NHL Trade Rumors


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

This page last updated: 06:33:52

We send most of the Leafs posts to our Leafs Rumours site

If you are looking for rumors that concern just your team, please visit our NHL Teams Rumors page.

The sent in rumors have been split into 2 pages. The NHL Talk page is the other page.

Yahoo Fantasy Hockey League of this site: http://y.ahoo.it/Eol1AqXD

We have now added a Fantasy NHL Teams Trade page.

01 May 2016 04:10:29
J. Gardiner, Pit 1st and Ott 2nd for #4 overall.

Believable0 Unbelievable5

01 May 2016 05:19:22
Oilers don't want an expensive offensive minded leftie. No deal.

Agree1 Disagree0

01 May 2016 04:07:48
Mtl: 1st (9), Juulsen, andrighetto, Hudon, 2nd (minnesota), 3rd

Clb: 1st (3rd)

Believable0 Unbelievable3

01 May 2016 05:09:05
If you look at it, your moving up 6 spots in exchange for two 1sts, a 2nd and a 3rd along with solid prospects.

Agree0 Disagree2

01 May 2016 06:09:14
Except in terms of picking in the top 3 of the draft - Quantity does not equal quality.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 May 2016 03:28:20
Letting you know now I really really really wanted laine

• 4th overall pick
•2nd round pick
• yak
• next years second
• 3rd round pick ( Pittsburg)

• 2nd overall pick

And to think Edmonton would keep it all if they got one more ball.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

01 May 2016 05:22:25
I would do this as an oiler fan.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Apr 2016 18:39:23
Assuming everyone stays in their draft positions:

Mtl: 1st (9th), Andrighetto, Hudon, 2nd, 2nd (minnesota)

Van: 1st (3rd), 7th

Draft pulijarvii.

Believable3 Unbelievable9

30 Apr 2016 19:07:22
Vancouver starts a riot in Montreal.

Agree6 Disagree3

30 Apr 2016 19:48:48
honestly too much coming from montreal, but i don't know if the nucks take it.

Agree2 Disagree8

30 Apr 2016 19:56:56
Not even close.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 20:10:03
To many spare parts and not enough quality pieces to move up from 9th 3rd especially in this draft.

Agree4 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 23:19:08
I'm going to say what Bud said would happen.
Atleast offer us 9+2nd+Juuleson/ Bealieu so Bennington would atleast consider it.

Agree2 Disagree0

30 Apr 2016 18:35:02
To OTT: R. Getzlaf

To ANA: 2016 1st (12), M. Zibanejad, G. Gagne.

Believable2 Unbelievable8

30 Apr 2016 18:47:09
Getzlaf is to old. He's still a great player but he's not the same player he was a few years ago so it's a big no for Ottawa.

Agree6 Disagree8

30 Apr 2016 19:07:40
Not enough for Getz.

Agree6 Disagree3

30 Apr 2016 19:18:09
Yea I guess 30 is too old for a team without a #1 center.

Agree6 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 19:50:59
If I was Ottawa, I would do it.

Agree5 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 20:11:53
I'm not saying he's a bad player or anything he's amazing but he is declining he probably only has a few more years left as a true 1 one center so there's no point for either team to make that trade Anaheim has a older team who are try to win right now and Ottawa is still pretty young and need a year or two before they become a real threat again. I'd rather not risk the future of the team unless it's a sure thing that we'll win the cup and as good as getzlaf is he doesn't guarantee that.

Agree2 Disagree4

30 Apr 2016 23:05:59
Sens that's ridiculous Getzlaf will be a number one Center for another 5-7 years.

Agree3 Disagree0

30 Apr 2016 23:55:17
This is a smart move for Ottawa, I don't know what you're saying @sens

Melynk even said it, he wants to make the playoffs and be a threat. Getting a guy like Getz would do it, and even though he is 30 - he will be a force for at least five years.

On the flip, i can't see anaheim doing it. They WANT to be a contender and trading getz isn't worth it. I see where your coming from (this trade basically mimicks Silferberg/ 1st for Ryan), but tho Getz is older, he is much better than ryan was.

Agree1 Disagree1

01 May 2016 02:55:32
I mentioned on another site that ANA should consider trading one of Getzlaf or Perry given 4 straight game 7 exits. Don't need to rebuild but need to tweak. I don't know that this trade is the right move, but shopping either player to at least see what sort of offers they get is something I definitely think they need to do.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Apr 2016 14:15:24
Tampa Drouin
Col- Barrie

Nashville- Leo Komarov, 3rd
Toronto Kevin Fiala 2016 first or 2nd pick.

Believable0 Unbelievable13

30 Apr 2016 14:29:17
Way to much for Komarov and no from the avalanche.

Agree6 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 14:35:23
have to think col values a dman like barries over a kid like drouin.

Agree5 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 16:01:41
I'd do Komarov for Either of those pieces.

Agree1 Disagree4

30 Apr 2016 17:27:41
Fiala is not going to be traded, and certainly not for Komarov.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 20:53:15
In the leafs Nashville trade the leafs would probably have to add a lot, like nylander, komatov and the 3rd is not worth either piece.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 13:19:39
Could this possibly happen?
CHI: 2nd (From Detroit)
DET: Bickell, Shaw
ARI: Datsyuk, 2nd (From Chicago), 3rd (From Detroit.

Believable0 Unbelievable10

30 Apr 2016 13:31:40
Take out chi 2nd and add Jurco.

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 16:12:19
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but what's being given up is

Chi -Bickel, shaw and a 2nd. Receiving a 2nd

Det - datsyuk, 2nd and a 3rd. Receiving Bickel and shaw

Ari- nothing. Receiving a 2nd a 3rd and datsyuk.

So if I'm right Chicago gives up a bad contract and a good player to move up 6 spots in the second. ridiculous
Arizona gets a lot for nothing.

Agree1 Disagree3

30 Apr 2016 21:12:10
@ThrBlackAlpca well it the reports are true about datsyuk going back to the KHL detriot will try and dump his contract to go full out on free agents or traded and Arizona has next to no big name players besides oel and doan but even OEL has one of the best contract in the NHL and doans probably going to get traded.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 21:13:19
Arizona also takes on 7.5 million for a player that won't play.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 23:44:20
I'm not saying that Arizona wouldn't be wise to get the contract. I'm saying they won't get a second and third for nothing.

Maybe give up a 4th for datsyuk and a third.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 May 2016 00:46:34
@TheBlackAlpca Arizona gets a lot for taking on the last year of Datsyuk's contract.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 May 2016 02:29:05
They don't have to pay him it's only the cap hit. And Arizona probably won't have cap issues.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Apr 2016 13:10:36
Leafs trade

Bozak and a 4th

Det Datsyuk and mantha

Det gets a center to fill Datsyuk spot and saves 3 million to get another player Toronto takes extra cap but gets a good young prospect

Tor jvr corrodo and sj 2nd


Believable3 Unbelievable10

30 Apr 2016 14:38:21
Ana Anderson and one of the dmen.

Agree1 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 15:37:13
I don't think that would get Mantha from Detroit but it sounds good to me.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 17:56:01
I would do the Detroit one as a leafs fan. Have the cap for it and would love to see mantha. in toronto.

Agree2 Disagree2

01 May 2016 00:48:16
As much as Detroit would love cap relief, they would never give up Mantha. No from Detroit. But. if it was a lesser prospect, such as Teemu Pulkkinen or Tomas Jurco and Toronto takes out Bozak, maybe Detroit will consider it.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Apr 2016 12:38:08
If I were detroits GM I'd offer these

Det: Kronwall and 3rd

Edm: Yak,2nd and Fayne

I think Edmonton would love his presence on the blue line.

Det: Datsyuk and 16th

Tor: Percy and 26th

Frees up 7.5 in cap but moves down 10 spots also getting a good prospect and gives Toronto a very good pick.

Det: Tatar and 2nd

Ana: Virtanan

Gives Ana that top line winger for there 1st line and gives Detroit a young future fringe top pairing D.

Det: Mantha, Jurco and Oullete

Dal: Nichushkin

Gives Dal a Couple of strong prospects and gives Det a good power forward.

Then Det signs Stammer to a 8 year 84mil/ 10.5 mil Annual contract.

Believable1 Unbelievable12

30 Apr 2016 13:05:25
Good lord, where to begin. 😆.

Agree5 Disagree4

30 Apr 2016 13:13:33
Det could only give 7 years unless they trade for his rights.

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 13:15:28
The last one is ridiculous. I wouldn't trade Mantha alone for Nichuskin.

Agree6 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 16:16:23
Kronwall is 35 I wouldn't give yak up for him

Detroit won't want to do that.

I've no idea the value in the third

And Detroit gives up to much in the last.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 01:22:34
Is this fair.

Cal: Bishop and Drouin

Tbl: Sam Bennet.

Who adds?

Believable3 Unbelievable13

30 Apr 2016 01:35:28
Calgary adds alot.

Agree11 Disagree4

30 Apr 2016 03:57:06
I'd say Bishop and a mid round pick or C level Prospect for Bennett is fair. Drouin is proving he's still an elite talent. His trade value has gone up since his holdout. Good for TB to get him back. Either he stays now or if you trade him you can get a real nice return and fill whatever need you have.

Agree8 Disagree3

30 Apr 2016 04:13:46
Calgary adds alot.

Agree8 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 05:57:06
Although value is there I don't think Calgary wants to give up Bennet. He's one of those untradeables.

Agree6 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 05:59:51
Then again reading the post below Bishop would need to be extended.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Apr 2016 07:31:15
Are you high? Although many of you disagree, Bishop should win this years Vezina trophy and Drouin looks good in the playoffs so far, very high ceiling, young player. Just as Bennett.

Because of not having had some of these "issues", I'd say Bennett is worth slightly more than Drouin. Never heard the the slight difference between two players is made up by an elite starting goalie, tho.

Agree3 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 12:20:31
Well maybe I over value Bennet but IMO Bennet is almost as good as Gaedreau.

Agree1 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 12:21:01
Take out drouin, and add some picks, like the ones from your previous trade.

Agree1 Disagree3

29 Apr 2016 14:18:22
To Calgary Bishop

To Tampa 2nd 2016 (Calgary), 2nd 2016 (Dallas), 1st 2017 (Calgary)

Believable8 Unbelievable14

29 Apr 2016 15:27:39
Fair trade.

Agree5 Disagree3

29 Apr 2016 17:57:27
I vote believable because I don't see Bishop staying in Tampa, he will become the highest paid goalie in the league and they can't afford it. Vasilevsky will become their starter but I think they will just end up letting Bishop walk because they are going to hope he can win them a cup before free agency and just take the extra cap space.

Agree2 Disagree5

29 Apr 2016 18:39:35
You would have to think that Sam Bennet would be in talks to be apart of the package. Can't just get picks for a great goalie like Bishop.

Agree3 Disagree7

29 Apr 2016 20:56:19
He is a UFA so it isn't as if he is signed long term I think it's decent value and they send him West coast. Better then losing him for nothing.

Agree3 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 21:26:17
A first and 2 2nds for a year of Bishop is decent. Definitely not Sam Bennett. Maybe if Bishop was extended. As for letting him go for nothing it's possible but not smart. As a Tampa fan I would be torn about this return because the seconds aren't much and if he can make that 1st a low one.

Agree2 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 21:32:38
Yea I say that's is a big inderpayment for bishop, and the Lightning would want either Bennett/ guedreau/ Monaghan/ Hamilton. That's just my opinion,

Agree1 Disagree6

29 Apr 2016 22:19:18
If they want that then it better be Vas and not Bishop.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 02:27:31
CGY simply isn't giving guys like monahan, bennett, gaudreau, and hamilton for for what will be a goalie going into his age 30 season with only 1 year of guaranteed control, and its laughable reading things like that. Bishop also won't be the highest paid goali in the league, no way someone will pay him over 8.5 mil since he'll surely want term.

Agree5 Disagree2

29 Apr 2016 13:41:01
NyRangers Trade

Toronto Trades
1st Round Pick 2016 (Pittsburgh's)

The Rangers have put themselves in a position to deal from weakness with trading high Draft Picks and little to no Cap Space.
This Trade Proposal with Hunwick's low Salary and putting Lupul on the LTIR frees up enough space to resign Yandle and fill in the bottom 6 Forward positions as well as pickup another lower Salary DMan, also getting a good Prospect in Dermott and a badly needed 1st Round Pick.

The Leafs can afford to Trade Pit's Pick and makes them much better on Defence.


Believable2 Unbelievable21

29 Apr 2016 13:58:54
So I guess we're just going to give up on the whole rebuild thing? ok.

Agree10 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 14:02:14
I thought the leafs were rebuilding. Are they done after one year? Same old leafs trading first round picks and prospects for old uselee players with high saleries.

Agree4 Disagree3

29 Apr 2016 14:03:12
I don't believe they are moving McDonaugh. He's their captain and best defender plus you build around a defender like that as they are hard to come by. Girardi can be moved (Clarkson got moved, it's not impossible) a team like Arizona who is weak defensively and could use a RHD partner for OEL would welcome him and help them reach the cap floor. Anyways the Leafs are in no position to be giving up picks and prospects. Even though the Leafs would likely accept, I don't like the trade from the Rangers standpoint.

Agree6 Disagree6

29 Apr 2016 14:07:59
No from both teams.

Agree5 Disagree3

29 Apr 2016 14:25:39
McDonagh is 26yrs old.
Girardi can be bought out in a year or 2 as the Leafs have Cap Space.
Leafs have a lot of good Prospects and Picks.
A Trade like this is still part of the rebuild.
Look at Edmonton you don't rebuild with all young Players, Uncle Lou said himself an NHL Roster has a 3 parts of Vet Players, Players in there Prime, and Young Players, the Leaf Roster will be that.

Agree1 Disagree6

29 Apr 2016 15:12:23

Ive never heard of a rebuild that involves trading away 1st round picks and prospects for aging players with high cap hits. Must be the new way of rebuilding?

Agree5 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 17:59:51
How does my comment have 3 unbelievables? McDonaugh isn't what's wrong with the Rangers. It's the fact they can't put a good team in front of Lundqvist and have too many bad contracts.

The leafs are rebuilding. Won't trade picks or prospects it's a fact.

Agree4 Disagree2

29 Apr 2016 18:54:52
Shanahan himself in an interview said the Leafs would trade Draft Picks if it made sense in what they are doing, not just Draft Picks are involved in there rebuild, Trades and Free Agents are as well, just because the Leafs have 13 picks in this years Draft doesn't mean they won't Trade some as part of a package to get better.
A rebuild is to get better and if Trading a late 1st Rounder does that then the Leafs will Stammer2Leafs2016.
A rebuild isn't a complete teardown.

Agree2 Disagree5

29 Apr 2016 20:26:57
I agree with you JF12 100%.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 20:42:34
okay listen you guys have to be crazy. let's break it down like this

Girardi - Lupul, Hunwick = pure cap move for the rangers, girardi upgrade on hunny and lupul goes on ir, rangers lose about 4 mil in cap (not 100% on exact amount)

Mcdounagh - Dermott, pitts first = first of all lol from rangers stand point terrible trade can get a ton more, second come on i don't care if you're rebuilding, if you can get a 26 yr old #1 dman for a package like that, you do it, it doesn't do anything to hinder the rebuil, he is the CAPTAIN of the rangers yes CAPTAIN, would he not bring good leadership to that ridiculously young core and he's also obviously a great player

anyways my thoughts after reading all of your replies to pinballs post.

Agree7 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 21:09:25
Seriously can we please block Pinball he is just on here to antagonize people, no human with half a brain would suggest the things he does.

{Ed018's Note - im not gonna ban him just because he posts things that migh not make sense, with that being said Pinball you better not be posting these things with the intention of winding people up}

Agree5 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 21:34:37

Definition of REBUILD on the internet:
build (something) again after it has been damaged or destroyed.

your point about rebuilds not being teardowns is irrelavant.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 23:41:32
NHL trade rumours trades Pinball to HF boards for future considerations.

Agree4 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 00:36:46
When the site editor actually replies 😂😂😂😂😂😂.

{Ed018's Note - I just started following hockey so I'll probably be on more frequent now}

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 00:41:37
Wow! block a guy because you don't like what he has to say. Someone's petty.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 01:38:43
I agree with the fact that if they can get better by ripping a team off they would. I don't see it as ruining a real build by trading for a number 1 D entering his prime age.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 04:47:23
So your name is Stammer2lLeafs2016, which if it does happen probably means Toronto is able to come out of this rebuild a heck of a lot sooner. If Stamkos were to sign in Toronto, I am sure he would be extremely happy to see Toronto make a move to acquire a guy with the talent level of McDonagh.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 01:35:38
Edm: Brodin

Min: RNH

Edm: 9th overall, Mitchell, 3rd

Mtl: Yak

Edm: Jvr, Michalek (retain 50%)

Tor: 9th overall Ference, 3rd

Edm: Shaw, Bickell, Trevor VR, 4th

Chi: Davidson, Michalek (cap is only 2m)

Believable4 Unbelievable20

29 Apr 2016 02:01:02
Did I just read Yak for 9th overall, Mitchell and a 3rd? WOW.

Agree15 Disagree2

29 Apr 2016 02:19:22
I wish yak would get a 1st round pick :* (

Agree6 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 07:22:48
Jesus Christ only thing plausible is the first trade every thing after that is ridiculous. Hang your head in shame.

Agree6 Disagree3

29 Apr 2016 11:39:57
I'd consider the JVR trade but I would probably like a sweetner and yeah Yak won't fetch a top 10 pick I doubt even top 20.

Agree3 Disagree2

29 Apr 2016 14:28:52
The reason why I put the 9th overall pick because Mtl would be the only team to do it because yak and galchenyak played together, personally I don't think he's worth that but mtl would be a team to consider it
instead of mtl adding a later pick edm adds a mid/ late pick then.

Agree1 Disagree2

29 Apr 2016 16:51:33
"Edm: 9th overall, Mitchell, 3rd
Mtl: Yak"?

That is a good one. Yak couldn't fetch a late second round pick. Thinking that Montreal would give their first round pick is completely ridiculous!

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Apr 2016 13:11:57
First, Yak gets 9th overall+. Already ridiculous.
Then you turn around and swap that pick to TO for things Edm doesn't need? Where's your head at?

Agree2 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 13:54:30
Lol Yak for 9th overall + Mitchell + 3rd is worse than some of Pinballs trades.
A more realistic trade would be Yak for 2nd + 4th.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 00:59:43
One of my 3 favourite leafs of all time retired today. Good career Colten Orr, you're a beauty even though you're a plug.

Believable8 Unbelievable4

29 Apr 2016 07:20:32
I honestly thought he quit hockey like 3 years ago.

Agree9 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 09:02:23
Yeah me neither, think he was in the AHL/ ECHL a year ago and did nothing this year then called it quits.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 00:24:03
How are these trades?

Leafs: WSH 2nd and holland

Chi: Shaw and Bickle

Chi gets cap and leafs get there long time 3rd line Checker.

Leafs: Lupal and 4th

NJD: R. Clowe

Just a cap move.

Tor: Gabriel Carllson and Kerby Rychal

CLB: T. Bozak, Tony Cameransi, S. Percy and 4th

Leafs get a shut down D and a young strong 3rd line winger. CLB gets the best player in the trade a good 2nd line center And a couple good prospects.

Tor: JVR

Mon: 1st (9th) or Win:Trouba or Flames: Hamilton.

Mon gets a top line winger and Tor gets a very strong prospect. Sergechev, Chychrun or Olli Julivi. The other trades are only if Montreal dosent do that. I'll be dissapointed if JVR is back next season.

Believable1 Unbelievable19

29 Apr 2016 00:50:47
1st one isn't bad but the rest not so good.

Agree5 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 01:00:20
Oh hell no from CBJ.

Agree7 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 01:03:47
Columbus trade is terrible for the Blue Jackets.

Agree2 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 02:11:06
Yah what would it take to get Gabriel Carlsson? He looks like he'll be a good shutdown D?

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 02:37:23
Didn't Toronto trade that pick to Columbus?

Agree2 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 09:05:33
@vbb considering Carlsson was just drafted in 2015 and he's the the type of player CBJ needs, it would be an overpayment you wouldn't like. CBJ needs D and the only one the Leafs have that they would want would be Reilly. Obvious no way Reilly goes anywhere. Maybe Dermott and a pick? Idk let's just say he's not going anywhere anytime soon imo.

Agree2 Disagree1

29 Apr 2016 09:49:12
wait why in the world would the leafs make that first trade with chicago, they are rebuilding and the are what taking on a very bad contract in bickel and shaw who really isn't going to be helping us any time soon and we are giving up two futures? aww hell naw :)

Agree2 Disagree2

29 Apr 2016 14:05:34
Why would the leafs give up a 4th when Clowe's contract is worse? Anyways dumb trades.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Apr 2016 05:04:52
terrible trade for the Jets for 2 years of Jvr.

Agree0 Disagree0

NHL Rumours 2

NHL Rumours 3

Cell phone only version of this site: http://mobile.nhl-trade-rumors.com

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass