24 Jan 2018 22:28:58
I just think and this genius idea came out of my head
Mtl) Price
Edm) Draisaitl
...
Just kidding... (pff who really thought edm would even consider that)
Edm) Draisaitl
Cal) Tkachuk + Bennett or Gaudreau + Ferland

My point is absolutely neutral so tell me if there's anything wrong in that offer

1.) 24 Jan 2018
24 Jan 2018 23:26:41
What the point of the first part tho lol
And honestly think oilers decline based off the sole reason of Edmonton needs to have that one two punch of mcdavid drat down the middle.
And oilers say no to the first one, but the second for Gaudreau can’t see Calgary making that trade at all I think Gaudreau stays in Calvary for a very long time.

2.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 00:10:19
Gaudreau has way more value than draisaitl. Look at the stats. Bad trade.

3.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 00:49:24
A trade like that between Calgary and Edmonton would never happen and what’s the point of Calgary making that trade. Monahan is a good 1st line center.

4.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 00:56:56
Bennett or Johnny? How r those two remotely close in value?

5.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 01:35:47
Bennett or Gaudreau. lolll.

6.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 03:02:31
Pretty bored today hey man? Throw random poop up.

7.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 06:44:06
It’s two different offers lol he’s saying either:

Tkachuk ans bennett

Or


Gaudreau and Ferland.

8.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 11:34:48
Ohhh @Jim lmao. Ty.

9.) 25 Jan 2018
25 Jan 2018 15:25:45
Edmonton says no to Tkachuk/ Bennett

Flames say no to Gaudreau/ Ferland because Gaudreau makes almost 2 mill less than draisatl and flames already have monahan at centre who makes more than 2 mill less than draisatl.