Nashville Predators Rumours


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

16 Feb 2018 16:00:26
Friday Funday..

Nashville Paccoretti

Montreal 2018 1st, 2018 4th & Fredrick Gaudreau.

Edmonton: Eckman Larson & Strome

Arizona: Adam Larsson & Strome

The Stromes and Larsson's swap..

16 Feb 2018 21:57:44
I wish from the oilers side, but never in a million years.

16 Feb 2018 21:59:33
So Arizona decides to downgrade why?

16 Feb 2018 22:12:47
Don’t know why Montreal takes first one
And easy no from Arizona, however, if they lose OEL for nothing we’ll they take a look at it. But Dylan Strome will not be part of the trade he’ll stay. But ya no from Arizona lol.

17 Feb 2018 08:59:39
OEL>Larsson, Dylan>Ryan. What?

17 Feb 2018 11:47:36
Look who the poster is TSS, that should answer your question.

17 Feb 2018 15:46:44

true. true. lol.

'eBErLe is wORtH a fIrSt, rYaN sTroMe and tRavIs hAmOnIC'

Lmao, Ft4a whyd u change your name bud? lol.

16 Feb 2018 02:49:12
Poile stated phones remain wide open but prices for rental players high. Maybe he goes hockey deal again and goes after Skinner ( now not saying its likely skinner is moved but his names been out there)

To Nashville
J. Skinner

To Carolina
C. Jarnkrok
1St round pick
Alex Carrier or Jack Dougherty.
I would feel adding tolvanen or fabbro then preds are over paying a bit.

16 Feb 2018 22:14:04
Now this is something canes get interested by and no way Nashville adds Tol or Fabbro yikes extreme overpayment.

17 Feb 2018 01:56:39
Not too bad. Just don’t see why a 1st, alex carrier and scissons you proposed for Max Domi and the same package but jarnkrok instead of scissons makes it worth skinner?!

One of those has to be way off. Skinner has 200 career goals, Domi has 30 NHL goals. I know domis only 22 and has a lot of time left, but I think people forget skinner is only 25! Just been a top player on that team for what seems like forever, people assume he’s older I think.

16 Feb 2018 18:42:18
Predators go after another hockey deal with this potential idea:

To Nashville:
Max Domi

To Predators
Alexander Carrier
1st rounder 2018 or 2019
Colton Sissons

Before knocking this, Colton Sissons made a huge impact during the playoffs last season, flashing offensive upside. On a team like Arizona, i see Sissons posting Jarnkrok/Smith type numbers. Fringe 20g guy who can handle powerplay or penalty kill. He is utilized like a grinder basically because of depth
But at age 24 you can argue he has more to offer. Add Aberg if you don't like Sissons.
Carrier is 2nd best dprospect preds have and is right now, more nhl ready then Dante Fabbro. They want to reserve a roster spot for Fabbro. That is likely why Carrier remains an Ahler at this time + irwin yweber and bitetto fill that 6th defensive role right now.

16 Feb 2018 19:17:52
Lol you call Sissons a 20 goal guy
Not even close.

16 Feb 2018 20:40:20
I said potential.
He plays 4th line minutes.
Didnt declare him a 20g scorer, i said he has shown flashes of more. Clearly you didn't see him in the post season!

16 Feb 2018 21:22:18
why would nashville do this?

16 Feb 2018 21:23:54
I think this is too much for Domi.

16 Feb 2018 18:52:59
Typo above, i meant the opposite return goes to the yotes. Haha.

17 Feb 2018 05:51:44
Holy (trying to contain) moly, that's waaaay to much for domi.

14 Feb 2018 15:24:43
DET Gets:

James van Riemsdyk
Nikita Soshnikov
Andreas Borgman
2018 2nd Round Pick (SJ Pick)

TOR Gets:

Mike Green
2019 6th Round Pick

DET Gets:

2018 5th Round Pick
2019 3rd Round Pick

NYI Gets:

Petr Mrazek

DET Gets:

Jack Dougherty
2018 3rd Round Pick

NSH Gets:

Tomas Tatar

14 Feb 2018 15:44:31
why would leafs do that.

14 Feb 2018 16:19:15
JVR is of no value to a team not destined for the playoffs. Why would Detroit do that?

14 Feb 2018 17:06:14
That leafs/ wings one is terrible for both teams lol leafs lose a 30 goal man, a depth forward and a physical depth Dman plus a second rounder right before a playoff run, and wings get a UFA forward as the best piece coming back? For what? To score 10 goals in 25 games and give them a worse chance at a good draft pick?!

14 Feb 2018 17:06:44
Poor JVR. And why the heck would Detriot want a UFA?

14 Feb 2018 05:03:33
Mtl trades Pacioretty(50%). 2018 2nd, 2018 4th.

nashville trades - eeli tolvanen, dante fabbro.

before anyone starts saying anything. pacioretty isn't a rental and he's on really good contract and mtl are keeping 50% of his contract and remember everyone what hanzal got 1st, 2nd, 4th.

then Mtl trades plekanec(50%), 2018 4th.

penguins trades 2018 2nd.

then Mtl drafts Tkachuk





14 Feb 2018 05:18:44
Consider Nashville probably wants to go in I can see this trade but that is one steep price, so I also don’t see them making this.

14 Feb 2018 07:55:26
Nashville has got a young core so I can see them willing to give up 2 young promising pieces for a guy that has scored 30 plus goals the last few years.

14 Feb 2018 10:46:41
Both are top prospects, Habs would be lucky to get one of them, no chance they get both.

14 Feb 2018 13:14:25
If not gets both does guys for Patches that's a steal imo. But realisticly one of those prospect and a second or B prospect is fair. They are both A level prospect such is equal to a top rental but since Patches has another year left the second or B prsopect males it even I believe.

14 Feb 2018 15:47:12
the reasoning is that our 2018 second is almost like a late first, would it be more fair to add a 3rd on that which is close to a second.

14 Feb 2018 15:50:20
i remember when sherback wasn't a good skater now he's hella fast and and an amazing skater so vilardi will prob learn.

14 Feb 2018 16:07:56
Retaining 50% on patches ups his value so realistically he should get those 2 A prospects no problem. Imagine a 30 goal scorer for less than 2.5 million, not bad.

14 Feb 2018 18:52:24
I wouldn't give yo Tolvonen alone for Patches let alone adding Fabbro. Think of the age gap. Ten or so years of Tolvonen or one year of Patches. I'm going with Tolvo.

15 Feb 2018 22:08:57
U wouldn't trade tolvanen straight up for pacioretty?

Might wanna get that checked.

16 Feb 2018 01:07:24
I agree with yup, nashville definitely shouldn't trade tolvanen for a year and a half of old patches that they don't need.

16 Feb 2018 03:04:26
This is brutal for nashville. Maybe if Pacioretty was scoring like a 30 goal scorer would this make sense. but even still. Nashville top 2 prospects for one year of a a guy slumping is a huge no from the preds.
1St2018, 2nd 2019 plus aberg for pacioretty.

12 Feb 2018 13:38:48
Alternative for predators could be:

To Nashville:
Thomas Vanek

To Vancity
2nd rounder
Alex Carrier

This could be a cheaper avenue if guys like tatar or Nash seem over priced.
Carrier right behind Fabbro as preds second best d prospect currently.

12 Feb 2018 21:09:19
Fills both team needs plus Nashville has a surplus of dman so they could be willing to give one up and the 2nd rounder will basically be a 3rd so is it’s not much to give up for a middle 6 forward.

13 Feb 2018 04:41:33
i like it. i'd say both teams would be happy with this deal.

12 Feb 2018 13:31:12
Predators looking to put themselves over the top. Rumors that they scouting wing games.

To Nashville:
Tomas Tatar

To Detroit:
1st rounder 2018
Pontus Aberg
Jack Dougherty

Preds get proven scorer with term, who has struggled a bit this year, and wings get speedy winger Aberg who can fit in top 9, a 1st, and decent shutdown d prospect.

12 Feb 2018 15:25:37
This is the type of deal that would get Pacioretty. Not Tatr who's at most top 6 mediocre winger. Big no from Nash.

12 Feb 2018 16:45:48
Agree with colt, package could get better player.

13 Feb 2018 03:54:20
I'm guessing they were scouting Green. Sub Tatar for Green, take away Aberg.

04 Feb 2018 02:59:39
I've made 3 Simmonds trades in the past. Replies stated that one of them one far in favour of the Flyers, one trade didn't get enough for him and the other got mixed reviews which I guess is sort of good if i think about but I'll just try some more

PHI: Simmonds (50% retained because I believe Blues can't take his full contract), 3rd round pick

STL: Kostin, Barbashev, conditional second round pick (turns into 2019 First if Blues make it to the Cup)

PHI: Simmonds, 4th round pick

MTL: Galchenyuk

PHI: Simmonds

TOR: Kapanen, 1st round pick

PHI: Simmonds

NSH: Tolvanen, 3rd round pick

As I was typing these they seemed fair but then when I compared all the returns, the value didn't seem equal so I already know some of it it's off. But just curious what you would change to the offers while keeping the base of the trade intact

04 Feb 2018 06:40:57
First of all, I don’t know why Philly would want to trade Simmonds. They are battling for a playoff spot and he is a very important piece to their team. Anyways, I don’t know enough about the players from St. Louis or Nashville to comment. With age difference considered I don’t think the trade for Galchenyuk is bad but I’d still keep Simmonds for another year and decide what to do then. As a leaf fan I would do that trade. Simmonds is exactly what the the leafs need. Babcock doesn’t seem to care about physicality but when the playoffs start, things get rough. The leafs have a lot of young talent but will get man handled by a team like Boston. I’d rather Toronto play Tampa just because they’re not as physical. I’m guessing you’re a Flyers fan, why do you want to trade Simmonds?

05 Feb 2018 20:39:08
The flyers would want to trade him because they can't afford a resign in 2 years and they'd get the most value this deadline. Simmonds 2 years left on that sweet contract will draw a bunch of reward.

06 Feb 2018 23:21:10
The thing about these trades is that they can all be done in the offseason so they can essentially make a playoff push with him this year and trade him in the offseason. I just feel trading him to a team at the deadline could get you more considering the team would be using him for two playoff runs instead of 1. As for why I want to trade him. Personally I think he's overrated by a lot of people. Not too much but the fact that many Flyers fans called Schenn a powerplay specialist yet never said anything remotely close to that regarding Simmonds surprises me considering the amount of his production coming on the powerplay in recent years. Yes he was better than Schenn during their tenures here but they were very similar. The main reason I would want him gone is because he's a free agent next year and he'll be looking for big money. Guys like him don't usually play too well when they reach their mid 30s and I don't want to be the team to pay him all that money. So better to get something than nothing. Not to mention we'll also have to sign some younger guys.

08 Feb 2018 15:57:26
I get what you're saying, as a Flyers fan as well I love Simmonds and wish we could keep him but my opinion is get paid as much as possible. Kapanen and a 1st or Tolvanen and a 3rd! You won't get that if next year, having three 1st this year could let them go get an Evander Kane or a guy like OEL and Kapanen fills Simms spot.

01 Feb 2018 07:18:54
Pens looking to find a replacement for Bonino who has somewhat struggled so far in Nashville. How about just bringing him back? Not sure about his value right now. With Fisher coming out of retirement, Preds really don't need another centerman but they could use a winger. Hagelin+ or Sheary?

01 Feb 2018 18:53:21
Definitely not sheary.

31 Jan 2018 17:17:31
Fischer is coming out of retirement and joining Nashville for the rest of the year.

31 Jan 2018 18:01:48
I had a feeling he wouldn't stay away.

26 Jan 2018 15:11:27
2018 1st (COL) + S. Girard + C. Morrisson for R. McDonagh

Pretty out there idea but I could see the Rangers entertaining an offer like this. Colorado would do this to get their staple on defense. In order for them to be a championship contender they need someone to play against top lines and right now I wouldn't trust anyone except maybe Johnson to be able to consistently play against top lines. They have enough young peices to afford to lose these ones

26 Jan 2018 15:42:11
Way too much, tbh.

26 Jan 2018 16:24:56
Girard has been hugeness for the Avs so he'll no from Colorado.

26 Jan 2018 18:11:39
Ok but is the idea ok? Maybe replace Girard with Zadorov?

11 Jan 2018 22:23:37
This team would be insane

Nashville fabbro tuvanen fiala 1 rd pick and 2 bonino

Ottawa brassard mark stone ceci

Forsberg jonahens avidsson
Smith turris stone
Watson brassard jarnork
Hartnell sissons aberg
Josi ellis
Elholm subban
Emelin ceci

12 Jan 2018 00:08:39
Way too much from Nashville. Wow!
Stones good, but not those three players and a 1st, 2nd good. AND Bonino. Just seen him
Wow this is terrible for Nashville!

12 Jan 2018 00:25:09
Only guy worth getting there is stone imo no way Nash should give away so many assets for the other two.

12 Jan 2018 02:50:06
No from OTT imo, (probs biased) but Stone should be untouchable, without brassard we have a huge hole in our top 6 and you can have Ceci for free. lol.

12 Jan 2018 04:07:08
Bonino suck he way over payed he play good with kesel that about it to me with his contract makes him have negative vaule brassard would probably the best 3 line center in the leage ceci is underated he's a top for dman with some size.

12 Jan 2018 06:55:17
High is English your first language or second bcuz I can’t tell lol work on some grammar and spelling yikes after reading that.

12 Jan 2018 13:53:20
Bonino has negative value? LOL.
Fabbro, Tolvanen, Fiala alone have more value than the whole Sens package here. And you want a 1st, 2nd and Bonino. Just god awful for the Preds. Stone should be untouchable and Sens GM has said so. But this is an overpayment and should be a clear yes from Sens.

12 Jan 2018 21:43:26
Ottawa says thanks but no thanks.

And Ceci is far from free get real hoff68 he was almost traded straight up for hall when he was in edmonton and is worth more now as he's gotten better since then. is hall worth nothing now too? DIDN'T THINK SO! STOP CALLING YOURSELF A FAN MR. BAND WAGONER.

09 Jan 2018 22:33:31
If i was jim benning i would try to unload all my assest

Canucks: dahlen ben hutton 2 rd pick eriksson

Carolina: haydne fluery

Canucks: tanev vanek grunland or gadjovich 2 rd pick
Nashville fabbro Tolvanen

Canucks: edler sutter canuck retain 3m m of edler contact next year and .8 million a year of sutter contract freeing up 3 m in cap for

Tampa: Callahan coburn foote 2rd pck

09 Jan 2018 23:34:03
Not trading Dahlen Gadjovich or our 2nds were good with drafting 2nd round picka.

10 Jan 2018 00:15:15
Don’t think there’s enough quality going to Nashville. I wouldn’t say that Tanev is a upgrade on any of the top 4 defence that they already have and yes Vanek is having a decent year but he’s getting old and isn’t exactly known for his playoff contribution. Don’t know much about gadjovich but I do know that fabbro is a really good defence prospect who is controllable for a bunch more years and will fit nicely into their top 4 when guys like ekholm or Ellis become ufa and Nashville can’t keep both. Tolvanen looks like the steal of last years draft, could even play this year once the lol season is over. In my opinion Nashville gives up 2 really good future pieces to get players that in my opinion aren’t going to put them over the top.

10 Jan 2018 00:31:44
lol ok now this is getting stupid these are both so unbelievable it hurts that you actually thought this was a good idea and please don’t comment trying to justify. This is brutal and I hope you figure it out soon lol.

10 Jan 2018 00:59:21
Your stick with Eriksson and that contract.

10 Jan 2018 01:00:40
Nashville doesn't need Tanev, stop trying to trade him there for heir top prospects.
They aren't giving you Fabbro and Tolvanen for that.

10 Jan 2018 01:54:49
Carolina has like 20 million in cap space lol they could take it and be fine lol well picking up a good prospect if nashville gets any of there top four dman injury then there not going to be so deep then guys would be playing 25 30 mins a night what well burn them out this well keep the top four around 22 min a night.

10 Jan 2018 04:40:48
Man. Tampa isn't giving up foote and a high pick to save 3 mill. Just stop.

10 Jan 2018 07:40:01
If they wanna keep Namestnikov, Vladislav and point or they can keep 2 player that's not play like they should be in the nhl and on top of that there getting a big dman upgrade and a even bigger upgrade on the wing or center.

10 Jan 2018 12:27:31
Coburn isn't as bad as your making him out to be. Tampa has about 2 mill cap space for next year right now. Sustr and Kunitz free up 4 more while being easily replaced from within (Erne/ Cirelli/ Thomas/ Cernal/ Masin) . Also 225k from Condras buried deal. So that's roughly 6 mill. Then the cap is projected to go up as much as 5 mill. So there's 11 mill for raises to Namestnikov next year. Season after that Stralman Coburn and Girardi deals done freeing up about 11 mill. that's when Kuch and Point need deals. Callahan will be in the last year of his deal and could be bought out to save another 3.5 mill if needed. Vasi needs a deal year after that. They aren't in as big of a hole as you think especially right now.

10 Jan 2018 20:20:11
Yeah this at least the third attempt of tanev to Nashville. There’s like 27-28 out of 31 teams that need some kind of upgrade in their top 4D. Why keep forcing him to one ofthe 5 or 6 who definitely do not? Lol

Pick someone, pick anyone other than like Nashville, anaheim, stlouis, Carolina.

09 Jan 2018 18:06:26
If Philadelphia drops off and Simmonds ($3.975MM through 2018-19) is available at the deadline. The Flyers may not be able to afford him with Provorov, Konecny, and Sanheim along with roster spots for prospects like Frost, Allison etc. Simmonds gives a solid 2nd line goal scoring threat, PP producer, character, and toughness on a great contract.

Toronto: Lindgren, 2018 1st
Flyers: Simmonds

Tampa Bay: Katchouk, Raddysh, 2018 3rd
Flyers: Simmonds (50% retained)

Nashville: Fabbro or Tolvanen, 2018 1st
Flyers: Simmonds

09 Jan 2018 18:16:47
I’m not aware who Lindgren is, so maybe this is why I think this, but I think the Tampa and the Nashville trades are way way more than the leafs one.
However if Tampa goes all in, Simmonds at 50% retained wow hard to not accept that.

09 Jan 2018 18:34:46
Toronto says no, as good as Simmonds is come time to renew his contract they won’t be able to afford him, also they need the puck moving right handed d man more than another right winger. Nashville also gets hosed, fabbro is a really good prospect and Tolvanen could be the steal of last years draft and a first. granted the first will be fairly low but stillNashville gives up way too much!

09 Jan 2018 18:51:04
It was Fabbro or Tolvanen but still agree with you mertle.

09 Jan 2018 19:26:25
McJesus: I tried to balance all of the trades. Lindgren is a R defenceman selected 17th overall last year.

Mertle: Wayne Simmonds is not Thomas Vanek or some other overpriced deadline clown on a UFA. He has one year left on a great contract and an excellent player to boot. It was Fabbro or Tolvanen, not both. 1 st and an A prospect is reasonable for Simmonds. Quality for quality. I actually think Hextall could ask for a bit more on each.

09 Jan 2018 20:03:19
It’s liljegren, and that’s probably fair value but makes no sense. Leafs have tons of forwards who can produce, already going to lose a big LW 30 goal man in JVR because we probably can’t afford him. If philly can’t afford him because of provorov and koneckny, what chance do leafs (Matthews, marner, nylander) Tampa (kucherov, vasilevsky) have of signing him? And teams like those going forward with guys going to get massive raises internally can’t justify giving up multiple good young cheap assets for him to walk in a year.

09 Jan 2018 20:16:00
Lindgren with Habs and Simmonds not worth their first alone.

09 Jan 2018 20:26:43
Shiza. I even looked up his name and draft ranking. My bad.

Unbiased Jim: you're correct that Toronto may not be able to afford him just like the Flyers, however, the key difference is that Toronto can actually have a shot at winning a Cup in the next two playoffs. The last time I checked, Komarov is pencilled in at 2 RW and Simmonds would be a big upgrade. Ultimately, out of the 3 teams I proposed, Toronto makes less sense than Nashville and Tampa Bay, but still logical.

09 Jan 2018 20:42:14
I dunno about both Katchouk and Raddysh. Both are great prospects. Maybe one of them and a first.

09 Jan 2018 22:25:16
My bad, didn’t catch the “or” in the Nashville trade. I agree that Simmonds is a really good player I still think it’s too much for a year and a half of him. I also think that Nashville is playing good hockey, they have a good group and sometimes it’s not a good idea to mess with team chemistry during the season. Young promising d man and centerman are more valuable than wingers. that’s just my opinion tho.

09 Jan 2018 23:47:05
I like these trades way too much so I'm going to assume they are all in favour of the Flyers.

10 Jan 2018 00:34:02
Okay yeah his name was not spelt right so I had no idea lol but ok makes more sense now.

10 Jan 2018 05:23:32
I’d want to replace Lindgren with Kappy or Connor brown Toronto needs him in the system.

10 Jan 2018 21:03:12
Komarov is only that high in the lineup because he’s kadris winger and kadris line shuts down every top line. If they’re looking for more goal scoring they have marner and nylander are clearly above komarov on the depth chart at RW, and Connor Brown scored 20 goals last year playing bottom 6 minutes and is on his way to 18+ again. That’s an option. Not trying to pick on your trade or analysis, just goal scoring and wing depth is not leafs issue at all.

04 Jan 2018 07:36:35
Canuck tanev baertschi if they don't make it to the stanley cup final 2rd pick

Nashville fabbro Tolvanen

Ekholm subban
Josi tanev
Emelin ellis

04 Jan 2018 09:07:38
2nd round pick for Tanev & Baertschi? You are super high

04 Jan 2018 15:00:53
Everyone seems confused so,
VAN: Tanev, Baertschi, Conditionnal 2nd (is removed if NSH makes the SCF)
NSH :Fabbro, Tolvanen

That's a lot to give from Nashville's perspective.

04 Jan 2018 15:13:17
Massive no from Nashville Wow.

04 Jan 2018 15:58:59
Nashville does not need a D to push Ryan ellis to the third pairing (which I don’t think happens anyway with tanev) lol and they certainly don’t need to trade their best young D prospect who they will need to take a top 4 spot if/ when their current top 4 become unaffordable because with team success comes individual raises. Subbans $9 mill makes it hard to keep 3 other really good D like they have, and bringing in tanev to the mix with only prospects going back makes it impossible.

04 Jan 2018 19:06:00
Tolvanen is the top steal of the draft and could become a superstar.

04 Jan 2018 23:31:00
Someone in there top four is bound to get hurt in the playoffs same as there top six that well screw them over in the playoffs like it did last year i think if they made this trade they would be top runner to make the stanley cup finals.

04 Jan 2018 23:36:45
Ryan ellis has one more year after this one and nashville won't be able to sign him cause he propbaly going to want 7 mill a season tanev sign for next 4 years at 4 million a season and is only 27.

04 Jan 2018 23:53:43
Lol. They aren't giving up both those prospects tho. I wouldn't even give Tolvanen alone for Tanev and Beartchi. Not even close.

02 Jan 2018 22:32:13
NSH: Craig Smith
CGY: Second Round Pick, Michael Stone

03 Jan 2018 00:50:57
With how the Fiala-Turris-Smith line has been playing since they traded for Turris, This is an easy easy no from Nashville. Their D is fine, no need for Stone and a pick for their second line winger with great chemistry with line mates. Especially when they are ready for another deal run.

03 Jan 2018 01:36:56
Yup is right. Makes no sense for preds. They have great D, this made a bit more sense more 40 games ago because they were missing Ellis for half a season. With Ellis back and that line clicking, easy pass.

03 Jan 2018 07:34:24
I thought they were looking for a dman? Maybe not

03 Jan 2018 19:28:28
No they just got Ellis back, last night I believe. Both him and Parise made their season debuts.
Nashville running, I think
Josi Ellis
Ekholm Subban
Emelin Bitetto

And as I said above about Smith, They aren't trading him. He's been so good for them. They value him high to their team and rightfully so.

03 Jan 2018 21:38:36
Yeah. The only guys Stone is better than on that 6 is emelin or possibly bitetto, and he’s miles behind the other 4, but you don’t break up a second line to barely upgrade your 5th/ 6th best Dman.

19 Dec 2017 15:46:49
List of Tavares trades (franchise player gets fair value):
NYI trade
John Tavares
2018 2nd rd pick

DAL trade
John Klingberg
Miro Heiskenen
2018 1st
Conditional 2019 2nd (becomes a 2019 1st if DAL makes Cup Finals)
Conditional 2020 3rd (becomes a 2020 2nd if Tavares re-signs with Stars)
NYI trade
John Tavares

NSH trade
Roman Josi
Kevin Fiala
2018 1st
NYI trade
John Tavares

CBJ trade
Zach Werenski
Pierre-Luc Dubois
2018 1st
Conditional 2019 1st (becomes an official 1st rounder if Tavares re-signs with CBJ)
NYI trade
John Tavares
2019 2nd

TOR trade
William Nylander
Timothy Liljgren
Kasperi Kapanen
2018 1st
2019 1st

19 Dec 2017 16:14:36
I don’t think anyone pays that price. Not saying he’s not worth it, just saying I think he has his plan of where he’s going to be next year, whether it’s in NY or not. No one will give away 4 great assets with one extra pick being the condition on signing. Ppl aren’t gutting their team for a rental which he essentially is. All those teams are playoff teams theoretically and they all get worse today and much worse down the road to add one guy for a playoff run?

19 Dec 2017 16:22:31
For .5 year of taverns laughable. He would need to resign trade and sign ect.

19 Dec 2017 17:04:40
Leafs easily send the worst package lol, why am I not surprised. Like the LEafs package would not even gt you Josi from the NSH package, let alone you adding Fiala and a 1st.

19 Dec 2017 19:26:46
Oiler rng yam and 1 rd pick and Ethan bear for Tavares. Chris tanev Hutton vanek. Several Puljujärvi,

19 Dec 2017 19:37:37
No way a rental lands even remotely close to the packages proposed in any of those trades.

19 Dec 2017 21:14:12
Lol leafs and cbj gives the most I but ever time give up to much.

19 Dec 2017 22:16:52
5 first rounders for a ufa leafs say no.

20 Dec 2017 21:53:11
Did you forget to add Mathews and Marner in that deal! LOL! Nobody with half a brain would make this deal.

16 Dec 2017 04:57:59
Van Sutter & guddy retain 2 mill

Pit haglin and 1 and 2

Canucks erikson goldobin Hutton

Car haydn fleury

Van baertschi 2.rd pick

Stl Robby fabbri

Canucks edler 2 rd pick

Nashville emelin fabbro

16 Dec 2017 05:43:50
Pitt doesn’t need another 3rd line center, also too much going to van. 2nd trade is too much for fluery, 3rd not enough for fabbri, when he’s healthy he’s much better than baerschi and the 2nd doesn’t make up the difference, and the 4th trade is just crazy. no way does Nash give up emelib AND a very good defence prospect for a guy that is arguably no better than emelin, once again the 2nd doesn’t make up the difference.

16 Dec 2017 08:56:12
lol edlers can actually make a pass and skate pretty good. Unlike emelin
and if you look at his stats he's a grate playoff performer in 65 games he as 31 pts
blues what to win a cup Robby fabbri not play this year you can't ask for someone what has the same value as him cause his not playing but there getting a pretty good player.

16 Dec 2017 16:54:37
Blues would still say no. You don't trade a player when his value is perceived low due to injury. I'm sure they would rather have fabbri, then another 3rd line player.

16 Dec 2017 19:43:15
Lol baertschi not a third line player he can put up 20 25 goals.

16 Dec 2017 20:33:32
Ok, so yeah let’s say that edler is better than Emelin, do you really think that a top defence prospect is the difference between them! Nashville looks to be doing just fine with the defence they have now so why would they trade away a really good prospect to get a person hair better?

17 Nov 2017 14:13:03
MTL - Galchenyuk
NSH - Yannick Weber

Time to get back Weber to the team that drafted him

I might or might not be doing my best yup impression

17 Nov 2017 15:58:53
You've done great!
but we're just impersonating delusional Habs fans. Great times.
I can't wait for the daily Price trade. Or the daily Habs/ Oilers proposal!

17 Nov 2017 23:29:34
Oh so I guess I'm on the other side of the delusion spectrum since I'm also a habs fan?

17 Nov 2017 00:53:46
Vancouver Ben Hutton or del zotto

Nashville dante fabbro

17 Nov 2017 03:48:45
Hahahaha yaaaaaa cause Hutton and Del Zotto have the same value. Clueless.

17 Nov 2017 04:12:06
Your stupid if you think there not del zotto is play better then Ben Hutton the hoping Ben Hutton turn into a player like del zotto yup get a life you hater.

17 Nov 2017 14:13:34
Hahahahahaha. So good.

No, you're* stupid.

17 Nov 2017 15:56:03
Good one lol.

17 Nov 2017 17:46:58
Lol. I know. You make it too easy.

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass