15 Sep 2016 03:01:17
Men price look bad! They would be wise to trade him to the oiler or leaf while he got value

Mon: price

Edm: draisaitil, jeese p and 2 first

Or

Mon: price

Tor: nylander, marner, mattews

With all that being said every media in Canada say that pietrengelo is god awful and that he should be bench!


1.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 07:19:53
lol um absolutely effing no from Edmonton. And also no from leafs. And the fact Oilers added more made me throw up a bit.


2.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 07:24:52
😂😂😂.


3.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 11:38:04
Montrealfinest go back to your original account.


4.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 12:29:47
Bigger no from leafs IMO but those are both terrible.


5.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 14:32:43
Wtf is this garbage. Leafs/ oilers take 3 steps back if they do this. Even NHL17 says no lmao. Sad attempt.


6.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 16:41:42
Hahaha are you high? Price is leaving Montreal after next year anyways. No Wayne re signs with the Habs, they are on a downward spiral!


7.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 16:42:36
Not a single goalie in the history of hockey that's worth that much. Leafs and Oilers just locked up goaltenders for 5 and 3 years respectively. Both of whom are starting goalies capable of stealing games for their teams. You are actually delusional if you think these are even close. I wouldn't do Drai and JP alone for Price let alone adding 2 1st's. Doubt the leafs would do Matthews for Price straight up.

Price just cam off a season ending injury. While i am sure he will return to his original form, there is still some uncertainty with his last few lower body injuries.

No team is going to give up their future for a goalie period.

Even though its clearly just a little rust, you sound worried that Price isn't going to be himself again.


8.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 17:22:40
how about this:
edmonton: talbot
montreal: scherbak, galchenyuk, 2 1st

that's how stupid your trade looks.


9.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 18:37:21
No way Price gets you 4 top 4 draft picks.


10.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 20:04:44
Lol youjust compare price to that no good Talbot.


11.) 15 Sep 2016
15 Sep 2016 23:16:50
Kaners trade proposal is better then both bigjoes and he was completely joking.


12.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 00:27:19
No matter how many different accounts you use, there's no hiding your bias stupidity.


13.) 16 Sep 2016
16 Sep 2016 02:11:38
exactly shootsmcgee. just because price is an elite goalie doesn't mean he can get you all that. and talbot is edmonton's starter so i chose to go with him. what? do you want me to use my favorite team, chicago blackhawks', goalie as comparison instead? how about crawford for scherbak, galchenyuk and 2 firsts instead? closer? no? then don't think price will get that. need i keep going with goalies? does fleury get that for pittsburgh? no? i'm just making the point that your trade looked stupid.


14.) 17 Sep 2016
17 Sep 2016 22:16:23
Kane holtby or Quick could get that.