27 Mar 2019 04:41:42
EDM - Lucic (6M 4YRS), 2019 2nd, 2020 2nd
TOR - Zaitsev (4.5M 5YRS), 2020 1st
VAN - Schaller (1.9M 1YRS)

EDM - Zaitsev
TOR - Schaller
VAN - Lucic, 1st, 2nd, 2nd

Would these teams be interested in a trade like this? If so, how are the values?


1.) 27 Mar 2019
27 Mar 2019 05:49:11
I actually don't think its too bad. But trade clearly favours toronto.


2.) 27 Mar 2019
27 Mar 2019 07:01:48
Toronto gives up more. A second to dump Zaitsev isn’t enough.


3.) 27 Mar 2019
27 Mar 2019 10:11:22
vertius, they are giving up a 1st though?


4.) 27 Mar 2019
27 Mar 2019 15:05:33
yeah a super super late 1st to tho.


5.) 27 Mar 2019
27 Mar 2019 15:51:47
Considering where they are likely to finish its an above average second.


6.) 28 Mar 2019
28 Mar 2019 11:35:20
Wait so toronto gives up a 1st and oilers 2 2nds this doesn't favor toronto it favors edmonton lolll they aren't going to get rid of lucic for 2 2nds enjoy lucic edmonton until the end of his contract hahahahaha.


7.) 28 Mar 2019
28 Mar 2019 11:36:54
My bad didn't know zaitsev went to edmonton yea toronro should give up a tad more maybe add a 2nd going to vancouver and a 3rd from vancouver to Edmonton or so.


8.) 28 Mar 2019
28 Mar 2019 11:37:52
Maybe Toronto adds a 3rd or 4th, who should get it?


9.) 28 Mar 2019
28 Mar 2019 16:10:19
MTL4LIFE. Why would Vancouver add when WE’RE taking on a bad contract? What logic is that?! Edmonton can keep Lucic if they think we’re adding to help them get rid of the contract, like what?


10.) 28 Mar 2019
28 Mar 2019 20:49:53
Settle down he said VAN would receive a 2nd and add a 3rd so they’d be going up a round. I kind like it.


11.) 29 Mar 2019
29 Mar 2019 04:16:02
Van ain’t giving up nothing. I said it once and I’ll say it again, EDM can shove the Lucic contract where the sun don’t shine if they think ANYONE is going to give ANYTHING to take that contract. I don’t care if it’s *upgrading* or whatever. A late first and two seconds (especially when we’re giving up a third for one of those seconds) is not in ANY universe a good deal. Get real.


12.) 29 Mar 2019
29 Mar 2019 05:02:24
Holy buddy if you don’t like the deal than okay but don’t go off if you don’t even get it. The deal I proposed was a 1st and two 2nds. He suggested VAN getting ANOTHER 2nd to make that three 2nds.

VAN should be bad for a couple years to rebuild IMO. There a team that can afford to have a bad contract for a few years. Adding 3 picks in the first two rounds is huge.


13.) 29 Mar 2019
29 Mar 2019 20:53:52
I do get it, you’re the one who isn’t. An above average second (which is what Toronto’s first will be) and two other average 2nd round pics isn’t enough to entice a team to take on Lucic’s contract. Do you understand yet?

Just stop adding the Canucks to your trade proposals because clearly you know nothing about them if you think they’re going to be out of the playoffs for a couple more years. We would’ve been in the playoffs this year if it hadn’t been for injuries, we will most likely make it next year barring another mass injury bug. The Canucks are a lot better than people like to give us credit for. Take your rubbishty picks and shove ‘em.


14.) 29 Mar 2019
29 Mar 2019 21:25:29
Then why in the above comment did you say “a late first and two seconds (especially when we’re giving up a third for one of those seconds) ”? If you would’ve said a late first a three seconds then you would’ve been right. So yeah pipe down.

The Nucks are you going to finish 10 points out. They don’t have a good enough roster to blame missing playoffs on injuries.
Don’t worry I didn’t make the proposal so make you happy. Clearly some other people found in interesting and believable. If you don’t think high picks will help your team then your helpless.