NHL Trade Rumors


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

We now send some Montreal Canadiens posts to our Habs Rumours site

We also send most of the Leafs posts to our Leafs Rumours site

If you are looking for rumors that concern just your team, please visit our NHL Teams Rumors page.

The sent in rumors have been split into 2 pages. The NHL Talk page is the other page.

27 Mar 2017 04:24:20
MIN: Dumba

EDM: Ebs + 2nd
Ott: Ceci + Pageau.

Believable1 Unbelievable2

27 Mar 2017 06:39:46
No from minny they don't need another center and no from Ottawa. In my opinion ottawa doesn't have great defense as a whole. Ceci should stay.

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Mar 2017 12:15:57
Agree with McJ above. Minny has Granlund, Staal, Koivu, and a couple other guys like Coyle who can step in and play center.

And Ottawa is very thin on D, Ceci is barely a top 4 defender yet he's heavily leaned on for them.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Mar 2017 07:17:14
EDM: Puljarvai
ARI: Strome

Edmonton can reunite Strome with McDavid and Arizona already has some Centre prospects so they could use Puljarvai more

Believable2 Unbelievable9

26 Mar 2017 20:27:40
No thanks bro.

Agree6 Disagree0

26 Mar 2017 05:07:53
Edm: RNH, Ebs, 1st 2017, 1st 2018
Fla: Ekblad

Close? What would edmonton or Florida add to even out?

Believable0 Unbelievable7

26 Mar 2017 05:25:02
That's a whole a lot for ekblad, even though ekblad is a beast and great dman.
Probably Oilers need to send nurse in the deal.
Not sure if panthers make the deal. They do have a ton of forwards.

Agree5 Disagree3

26 Mar 2017 13:35:31
Doesn't really make sense for Florida because they aren't super strong on defense but are very solid down the middle.

Agree5 Disagree0

26 Mar 2017 20:29:36
Uh I'd like to say Florida actually has a pretty solid d core.
And no from both teams. Edmonton doesn't get any better tbh even tho Ekblad is amazing.

Agree3 Disagree1

26 Mar 2017 03:25:53
New Jersey: Kyle Palmieri
Ottawa: Ceci, 2017 2nd

Believable0 Unbelievable9

25 Mar 2017 10:12:36
Expansion draft move

MIN sends Kirill Kaprizov to LV for them taking Marco Scandella instead of Jonas Brodin. Kaprizov looks like a steal (5th round 2015), best in goals at the WJC, 20 goals in the KHL this season. Should the Wild do it or another prospect could be enough for LV to make a deal? Tuch/Greenway? Kunin and Eriksson Ek should be untouchable IMO.

Believable7 Unbelievable7

25 Mar 2017 13:42:01
Lol no from Minny. Kaprizov is looking like a 1st line winger right now and I don't think Minny is going to give that up for nothing.

Agree2 Disagree2

25 Mar 2017 13:47:40
I mean I they could do that yeah. But Kaprizov is a fantastic prospect. I mean I guess if they're that high on Brodin then maybe.

Agree4 Disagree0

25 Mar 2017 21:44:26
I mean you just stated why kaprizov shouldn't be traded. So.

Agree2 Disagree0

25 Mar 2017 03:22:41
A crazy idea I had.

NOTE* These are just the bases. Not saying that they would go 1 for 1 for each other just the main parts of the deal.


- Jake Muzzin

L.A Kings:

- Gabriel Landeskog


Colorado needs defence. LA was potential trading partners with Colorado during the trade-deadline times.

Muzzin is on a great contract around 4.3 million until 2019-20

Landeskog fits what L.A is looking for. Physical guy that scorers goals. Since Gaborik isn't producing Landy could get more ice-time.

Muzzin, Johnson, Barrie, Zadarov as top 4.

Believable1 Unbelievable14

25 Mar 2017 03:56:02
Colorado would want a younger d man as they are rebuilding.

Agree5 Disagree2

25 Mar 2017 04:52:24
There not really rebuilding. They have a fairly decent top 6 although they'd have to fill Landeskogs spot. And that top 4 is pretty solid. If there first rounder is NHL ready and with this trade they should have a solid team IMO.

Agree3 Disagree3

25 Mar 2017 05:22:36
Xcing it's not like Muzzin is 33 or anything. Like he's 28 with 3 good years and he is a definite top 4 d-man. Probably a number 2 Defensemen, but I'd like to see what he could do on a team w out a Superstar like Drew Doughty. Tbh I'd rather it be Martinez because Muzzin's a more complete package and Landeskog has had some off years the last 2 seasons.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Mar 2017 07:16:52
@Xcing just because they are horrible doesn't mean they are rebuilding.

They need a solid defence and maybe 1-2 more scorers. (Rantanen might score 45+ Points next season)

Arizona is in a rebuild.

They acquired Lawson Crouse just to take on Dave Bolland's contract. THAT'S rebuilding. They took Datsyuk's contract for like a pick I think. THAT'S rebuilding.

They didn't trade any of their core pieces during the deadline.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Mar 2017 13:39:21
Are you telling me it's in Colorados best interest to trade a young piece for a player in his prime? Colorado is looking to the future and not the next couple of years. While they might not be full blown rebuilders they are focusing on the future hence looking for younger d men. Also Sakic said they want a young d man in return so.

Agree2 Disagree1

25 Mar 2017 01:22:23
Mtl: 1 Rd pick 2017

NYI: Storme

Believable4 Unbelievable9

25 Mar 2017 03:17:22
Might work.

Honestly if NYI could have gotten 16th overall and 32nd overall from Edmonton for Griffin Reinhart I'm sure they could get this.

Switching Strome back to center might be a good move.

Agree2 Disagree1

25 Mar 2017 21:45:05
Lol so Strome is worth a 1st round but Eberle isn't? Ok.

Agree0 Disagree1

26 Mar 2017 04:40:55
Eberle makes $6million a year which is why his value is so low.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Mar 2017 19:44:49
S. Falkovsky for N. Bastian

Both fill a need for their respective teams. Bastian comes in a perhaps Calgarys best RW prospect despite his current struggles and Falkovsky becomes one of the best defense prospects in New Jersey.

Believable2 Unbelievable6

24 Mar 2017 20:30:44
I don't mean to be rude but i havnt heard of either of those prospects before, any info on them?

Agree1 Disagree3

24 Mar 2017 21:21:27
Np. Nathan Bastian is a large (6 foot 4) RW that plays a power forward game. He is struggling in the OHL this season despite playing with high end line mates. He was drafted 41st overall in 2016. Calgary has next to none decent RW prospects.

Stepan Falkovsky is a monster (6 foot 7) on the blue line. He plays a good two way game and has taken a huge step this year posting 32 points in 54 games in the ECHL. He is left handed and could make the jump to the AHL next year. New Jersey lacks defense prospects and have better RW and forward prospects than Bastian.

Agree1 Disagree3

24 Mar 2017 22:26:18
7th round pick for 2nd round pick?

Agree3 Disagree2

25 Mar 2017 00:36:03
Their worth about the same because Falkow ski is actully looking to be a steal at 7 Rd. HE'S really improving his defensive play and with his style and size plus the fact that he's pretty offensive for a 250 pound guy he's quite interesting.

Agree0 Disagree2

25 Mar 2017 03:09:16
Hahaha. Yeah, let's trade a prospect who we really like and drafted high who is having one bad year for an ECHL defenceman who might not even make the jump to the AHL permanently.

whoop de doo.

Agree1 Disagree6

25 Mar 2017 13:55:31
Ok TysonBarrie2 I see where you're coming from. He was drafted quite a bit higher and they're may value him quite a bit but if they came can move him to be more well rounded then it makes sense.

We are not talking about one bad season in the NHL we are talking about season as a 19 year old in the OHL with one of the best teams in the OHL. I know it's only one season but with that poor of a season it almost guarantees that he is back in the OHL next season unless he is spectacular at training camp. Every season he is not playing pro decreases his value.

I would argue that Falkovsky has a greater chance of playing the AHL next season than Bastian. He is playing outstanding for his rookie year in the ECHL which I would argue is a bit harder than the CHL.

While it does not house the elite talent that the CHL does it is made up of more men and teams are more well rounded. Falkovsky will almost definately be playing in the AHL next season.
Whoop de doo.

Agree0 Disagree2

25 Mar 2017 17:54:20
Honestly. I don't care who has the better chance to play in the AHL next year. I care about who has a better chance to be an NHL differnce maker in their career. Right now that's Bastian. Players in the ECHL very rarely turn into NHL players of any kind let alone a difference maker.

Agree1 Disagree1

25 Mar 2017 18:58:35
Ok but Bastian is not even being a big difference maker in the OHL. Falkovsky might not become a difference maker in the NHL but I would argue that he has a greater chance of making the NHL.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Mar 2017 04:44:29
Interesting offer but I think Calgary stays with the big late blooming kid.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Mar 2017 13:25:36
I wouldnt. He likely goes AHL the year after he's done juniour and his skill set lends to a shutdown and pk role. He has a better chance than an ECHL player to make the NHL ECHL players almost never work their way up.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Mar 2017 12:38:10
An interesting one:

-Adam Henrique
-Michael Cammalleri
-2017 2nd round pick

-Bobby Ryan
-Cody Ceci

I know there are a lot of sens fans on here but Henrique is a 50 point center and they get out of Bobby Ryan's awful contract

Believable1 Unbelievable12

24 Mar 2017 13:26:19
So if Cammy and Ryan cancel, its Henrique + 2nd for Ceci.

No way from NJ.

Agree6 Disagree3

24 Mar 2017 14:05:12
No body want Bobby Ryan unless Ottawa retains as much as allowed by the NHL.

Ceci is not worth anything other than a 3rd liner.

Agree5 Disagree7

24 Mar 2017 14:41:20
Yea not a chance from NJ, Ceci is probably capped out at a number 4/ 5 defenseman despite what we had all hoped for him.

Agree2 Disagree2

25 Mar 2017 01:08:45
Change Ceci with Chabot and it's fair.

Agree1 Disagree5

25 Mar 2017 13:43:14
Lol no shot from NJ.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Mar 2017 05:57:17
Eberle's and RNH's performances in playoffs will determine a lot.
I do believe that the GM would prefer to trade the two, especially Ebs. He doesn't fit in the GM's type of team.

Oilers: Ebs
Islanders: Strome + Pulock
(Strome has less production than ebs, but he has size and will be cheaper. Oilers need space for future contracts)

Oilers: RNH + Pulock + 3rd rd pick 2017
Canes: Faulk
(Oilers need right hand dman. Canes need centreman + Poluck is a good prospect)

Believable4 Unbelievable9

24 Mar 2017 11:56:58
if I'am snow I wouldn't trade pulock for ebs straight up.

Agree4 Disagree5

24 Mar 2017 13:26:51

Isnt Pulock gone by the expansion draft tho?

Agree2 Disagree3

24 Mar 2017 14:33:18
Uhhh ya not happenin'.
The GM does NOT want to trade them unless there's equal value coming back in one single player. 2 or 3 for 1's are not happening. 1 for 1 for equal value, or Edm multi players for 1 better is required to move these 2.

Strome is not wanted in Edmonton. Please stop including him in deals. Edm already has a squad full of less than 50% faceoff men and depth 3rd/ 4th line grinders with lots of depth in the minors for a lot less money than Strome's getting. Edm Just says no to Strome!

Pulock. Has potential. BUT the trade would involve Pouliot, or perhaps 2 for 1 prospects like Slepyshev, Pitlik, Pakarrinen Simpson, Caleb Jones.

Sorry but Oilers GM and Fans snicker at this proposal.


Pulock is exempt from the expansion draft.

Agree0 Disagree6

24 Mar 2017 14:43:48
Not necessarily, Isles will protect Leddy, Boychuck (NMC I think) and if they go 7-3 they'll probably protect Hamonic unless he is traded. If they go 4-4 then Pulock will be protected. Based on the Isles heavy pursuit of Duchene I have a feeling they will be trading D for a top quality forward this summer.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Mar 2017 17:12:29
Fair Trade for All:

Who said strome used as centre on the Oilers. He would be a second line right wing. Cap salary is going to be imp.

Plus, tell me why canes need pouliot?
Plus, what's the difference between adding jones or Pulock?

So did the GM himself call you and said that he would snicker at this trade? I didn't know you guys were best friends. So what kind of advice does he call and so you for?

Agree1 Disagree1

25 Mar 2017 00:16:55
Eberle is not worth those two. Also nyi will need to resign tavares and Eberle, who is seriously underperforming this year, will have a cap hit of 6mil. So tavares or eberle real tuff decision lol.

And once again faulk top 10-15 in nhl puck moving dman for that lol. Reminds me when you oilers fans tried to pushow that agenda on the blues for petroleum lol.

Seriously though how many years have you guys been over valuing those two yet nobody wants them lol.

Agree1 Disagree2

25 Mar 2017 01:42:05
Colt, You overvalued Shattenkirk for way too long at then it was proven when he was traded. If I were you I would shut your mouth about any fan of any other team valuing their players until they are traded. You are the last one on here to try and say someone overvalues a player. Lol.

Agree2 Disagree1

25 Mar 2017 09:39:11
Hey yup, Shattuck got 1st rnd pick nhl ready top prospect who by the way has 3 points in four games and a 2nd round pick 2018. though I would have liked more it was enough.

Your problem is you're still but hurt over the hall for Larson deal. It's cool but eventually you got to get over it lol.

Also yup, your hate for me doesn't make my assessment incorrect.

Agree0 Disagree1

25 Mar 2017 12:41:15
Shatty got traded for a future top line player plus some jive picks kn top of that. He got more then what we all thought right talkie?

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Mar 2017 15:13:15
You probably thought that prospect was crap on the Caps before the trade, now he's a blue and he's unreal ready to go. Homer.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Mar 2017 15:19:32
I've liked the Hall trade since the minute it happened. Lol. How could I not like the trade, Larsson is a great fit and I never once liked Hall since the day we took him over Seguin (didn't even really love either of them at that time) .

Colt, it's not my hate for you, it's legit fact you overvalued and screamed your STL blue Shattenkirk was this super amazing super high valued player when Hanzel got just as much as him and you said he was worth a 2nd and Shat did NOT fetch what you were screaming he would.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Mar 2017 17:39:44
If they traded Shattenkirk for a washing machine you would be saying that it was a great deal because the washing machine is one of the best made. You are the single handed biggest homer on this site.

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Mar 2017 04:55:01
love hockey, i went through the trade, i never saw pouliot in there. i saw pulock in there but no pouliot.

Agree0 Disagree0

NHL Rumours 2

NHL Rumours 3

Cell phone only version of this site: http://mobile.nhl-trade-rumors.com

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass