30 Jul 2017 20:53:10
Habs : plekanec and juulsen

Detroit : nyquist

both side are winner

habs need a for forward who can score goals

detroit need depth in defense


1.) 31 Jul 2017
31 Jul 2017 01:33:38
No only Habs win here, Plekanec is a one year cap dump making more then Nyquist which doesn't help Detroit's current cap situation.

Juulsen is a good d-man but he is no Sergachev and not likely to pass many of our other young d-men.

So ultimately Detroit says no, also Nyquist has a NTC that he would have to waive for Montreal which isn't a guarantee. Also he is one of Detroit's higher value assets and won't be sold cheaply.

His production has gone down recently but probably could be productive with a change in scenery. Essentially for Nyquist the cost is going to start at a 1st plus and the bidding war goes from there. Also Montreal has the cap space to take Nyquist at full contract without retention or cap dump Plekanec back.

So if Montreal wants him and he will waive, then it's 2018 1st +. The plus may be higher since its in the division.

So essentially Montreal wins, deal is unfair and unlikely to happen unless the following reasons above occur.


2.) 31 Jul 2017
31 Jul 2017 01:58:32
Honestly would rather keep Juulsen. Someone is going to have to play D for the Habs in the next few seasons. he looks like only prospect capable of making the team in future.


3.) 31 Jul 2017
31 Jul 2017 04:08:15
Montreal needs depth on centre. So who takes plekanec's spot?


4.) 31 Jul 2017
31 Jul 2017 13:28:00
Montreal is doomed. No prospects, no one to play d or center. MB is an idiot.


5.) 05 Aug 2017
05 Aug 2017 10:03:34
yeah I was, this site bounces around on me all the time, I love hockey, love the Habs, like pittsburgh penquins,


6.) 05 Aug 2017
05 Aug 2017 10:52:52
Lol cap dump and Juuleson for Gus? I know he's been declining last couple years but still has young and more value then that.


7.) 05 Aug 2017
05 Aug 2017 10:55:50
I'd take that from mtl. But would Detroit tho? Nyquist is good.