither are going to be game breakers, so I’ll take the 1.5 mill cap savings for the next 4 years and 7.5 cap savings for the 3 after that easily.

26 Apr 2018 18:12:56
Parise over Erikson while Parise is older and gets paid 8,5 million until he's 40 year old? Erikson is a cap dump bit still puts up points. Parise is a massive cap dump that would have to be retain 6 million tp have any value lol. Retain Erikson 2 million and you have a valuable vet.

26 Apr 2018 18:13:25
Parise is signed for another 7 years

Erikson is sign for 3 more prarise well be 41 when his contract ends erikson well be 36 dumb dumb.

26 Apr 2018 20:27:21
Parise over Erickson? That’s like saying Lucic over Cam Akitsson.

24 Apr 2018 23:35:11
This move happens after the draft but before July 1st.

Dallas: Spezza and heiskanen

Vancouver: Baertschi

Then on July 1st Dallas signs John Carlson with the cap freed up from spezzas deal and they get a a good winger back then can help have more offence on up and down the line while Vancouver gets a good prospect while taking back a bad contract.

25 Apr 2018 01:34:16
Oh god lmao.

25 Apr 2018 01:48:34
Overpayment from Vancouver. Heiskanen is clearly a C-prospect, he was only taken 3rd overall last year as a joke obviously. Baertschi has had an astonishing career so far (18 goals is his career high), and clearly can fetch a better return than a rubbish prospect like Heiskanen. I have a little proposal of my own:
VAN: Juolevi, Eriksson
DAL: Faksa.

25 Apr 2018 02:24:32
This is up there with the worst I’ve read. Stars are hoping this kids a superstar. They’re not trading him to get a 3rd line winger haha.

25 Apr 2018 04:45:37
Oh my is that hilarious. Spezza's a cap dump and grossly overpaid, but it's only for one more year. Heiskanen? C'mon.

25 Apr 2018 06:28:01
Yours double daily crazy overvalue of Canuks players. Can always count on Brock and AO99 for a good laugh.
Delusional.

25 Apr 2018 07:21:34
If Baertschi played a full 82 game seaso, he would of been on pace for over 20 goals and almost 50 points on the Canucks. If he went to Dallas he’d be a top 6 player for sure and he could definitely increase his totals which would be great. Yes losing heiskanen would be a huge loss but getting rid of spezzas contract helps Dallas create cap room for them to, add an already established top pairing defensemen which would cost them no assets to get. Also Dallas is in win now mode before they got to pay Seguin big money and maybe even honka get a big raise. I’m not sure if Dallas would want to wait 3-5 years for Heiskanen to properly develop into a stud while their core s in their prime right now.

25 Apr 2018 09:31:02
Brock. please stop making us look bad.

-Canucks fans

Yes adding Hesikanen would be unreal but he will be a great partner for Klingberg in a few years imo and he should jump into the NHL next year.

25 Apr 2018 14:48:35
Canucks sucked. That’s like when the leafs sucked and mason Raymond scored 19 or 20 goals. Guys get put in situations way above their skill set and cash in because there’s no one else. That doesn’t mean that Raymond could go to a better team and be a top line player lol he is what he is. And crap teams sign these guys, give them prime ice time and hope they have a great year so they can flip them for a 2nd or 3rd rounder at the deadline to a contender looking for depth, not to good teams looking for top players and not for top prospects! Baertschi is a middle six utility player that has a bit of offence.

23 Apr 2018 09:29:39
Canucks sutter gagner sven

Oiler lucic 1 rd pick

Canucks tanev 3 rd pick

Dal 1 rd pick

23 Apr 2018 10:47:16
Lol. Broken record.

23 Apr 2018 18:49:00
Why all the Edmonton/ Canucks trades Brock? Ya know there is a whole big ole league out there. 29 other teams than Van and Edmonton.

And do ya really think Edmonton would send a pissed off Lucic to a team in the same division.?

23 Apr 2018 20:05:24
That trade literally makes Edmonton worse imo to lol. Lucic is going to comeback better next season.

24 Apr 2018 01:35:38
Any deal would revolve around louis for milan plus van city adding.

23 Apr 2018 04:20:53
Col: two 2nd round picks

NYI: Varlamov

Then

Col: Markstrom

Van: Timmins.

23 Apr 2018 05:48:37
If sven can't get you timmins i doubt markstrom will lmao.

23 Apr 2018 08:04:04
Hahahaha. Colorado laughs at the Vancouver one.

23 Apr 2018 11:10:41
Timmons won’t be traded for anything short of a gross overpayment.

23 Apr 2018 02:20:27
to Toronto
Tanev

to Vancouver
Brown
2nd
5th.

23 Apr 2018 05:49:38
Keep brown well just take a first.

22 Apr 2018 18:16:35
Mtl weber patch price

Canucks elias petterson

22 Apr 2018 19:15:40
Lol ya good trade.

22 Apr 2018 20:01:13
Habs add all draft picks for next 4 years.
Canucks add a 4th rounder in 2026.and maybe a guided tour of StanleyPark.

22 Apr 2018 20:39:57
Lol pretty sure canucks don't have the cap space to take Prices (10,5), Weber (7.5)Patches (4.5 but surely 6+ million next year) and at the expense of they're best center prospect on top of that. Maybe something around Weber (10 % retain) and Hudon for Petterson but not sure Vancouver should go down that route tbh.

22 Apr 2018 20:42:50
lol no thanks, Pettersson is seriously looking like he could be a franchise player, you can keep Weber and Price’s horrendous contracts and let them run you into the ground, it’s what MTL deserves for its incompetence.

22 Apr 2018 22:42:24
Where are you going to get all that money
Please elude me.

23 Apr 2018 04:17:20
Jim benning goes to east hasting and smiles like a 🍩 is where he gets the dumb dumb how else we he get it lol this post i a joke they would add chucky and galherger and retain all there salary and next 100 first rd pick and maybe a 7 to even thing out.

23 Apr 2018 08:11:43
Lol @ colt talking about a team not being able to take so much cap but then posts Boston trading for Draisitle and signing Carlson for $9M. 🙄🙄🙄. Clueless.

23 Apr 2018 14:14:13
Well let's see shall we. Nash = 7.5 million = pouff gone after this summer then Beleskey will probably be bought out a couple million off and then add some tweaking around and you got the space. I know creativity ain't your strong suit but give it a shot and the world will await you bud.

23 Apr 2018 16:45:36
You know Beleskey isn’t in Boston anymore, right? He’s a ranger?

23 Apr 2018 17:04:27
Belesky went to the Rangers in the Nash deal. And the Rangers retained on Nash. Boston only has like $3.9M of Nash's contract on their books.
Who needs creativity when you know the facts. Lol.

19 Apr 2018 15:05:30
Canadiens: Alex Galchenyuk + Brendan Gallagher
Flames: Sam Bennett + Rasmus Andersson
Canucks: Brandon Sutter + Chris Tanev

Canadiens (S Bennett + C Tanev + B Sutter)
Flames (A Galchenyuk)
Canucks (B Gallagher + R Andersson)


M Pacioretty - S Bennett - J Drouin
A Lekhonen - B Sutter - C Hudon
P Byron - P Danault - A Shaw
N Sherbak - J De La Rose - N Deslauries

V Mete - S Weber
K Alzner - C Tanev
D Schlemko - J Petry.

19 Apr 2018 16:39:00
Is this a joke?

19 Apr 2018 18:42:16
Terrible for CGY. Bennet for Galchenyuk is a lateral move and you think we should add s solid low cost NHL ready prospect. No thank you.

19 Apr 2018 19:54:25
Actually that's a good deal with galchenyuk. Bennett has showed flashes of brilliance but hasn't been able to capitalize on it. I think he could benefit from a change of scenery. He belongs in the east.

19 Apr 2018 21:11:56
Lmao Galchenyuk is much more proven as a decent secound line guy
And you want us to add Gallagher
Holy Christ
Flamea and Canucks fan really do believe in miracles.

20 Apr 2018 01:50:35
hell no from montreal Bennett is going to be a bust hell no wtf.

20 Apr 2018 02:57:25
I'm actually a Devils fan thank you very much. If you haven't seen the package that the Canadiens receive for them then that's your problem.

17 Apr 2018 22:37:24
Christopher Tanev (4.450 Million) + Brandon Sutter (3.500 Million - 20% Retention) to the Toronto Maple Leafs in exchange for Andrew Nielsen (ELC) + Dmytro Timashov (ELC) + 2018 1st Round Pick.

Toronto picks up a dman who just had an injury riddled, down year. They take back a salary dump in Brandon Sutter who could be a decent 3rd line centre, ; and due to his salary addition, the value going to Vancouver should be lessened.

Vancouver picks up a First Round Pick, as well as two prospects for a dman who may be overtaken by guys like Hutton, Stetcher, Juolevi and possibly guys like Dahlin/ Boqvist/ Hughes should they target dmen.

Toronto Lineup:

Zach Hyman - Auston Matthews - William Nylander
Patrick Marleau - Nazem Kadri - Mitchell Marner
Andreas Johnsson - Brandon Sutter - Kasperi Kapanen
Joshua Leivo - Miro Aaltonen - Connor Brown

Chris Tanev - Morgan Rielly
Jake Gardiner - Travis Dermott
Ron Hainsey - Nikita Zaitsev

Frederik Andersen
Garrett Sparks

- Its probably a bit too little from Toronto, idk how to sweeten it. maybe add in Connor Brown for Timashov and remove Sutter? Idk.

18 Apr 2018 02:15:07
I like it Tanev would be a great fit.

18 Apr 2018 02:43:55
Brock is going to want Nylander, 1st for Tanev lol all star top
Pairing guy in his prime Tanev. Stud. Or is that Edler?

18 Apr 2018 09:58:16
Not enough value from Toronto to get anywhere near Tanev, plus Sutter in a good team is a 3rd liner or a really good 4th liner and at only 3.5 million he has enough value to fetch atleast 2 2nd round picks considering cap hit, contract length and age. So I’d say No bug time from Vancouver, maybe add Liljegren or Dermott.

18 Apr 2018 12:01:34
Sutter sucks @AO. he's been a 20-30 point guy. You’re saying he'd be a great fourth liner, that proves my point, at 3.5 million, he is an overpriced contract that is going to be added to a trade in order to lower the value that is going towards the Canucks. He can’t fetch 2 seconds, i don't know where you got that from (Shaw/ Eller maybe), but they were both traded before they were signed to bloated deals. Sutter already has one.

And as seen by multiple people, including non-Leaf fans like Yup, Liljegren for Tanev is an overpaymenr by the Leafs. I’d consider Dermott as the same as Liljegren, so that too would prob be an overpayment.

18 Apr 2018 12:30:26
You can keep Suter then lol.

18 apr 2018 16:17:35
brandon sutter has negative value at best.

18 Apr 2018 20:31:26
Looks about right. Ignoring the nonsense about Sutter being worth 2 2nds (he’s not) I think it’s reasonably close. If Tanev was not such a bandaid Vancouver would get more but he misses like 30% of the season every year. Leafs would probably be willing to add a 2nd or a meh prospect, especially considering how well he played with Rielly at the worlds. You can forget about adding Dermott or Liljegren though.

19 Apr 2018 00:01:30
Not bad value.

@AO99 - His great contract value makes him a great 4th line centre so leafs have to add a 19 year old top D prospect. Lol at 3.5mill?!?! Every team in the league has 4-5 players either on the team or in the AHL knocking on the door that could play 4th line for $800k-1.5mill. You’re nuts haha of you had h e quotes tanevs good contract (2 yearsx4.45mill) I could agree, that’s good terms for a top 4 D.

19 Apr 2018 04:00:48
Tanev sven Gagner retain 25 percent of Tanev contract 25 percent of gagner as well reason Canucks have a lot of cap maple won’t / add value / there lossing Bozak and Jvr there not as good but won’t cost them lot in cap
2018 1 2019 1.

19 Apr 2018 04:43:09
Actually not bad, good post.

19 Apr 2018 15:54:38
@Brock, leafs would have no interest in anyone you named there except Tanev. And you want 2 first round picks for them to take a handful of your misfits? Lol not a chance.

16 Apr 2018 21:08:34
Canucks loui erikson goldobin joulevi hutton 3 rd pick

Coyotes GOLIGOSKI dylan strome domi

Buy out GOLIGOSKI

If the win dahlin

Domi horvat boeser
Petterson dahlen virtanen
strome gaudette hayden
Grunlund chapu archabold

Dahlin seabrooks
Edler tanev
Pouilot guddy

16 Apr 2018 21:58:14
Which dimension of hell did Seabrook pop out from?

And, just no to the trade, like what the f***.

16 Apr 2018 22:23:54
The strome probably be a avg 2 line good 3 liner joulevi has more vaule it fits there needs more.

17 Apr 2018 00:44:08
He posted one below which I think explains seabrook in his imaginary world.

17 Apr 2018 01:23:53
Send me the number of your dealer because you got some dank stuff clearly if you think this is a good trade 😂 oh my.

17 Apr 2018 01:58:31
I think it’s from his trade below topshelf. I guess we have to follow all his posts as he builds his dream team.

14 Apr 2018 00:30:01
Would this be legal

Blackhawks toew kane

Canucks 7 rd pick

Canucks toews kane retain 2.5 each for 3 years

Blackhawks 1 rd pick ?

14 Apr 2018 07:20:32
No. If you retain money on a players salary it is for entire contract.

And let me get this right, Did you just try to trade a 7th for two players. Then turn around and try to trade them back to that same team for a 1st but retain salary for only 3 years? W. T. F. 😳😳😳😳

You think the Blackhawks would trade a 1sr round draft pick for $5M in cap space for 3 years. You really are some kind of special.

14 Apr 2018 08:47:24
Also just from a owner view that's 15 million dollas for a player of 30 percent of having a nhl career so yeah.

14 Apr 2018 13:37:19
A. You can not retain salaries for a portion of the contract.
B. The Canucks can not leagally take on 21 million dollars
C. This is a huge violation of the CBA
D. Johnathan Towes and Patrick Kane for a 7th round pick? Really

My mind is blown this is ridiculous.

14 Apr 2018 13:49:18
Hopefully this is a troll. Please Brock, just admit your trolling. I mean, like there's no other explanation.

14 Apr 2018 16:16:52
Wow . I'm not even sure what I just read.?

14 Apr 2018 17:26:42
Hahaha this is good.

14 Apr 2018 17:36:38
Every time i think we have hit rock bottom, someone comes along and says “you think that’s Rock bottom? Read this! ”.

14 Apr 2018 00:18:24
Canucks trade: tanev, Baertschi, Goldobin, 4th round pick 2019

Wild trade: dumba, 1st round pick 2019


Would this be possible?

14 Apr 2018 07:16:05
Hahahahahahaha. Watch two Minny Winnipeg playoff games and see that Dumba is stepping up huge while Suter is out so you want to trade for him. And you want them to add their 1st. Lmao. You're so delusional.

14 Apr 2018 08:11:42
Are you really trying to chirp me hahahaha. You must be a pretty sweet dude.

14 Apr 2018 10:34:16
Sorry, This is not possible.
Lol
Better?

14 Apr 2018 12:25:29
Bentley = Brock?

Posts are just as bad and homerish.

14 Apr 2018 12:56:56
Was thinking the exact same thing. I actually thought it was Brock. I wrote my first reply thinking it was him.

14 Apr 2018 16:19:32
Is it a coincidence that once Golden Showers was gone, all these other " characters" came outta the wood work. ?

14 Apr 2018 17:38:25
If Bentley isn’t Brock, they could be best friends lol.

14 Apr 2018 21:09:29
You forgot to add staal and Granlund from Minnesota that’s the only way this awesome trade would get Vancouver’s attention!

16 Apr 2018 20:23:36
Doesnt really fit min soda need or canucks maybe tanev gaudette sven
Gaudette did get any point with canucks but look really set up a lot of scoring chances they need a center.

12 Apr 2018 23:03:27
Carolina gauthier

Canucks kole lind

Canuck sven markstrom

Carolina darling bean

13 Apr 2018 00:03:13
No from the Canucks on both. I believe Kole Lind may have less value then Gauthier league wide but Canucks value him more to the team then other teams would.

13 Apr 2018 00:10:01
A few months ago we argued that Kole kind was going to be a guaranteed stud and 40 Goal scorer. Now you wanna trade him away 3 months later. That must mean you see gaithier as a 50 goal man lol.

13 Apr 2018 00:34:29
But then again, just yesterday you said darling sucks and now you’re trading for him too lol.

13 Apr 2018 00:37:10
Not sure if trolling or just ignorant.

13 Apr 2018 03:41:31
Lol i never said that i said kole lind going to be a top six winger lind has more offience up side up side then gauthier but gauthier a big strong guy hop fully a some like tom wilson gauthier is a 3 line but still has value with canuck having dahlen petterson boeser all smaller goldibin all smaller guy they need some size. Darling does suck but it going to take something to get bean.

13 Apr 2018 12:28:23
Like Tom Wilson? He’s the softest player you can imagine ( Gauthier) he does not use his size.

14 Apr 2018 05:16:52
Yeah, julien gauthier scored like .75 goals per game for a cpl seasons in junior and doesn’t play overly physical. Are you sure you’re not thinking Frederik “freddy the goat” Gauthier from the leafs as your big, physical bottom six?! Lol.

11 Apr 2018 05:52:57
Canucks: Hutto, Granlund and beiga

Coyotes: Domi


Canucks: Edler and gagner
Canadiens : Valiev and winnipegs 4th round pick

Canucks: Nilsson and Tanev
Hurricanes: Darling and Bean

11 Apr 2018 06:09:23
Uh why does Carolina do that?

11 Apr 2018 07:14:52
Cause scott darling sucks his past 2 years he has 0.88 sp and is makeing 4.15 million a year and nilson a making 2.2 and has better stats.

11 Apr 2018 13:06:26
Darling is one of the worst contracts in the NHL he’s an AHL player being payed 4 million and Bean isn’t anything special he might be worth a lower mid first he isn’t meeting his expectations. They cancel each other out in value. Then Tanev Is a great stay at home 3rd dman on a solid contract huge no from Vancouver.

11 Apr 2018 16:06:53
@vbb, how does darling and bean cancel each other out? They’re on the same side of the trade lol I’m confused with your reasoning here.

11 Apr 2018 17:15:42
No from Canucks on all three, wow.

11 Apr 2018 20:17:56
Darlings nagitive value. As I stated he has one of the worst contracts in the nhl.

09 Apr 2018 01:08:01
Dallas trades: guryanov, spezza, Lindell

Vancouver trades: Sutter, Goldobin, Hutton, 3rd round pick

09 Apr 2018 14:14:28
Lindell is not being traded and especially not for that very underrated reminds me of Jacob Slavin.

10 Apr 2018 20:01:22
No no no no no no... rebuilding with old player... just... no

08 Apr 2018 15:53:22
To VAN:
Andrew Ladd
CGY 1st 2018 (probably 12th overall)

To NYI:
Brandon Sutter


Isles sacrifice a high pick to get rid of Ladd's contract. They get a useful (yet overpayed) player in return.

Canucks can afford to take on a bad contract. Ladd would have to waive his NTC but he's from BC so it's a strong possibility.

08 Apr 2018 18:46:07
Lmao no not worth at all to do that for islanders are you serious?!

08 Apr 2018 18:48:05
If anything, it should be Ladd and a little for Sutter. Both contracts are albatrosses tho.

08 Apr 2018 20:11:16
That’s a big over payment to dump Ladd.

08 Apr 2018 01:55:08
Vancouver Canucks:
• Brandon Sutter
• Adam Gaudette
• Olli Juolevi
• 2018 1st Round Pick

Ottawa Senators:
• Erik Karlsson

08 Apr 2018 06:03:16
Canuks should just keep those pieces. And continue with a rebuild. Karlsson at that age won't be the difference for that current Canuks team.

08 Apr 2018 15:54:02
Lmaooo. Why are you guys acting like that trade is fair. Karlsson, a 2 time norris defenceman, is not going to be dealt for this little. Dream on bud

08 Apr 2018 17:31:58
U crazy? That’s the future of the Canucks
Stop thinking you’re going to get the moon for EK.

08 Apr 2018 17:38:10
Agree with yup, nucks are in rebuild, makes no sense for them to give up those assets for yes, arguably the best d in hockey, but he’s in his prime now and if they're not going to win now then it’s stupid to give up those young assets.

08 Apr 2018 17:47:57
So you're telling me that a guy who played 5 games in the nhl and still hasn't registered a point yet but is still a good prospect, as well as brandon sutter who has just 11 goals and juolevi who is still an unproven defenceman with no NHL experience can get you EK in his prime. i'm sorry but even though Ottawa has had a bad season, this trade is even worse just because the value is not there and its going to be a big gamble from Ottawa's perspective.

08 Apr 2018 19:32:18
It’s not that it’s not enough value, it’s solely based on the fact that Vancouver is rebuilding, giving up young good prospects for Karlson sets them back in their rebuild. You draft young guys, develope them then when you’re close to being able to do damage then you acquire vets. Chicago is a good example. they drafted seabrook, Keith, Kane Toews etc when you have a good core then you can start giving up picks and young assets for vets, nucks aren’t there yet that they can or should be trading away prospects. If they made this trade they’d still be bottom of the barrel team.

08 Apr 2018 19:49:58
I understand they don't want to give up their future, but then why make a trade for karlsson then. You know ottawa is going to ask for something big in return

08 Apr 2018 20:23:22
This package could get EK %100. I never said I couldn't. I could even argue that it's not enough.
I said that Vancouver, to me, isn't in the right position to give that away for that player at this time.

08 Apr 2018 23:27:13
@Yup he’s arguing with me.

09 Apr 2018 00:06:30
@yup i don't think you know what's fair value buddy. You said in an earlier post that Patches, Alzner, Byron for Eichel, Ristoleinen, S. Reinhart is a fair trade. Soo...

09 Apr 2018 04:06:19
Crazy attack relax bud jesus.

09 Apr 2018 13:46:22
Hahahaha. Ya. And that was complete sarcasm. You can't actually think I meant that. Lmao. That was clearly a troll. Wow.

06 Apr 2018 23:21:00
Vancouver trades: Tanev, Baertschi

Edmonton trades: Lucic, 1st rounder 2018

07 Apr 2018 00:18:42
It's going to take more than that to rid Edmonton of Lucic's cancerous contract.

07 Apr 2018 01:27:55
A top 10 pick wouldn’t be enough? Lucic’s contract is maybe 2 million too much, that first would definitely do it IMO.

07 Apr 2018 05:56:35
Base of trade
Mtl) Only if it’s Brady Tkachuk
Cal) Monahan

Reuniting the Tkachuks
And Mtl needs a 1st line Center.

07 Apr 2018 13:00:02
Then Calgary needs a first line centre lol the Tkachuks reunited is a nice story, but you don’t give up a 24 year old first line centre signed long term for a nice story. I remember people in Toronto making these types of overpayment offers so we could draft alex Nylander too, why? Lol they’re big boys, they can play apart.

07 Apr 2018 13:03:43
Also remember leafs fans (and Brian Burke) wanting to give up all these assets to move up and get Brayden schen.

07 Apr 2018 14:39:26
Lucic is 29 and his game is regressing bigtime. It will continue to do so given his style of play. His contract is already an albatross and it still has 5 years left on it. I'd want more than a 1st (albeit a high and valuable first) . His contract is just too awful.

07 Apr 2018 21:54:58
Tanev and sven would be worth a top ten pick yet taking on the contract.

07 Apr 2018 23:37:56
Russel and Strome worth a top 10 pick too?

08 Apr 2018 01:47:27
Tanev younger and better then russel and sven a lot better then strome.

08 Apr 2018 01:48:21
Lol. Tanev and Sven aren't worth a top ten pick. Wtf. You overvalue all Canuks players wayyyy too much it's crazy.

08 Apr 2018 03:22:30
Tanev and Sven are not worth a top 10.
Honesty, Tanev is decent . but he's a little overrated IMO.

04 Apr 2018 08:40:17
Canuck Hutton tanev Sven Edler Granlund

Oiler klefbom 1 rd pick russel Lucic 2019 1

Canucks buy out

Drais mcdavid yam
Sven rnh Jesse p
Granlund strome aberg
Rattle kharia Zassian
Nurse Larson
Edler tanev
Hutton bear / benning / sekra

04 Apr 2018 10:40:02
This is really bad. even coming from you.

04 Apr 2018 10:49:10
Lol. Classic Brock.
You really should just stop with the Van/ Edm proposals man. It's come that time to just give it up.

04 Apr 2018 17:00:24
I think edm would jump all over that they would safe 8 million in cap for 2019 and maybe sign karlson or or some other big name so hutton and sven for klefbom that fair tanev for lucic and a first rd pick edler and grulund first rd pick and another bad contact with negative vaule russel.

04 Apr 2018 17:15:07
I can "think" I have a realistic shot with Mila Kunis.

It doesn't make it true.

04 Apr 2018 20:37:02
That is so unrealistic not even getting into the value just the pure magnitude of assets coming from both sides.

06 Apr 2018 00:34:28
have another one man! . and i thought i was bad:)

03 Apr 2018 19:00:54
Canucks loui eriksson palmu 2 rd pick

Vegas 7 rd pick

03 Apr 2018 20:58:04
Honestly with the Canucks cap situation I’m not to bothered about Ericsson’s contract, especially not when we’d loose a 2nd and Palmu. We’re in a position where pics are important. If it was just Ericsson and Palmu then it would be alright but the second? No way.

04 Apr 2018 00:39:57
Honestly even if the Sedins stayed wed have don’t **** cap room that keeping loui doesn’t hurt them all. He’s the most expensive contract and it’s still only 6 million so they are fine.

04 Apr 2018 06:53:17
It's not like Vegas GM is a brand new idiot to the league. They aren't just going to take your crap contracts. People need to stop thinking this.

04 Apr 2018 13:50:58
McPhee’s a very smart man as he has put on display this year and last. Also Canucks are not in a position to be giving assets to get rid of money. Keep the prospects and picks and build. Then move one down the road with Erikson if you need the space. Imagine if buffalo gave away picks and prospects to get rid of money 3-4 years ago. Now they’re still not good, still not paying their new core big money (besides Eichel) and they have 2-3 less prospects. Those contracts could be gone on their own by the time you’re ready. You don’t give up assets to be $25 mill below the cap instead of $19 mill lol you give it up to be $10 mill instead of $4 mill below to make a play for Tavares.

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass