29 Sep 2019 15:27:02
Minnesota Trades
Pateryn

Toronto Trades
Ceci

Ceci gives the Wild more offense from the backend and they have enough Cap Space to make this deal.
Pateryn is better suited to play on the RSide with Rielly plus gives the Leafs a little more Cap Space which they need.

Thoughts ?

1.) 29 Sep 2019
29 Sep 2019 16:52:33
I think Minnesota adds a little. Ceci's younger and has a higher offensive upside than Pateryn

2.) 29 Sep 2019
29 Sep 2019 18:10:10
Kyle Dubas: It’s over-pay Guerin, I have the high upside player!

Bill Guerin: You underestimate my player’s defence power!

Dubas: Don’t try it!

Guerin: *Jumps with this trade to submit it with an add on leafs side*

Sorry had to do this once I saw @Mustafarr ‘s name.

3.) 29 Sep 2019
29 Sep 2019 18:58:47
Minnesota can’t afford to do that. I think I mentioned CapFriendly before to you. I highly recommend you check it first before posting. Not sure why Minnesota wants a 4.5 mill third line player. Because Ceci would be third line behind Dumba and Suter. Maybe they want to start a trend by overpaying for depth guys?

4.) 30 Sep 2019
30 Sep 2019 00:54:30
As much as I’d love the leafs to trade Ceci it won’t Happen but on the other hand he might thrive maybe.

5.) 30 Sep 2019
30 Sep 2019 22:27:25
Im not agreeing or disagreeing to this deal but as far as cap is concerned

Minny has 1.5 in space

Pateryn is worth 2.25
Minny is at 25 roster players so 2 guys must be cut that's 1.5 between 2 low end salaries

2.25 + 1.5+ 1.5= 5.25 million

750,000 left over if this deal ever happened

Yeah that's how the cap works and i don't need cap friendly.

6.) 01 Oct 2019
30 Sep 2019 23:58:50
The original prop didn’t say anything about cutting players there Craigger. Thanks for the math lesson. So Minnesota loses three players for one Ceci. Is that what you are telling me? Damn smart move there. And what two depth players get cut along with Pateryn being traded to make this deal work? Please do explain. This I got to read.

7.) 01 Oct 2019
01 Oct 2019 01:12:33
Yeah i totally agree with you HockeyFanatic it didn't say anything about cutting players but minnesota does have 25 on their roster so they legally have to cut 2.

They have 15 forwards and 8 dmen and 2 goalies. My guess, and its only a guess, they waive JT Brown and Brad Hunt. If they don't want to waive anyone then they would need to send a couple of ELC players down. Either way its got to be 2.

Before this deal even needs to be considered getting rid of 2 players from the main roster must happen so it has no affect on this deal.

No matter what by tuesday night minnesota will at least have 2.75 remaining on the cap.

you asked i just wanted to answer. Trading ceci for pateryn has nothing to do with the 2 guys having to get off the roster so it can't be looked as getting ceci losing 3 guys. Its only ceci for pateryn. The cap works for both teams .

I do agree with you though. minnesota dealing for ceci doesn't seem like a good move.

8.) 01 Oct 2019
01 Oct 2019 01:26:25
This in no way to disrespect anyone. i just love chattin hockey when i can. if i'm wrong ill admit it. i'm real bad at coming up with deals because i'm no GM.

Im like that math guy who can't figure out the answer to a long equation but i can double check of it.

Ill correct someone calling out someone if there statement isn't totally correct. I expect the same from others. If i'm wrong i like to know it, be shown it then learn from it. Debating something without real proof isn't debating its opinionating. i like to debate but once in a while my opinion does get in the way. i try to not be bias so facts always back up the truth.

HockeyFanatic nice meeting you . i'm a leaf fan first but i love the game and i'm huge into jr hockey. have a good one.

9.) 01 Oct 2019
01 Oct 2019 20:27:56
Pateryn is hurt 6-8 weeks so guess this conversation just died.