17 Nov 2017 14:09:03
Mtl: Kane

Buff: Nielsen, Gallagher

1.) 17 Nov 2017
17 Nov 2017 14:51:07
Just to clarify Julsen not Nielseon. Type error.

2.) 17 Nov 2017
17 Nov 2017 15:34:10
Closest thing you have posted. I’m sure habs will want an extension with it. Also not sure if habs need another guy with off ice issues there, but the talent is undeniable.

3.) 17 Nov 2017
17 Nov 2017 15:59:54
You want to trade Juulsen and Galagher for a UFA?

4.) 17 Nov 2017
17 Nov 2017 17:44:08
I think this makes more sense if Lane was to resign, Golden? Is that your thought behind trading Juulsen and Galagher for the UFA Kane?

5.) 17 Nov 2017
17 Nov 2017 19:53:31
Ya but yup nth Gallagher is overvalued. As a guy who sees him play he's definitely good an energic but Kane is playing well this year and one pace for 82 points even tho that won't happen but could get around 70 he has the talent. So you take him, hope he matured and sign him to an extension if he did matured. If not well it cost you Gllagher and a prospect. The risk/ reward is worth it imo. And not has the CEO room to sign him even with Price 10,5.

6.) 17 Nov 2017
17 Nov 2017 20:19:16
Ok. You actually put some thought into this. I'm kinda shocked man. Keep it up.

This would all depend on what other offers buffalo would get on Kane and how much they value Juulsen. If they think juulsen is good for their blue line it could maybe work.

7.) 17 Nov 2017
17 Nov 2017 21:13:40
It’s really not that bad but Galleger is such a big part to the team he’s a presence every time on the ice he is the heart to there team. For that no from Montreal. Maybe Chuck go E. Kane? But there’s not really a point don’t think Montreal is a true contender.