30 Dec 2017 20:33:32
Ott: Hoffman/ceci/brassard

Edm: hopkins/2018 1st

Ott: ryan/ karlsson/ condon / burrows

Dal: seguin/ benn/ bishop 2019 3rd



Ott: benn/ seguin

Ari: domi duclair 2018 1st

1.) 31 Dec 2017
30 Dec 2017 23:47:17
Wow Benn=Karlsson

Ryan ( nagitive value ) Burrows And Condon= nothing.

2.) 31 Dec 2017
31 Dec 2017 01:07:46
Holy wow. Rape the other team.
These are way too heavily in favor of Ottawa.
Where's the Phanuef for a teams 1st and top prospect?
Surprised you didn't propose Phanuef for Barzel or Boeser.

3.) 31 Dec 2017
31 Dec 2017 01:40:26
Lol No.

4.) 31 Dec 2017
31 Dec 2017 06:55:38
Why not do this;

Ottawa buys out Phaneuf, Burrows, Smith and MaCarthur
Then
Ott: Karlsson, Hoffman, Ceci, Condon

Ari: Ekman-Larsson, Domi, Duclair and 2018 ist

Then
Ott: Ryan, Anderson

Dal: Bishop, Faksa.

5.) 01 Jan 2018
01 Jan 2018 11:34:30
Lmfao Ryan (consistent 60 point getter) is far from negative value and karlsson (generational) > Benn (elite) sorry to tell you but don't kid yourself.

Burrows = HEART guy that adds experience, leadership, and goes into corner battles with everything he has, while Condon is a solid back up goalie on any team. So again far from nothing.

What I don't agree with on this is
Why does ottawa bring bishop back without moving Andy? 2 huge contract goalies not a good thing.

And Seguin and benn >>>>> domi, duclaire, and a chance at the number 1 pick, maybe one of the 2 for that but definitely not both.

Take out bishop and Condon and fix the Arizona trade by saying Seguin and a 3rd from Dallas deal for duclaire domi and the 2018 1st (lottery pick, NOT a guarenteed number 1 overall even if they finish dead last)

6.) 02 Jan 2018
02 Jan 2018 10:48:53
News flash karlsson >> Benn
Ryan = consistent 50 to 60 point guy or 0.65 ppg guy, definitely NOT negative value no matter how you look at him or his contract.

Only things here that don't make sense are why would ottawa want a 2nd big contract goalie, i'd take out the goalies in falls trade and up the 3rd to a 2nd or even possibly a 1st if Dallas finishes high enough in the standings to warrant that.

Also Seguin and benn is a huge over payment in the pho deal. I get that the pick is probably going to be a lotto pick but it's still not a guarantee though, so maybe change that one to

Seguin, batherson, and the pick from Dallas
For
Domi, duclaire, and the 1st

The rest is fine.

7.) 02 Jan 2018
02 Jan 2018 10:56:19
Hawks not a bad idea but MacArthur is most likely going to retire anyway, Smith is likely an asset that can get a good trade return while burrows and Phaneuf could easily be picked up at deadline by a contender. might not get a lot for them but definitely something is better than nothing. even a couple later round draft picks like 4th 5th or 6th rounds. otherwise I actually like this post of yours.

8.) 03 Jan 2018
03 Jan 2018 21:05:24
I'm confused, Ryan is consistently injured and has not touched 60 pts since 2011-2012. I'm a Sense fan, but this is over-valuing him, particularly given his ludicrous contract. That said, slot him into a 2nd-3rd line role for a cup contender and he may be worth it for another team.

9.) 06 Jan 2018
06 Jan 2018 17:06:16
Bobby ryan has never hit 60 points since 2010-11 with anaheim, he only broke 50 points mark 2 out of the 5 years as a sen. somehow this makes ryan a "consistant" 60 point getter? So clueless rambo, or maybe you're just dumb and don't know what the word "consistant" means? Afterall, you can't spell it. there's no way in hell phaneuf could easily be picked up by a play off contender, that's such an uneducated comment. Phaneuf is ours to keep, we knew that when we traded for him.