08 Jun 2017 19:43:17
Ana vatanan and stoner
Tor kapenan lepsic and a 3rd

Ana dumps 8 mill in cap space buying dumping stoner leaf she expose stoner or he fills in as 5/ 6/ 7 guy for the last year of his contract kappy and lepsic are both nhl ready or really close

Leafs get a top pairing dman young good contract to move forward.


1.) 08 Jun 2017
08 Jun 2017 21:45:02
No for a few reasons. Don't want Stoner's contract. If they are taking the bad contract why are they adding the pick? Vatenan is injured and may not come back the same player. Those two are probably earning a spot on the Leafs out of camp. So again no.


2.) 08 Jun 2017
08 Jun 2017 21:46:33
Would not call Vatanen a top pairing dman at all but he would definitely look good on Torontos right side along with Rielly.


3.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 00:01:28
Ducks would decline so fast your head would spin. Garbage offered.
Better up the ante to a useful piece coming back for Vatanen like Marner or JVR+ perhaps.


4.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 00:15:32
Stoner has 1 year left so it's not bad.


5.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 00:52:05
Again. another idiotic statement from ft4all. Marner. lol.


6.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 01:24:12
Do not want anything to do with Vatanen on leafs. We need a top pairing deffinsive zone PK specialtist.


7.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 02:00:28
I don't think this new management the Leafs have is that dumb. You are giving up a young NHL player who has shown a tendency for scoring big goals; A decent prospect that plays a feisty game; Plus a 3rd rounder. For an undersized defenseman that slipped to the 3rd pairing in this years playoffs. He also might not be back till Christmas.
I thought Toronto was in year 2 of their rebuild. Why not draft a couple right handed defenders. Foote, Timmins maybe Luke Martin in the second round. Toronto will have a lot tougher of a time making the playoffs next year. Tampa will be better, Florida will not be a train wreak. They will also have to face other teams #1 goalie. I don't think the playoffs are a foregone conclusion.


8.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 03:16:46
@FT4A Marner!? Hahahaha keep it up man.


9.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 06:36:07
NO. NO. No. NO.
Vatanen is not what the leafs need. NO NO NO!
The only ways the leafs would or should do this is for a bag of pucks!


10.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 11:27:45
Yet if this wasRNH for Vatanen, FT4A would be asking for Lindholm + Montour instead. But for the original, i don't mind it, only one concern is that Vatanen is the same mindset is Gardiner/ Zaitsev, not really the defensive guy we want alongside Rielly. I'd rather pay that price for Tanev + a cap dump than Vatanen + a cap dump. Hoever, if this trade was made, i woudnt be very upset.


11.) 09 Jun 2017
09 Jun 2017 11:36:05
VanCity said it perfectly.