NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

Zamboni's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Zamboni's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Zamboni's Posts

 

 

To Zamboni's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Zamboni's last 5 talk posts

 

To Zamboni's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Zamboni's last 5 talk replies

 

Zamboni's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Zamboni's rumours posts

 

17 Mar 2019 14:08:09
Edmonton must make trade. Only good players to trade is defense. So:

Edmonton trades Oscar Klefbom to St. Louis for Jayden Schwartz.

St. Louis must needs left defense. Only Dunn is good for left side defense. Edmonton needs winger for to play with McDavid. The money is very close as well. So this trade is good for both team.

Zamboni

1.) 17 Mar 2019 15:08:13
. i thought edmonton was bad defensively but good offensively? why would they do this?


2.) 17 Mar 2019 17:24:41
No they are not good offensively they are Mcdavid and Draisaitl that’s about it on there forwards. The problem with Edmonton is they have too much money tied up in older slower players that aren’t worth the money. They need to try to sell and do a full rebuild and no more half ass rubbish they’ve been doing for the past decade.


3.) 17 Mar 2019 18:55:41
Edmonton is not very good offense or defense. But defense they have more tradeable players. Cannot affors to lose good players offense because is nobody good after top 3-4 guys. Chiarelli brings in lots of defense before fired. We can trade defense.


4.) 17 Mar 2019 21:11:07
Lol. They aren’t trading Klefbom for a winger. That would Jen create too big a hole in D. Klefbom is their beast back there (when healthy) .


5.) 18 Mar 2019 04:03:01
Absolutely idiotic for oilers to make that.


6.) 18 Mar 2019 08:11:26
Rather keep Schwartz

Blues have jaybo, Edmondson, Dunn on left side.


7.) 18 Mar 2019 15:37:47
But why is trade idiotic McJesus. Klefbom is very good player, yes. I watch him many times. But so is Swartz. We have so many other very good players on defense too. Nurse is very good. And Russell and Larsson too. We have many others that are very good too. If Schwartz is not worth Klefbom, then why not you tell us what he is worth?


8.) 18 Mar 2019 20:01:08
Blues will never trade schwartz. Brings to much to our team. He may be having a down year, but his play is still a driving force for the team.


9.) 20 Mar 2019 15:15:21
Zamboni Klefbom is Oilers only legit first pairing D. Nurse is a solid second pairing as is Larsson. Russel is not very good and all the D Chiarelli brought in at the end are 3rd pairing/ scratches. This trade does not help Edmonton.


 

 

17 Feb 2019 05:46:46
Edmonton trades RNH to Avalanche for Jost and Barrie

Colorado needs more offensive depth. Edmonton wants a puck moving defenseman. Jost gives us a forward back to replace RNH. Still young with lots of potential.

Zamboni

1.) 17 Feb 2019 06:23:59
Damn that’d be great but like jeez losing Nuge leaves such a huge hole it’s tough but that’s a really good offer for Nuge I don’t think Colorado would be too quick to even do that either.


2.) 17 Feb 2019 20:57:59
Thanks McJesus. I’m still pretty new at this. I know trading RNH depletes our own scoring depth, but we don’t really have any good trade pieces. We drafted too many busts.


3.) 18 Feb 2019 00:52:25
That’d be a good trade for oilers. Jost will be a very good scoring forward and Barrie is what the oilers have been after for the last year or so. Honestly I think it’s too much from Colorado, given jost’ age and ceiling I think they (col) should hang on to him, if they are to trade him I think they’d want someone who is a bit younger and more of an offensive threat than Hopkins. Nothing against Hopkins but if scoring is what Colorado is after than I think jost will be a better scorer than Hopkins and with maker and Timmins making the team next year I don’t think this trade will make them better.


4.) 18 Feb 2019 09:14:15
No from Colorado the fact you think this is even clost Mcjesus it shows your true biased.


5.) 20 Feb 2019 14:52:15
dont trade jost for rnh who doing nothing with offensive team. and i think barrie will stay avs for long time.


 

 

 

Zamboni's talk posts with other poster's replies to Zamboni's talk posts

 

11 Feb 2019 02:42:37
Winnipeg Jets trade Niku to Washington Capitals for Burakovsky and a 3rd.

Both players are available. Winnipeg is looking for someone who can play now for this year’s playoff run, while Washington is looking for futures.

Jets can afford Burakovsky, who gives them solid depth. Washington gains a decent prospect and cap space.

Zamboni

1.) 11 Feb 2019 03:58:30
I think if Jets trade Niku, it's in a package to land a 2nd line centerman.


2.) 11 Feb 2019 04:21:19
I'm not sure that the jets are open to moving Niku but stranger things have happened.


3.) 11 Feb 2019 04:51:45
I think the jets would move niku but they would have to get something more in return. like a package with niku in it for something good that would be a difference maker.


4.) 11 Feb 2019 13:01:22
Burakovsky is a winger, so not needed by the Jets at all. Washington is trying to repeat as Stanley Cup champs, so I doubt they trade depth. But if the Jets did want him Niku is way too much to give up.


5.) 11 Feb 2019 17:43:57
I know Jets need center more than wing. But they might not be able to get a decent center without having to disrupt the roster. Burakovsky doesn’t cost them a single roster player here, and provides good depth and insurance for injury. And as pending RFA, he won’t get anything close to the $3M he currently makes. Niku is good, but his brief stints at NHL level have been uneventful. He’s a while from being a full time nhl player that can contribute in a meaningful way. Jets have got to be thinking they are contenders this year. I can’t see how adding a guy like a Burakovsky to the team would hurt. If Niku isn’t the guy, then maybe Stanley?


6.) 11 Feb 2019 17:53:14
Stanley or Niku are both too much to give up for a 4th line depth player. Maybe a 4th or 5th pick, not an NHL ready defenseman or a former first round pick that is progressing nicely in the AHL.


7.) 11 Feb 2019 17:53:46
I can’t see the Jets trading Niku for Burakovsky.


 

 

 

Zamboni's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Apr 2019 15:08:11
Yes, Mr. Habby. You understand very good what I mean. Defensemen are list 1/ 2;3/ 4;5/ 6. Is top 2 is 1/ 2. Is top 4 is 1/ 2 and 3/ 4. Is top 6 is 1/ 2&3/ 4&5/ 6. Is all defensemen. Top 2 is only the first line. Top 6 is everyone. I do not understand Mr Vertius and his language. How can he use top 6 for only the bottom pairing? No. It does not make sense. It is not me. No. My English is very good, yes.

Zamboni

 

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Apr 2019 14:59:57
It doesn’t not matter Mr. McSmartyPants if English is my first language. No. Saying Top 6 defenseman is like saying top 12 forward. It does not make sense. Top means the best, a few select players off the entire team. Saying top 6 means the best 6, which is all the defensemen on the team. Of course he is top 6. All defensemen playing on the team are top 6, yes. He does not make sense. I understand English very good.

Zamboni

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Apr 2019 21:16:03
But all defensemen are top 6, yes? Where in the top 6 are these guys going to play? I believe is bad trade for Montreal. Armia and Brook are better players, yes.

Zamboni

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Apr 2019 21:12:35
I do not understand. Top 6 defensemen? But there are only six. How can there be a top 6 or a bottom 6?

Zamboni

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Apr 2019 01:40:35
We don’t need both Ristolainen and Parayko. Larsson is better than Ristolainen. We keep him.

Zamboni

 

 

 

Zamboni's talk replies