Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts
Oilers4cup's Profile
Oilers4cup's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Oilers4cup's Posts
To Oilers4cup's last 5 rumours posts
To Oilers4cup's last 5 banter posts
To Oilers4cup's last 5 rumour replies
To Oilers4cup's last 5 banter replies
Oilers4cup's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Oilers4cup's rumours posts
31 Dec 2016 18:31:54
There was this rumour going around that the oilers offered a trade to Colorado ( probably fake like always ) but anyway the trade was.
Edmonton
•Eberle
• 2017 1st
•Davidson
Colorado
• duchene
2017 2nd
As a oiler fan I would do this trade in a heart beat the draft is weak this year, duchene could play wing and actually keep up with Connor and Davidson is replaceable. What do Colorado fans think of the trade?
1.) 31 Dec 2016 19:24:28
No from Colorado value is there but they don't need a RW and why would the oils need another center.
2.) 31 Dec 2016 19:58:26
Dushene can play wing as much as he play center so your whole argument is falling apart and Aves should get a right winger before a lefty because Landy, Rantanen are the best wingers ontte team and are lefty so it wouldn't hurt to get a righty who can fill the net.
3.) 31 Dec 2016 20:34:52
Oilers need atleast a dman back in my opinion if we're trading a dman but i love Duchene.
4.) 01 Jan 2017 15:26:17
McJesusHabs. no one is suggesting they get a LW. Avs need help on D before they get help up front. don't see the need for eberle from the avs, dutchy plays centre and wing, so any position argument is out the window.
Then added on the trade is davidson (who? AHL Journeymen? Avs have plenty thanks though) and a 1st while the avs add a 2nd. Value doesn't match up whatsoever.
This is the type of trade that will lose Sakic his job. Maybe the avs should take this?!
28 Dec 2016 22:10:20
Pouliot hasn't done rubbish with the oilers this year and the oilers really need to find a winger for Connor
Edmonton
• 2017 1st round pick
Pouliot
Arizona
Domi.
1.) 28 Dec 2016 22:26:20
Domi is out of the question. Duclair would make more sense.
2.) 28 Dec 2016 22:26:46
Oils add.
3.) 28 Dec 2016 23:42:07
not happening. the first is not going to be 1st - 5th overall this year (unless an 18-wheeler falls of a cliff), and with not so strong of a draft class, getting Domi with that offer is a no-no right now.
4.) 29 Dec 2016 01:05:56
That fact you think that would get Domi made me cringe.
5.) 29 Dec 2016 03:10:24
Coyotes laugh in your face. McDavid for Strome and a 1st sound good?
6.) 29 Dec 2016 15:36:45
BeeJay96 how do you even compare mcdavid to domi, whole different lvl. also strome > pouliot.
09 Nov 2016 04:50:48
Oilers
• pouliot
any team
4th round pick
I'm tired of pouliot he just can not find success with the oilers, he is making way to much for the amount he's producing and the amount of penalties he takes 🙄 He probably could find success somewhere else but I've had anuff of him in Edmonton and want him gone also he's taking up spots that can be filled with injured player when there ready to come back ( Hendricks caggiula )
1.) 09 Nov 2016 07:48:11
It sucks because he's honestly a decent player and last year he did low key really well for himself. This year has been a train wreck it's embarrassing for him and literally costing the Oilers games. They aren't going to trade him, and I bet there is no team who wants him, but he either needs to be scratched or pick his rubbish up because its Bad.
2.) 09 Nov 2016 13:28:59
DAL should take a chance on him with the rediculous amount of injuries we have.
3.) 09 Nov 2016 17:27:33
He doesn't work hard enough. Only good game he's had is the one after he got sat for all the penalties. I thought the same last year though too.
11 Sep 2016 17:49:37
Oilers
• pouliot
• 2017 3rd
• 2017 7th
Ducks
• Rakell.
1.) 11 Sep 2016 18:45:58
Why would the ducks even consider this?
2.) 11 Sep 2016 18:55:22
How about Cogliano, 3rd and 7th for Hopkins?
3.) 11 Sep 2016 19:27:17
People have to stop putting pouliot in trades. No one wants him at face value. If someone can steal him, he's a good secondary/ depth guy, but when he makes 4mill and wouldn't be in the top 6 on any contending team he's not worth much at all.
4.) 11 Sep 2016 19:31:13
Brutal.
5.) 11 Sep 2016 21:23:21
Lol yeah i think ducks say no . I get ducks need a LW but not pouliot, and definitely not for that.
6.) 12 Sep 2016 01:04:30
Why wouldn't the ducks want to get older, more expensive (probably) and less production?
7.) 12 Sep 2016 01:13:09
I saw a artical saying pouliot was going to the ducks in a trade when they traded for maroon but he was injured at the time and it fell threw.
8.) 12 Sep 2016 04:51:52
Pouliot and Yak for Maroon and Vatanen WAS going to happen at trade deadline but then Pouliot was injured a few games before. So they just made a pick for maroon trade. That's a well known fact. So yes, Anaheim is apperently, or was, interested in Pouliot at some point.
But Rakell has more value than this package proposed here.
9.) 12 Sep 2016 08:31:26
That doesn't seem realistic to me^ Unless Yak has more value then we think I guess.
10.) 12 Sep 2016 18:13:42
Leafs 17
Please turn on TV and watch the WCH . RNH and McKinnon combo is the most dangerous combo on the ice. Please pay special attention to how many times RNH strips to puck away from defenders to turn the play into an offensive opportunity instead of running around in their own zone taking minus's on the scoresheet. and who is the first forward back on the back check. it ain't Austin. or Little J. or McD. or Coutier. Take a guess who that is.
A complete player who's worth of Selke consideration plays 2 way hockey.
Revised.
Cogliano, Rackell, Vatenen 2nd rounder for RNH. OR No deal.
11.) 12 Sep 2016 21:39:16
I was mocking his trade proposal. Take it easy k dog, we know Hopkins is the best 2 way center man in the league and will win the selke this year cause he's way better than Kopitar and Toews.
12.) 12 Sep 2016 23:40:41
It is realistic. It's a fact. That trade I just posted a few lines up was about to happen but then Pouliot was injured just a few games before the deadline. So the deal fell through and they just made a trade for Maroon. Then decided to resign Vatanen. Vatenen was the main target for the Oilers for a D man from before the deadline until he was resigned.
10 Aug 2016 22:03:25
Oilers
•Yakapov
Montreal
• condintinal 2nd round pick
The pick becomes a 1st if yak puts up 40+ points
I still think yak can turn his career around, plus yakapov and galchenyuk put up some big points in sarnia. I don't want to see yakapov go but he deserves a fresh start Dallas Eakins didn't help to start with and its been down hill since he got here.
1.) 11 Aug 2016 00:11:19
A 2nd or Juulsen would be nice.
But having a condition of getting 40 points from a former 1st overall is pretty embarrassing, if it should turn into a 1st round then it should be atleast 65+ points.
2.) 11 Aug 2016 00:29:09
@mcjesus Christ originally I had it becoming a 1st if he gets 60+ points but even if he did turn it around I can't see him putting up more then 50 points this season.
3.) 11 Aug 2016 00:51:59
65+ deserves more than a 1st though. I don't know it's not bad I guess. But yeah Juulsen would be ideal.
4.) 11 Aug 2016 01:47:12
Yakupov couldn't get a 3rd at the draft. Tough position for the Oilers.
5.) 11 Aug 2016 02:21:05
Edmonton won't get Juulsen. The 2nd is far more likely.
6.) 11 Aug 2016 02:47:36
Agree that galchenyuk could help make yak more comfortable. So far he is anything but. I will repeat, yak rows the boat out there, splashes around, makes a bunch of waves but the boat doesn't go anywhere.
Juulsen has to be part of the discussion.
7.) 11 Aug 2016 05:32:06
Such baloney that Yak couldn't get a 3rd. Every single team in the league would trade a 3rd for Yak. I think a conditional pick has some merit. Yak would round out Montreals top 6 nicely. We know when he has chemistry with a player he can put up strong numbers.
8.) 11 Aug 2016 06:16:25
Even if yak puts up 40 pts not worth a 1st.
9.) 11 Aug 2016 08:04:11
Exactly, he needs atleast 60 to get a first round.
10.) 11 Aug 2016 11:53:16
juulsen is not that good, if MTL wants to add to scoring and see if Yak can bounce back by playing with Gal then they will have to pay for it. Still a number one overall pick with some upside despite some bad play.
11.) 11 Aug 2016 15:51:29
Ed would jump at this offer. Habs would want to do it for a second no conditions.
12.) 14 Aug 2016 00:57:19
Oils add a 3rd rounder.
Oilers4cup's banter posts with other poster's replies to Oilers4cup's banter posts
19 Nov 2016 00:54:31
So if michale stone is available what would it take for the oilers to get him, if Eberle can't go going still with Connor it nuge I would gladly do a 1 for 1 trade Eberle for stone, we all now PC is good at those 🙃.
1.) 19 Nov 2016 03:38:32
Maybe try to sign him in the offseason. Do you sign free agents after the expansion draft? Still I don't know if that'll work cap wise. Klefbom, Larsson, Sekera and then Stone would be an expensive top 4. Plus Nurse has really taken a step this season and there's also Davidson. Getting a top 4 righty would be nice but Sekera would have to be gone.
Also Eberle has always been a lazy streaky player. I don't know why he's suddenly being criticized. He's the Oils only proven top 6 right wing, can't really afford to lose him. Pouliot plus a good pick but that probably wouldn't get it done.
24 Oct 2016 18:14:31
I know this won't happen but I was thinking what if the coyotes win the draft lottery and offered the pick and some to Toronto for Matthews what else would the coyotes have to add to get Matthews please be realistic here.
1.) 24 Oct 2016 18:19:17
First off arizona doesn't need a center they have doing Doral and stroke for future and have hanzal for one. So if i'm arizona and I have the first overall pick I would draft liljegran or move down for liljegran.
2.) 24 Oct 2016 18:21:37
You ask us to be realistic seconds after you propose something insane. Nope, it doesn't work like that.
3.) 24 Oct 2016 18:22:38
*dvorak *strome.
4.) 24 Oct 2016 19:19:38
im pretty sure mathew is not going to be moved for a long time. Hey shanks maybee you could add some insight or possibiliies or just say hey i'm pretty sure they won't trade him.
5.) 24 Oct 2016 19:24:52
A post like this doesn't deserve added insight. You should know that
6.) 24 Oct 2016 20:50:09
once again you have two choices inlife be an a*s or be civil. So why don't you try to be civil and educate the people who you think are beneath you.
7.) 24 Oct 2016 21:20:54
gonna stay outta it, but colt, if its a post (like this one) that's pretty stupid to say the least, how can you possibly put any insight into it? its like teaching a monkey how to speak. it won't work.
8.) 24 Oct 2016 21:50:54
Topshelf- have you ever seen shank add anything besides an insult? I'd be shocked if you did.
9.) 24 Oct 2016 22:15:29
I made this post to see what offers would be I never said or ment for it to look like a legitament trade proposal just for fun and it doesn't matter what Arizona needs sheesh.
10.) 25 Oct 2016 05:02:35
Shank has added a lot to conversations before. Open your yes. You only choose to see the hate towards you, Colt.
11.) 25 Oct 2016 05:29:06
No yup I read this site everyday. Never does shank say anything constructive it's always an insult or belittlement of others. Yup your about 90% sh1t talking 10 percent actual hockey talk.
12.) 25 Oct 2016 06:17:31
Meanwhile, tankie talks Blues 98% of the time (even if the post he is replying to has nothing to do with the Blues) and defends his dumb Blues-related posts 2% of the time.
Yeah, you're a much more valuable member of this board, brah.
13.) 25 Oct 2016 13:37:23
I never said I was a valuable member of this board bra. But if all you got is I talk about a team I love to much then I guess I'm guilty of beING a huge fan of my team.
14.) 25 Oct 2016 18:49:08
Being a huge fan of a team is fine (Hint: they aren't your team - you have literally nothing to do with them beyond giving them a few hundred dollars a year if you go to some games), the issue is your nonsensical and totally unrelated rants about how great every STL player is. If a post does not mention STL or a STL player, then no one wants to talk about STL in there. Don't bring in Parayko, Lehtera, or whichever of the other 21 Gods on the STL roster you are stroking today.
15.) 25 Oct 2016 19:38:30
Lol. Every time you talk I cringe, Colt. Face in Palm*
It's comedy, Laughing at you not with you comedy.
16.) 25 Oct 2016 20:28:06
Shanks they are my team bra. Not really sure why that bothers you. As for the blues it's ok to be jealous of a superior team. As for blues players I haven't said rubbish lately you and you cronies yup chirp gave mentioned far more than I have. The problem with you children is you think your better than everyone else but your arogance proves you other wise. AL you three are is a bunch of teenagers who live in thier moms basement typing away behind a computer. So hateful towards others and thier opinions. Do us all a favor go out in public find a girl and get laid maybee you will come back men instead of little boys lol.
17.) 25 Oct 2016 21:56:42
Lol Colt. Yes you are guilty of liking your team too much. The new love for Yakupov and the Lehtera comment the other day just adds to the rest of your lust for the Blues. I have said the same thing about Chirp and Yup in the past. Chirpy rips on Sosa for not watching Weber more when he was in Nashville. Little does he know that some people have jobs, wives and kids which leaves very little time to even follow their own team. Chirpy had to go away for a few months because he didn't want to hear about the Larsson for Hall deal after bashing the Kessel deal every day. Yup is just a follower that agrees with everything master Chirp says. Shankar at one time was a great poster with lots of hockey knowledge. I'm not sure what happened there, he's now fixated on all of your comments which doesn't leave him time to post anything useful. It would be nice to have some good hockey talk, but it is unlikely with all the tweens that don't have the maturity level to speak like adults.
18.) 25 Oct 2016 22:06:28
Holy crap tankie, are you ever a waste of time. I mean, at least my cronies and I can come up with things to say other than childhood insults. You question our maturity as you use insults said by 8-year-olds and write at the level of a 6-year-old. Now, please continue - like yup says, laughing at you, not with you.
19.) 26 Oct 2016 12:03:20
@leafs
Pretty good "rant", if it be that?
12 Aug 2016 04:48:15
If the oilers manage to get a guy like Barrie or Ellis do you think they have a shot at making the playoffs? We're fine upfront and if we do get a good offensive right shot our Defence would look nice to.
Klefbom - larsson
Sekera - X
Davidson - fayne.
1.) 12 Aug 2016 05:22:41
Not with Larson has a number one lol.
2.) 12 Aug 2016 05:38:53
I think even without one of them I think edm could be close I like the larson pick up he is a solid dman Davidson and klefbom are underated but a healthy McDavid with the rest of the team they are in good shape.
3.) 12 Aug 2016 09:02:55
Larsson can't score, but can defend against top players like nothing, he's a minute eater. with Klefbom, he could hold his own, but I'd expect him to be better offensively than Larsson, Davidson could possibly break the top 4, he does play right side too, but don't expect that till the middle of the season. Without any help, Sekera showed he had some holes in his defensive game playing on the top pair, yet he knows how to score, on sheltered minutes and power play/ 3v3 OT time he could yet again reach 30 points on the second pairing, all I can say is what the Oilers are searching for now, is a d-man who could consistently score 30+ points and quarterback a power play.
4.) 12 Aug 2016 09:57:54
V bro you need an offensive d man to win a cup or else you just end up like Minnesota.
5.) 12 Aug 2016 13:12:43
I agree Ed needs a top 3 d-man but teams won't do a trade for bottom 6 forwards or unproven prospects. it will cost them a top 4 forward. They got fleeced in the Hall trade but I don't think other GMs are that foolish. So stop with the pro oilers, unrealistic trade proposals that are posted here and make reasonable ones.
6.) 12 Aug 2016 14:08:20
lol @Canadafinest dude suter legit put up 50+ points is he not offensive enough for you?
25 Jul 2016 00:18:47
Anyone hear anything on Brandon pirri? I've heard a lot of teams are interested in him but surprised he hasn't signed yet, I would love the oilers to sign him and put him on the 3rd line centre spot and will gladly give a 6th round pick to the ducks for him.
1.) 25 Jul 2016 04:31:22
I'm sure ANA would love the free draft pick since Pirri wasn't qualified and is a UFA.
Beyond that, EDM may be a good fit for him. However, I'm sure there is a fair bit of interest in him and he's weighing his options. That's not to say he's going to sign some 5 year 25 million dollar contract or something, but there surely has to be some interest in the guy.
19 May 2016 20:54:19
So talbot got his 3rd shutout of the tourney let's hear the hate now.
1.) 20 May 2016 00:02:36
Still not a starter. Will never win a cut for the oilers.
2.) 20 May 2016 01:28:03
He's no Jonathan Bernier that's for sure.
3.) 20 May 2016 16:05:05
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? And a non-NHLer is leading the tourney in pts. Time to hand over the Hart trophy.
4.) 20 May 2016 16:45:12
How is talbot not a starter? His save percentage this season was top 15. BEHIND THE OILERS DEFENSE.
Sekera Fayne
Rienhart Oesterle
Nurse Pardy
Not an easy defense to play behind.
12 Jan 2017 18:31:56
One problem the Penguins won't win the cup.
01 Jan 2017 04:42:54
Yea no.
30 Dec 2016 21:46:01
Hossa is old and gets injured every 2nd game well hendo is a great leader and a 1st is still a 1st round pick so no thanks.
07 Dec 2016 22:00:19
Don't think a trade cancels outs Vegas taking a player only if Vegas signs a free agent from Washington.
28 Oct 2016 03:21:45
Yea no thanks if price stays healthy that pick will be a late 1st don't need Emelin or carr and who is DLR?
16 Nov 2016 22:46:45
remember your dealing with benning here anything is possible.
27 Oct 2016 06:13:31
I think laine and vessey will be the top 3 contenders, puljujarvi will probably be sent down, tkachuck I don't know chycuhren possibly and sergachev I don't know.
24 Oct 2016 22:15:29
I made this post to see what offers would be I never said or ment for it to look like a legitament trade proposal just for fun and it doesn't matter what Arizona needs sheesh.
30 Sep 2016 18:53:37
Where are you getting this " news "
29 Aug 2016 06:37:00
They way your spelling coyotes is bugging me.