NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

Dr_Invictus's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Dr_Invictus's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Dr_Invictus's Posts

 

 

To Dr_Invictus's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Dr_Invictus's last 5 talk posts

 

To Dr_Invictus's last 5 rumour replies

 

Dr_Invictus's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Dr_Invictus's rumours posts

 

29 Jan 2016 23:27:01
To NYI: Hudler, Wotherspoon, Russell, Hunter Smith
To Cal: Dal Colle, Hamonic, 2nd

To Tampa: Wideman, Klimchuck
To Calgary: Drouin, Carle.

Dr_Invictus

1.) 30 Jan 2016 00:31:20
Calgary wins those big time. Not even close.


2.) 30 Jan 2016 01:01:32
terrible for tbl and NYI.


3.) 30 Jan 2016 01:13:58
Both favor Calgary in my opinion.


 

 

 

Dr_Invictus's talk posts with other poster's replies to Dr_Invictus's talk posts

 

25 Jun 2017 21:18:13
Calgary Needs a Big, top Line RW to compliment Gaudreau and Monahan. There aren't a lot that come to mind who are in the same age Bracket, except the following:

-Michael Dal Colle, NYI
-Anthony Manta, DET
-Miko Rantanen, COL

Ergo, the options are:

To DET: Oliver Klington, Andrew Magniapane To CGY: Mantha

OR

TO COL: Rasmus Anderson
TO CGY: Rantenen (Maybe sweeten with a 3rd if they balk)

OR

TO NYI: Troy Brower, Klington
To CGY Michael Dal Colle

OR

Calgary could just sign MIchael Grabner, so long as the term and Cap hit aren't above 4M per. If you look at the Cost/Point of RW players in the NHL last year Alex Chiasson was 12th. Considering Calgary's cap space, they need to get a player who produces at higher rate per dollar. Only Mantha and Ranten seem to fit that bill. (I'm sure Boston won't part with Pastrnak and Winnipeg won't give up Laine). I included Brower in the NYI trade because they are in a "win now mode" and need him more than a prospect like Lazar.

Cheers

Dr_Invictus

1.) 25 Jun 2017 23:45:17
Rantanen is the most untouchable piece on Colorado maybe add Dougie Hamilton Take out Brouwer on dal Colle. No from Detroit.


2.) 26 Jun 2017 00:36:06
I agree with your premise of the Flames needing a young top 6 RW who is big to compliment their top players.

Now being a Red Wings fan, Detroit declines the deal you proposed. So long as we have Holland, he isn't going to make any big trades. Mantha has shown he has promise and won't be traded very easily. Not saying he is going to be to command the moon but it's going to have to more then this offer and possibly more then your willing to pay. Detroit is in rebuild transition where we need our young players like Mantha, AA, Larkin and Svechnikov. Detroit is trying to build around this core through drafting.

Anyone else on our roster besides those I mentioned are available for a reasonable price. Ideally picks/ prospects or young roster players as the return. Values vary for each of those and salary/ reasonable cap dumps can be taken to even out value.

So if for example Calgary wanted Nyquist/ Tatar in their top 6, then there may be a deal there which is more plausible then moving Mantha.


3.) 27 Jun 2017 17:34:55
Where do I start?

Mantha is worth more than Kyling. Mangipane doesn't make up the difference at all.


There was a reason why Rantanen was taken in the top 10 in 2015, and why Andersson was a second rounder. Colorado doesn't take that.

Brouwers contract is awful. Although Kyling for MDC isn't that bad, I really don't think NYI wants Brouwer+Ladd+Boychuk as bad contracts.

And Grabner ain't a UFA until 2018.


4.) 27 Jun 2017 17:35:49
Nylander - if you think Calgary adds Hamilton onto any of these trades you're insane. He's worth more than any of the players listed here.


5.) 28 Jun 2017 11:22:43
Doubt Colorado let's Rantanen go Without Hamilton or Bodie.


6.) 28 Jun 2017 23:27:35
Hamilton>>dal colle
Hamilton>rantanen.


 

 

 

Dr_Invictus's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Oct 2017 21:37:57
The second trademarks seems unnecessary. Why not trade for a top line RW instead of duchene?

Dr_Invictus

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Sep 2017 17:00:22
That is a fair deal. Jankowski has size and skill and will be a good second line center.

Dr_Invictus

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Sep 2017 16:31:21
Duchess is a cancer in the dressing room. No thanks.

Dr_Invictus

 

 

Click To View This Thread

03 Jul 2017 05:39:56
Kucherov. One good year. IOn what year is he untraceable. It's reminiscent of Vancouver fans claiming kesler was worth 3 1st round picks after one 40 goal season. one. And he just declined after that. He's no Hall of famer.

Dr_Invictus

 

 

Click To View This Thread

03 Jul 2017 05:35:36
Who is the fool who said tkachuk, a 1st, and Jankowski for galchenyuk? In what world? Why?

Dr_Invictus

 

 

 

Dr_Invictus has no Talk Replies