NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


Slayter's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Slayter's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Slayter's Posts



To Slayter's last 5 rumours posts


To Slayter's last 5 talk posts


To Slayter's last 5 rumour replies


Slayter's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Slayter's rumours posts


08 Dec 2017 01:13:49
Edm: puljarvi and nurse.


1.) 08 Dec 2017 05:11:38
big ol' No from EDM.

2.) 08 Dec 2017 09:56:49
Wouldn’t trade either of those guys for Juolevi.



22 Nov 2017 23:06:58
Canucks: gudbranson
Leafs: Liligren

Canucks need a good power play defence and to help joulevi and Toronto needs a big strong defence an to protect there young talent.


1.) 23 Nov 2017 00:29:49
Big no from leafs wth

2.) 23 Nov 2017 00:53:04
No no no no.

3.) 23 Nov 2017 01:08:00
Dont Need to trade a top prospect to get physical players
So Van cam dream on.

4.) 23 Nov 2017 02:59:48
No from Toronto. Easy no.

5.) 23 Nov 2017 03:18:15
Leafs aren't trading Liljegren anytime soon. he's a steal. And for that little (aging defenceman) keep dreaming

6.) 23 Nov 2017 14:13:03
Liljegren May be nothing special, but he may be the steak of that draft. Was ranked second and dropped hard. He’s a wild card but Gudbranson we know is nothing special. Would you trade a mystery box with either $5 or $1000 in it for $10? I wouldn’t. I’d see it through.

7.) 24 Nov 2017 05:29:36
Nope. How about seeing how good this kid is before trading him?



13 Nov 2017 00:55:06
Van: virtanen And a 3rd

Ana: Lindholm.


1.) 13 Nov 2017 03:39:26
no even close.

2.) 13 Nov 2017 04:36:11
HA THIS IS HILARIOUS! Anaheim spits in Jim Benning's face for that offer.

3.) 13 Nov 2017 06:11:45
Hahaha yikes.

4.) 14 Nov 2017 02:04:17
If not taken would of develop the way he was projected to be I'm sure it could work. But he's just isn't they're so big no. Lind.



03 Nov 2017 00:08:12
Avs: duchene
Canucks: joelevi and erikkson retain half of salary.


1.) 03 Nov 2017 03:04:57
Sakic would ask for Juolevi + Tanev + prospect/pick lol. Sounds dumb but so is sakic

2.) 03 Nov 2017 03:14:02
Big no from Colorado.

3.) 03 Nov 2017 05:18:04
Huge no from Vancouver. Defense pool is already weak as it is so makes no sense from Vancouver.



04 Sep 2017 01:41:55
Canucks: Erickson
Dallas: 3rd

Basically just a cap dump for Vancouver and Dallas gets a 3rd line forward to help them with a cup run.


1.) 04 Sep 2017 06:24:00
Andddd why would Dallas want $6M for many more years to come? And for, as you say, a third liner. This is so stupid.

2.) 04 Sep 2017 07:01:20
Deal from Van, no take backs. Jim Nill doesn't seem that stupid.

3.) 05 Sep 2017 10:24:09
Retain 3 mil.

4.) 07 Sep 2017 01:18:47
Maybe a 4th round instead.




Slayter's talk posts with other poster's replies to Slayter's talk posts


25 Nov 2017 01:00:10
Just so everyone knows no one wants gudbranson because his analytics are so bad so all rumors are false.





Slayter's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

07 Dec 2017 01:53:04
Boston pushes you out of the window of the skyscraper there office is than piss’s on you from the window.




Click To View This Thread

07 Sep 2017 01:18:47
Maybe a 4th round instead.




Click To View This Thread

01 Sep 2017 02:14:38
I was thinking canucks retain some salary like 25 percent on each.





Slayter has no Talk Replies