NHL rumours 3
Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.
01 Mar 2024 14:40:56
Ottawa Trades
Tarasenko*
6th Round Pick 3024
Toronto Trades
NRobertson
McMann
1st Round Pick 2024
*Ottawa retains 50% of Tarasenko's expiring contract.
For Toronto they add upfront that can only help for the playoffs, NRobertson and McMann have played well enough that they have trade value, adding the 1st Rounder Ottawa would insist on because of the retention.
For Ottawa it's another year out of the playoffs and they will be shipping out players on expiring contracts like Tarasenko and looking towards the future, in my proposal The Sens get 2 forwards that will give them some more depth at The NHL level plus a 1st Rounder.
Thoughts ?
Believable2
Unbelievable14
01 Mar 2024 20:33:58
Tarasenko is not needed. Rather the pick and the younger players.
Agree5
Disagree1
02 Mar 2024 19:56:41
tarasenko has been one of my targets all season, he has the tools needed to do well in the playoffs.
Agree1
Disagree2
02 Mar 2024 19:58:49
Senko doesn’t return a 1st.
Agree2
Disagree6
03 Mar 2024 14:10:07
Toronto doesn't need a scoring forward they need defensive depth.
Agree2
Disagree1
05 Mar 2024 16:14:44
Tarasenko may fetch a first if it becomes a bidding war for his services. Otherwise return is likely a prospect and a 2nd.
Agree0
Disagree0
01 Mar 2024 00:57:36
NJD - Vanacek, Holtz, 2025 2nd, 2024 3rd
BOS - Ulmark.
Believable5
Unbelievable8
01 Mar 2024 12:43:57
the rumoured package for Markstrom was Holtz + 1st + another asset (not named Vanecek) with some retention on Markstrom but the deal fell through cause the Flames wanted another asset on top of it for the retention. so I think the Bruins say no on this one.
Agree4
Disagree1
01 Mar 2024 15:26:31
I don’t believe the Flames would turn down a 1st, Holtz + for Markstrom. Bruins are also in more of a position to trade Ulmark. They have to pay Swayman this offseason and Ulmark only has this and next on his contract.
Agree0
Disagree3
01 Mar 2024 17:36:34
They turned it down because it’s a weak draft, that’s why they turned down 1st + Ceci from EDM for Tanev and 1st from DAL for Tanev.
Agree3
Disagree0
01 Mar 2024 20:27:56
The Flames are selling everyone for picks. Are they going to be better next year? Should have traded Markstrom when his value is high considering the market and his play at this time. The rumour is they turned down the better pick from Edmonton because they didn’t want to take salary back right? Questionable move IMO.
Agree0
Disagree4
02 Mar 2024 20:00:11
I think Markstrom is better than Ullmark. Ullmark and Swayman stats are clearly inflated due to the bruins being so good.
Agree1
Disagree2
03 Mar 2024 17:38:46
Don’t think he’d still be a good target for the Devils? Bruins can do a quick retool and Ulmark is the most moveable.
Agree0
Disagree0
29 Feb 2024 13:44:36
Time for Oilers to Trade Bouchard !!!
Option for replacement;
NYI - Noah Dobson
Could a trade be made here ??
Believable2
Unbelievable18
29 Feb 2024 15:17:48
Don't think the Isles move Dobson. One of the best well rounded dmen in the league currently. He's probably there for the foreseeable future.
Agree7
Disagree2
29 Feb 2024 15:25:51
Sweet Lou loves Dobson, who is a potential Norris candidate this season or very soon. I haven't such an effortless skater in recent memory. A few strides and he's down the ice. Very impressive to see at ice level.
Agree9
Disagree2
29 Feb 2024 07:19:14
Habs-allen
Anh- Henrique
Col- Oskar olausson-behrens-1st pick col 2025- 4thpick 2025-joahnsen
Anh retain half on Allen,henrique
Habs-4th pick col
Anh- olausson-behrens-1st pick- Johansen
Col- henrique-allen
I've seen this rumors but with Callum Ritchie , pretty sure avs don't want to part ways with Ritchie so I swap him with olausson and swap the 3rd for a fourth seems more fair
Mtl- armia half retain- 4 the pick col
La - kaliev
Believable0
Unbelievable17
29 Feb 2024 03:33:07
Tanev gone but now hanifan to Carolina for D'Angelo, 1st and Anderson and flames trade with la involving markstrom and gavrikov
Believable0
Unbelievable12
29 Feb 2024 03:55:08
Dangelo I’m guessing is a no, ufa and has stated won’t play in Canada. Not sure Anderson is wanted either. Why would Gavrikov be involved to old for what seems to be flames plan.
Agree6
Disagree1
29 Feb 2024 04:07:45
Markstrom gone gives Anderson a splitting share and hanifan kinda has flames hands tied so a first and a couple replacement players maybe best they can do. Offensive and defensive d to somewhat offset there losses this year and frees up money for futures.
Agree0
Disagree2
29 Feb 2024 04:10:21
Gavrikov and Anderson signed through next year to. Find a place for vladar this offseason if at all possible.
Agree0
Disagree3
29 Feb 2024 01:19:01
After season. If rumours are true petterson and van are having difficulty, so to Chicago for 2024 1st(tb) , 2025 1st(Chicago) 2025 1st(tor). Big jump for both but if petterson doesn't wanna resign, throwing it out there.
Believable3
Unbelievable13
29 Feb 2024 15:29:43
If VCR can't work out a deal with Petterson, and they actually did trade him, they'd want a player who can help them now for a Cup run instead of futures, IMHO.
Agree4
Disagree1
29 Feb 2024 16:16:19
From what I've seen an 8yr. deal is imminent and likely to be signed in the coming days so Pettersson can stay a Canuck. If things fall through then I'm assuming whoever is making a trade to get him will get to discuss an extension before hand and the return will be astronomical.
Agree1
Disagree3
28 Feb 2024 20:14:52
Seattle Trades
Larsson*
6th Round Pick 2024
Toronto Trades
Timmons
Hildeby (AHL)
Grebyonkin (KHL)
1st Round Pick 2024
*Kraken retain 50% of Larsson's remaining contract.
Thoughts ?
Believable5
Unbelievable16
29 Feb 2024 01:46:07
- This the same trade you posted yesterday, except you swapped AHL player you included.
- Do you seriously think it makes a difference whether you have Hildeby instead of Abruzzese?
- I don’t think Ronnie Francis looks at this and goes, “wow…Hildeby? We are DEFINITELY doing this deal NOW! ”.
Agree7
Disagree4
29 Feb 2024 03:20:54
Chickenfoot
Seattle an expansion team only a few years ago has no serious prospect depth.
Look at the ages of all the goaltenders at The NHL and AHL level, Hildeby will be a stud goaltender because of Woll he is expendable.
Timmons is out now but will be more a next season defenceman for Seattle, Grebyonkin is a good prospect and adding a 1st Round Pick only helps for the future.
Why do you think a team like Seattle wouldn't want prospect depth?
Larsson is good but this isn't an AllStar they are trading.
We can agree to disagree but Ron Francis knows you build by having prospects and draft picks, minus a few players the entire organization has castoffs from other teams and not very many prospects.
So your logic again makes no sense.
Agree0
Disagree7
29 Feb 2024 10:29:18
Don't think you see GMs take a chance on a guy like Grebyonkin until they see what he looks like playing on NA sized ice and how adjust to the different style of play. Obviously the potential is there for him to be an offensive NHLer, but his defensive game needs work and lots of it.
Hidleby has great numbers in the AHL and it is unfortunate Keefe didn't give him a game or two when he was up with us to see how he would fair. If he's going to be a "stud goalie" why are we trading him when goaltending is an area of weakness for us?
Agree4
Disagree3
29 Feb 2024 12:31:07
MG69
Because Woll is our Goaltender going forward, plus Toronto has Peksa and Akhtyomov as future Goaltender prospects.
Toronto is actually deep with Goaltender prospects so Hildeby is expendable, and Seattle has no serious Goaltending prospects.
That's why for both Teams.
Agree0
Disagree8
29 Feb 2024 13:27:43
We would be foolish to put all our eggs in the Woll basket. He's looked good in a small sample size there's no denying that, but until I see him log 40+ games in the season and put up good numbers I'm not willing to say that's our guy. If Hildeby is as good as we are hoping why would you not want to hold onto him and run a tandem of Woll and Hildeby rather than find a stop gap backup year after year? The other two you mentioned are probably 3-4 years away from potentially being able to compete for an NHL job. Seattle has 8 picks this upcoming draft and that's without any trades yet to potentially happen. They can easily grab a couple goalie prospects this draft.
You were onto something when you suggested a guy like Rutta or Brown. And thankfully Tanev didn't go for what I and most others thought he would go for so the odds of it costing a tonne to get a player like that went down. Larsson would be a great add, but Francis doesn't need to move him and can hold onto him till they get the deal they want which I don't think will be this. Rather hold onto our 1st and get another prospect (since we have very few of them) and see where we are at in the summer.
Agree6
Disagree2
29 Feb 2024 15:34:05
PINBALL: Thanks for the unintentionally hilarious lesson in how to build a team. that was awesome! It's always notable to be condescended to and insulted by someone with your hockey acumen. You're on fire today Pinball!
Agree6
Disagree2
03 Mar 2024 00:32:37
Seattle drafts a goalie in the 2nd round, back in 2022, then pinball claims Seattle has no goalie prospects.
You can't make this stuff up.
Agree2
Disagree0
04 Mar 2024 15:50:15
@Renidrag I find it more ironic he's talking about Seattle having no prospect depth when we (the Leafs) don't either lol.
Agree0
Disagree0
28 Feb 2024 03:35:58
Cal: tanev, hanifan 50% both. Dal: faska, lundkvist,kyrou, 2 first, 2 3rds. Tanev and hanifan should get a 1st and a young player or prospect, then 3rds for retention. Faska makes money work. Read Dallas has talked about getting both. Anywhere close?
Believable3
Unbelievable14
28 Feb 2024 17:06:50
SHOOTS: wow, that's an aggressive play, and it totally works for both sides! This is a really interesting and realistic one Shoots! Nill is the kind of guy to be quiet for a long time and then pull something major if he finds it. Interesting stuff!
Agree3
Disagree2
29 Feb 2024 01:21:16
Maybe 4ths cause faska is a decent player to get back.
Agree0
Disagree0
29 Feb 2024 03:06:14
Guess not. 😂.
Agree0
Disagree1
29 Feb 2024 03:24:35
Well got Dallas right i guess, kyrou the offensive d, grushnikov the defensive d so was close, 2nd and 3rd with no retention.
Agree2
Disagree0
29 Feb 2024 15:35:27
Shoots: it was an excellent proposal, and you were obviously on to something.
Agree2
Disagree0
29 Feb 2024 15:50:48
What how does kyrou work into this lmfao.
Agree0
Disagree0
01 Mar 2024 11:06:16
REDWING: what’s your question regarding Kyrou’s inclusion?
Agree0
Disagree0
27 Feb 2024 23:29:25
Montreal Trades
DSavard*
Toronto Trades
Villeneuve (AHL)
Grebyonkin (KHL)
1st Round Pick 2024
*Montreal retains 50% of DSavard's remaining contract.
A trade that helps the future for Montreal, The Leafs finally get there RHanded Veteran Defensive Defenceman.
Thoughts ?
Believable1
Unbelievable20
28 Feb 2024 09:57:12
If Savard gets traded it’ll be for a 1st or equivalent plus.
I assume the Russian is there for trolling & fun, and in the spirit if that I appreciate the sense of humour 👍.
Neither prospect moves the needle for me personally, and I fully expect Tampa or someone else will make a much more compelling offer.
Agree8
Disagree3
28 Feb 2024 11:59:18
Savard isn't worth a first.
Agree1
Disagree2
27 Feb 2024 16:03:37
Montreal trade with nj devils
Mtl:Allen
To
Devils: holtz
Montréal trade with la
Mtl:Savard
To
La:Turcotte and 2nd round
Mtl trade with Florida
Mtl :Dvorak and 2nd round
To
Fla: knight
Mtl trade with Anaheim
Mtl: Harris, Barron ,Winnipeg 1st , mtl 2nd round
To
Ducks: zegras
Believable4
Unbelievable20
27 Feb 2024 18:11:25
- NJ trade is fair.
- LA trade is close, but I think Savard will bring a 1st + at the deadline.
- The FLA trade doesn't seem like a fit where Dvorak is done for the season. Perhaps it gets revisited as an off-season deal, but personally, as talented as Knight is, his addiction issues are a big red flag for me.
- The ANA trade is fair, but personally I don't like one-dimensional players like Zegras. He's like a Johnny Gaudreau in too many ways, and just doesn't seem like the kind of guy you go to battle with.
Agree5
Disagree3
27 Feb 2024 18:27:27
Allen not an improvement for devils. LA has log jam on defence already, not sure they want Savard. Why knight? Seems to much for Zegras. So I’m guessing no on all. 😂.
Agree2
Disagree3
27 Feb 2024 23:04:52
Allen is a 33 year old backup goalie
Agree2
Disagree1
28 Feb 2024 01:15:23
Log jam on d in la , who? Besides doughty? Savard is an upgrade
Devils: all 3 of their goalies are below 900 save% and are over 3.2 goals per game , Allen has similar number albeit on a bottom 5 nhl team , so imo Allen is an upgrade
Knight might be worth the gamble
And mtl ain’t getting Zegras for much less if not more
Agree2
Disagree2
28 Feb 2024 04:05:11
Spence and Clarke are 2 good young RHD but their LHD deepth is another thing.
Agree1
Disagree1
28 Feb 2024 17:15:17
Good points on Allen sidekick. I see him as a 1B that could come to a team without spooking a starter. (Goalies always have a more delicate psyche. to say the least. ) Allen is a good, short-term solution for someone. He's playing on a lousy team and his numbers reflect that.
Agree5
Disagree2
27 Feb 2024 15:51:36
To Pitt: Norris, Chychrun, 4th round pick (becomes 2nd round if Guentzel signs with OTT)
To Ott: Guentzel, Blomqvist
Believable2
Unbelievable16
28 Feb 2024 02:56:31
This is horrible for Ottawa, why would they even consider this?
Agree6
Disagree1
28 Feb 2024 13:29:45
What happened to you in Ottawa?
Agree1
Disagree2
NHL Rumours
NHL Rumours 2
NHL Rumors 4
NHL Rumors 5
NHL Rumors 6
NHL Rumors 7
NHL Rumors 8
NHL Rumors 9
NHL Rumors 10